Bach.

German family of musicians. From the 16th century to the 19th the extensive Saxon-Thuringian Bach family produced an unparalleled and almost incalculable number of musicians of every kind, from fiddlers and town musicians to organists, Kantors, court musicians and Kapellmeisters. The outstanding figure among them was Johann Sebastian Bach, but a great many other well-known and distinguished musicians were born into earlier, contemporary and later generations of the family.

In the following pages a list of the musical members of the family, in alphabetical order, with brief biographical notes on those who are not discussed separately, precedes an outline of the family history. §III is then devoted to the most important members of the family, in chronological order. The italic numerals 1–53 given in parentheses after the names correspond to the numbers given to members of the family in the genealogy drawn up by J.S. Bach in 1735, the Ursprung der musicalisch-Bachischen Familie. The numerals from 54 onwards continue on the same principle. The inadvertent fusion in the Ursprung of two family members, Caspar (b c1580; d 1642–4) and Lips (c1590–1626), into a single unnamed individual under the number 3 has been corrected, but in order to facilitate comparison the 3 is retained for them and their descendants along with the new numbers. The arabic numerals preceding the names refer to their individual entries in §III below. Non-musician members of the family are not listed, but some musicians with the surname Bach who did not belong to the main, Wechmar line are included.

I. List of the musicians

II. Family history

III. Individual members

CHRISTOPH WOLFF (I–II; III, 1–6, 7 (§7–21), 13, work-list, bibliography), WALTER EMERY/CHRISTOPH WOLFF (III, 7 (§1–6)), PETER WOLLNY (III, 8, 10), ULRICH LEISINGER (III, 9, 11, 14), STEPHEN ROE (III, 12)

Bach

I. List of the musicians

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (46) (b Weimar, 8 March 1714; d Hamburg, 14 Dec 1788). Son of Johann Sebastian Bach (24); see §III (9) below.

Caspar Bach (3/a) (b c1580; d ?Arnstadt, Sept 1642–1644). Son of Veit (1). He is mentioned as a Stadtpfeifer in Gotha in 1619 and as a court and town musician in Arnstadt from 1620; on 23 October 1621 he received the sum of 1 gulden to buy a bassoon (‘Dulcian’). As Hausmann (director of the town music) he lived in the so-called Neideckturm (the tower of Schloss Neideck, Arnstadt). In 1633 he left the count's service (as a result of the Thirty Years War the court could no longer afford his salary) and bought a house in the Jacobsgasse. Nothing is known about his subsequent activities.

Caspar Bach (3/54) (b c1605). Son of Caspar (3/a). He was trained as a musician (violinist) at the courts of Bayreuth (1621–3) and Dresden (1623) at the expense of the Count of Schwarzburg-Arnstadt. In 1623 the court paid him 38 gulden for three months' educational and living expenses and for instruments, and on 11 October 1625 he signed a receipt in Arnstadt for the sum of 1 reichsthaler. He is thought to have gone to Italy, and from this point no more is known about him.

Christoph Bach (5) (b Wechmar, 19 April 1613; d Arnstadt, 12 Sept 1661). Son of Johann (2) and grandfather of Johann Sebastian Bach (24). He was in the princely service and a court musician in Weimar, then from 1642 a town musician in Erfurt and from 1654 court and town musician in Arnstadt. A musical entry by him in the album of Georg Friedrich Reimann, Kantor in Saalfeld, survives (BJb 1928, 175).

Ernst Carl Gottfried Bach (73) (b Ohrdruf, 12 Jan 1738; d Ohrdruf, 24 June 1801). Son of Johann Christoph (42). He was Kantor in Wechmar, 1765–72, then Kantor at the Michaeliskirche in Ohrdruf.

Ernst Christian Bach (74) (b Ohrdruf, 26 Sept 1747; d Wechmar, 29 Sept 1822). Son of Johann Christoph (42). He was Kantor in Wechmar, 1773–1819.

Georg Christoph Bach (10) (b Erfurt, 6 Sept 1642; d Schweinfurt, 27 April 1697). Son of Christoph (5). He was trained in music at Arnstadt , and was evidently academically gifted; he attended the Gymnasium Casimiranum in Coburg (1663–5) and Leipzig University (1665–6). In 1668 he became Kantor and organist in Themar, and from 1688 he was Kantor at St Johannis in Schweinfurt, where his uncles Johann (4) and Heinrich Bach (6) had been organists. A vocal concerto by him survives: Siehe, wie fein und lieblich ist es for two tenors, bass, violin, three gambas and continuo (ed. in EDM, 1st ser., ii (1935) and in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser. A.4 (Stuttgart, c1976)). It was composed on his 47th birthday, evidently for performance with his brothers, the twins Ambrosius (11) and Christoph (12), probably at some family gathering. A Schweinfurt inventory of 1689 (see Wollny, 1997) lists four other vocal works: Gott ist unser Zuversicht, Meinen Jesum lass ich nicht, Wie lieblich sind auf den Bergen and Wohl her, lasset uns wohl leben.

Georg Friedrich Bach (b Tann, 17 March 1793; d Iserlohn, 2 Oct 1860). Not a member of the Wechmar line, he was a son of Johann Michael (see §III (13) below). A flautist, he deserted from Napoleon's army and went to Sweden, where he became music teacher to the crown prince (later Oskar I). On returning to Germany he taught music in Elberfeld and Iserlohn. Several manuscript keyboard compositions and a harmony manual by him survive (D-EIb).

Georg Michael Bach (66) (b Ruhla, 27 Sept 1703; d Halle, 18 Feb 1771). Son of Johann Jacob (3/60). From 1732 he was Kantor at the Ulrichskirche in Halle, adn from 1747 he taught at the Lutheran Gymnasium.

Gottfried Heinrich Bach (48) (b Leipzig, 26 Feb 1724; d Naumburg, bur. 12 Feb 1763). Eldest son of Johann Sebastian (24) and Anna Magdalena Bach. Although he was mentally handicapped, he was evidently a good keyboard player and, according to his half-brother Carl Philipp Emanuel (46), showed ‘a great genius, which however failed to develop’. From 1750 he lived with his brother-in-law J.C. Altnickol in Naumburg.

Gottlieb Friedrich Bach (68) (b Meiningen, 10 Sept 1714; d Meiningen, 25 Feb 1785). Son of Johann Ludwig (3/64). He was court organist and painter (Kabinettsmaler) in Meiningen.

Hans [Hanns, Johann] Bach (b Andelsbuch, Vorarlberg, c1555; d Nürtingen, 1 Dec 1615). Not a member of the Wechmar line; see §III(1) below.

Hans [Johann(es)] Bach (2) (b c1580; d Wechmar, 26 Dec 1626). Son of Veit (1). In the funeral sermon for his youngest son Heinrich (6) he is described as a ‘musician and carpetmaker’, and he was the earliest member of the family known to have been a professional musician. According to the Ursprung, he trained as a Stadpfeifer in Gotha and later settled in Wechmar, from where he travelled as a musician to various Thuringian towns, including Gotha, Arnstadt, Erfurt, Eisenach, Schmalkalden and Suhl. He married Anna Schmied of Wechmar in about 1602, and after his father's death took over his business and property. In the Wechmar register of deaths he appears as ‘Hanss Bach ein Spielmann’.

Heinrich Bach (3/56) (b Gotha, c1609; d Arnstadt, bur. 27 May 1635). Son of Caspar (3/a). He is mentioned in the deaths register as blind, and is therefore probably the musician educated in Italy and mentioned in the Ursprung as ‘blind Jonas’ because of his adventurous experiences, in allusion to the biblical figure of Jonah.

Heinrich Bach (6) (b Wechmar, 16 Sept 1615; d Arnstadt, 10 July 1692). Son of Hans (2). He was taught music by his father and his eldest brother Johann (4); his first appointment as town musician and organist of St Johannis in Schweinfurt cannot be dated precisely, but was about 1629–34. In 1636 he went to Erfurt (probably to stay with his eldest brother; there is no evidence that he held any particular appointment there), and in 1641 he became a court and town musician in Arnstadt, where he was also organist of the Liebfrauenkirche. The printed funeral sermon delivered by J.G. Olearius (Arnstadt, 1692; the biographical sections repr. in BJb 1995, 101–2) describes him as an ‘organist who touched the heart’ and a ‘musicus practicus famous for his art’, as well as a composer of ‘chorales, motets, concertos, fugues and the like’. A vocal concerto, Ich danke dir, Gott (1681), for five voices, 2 violins, 2 violas and continuo (EDM, 1st ser., ii (1935)), three organ chorales (ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967)) and two sonatas for two violins, two violas and continuo (ed. in Stuttgarter Bach Ausgaben, ser. A.3 (Stuttgart, c1998)) are extant. The Lüneburg inventory of 1696 lists another vocal work, the ten-part Als der Tag der Pfingsten erfüllet war, now lost.

Johann(es) Bach (3/57) (b Gotha, c1612; d Arnstadt, bur. 9 Dec 1632). Son of Caspar (3/a). He was a town musician in Arnstadt.

Johann(es) Bach (4) (b Wechmar, 26 Nov 1604; d Erfurt, bur. 13 May 1673). Son of Hans (2). After spending five years as an apprentice and two years as a journeyman to the Stadtpfeifer Johann Christoph Hoffmann in Suhl, he became a town musician in 1633 and from 1634 was organist of St Johannis in Schweinfurt. In 1635 he was appointed town musician in Erfurt and on 16 April 1636 organist of the Predigerkirche there. In 1649, while he was still organist, the church acquired the largest and finest organ in Erfurt, built by Ludwig Compenius. Johann Bach's first wife, Barbara, was the daughter of his master Hoffmann; the marriage was childless and in 1639, after her early death, he married Hedwig Lämmerhirt, daughter of the prosperous and influential Erfurt councillor Valentin Lämmerhirt. Two motets have been ascribed to Johann Bach: Unser Leben ist ein Schatten for two sopranos, alto, two tenors and bass, with a three-part echo choir and Sei nun wieder zufrieden for double chorus, as well as an aria, Weint nicht um meinen Tod, for soprano, alto, tenor, bass and continuo (EDM, 1st ser., i (1935)). See S. Orth: ‘Neues über den Stammvater der “Erfurter” Bache, Johann Bach’ (Mf, ix (1956), 447–50); S. Orth, ‘Johann Bach, der Stammvater der Erfurter Bache’ (BJb 1973, 79–87); and Brück (1990).

Johann Bach (59) (b Themar, 1621; d Lehnstedt, 12 Sept 1686). Son of Andreas Bach, a councillor in Themar. He was Kantor in Ilmenau and a deacon there from 1668. In 1680 he became a pastor in Lehnstedt.

Johann(es) Bach: see also under Hans Bach above.

Johann Aegidius Bach (8) (b Erfurt, bap. 11 Feb 1645; d Erfurt, bur. 22 Nov 1716). Son of Johann (4). He was taught music by his father, and in 1671 was a violinist in the Erfurt town music, becoming its director in 1682. From 1674 he also held the post of organist at the Kaufmannskirche in Erfurt, and was appointed organist of the Michaeliskirche in 1690. His pupils, besides his sons and nephews, included J.G. Walther.

Johann Aegidius Bach (36) (b Erfurt, bap. 4 Aug 1709; d Gross-Monra, nr Kölleda, 17 May 1746). Son of Johann Christoph (19). He was Kantor of Gross-Monra.

Johann Ambrosius Bach (11) (b Erfurt, 22 Feb 1645; d Eisenach, 20 Feb 1695). Son of Christoph (5), twin brother of Johann Christoph (12) and father of Johann Sebastian (24). On 8 April 1668 he married Maria Elisabeth Lämmerhirt (b Erfurt, 24 Feb 1644; d Eisenach, 1 May 1694), daughter by his second marriage of the late Valentin Lämmerhirt, councillor of Erfurt. She was the half-sister of Hedwig, wife of Johann Bach (4). Ambrosius was first a Stadtpfeifer in Arnstadt, then from 1667 a violinist in the Erfurt town music, and from 1671 court musician and director of the town music in Eisenach. The town chronicler of Eisenach, Georg Dressel, said of this outstanding and versatile musician, ‘In 1672 the new Hausmann [director of the town music] made music at Easter with organ, violins, voices, trumpets and kettledrums, something no Kantor or director is known to have done before in the history of Eisenach’. When, in1684, he was offered the post of director of the town music in Erfurt the Duke of Eisenach was unwilling to let him go, and he had to decline the offer. A portrait of Johann Ambrosius in oils, painted after 1671, is extant (D-Bsb). See F. Rollberg: ‘Johann Ambrosius Bach, Stadtpfeifer zu Eisenach von 1671–1695’, BJb 1927, 133–52; C. Freyse, ‘Das Porträt Ambrosius Bach’, BJb 1959, 149–55.

Johann Andreas Bach (44) (b Ohrdruf, 7 Sept 1713; d Ohrdruf, 25 Oct 1779). Son of Johann Christoph (22). He was an oboist in the military band in Gotha in 1733. From 1738 he was organist of the Trinitatiskirche in Ohrdruf, and from 1743 of the Michaeliskirche in the same town. He owned the so-called Andreas Bach Buch (see Johann Christoph Bach (22) below), one of the main sources for the early organ and keyboard works of Johann Sebastian (24).

Johann Balthasar Bach (63) (b Eisenach, 4 March 1673; d Eisenach, ?5 April 1691). Son of Johann Ambrosius (11). He was apprenticed to his father as a Stadtpfeifer. (Not included in the Ursprung.)

Johann Bernhard Bach (18) (b Erfurt, bap. 25 Nov 1676; d Eisenach, 11 June 1749). Son of Johann Aegidius (8); see §III (5) below.

Johann Bernard Bach (41) (b Ohrdruf, 24 Nov 1700; d Ohrdruf, 12 June 1743). Son of Johann Christoph (22). He studied with Johann Sebastian (24) in Weimar and Köthen in 1715–19, and was organist of the Michaeliskirche, Ohrdruf, from 1721. Spitta mentions two harpsichord works by him (now lost), a suite in E and a sonata in B.

Johann Christian Bach (7) (b Erfurt, bap. 17 Aug 1640; d Erfurt, bur. 1 July 1682). Son of Johann (4). He was taught music by his father in Erfurt and by his cousin Johann Christoph (12) in Eisenach, and became director of the Erfurt town music in 1666 or 1667.

Johann Christian Bach (32) (b Erfurt, bap. 31 March 1696). Son of Johann Christoph (17). He worked as a musician in Sondershausen.

Johann Christian Bach (50) (b Leipzig, 5 Sept 1735; d London, 1 Jan 1782). Son of Johann Sebastian (24); see §III (12) below.

Johann Christian Bach (69) (b Halle, 23 July 1743; d Halle, 20 June 1814). Son of Georg Michael (66). He studied in Halle with Wilhelm Friedemann Bach (45), who gave him the autograph of Johann Sebastian's Clavierbüchlein für Wilhelm Friedemann. He was a teacher at the Pädagogium (preparatory school) in Halle and is known as the ‘Clavier-Bach’.

Johann Christoph Bach (13) (b Arnstadt, bap. 8 Dec 1642; d Eisenach, bur. 2 April 1703). Son of Heinrich (6); see §III (2) below.

Johann Christoph Bach (12) (b Erfurt, 22 Feb 1645; d Arnstadt, bur. 28 Aug 1693). Son of Christoph (5). In 1666 he was a town musician in Erfurt, and from 1671 was a court and town musician (violinist) in Arnstadt.

Johann Christoph Bach (22) (b Erfurt, 16 June 1671; d Ohrdruf, 22 Feb 1721). Son of Johann Ambrosius (11). He studied in Erfurt in 1685–8 with Johann Pachelbel, and in 1688 was briefly organist of the Thomaskirche in Erfurt. He then deputized for his sick uncle and godfather Heinrich Bach (6) in Arnstadt, was organist of the Michaeliskirche in Ohrdruf from 1690, and from 1700 also taught at the Lyceum there. In 1696 he declined an invitation to succeed Pachelbel as town organist in Gotha, evidently made on Pachelbel's own recommendation. In 1695–1700 Johann Christoph taught his younger brother Johann Sebastian (24), who lived at his house in Ohrdruf after his parents' death, and dedicated to him the Capriccio in E bwv993, ‘In honorem Johann Christoph Bachii’, probably soon after leaving Ohrdruf himself. According to contemporary accounts, Johann Christoph was regarded as an optimum artifex, but it is not certain whether his reputation was confined to his practical abilities or whether he was also a composer. His wide-ranging musical interests are evident in two extensive collections of keyboard music compiled by him: the Andreas Bach Buch (D-LEm Sammlung Becker III.6.4; see Johann Andreas Bach (44) above), and the Möller manuscript (D-Bsb Mus.ms.40644). As well as being among the most informative keyboard and organ manuscripts of the period around 1700, they are also important sources of J.S. Bach's early works. No compositions are expressly attributed to Johann Christoph, but some keyboard works that have been assigned to Johann Christoph (13) could be by Johann Christoph (22) instead. See C. Freyse: Die Ohrdrufer Bache in der Silhouette: Johann Sebastian Bachs ältester Bruder Johann Christoph und seine Nachkommen (Eisenach, 1957); H.-J. Schulze: ‘Johann Christoph Bach (1771–1721), “Organist und Schul Collega in Ohrdruf”: Johann Sebastian Bach's erster Lehrer’, BJb 1985, 55–81; and documents in Bitter, iv, 40–47.

Johann Christoph Bach (17) (b Erfurt, bap. 13 Jan 1673; d Gehren, bur. 30 July 1727). Son of Johann Christian (7). After studying music with his father and attending the Erfurt Gymnasium, he became Kantor and organist in Niederzimmern, near Weimar. From 1695 he was Kantor and organist at the Thomaskirche, Erfurt, and from 1698 he pursued a similar career in Gehren. He compiled an organ book that later came into the possession of his son Johann Günther (33; see below) and a collection of works by Johann Pachelbel, J.C.F. Fischer and other 17th-century masters, including also some compositions of his own (US-NH LM 4983).

Johann Christoph Bach (28) (b Eisenach, bap. 29 Aug 1676). Son of Johann Christoph (13). He was a harpsichordist in Erfurt. In 1702–3 he was in Lübeck (perhaps studying with Buxtehude) and on the death of Johann Christoph (13) both he and his brother Johann Nikolaus applied for their father's post as organist in Eisenach. However, their cousin Johann Bernhard Bach (18) won the appointment. In 1706 he attended Jena University, and then went to Hamburg, where evidence of him is dated 1708–9 and where he married. He later went to Rotterdam (1717–20) and then to England, and seems never to have returned to Germany. It was evidently from him that the Duke of Chandos bought a harpsichord with two rows of keys in June 1720 for the sum of £572 (W. and M. Eisen, eds.: Händel-Handbuch, iv (Leipzig, 1985), p.93). See C. Oefner, ‘Neues zur Biographie von Johann Christoph Bach (geb. 1676)’, DJbM, xiv (1969), 121–3.

Johann Christoph Bach (19) (b Erfurt, bap. 17 Aug 1685; d Erfurt, bur. 15 May 1740). Son of Johann Aegidius (8). He was taught music by his father and attended the Ratsgymnasium in Erfurt. He was organist at the Thomaskirche, Erfurt, and from 1705 a member of the town music there, becoming its director in 1716.

Johann Christoph Bach (26) (b Arnstadt, 12 Sept 1689; d Blankenhain, bur. 28 Feb 1740). Son of Johann Christoph (12). He was organist in Keula in 1714, and from 1729 an organist, teacher and merchant in Blankenhain.

Johann Christoph Bach (42) (b Ohrdruf, 12 Nov 1702; d Ohrdruf, 2 Nov 1756). Son of Johann Christoph (22). He was in the service of the princely court at Sondershausen, and from 1728 was Kantor in Ohrdruf.

Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach (49) (b Leipzig, 21 June 1732; d Bückeburg, 26 Jan 1795. Son of Johann Sebastian (24); see §III (11) below.

Johann Christoph Georg Bach (75) (b Ohrdruf, 8 May 1747; d Ohrdruf, 30 Dec 1814). Son of Johann Andreas (44). He was organist of the Michaeliskirche in Ohrdruf from 1779.

Johann Elias Bach (39) (b Schweinfurt, 12 Feb 1705; d Schweinfurt, 30 Nov 1755). Son of Johann Valentin (21). He studied theology at Jena from 1728 and then in Leipzig from 1738. He lived in the house of Johann Sebastian (24), was his pupil and until 1742 acted as his private secretary and tutor to the younger Bach children. In 1743 he went to Schweinfurt as Kantor of the Johanniskirche and inspector of the church boarding-school. See K. Pottgiesser: ‘Die Briefentwürfe des Johann Elias Bach’, Die Musik, xii (1912–13), 3–19; F. Beyschlag: ‘Ein Schweinfurter Ableger der thüringischen Musikerfamilie Bach’, Schweinfurter Heimatblätter, xi (1925); P. Wollny and E. Odrich: Die Briefentwürfe des Johann Elias Bach (1705–1755) (Hildesheim, 2000).

Johann Ernst Bach (25) (b Arnstadt, 5 Aug 1683; d Arnstadt, 21 March 1739). Son of Johann Christoph (12). He studied in Hamburg and Frankfurt, and in 1707 became organist of the Neukirche in Arnstadt in succession to Johann Sebastian (24), for whom he had already deputized during winter 1705–6 when Johann Sebastian was visiting Buxtehude in Lübeck. From 1728 he was organist of the Liebfrauenkirche in Arnstadt.

Johann Ernst Bach (34) (b Eisenach, bap. 30 Jan 1722; d Eisenach, 1 Sept 1777). Son of Johann Bernhard (18); see §III (10) below.

Johann Friedrich Bach (29) (b Eisenach, c1682; d Mühlhausen, bur. 8 Feb 1730). Son of Johann Christoph (13). He succeeded Johann Sebastian Bach (24) in 1708 as organist of the Divi-Blasii-Kirche in Mühlhausen. An organ fugue in G minor by him is extant (D-Bsb).

Johann Friedrich Bach (35) (b Erfurt, bap. 22 Oct 1706; d Andisleben, nr Erfurt, bur. 30 May 1743). Son of Johann Christoph (19). He attended the Ratsgymnasium in Erfurt and then worked as a schoolmaster, Kantor and organist in Andisleben. From 1739 he deputized for his father as director of the Erfurt town music, returning to Andisleben in 1742.

Johann Georg Bach (70) (b Eisenach, bap. 2 Oct 1751; d Eisenach, 12 April 1797). Son of Johann Ernst (34). He succeeded his father in 1777 as court and town organist of Eisenach, titular Kapellmeister, notary and town treasurer.

Johann Georg Bach (b ?Güstrow, 1786; d Elberfeld, 6 Dec 1874). Not a member of the Wechmar line. He was the son of Johann Michael Bach (see §III (13) below) and taught music in Elberfeld.

Johann Gottfried Bernhard Bach (47) (b Weimar, 11 May 1715; d Jena, 27 May 1739). Son of Johann Sebastian (24). He was a pupil of his father, and was organist of the Marienkirche in Mühlhausen, 1735–7. He then became organist of St Jacobi in Sangerhausen (a position for which his father had applied in 1702). He left Sangerhausen in spring 1738, with what intention is not known. In a letter of 26 May 1738 Johann Sebastian complained bitterly of his ‘undutiful son’, whose character was apparently unstable and who had got into debt. He matriculated as a law student at Jena University on 28 January 1739, but died only a few months later ‘of a high fever’.

Johann Günther Bach (15) (b Arnstadt, bap. 17 July 1653; d Arnstadt, bur. 10 April 1683). Son of Heinrich (6). From 1682 he was assistant organist to his father in Arnstadt, where he also made keyboard instruments and violins.

Johann Günther Bach (33) (b Gehren, 4 April 1703; d Erfurt, bur. 24 Oct 1756). Son of Johann Christoph (17). He was a town musician (a tenor and viola player), and at some time before 1735 became a teacher in Erfurt. The Günther Bach Buch in the Lowell Mason Collection (US-NH) was compiled by Johann Christoph (17; see above).

Johann Heinrich Bach (43) (b Ohrdruf, 4 Aug 1707; d Öhringen, 20 May 1783). Son of Johann Christoph (22). He was taught by Johann Sebastian (24) and while at the Thomasschule, Leipzig, in 1724–8 was one of his principal copyists (Havptkopist C). He then became assistant to his brother Johann Christoph (42) in Ohrdruf, and in 1735 went to Öhringen in Hohenlohe as Kantor and organist.

Johann Heinrich Bach (53) (b Hamburg, bap. 4 Nov 1709). Son of Johann Christoph (28). According to the Ursprung he was ‘a good keyboard player’.

Johann Jacob Bach (3/60) (b Wolfsbehringen, 12 Sept 1655; d Ruhla, 11 Dec 1718). Son of Wendel (b ?Wechmar, 1619; d Wolfsbehringen, 18 Dec 1682), a farmer ‘who could also sing well’, and grandson of Wendel (b c1580). He went to school in Eisenach, later became organist in Thal, near Eisenach, and then Kantor in Steinbach (1679–90), Wasungen (1690–94) and Ruhla. The Schweinfurt inventory of 1689 lists a vocal work by him, Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, for four voices and instruments.

Johann Jacob Bach (16) (b Erfurt, bap. 14 Aug 1668; d Eisenach, bur. 29 April 1692). Son of Johann Christian (7). He served as apprentice and then journeyman Stadtpfeifer under Johann Ambrosius (11) in Eisenach.

Johann Jacob Bach (23) (b Eisenach, bap. 11 Feb 1682; d Stockholm, 16 April 1722). Son of Johann Ambrosius (11). He trained as a Stadtpfeifer in Eisenach under Johann Heinrich Halle, his father's successor, joined the Swedish Guard as an oboist about 1704–6 and went to Turkey with the Swedish army under Carl XII. In Constantinople he took flute lessons from Pierre-Gabriel Buffardin, and from 1713 he was a chamber musician with the Stockholm court ensemble. The occasion for the composition by Johann Sebastian (24) of his Capriccio sopra la lontananza del suo fratro dilettisimo (bwv992) has often, but without plausible grounds, been identified with Johann Jacob's departure from Germany about 1704–6. See C. Wolff. ‘The Identity of the “Fratro Dilettissimo” in the Capriccio B-flat Major’, The Harpsichord and its Repertoire: Utrecht 1990, 145–56.

Johann Lorenz Bach (38) (b Schweinfurt, 10 Sept 1695; d Lahm im Itzgrund, 14 Dec 1773). Son of Johann Valentin (21). In 1715–17 he was a pupil of Johann Sebastian (24) in Weimar, and from 1718 organist and Kantor in Lahm. A fugue in D by him is extant (ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach, (Leipzig, 1967)), and the existence of other compositions by him is documented (BJb 1949–50). See O. Kaul, Musikgeschichte der ehemaligen Reichstadt Schweinfurt (Würzburg, 1935).

Johann Ludwig Bach (3/64) (b Thal, nr Eisenach, 4 Feb 1677; d Meiningen, bur. 1 May 1731). Son of Johann Jacob (3/60); see §III (6) below.

Johann Michael Bach (14) (b Arnstadt, bap. 9 Aug 1648; d Gehren, 17 May 1694). Son of Heinrich (6); see §III (3) below.

Johann Michael Bach (30) (b Eisenach, bap. 1 Aug 1685). Son of Johann Christoph (13). He left Eisenach in 1703 and was later active as an organ builder in Stockholm, but nothing is known for certain about his later life.

Johann Michael Bach (b Struth, nr Schmalkalden, 9 Nov 1745; d Elberfeld, 1820). Not a member of the Wechmar line, but from a subsidiary Hessian branch of the family; see §III (13) below.

Johann Nicolaus Bach (9) (b Erfurt, bap. 5 Feb 1653; d Erfurt, bur. 28 July 1682). Son of Johann (4). He was trained in music by his father and in 1673 became a member of the Erfurt town music as a viol player.

Johann Nicolaus Bach (27) (b Eisenach, 10 Oct 1669; d Jena, 4 Nov 1753). Son of Johann Christoph (13); see §III (4) below.

Johann Philipp Bach (77) (b Meiningen, 5 Aug 1752; d Meiningen, 2 Nov 1846). Son of Gottlieb Friedrich (68). From 1790 he was court organist and painter (Kabinettsmaler) in Meiningen.

Johann Samuel Bach (31) (b Niederzimmern, nr Weimar, 4 June 1694; d Gundersleben, 1 July 1720). Son of Johann Christoph (17). He was a musician and teacher at the princely court of Sondershausen and then a schoolmaster in Gundersleben.

Johann Sebastian Bach (24) (b Eisenach, 21 March 1685; d Leipzig, 28 July 1750). Son of Johann Ambrosius (11); see §III (7) below.

Johann Stephan Bach (3/62) (b Ilmenau, bap. 5 June 1665; d Brunswick, 6 Jan 1717). Son of Johann (59). From 1690 he was Kantor at Brunswick Cathedral (St Blasius). He was also a poet, and there are reports that he wrote sonnets.

Johann Valentin Bach (21) (b Themar, 6 Jan 1669; d Schweinfurt, 12 Aug 1720). Son of Georg Christoph (10). From 1694 he was a town musician and head tower watchman (Obertürmer) in Schweinfurt.

Lips [Philippus] Bach (3/b) (b c1590; d Wechmar, 21 Sept 1626). His relationship with the family of Veit Bach (1) is not clear, but he too was a musician.

Melchior Bach (3/55) (b 1603; d Arnstadt, 7 Sept 1634). Son of Caspar (3/a). He was a town musician in Arnstadt.

Nicolaus Bach (3/58) (b Arnstadt, 6 Dec 1619; d Arnstadt, 1 Oct 1637). Son of Caspar (3/a). He was a town musician in Arnstadt.

Nicolaus Ephraim Bach (65) (b Wasungen, bap. 26 Nov 1690; d Gandersheim, 12 Aug 1760). Son of Johann Jacob (3/60). He was a musician from 1708 and organist from 1719 at the Meiningen Court. In 1724 he became organist in Gandersheim.

Philipp Christian Georg Bach (72) (b Ohrdruf, 6 April 1734; d Wernigshausen, 18 Aug 1809). Son of Johann Christoph (42). In 1759–72 he was Kantor of the Michaeliskirche in Ohrdruf, and from 1772 he was a pastor in Wernigshausen.

Philipp Ernst Christian Bach (78) (b Eisenach, bap. 20 May 1780; d Eisenach, 29 March 1840). Son and pupil of Johann Georg Bach (70). He was an official copyist in Eisenach, and was also active as an organist and an authority on organs. After the death of his father in 1797, and again in 1809, he applied for the post of organist at St Georg and was considered on the grounds that his ‘father and forebears … have filled this position with credit for almost a century and a half’. However, when the choice was narrowed down he did not get the post. This was probably less to do with the claim made by Kehl, the organist who held the post in 1797–1809, that the organ of St Georg was ruined since Philipp Ernst had played it ‘wildly’ than because the other candidates had greater practical and theoretical knowledge. With Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst (76) he was the last musical member of the family.

Samuel Anton Bach (67) (b Meiningen, bap. 26 April 1713; d Meiningen, 29 March 1781). Son of Johann Ludwig (3/64). He studied with Johann Sebastian (24) in Leipzig around 1732, and was later organist, and for a time also painter, at the Meiningen court.

Tobias Friedrich Bach (40) (b Ohrdruf, 21 July 1695; d Udestedt, 1 July 1768). Son of Johann Christoph (22). From 1714 he was organist of the Dreifaltigkeitskirche in Ohrdruf. He was appointed court Kantor in Gandersheim in 1717, Kantor in Pferdingsleben in 1720 and Kantor in Udestedt in 1721.

Tobias Friedrich Bach (71) (b Udestedt, bap. 22 Sept 1723; d Erfurt, 18 Jan 1805). Son of Tobias Friedrich (40). In 1747 he became Kantor at the school of the Reglerkirche in Erfurt, and he was appointed Kantor of the Barfüsserkirche there in 1762.

Veit Bach (1) (b Pressburg [now Bratislava], c1555; d Wechmar, nr Gotha, 8 March 1619). As a result of the Counter-Reformation he emigrated from Hungary to Wechmar. The founder of the Wechmar line, he was a miller and baker by trade, and was the first to show musical inclinations and talent in what was to become an extensive family of musicians. Veit Bach had a house in Wechmar, and he and his son Hans (2) are explicitly mentioned as ‘musici’ in the Wechmar local registry of 1600–10. See §II below.

Wilhelm Friedemann Bach (45) (b Weimar, 22 Nov 1710; d Berlin, 1 July 1784). Son of Johann Sebastian (24); see §III (8) below.

Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach (76) (b Bückeburg, bap. 24 May 1759; d Berlin, 25 Nov 1845). Son of Johann Christoph Friedrich (49); see §III (14) below.

Bach

II. Family history

The Bach family lived and worked in central Germany, primarily in Thuringia, with the Ernestine Saxon duchies and principalities of Eisenach, Gotha, Meiningen and Weimar, the county of Schwarzburg-Arnstadt, Ohrdruf in Hohenlohe, and the town of Erfurt in the electorate of Mainz. This area was relatively densely populated at the time, and although bitterly split politically it was denominationally unified. In this economically sound and culturally sophisticated context musical life flourished, encouraged in particular by ambitious displays of magnificence on the part of miniature courts, an awareness of musical tradition in the churches of the area (which apart from the Catholic enclave of Erfurt belonged to the Lutheran heartland), and the desire for prestige of many towns both large and small. The rise and decline of the musical Bach family is closely connected with these social conditions: first with the construction and expansion of musical practice in courts, churches and towns towards the end of the 16th century, then with the gradual decline in importance of such leading musical institutions as court orchestras, church choirs and town bands as the middle-class musical culture of the later 18th century began to develop. Musical life in Thuringia was notable for its wide variety within a small area, but it lacked a major centre (with an opera company, for instance), so that there was nothing to attract really famous musicians to it. In the Bach family itself sound, average competence was the norm. Only a few of its members achieved anything extraordinary, and most of those who did left Thuringia.

The unusual concentration of musical gifts within one family in such a narrow regional context has long interested students of genealogy, heredity and talent. The continual reappearance of musical gifts through the generations, with an increasingly large and then suddenly declining number of prominent family members culminating in the remarkable figure of Johann Sebastian Bach, remains a unique phenomenon. An essential prerequisite for the development of such a dynasty was certainly a general attitude to music as a craft to be learnt, so that the careers of male family members were more or less decided from early childhood. Musical training was usually provided within the family, by fathers, brothers and uncles. This was typical even of later generations. For instance, Johann Sebastian, who had himself studied with his brother Johann Christoph (22), is known to have taught six of his nephews – Johann Ernst (34), Johann Lorenz (38), Johann Elias (39), Johann Bernhard (41), Johann Heinrich (43) and Samuel Anton (67) – as well as his own sons. Carl Philipp Emanuel regarded it as quite natural to take his youngest half-brother Johann Christian (50) into his care. Studies or educational tours outside the region were uncommon, although there are instances in the Italian journeys of Caspar Bach's sons (3/548; cf the Ursprung), of Johann Nicolaus (27) and finally of Johann Christian (50). In these circumstances even Johann Sebastian Bach's journey to Lübeck to study with Buxtehude must be considered decidedly out of the ordinary.

In a self-contained circle of this kind, which was in the nature of a guild, it was natural for relationships with other musical families and intermarriage with them to be frequent. There were other families of musicians in Thuringia, if not as extensive as the Bach family itself. They included the Hoffmann family of Suhl and the Schmidt family of Eisenach. A series of marriages took place with these two families: Johannes (4) and his brother Heinrich (6) both married daughters of the Hoffmann family; Johann Christian (7) and Johann Aegidius (8) married daughters of the Schmidt family. Johann Sebastian himself is a typical example of close relationships between musical families: his first wife was a Bach and his second a descendant of the Wilcke family of musicians from Zerbst.

The family was very close because of its shared social standing and musical interests. Their social status as ‘outsiders’ (for in the 17th century musicians did not normally have rights of citizenship) and their strict religious views were other important features. Some of the family members even showed a tendency towards sectarianism. Family gatherings were held regularly, and must have resembled small-scale music festivals. A particular speciality of the Bachs was the performance of quodlibets at such gatherings. Drawing on information from J.S. Bach's sons, Forkel wrote in 1802:

The meeting place was usually in Erfurt, Eisenach or Arnstadt. They devoted their time together wholly to making music. Since the company consisted entirely of Kantors, organists and town musicians, all of whom had to do with the church, and in any case it was then still the custom to begin everything on a religious note, the first thing they did on being gathered together was to strike up a chorale. They proceeded from this pious beginning to jests that were often in great contrast. For they now sang folksongs, some of a rather comic and indelicate content, in such a way that the various improvised parts made up a kind of harmony, but the texts for each part were quite different. They called this kind of extempore harmonizing a quodlibet, and not only enjoyed a hearty laugh at it themselves, but provoked equally hearty and irresistible laughter in all who heard them.

The family was well aware that it was maintaining a musical tradition. It is no accident that Johann Sebastian, in a letter of 28 October 1730 to Georg Erdmann, described his children as ‘born musici’, and even the first brief biography of Bach in J.G. Walther's Musicalisches Lexicon (1732) and the more extensive account of his career in the obituary of 1754 refer expressly to the great master's background in a remarkable family of musicians.

It was Johann Sebastian himself who systematically investigated the background of the family and its musical heritage. His genealogy of the family, drawn up about 1735, is still the most reliable document on the family history, particularly in its early generations. (The original manuscript of the Ursprung is lost, but several copies are extant, including an especially important one with additions by C.P.E. Bach.) Johann Sebastian's estate also contained a collection of compositions by the most important earlier family members, under the title ‘Alt-Bachisches Archiv’ (the original, containing 20 works, was once owned by the Berlin Singakademie; it was thought lost in World War II, but was rediscovered, along with other Bach manuscripts, in Kiev (Ukraine) in 1999. This collection was probably begun by Johann Ambrosius, as a number of entries in his hand suggest. Johann Sebastian later reordered it, providing new title-pages, and also made practical use of it, preparing some instrumental parts.

The Ursprung traces the family tree without a break to Veit (1) in the middle of the 16th century. However, many of the details are unclear up to the generation of Veit's grandsons, the sons of Hans (2), and they cannot be fully clarified for want of insufficient archival documents (for instance, the Wechmar church records do not begin until 1619). Studies of the Bach family have sometimes assumed that Veit Bach was born in Thuringia and merely happened to live in Hungary for some time, or that he was born in Wechmar and was the son of an older Veit who had already emigrated from Hungary in 1545, but these theories are untenable. There is no reason to doubt the data in the Ursprung, particularly as Johann Nicolaus Bach (27), in a letter of 24 April 1728, clearly stated that ‘The Bachs come from Hungary’ (see Schulze, 1989).

It has been shown that other Bachs as well as Veit had settled in the little town of Wechmar, near Gotha, but it has proved impossible to trace the family relationship. For instance, there was a Hans Bach living in Wechmar in 1561, and later a Lips (Philippus) and another Hans Bach. They may have been close relations who had left Hungarian Moravia at some earlier date, and whom Veit then followed, or they may have been more distant relations who had been living in Wechmar for some time. The name of Bach (pronounced with a long ‘a’, as ‘Baach’, and often written that way as well) was already common in the Thuringian region, and can be traced there to the 14th century, although there is no evidence of musical activity on the part of these earlier Bachs. Where musicians do occasionally appear (for instance, a trumpeter called Eberhard Heinrich Bach from Rohrborn near Erfurt, who was the son of a Heinrich Bach and went to Indonesia by way of the Netherlands in about 1598), there is no evidence of any concrete family relationship. It seems best to regard the close circle of the musical Bach family as confined to those mentioned in the family genealogy of the Ursprung.

Family tradition in that work says of Veit Bach, a baker by trade, that he often amused himself by playing a ‘cythringen’ (a small cittern). The explicit comment – ‘This was, as it were, the beginning of music in his descendants’ – seems to indicate that none of Veit's ancestors was a professional musician. Nor indeed was Veit himself. He came from the area of Moravia and Slovakia in what was then the kingdom of Hungary with its capital city of Pressburg, now Bratislava (according to Korabinsky, Veit's native city), but his date of birth is not known. Nor is it known why and when he emigrated to Thuringia, but at the time of the Schmalkaldian Wars (1545–7) Protestants were being expelled in the wake of the Counter-Reformation, and there were probably restrictions on the practice of Lutheranism in Hungary in the following decades. The mention of Hungary in the Ursprung as the Bach family's country of origin should be regarded, in accordance with the terminology of the times, as referring to the central area of the Habsburg possessions in general, including Bohemia and Moravia. There are records of various people surnamed Bach in the 16th and 17th centuries in Moravia and elsewhere in the Habsburg territories, for instance Hans Bach the Spielmann (violinist; see §III (1) below).

Veit Bach settled in Wechmar, where he became a householder, and died there on 8 March 1619. Hans Bach (2), his son (probably the eldest) was the first family member to have a thorough musical training; he then practised as a musician, although he was also active in other capacities. His sons were the first of the family to devote themselves entirely to music. Their acceptance of salaried positions shows that they had settled in one place, thus taking the first step towards entering the urban middle classes and breaking with the tradition of the itinerant Spielmann or ‘beer-fiddler’, although their varied activities as instrumentalists point to the Spielmann tradition behind them.

Genealogical problems arise with a number of family members who were certainly connected with Veit's main Wechmar line but whose precise origin is unclear. There is a lacuna in the Ursprung itself concerning the brother of Hans (2); no name is given under the number (3), only the man's trade (he was a carpet maker), although there is at least brief mention of three of his sons who were musicians. Obviously Johann Sebastian Bach, as author of the Ursprung, lacked clear information on this point, and the result was some confusion between two family members. It seems possible that Veit had two sons as well Hans (2) – Johann Sebastian Bach's great-grandfather – and that these sons, Caspar (3/a) and Lips (3/b), have been merged into a single figure in the Ursprung. However, it is also possible that Hans Bach and/or Lips Bach of Wechmar were brothers of Veit.

The mention in the Ursprung of visits to Italy by the nephews of Hans (2) can in fact refer only to the sons of Caspar (3/a); documents show that the Count of Schwarzburg-Arnstadt encouraged the project. Moreover, Caspar had a son Heinrich (3/56), mentioned in the register of deaths as being blind, who must surely be identical with the ‘blind Jonas’ of the Ursprung; the nickname ‘Jonas’, deriving from the biblical Jonah, would presumably have referred to his adventures. On the other hand, the forebears of Johann Ludwig Bach (3/64) can go back only to one Wendel Bach, who must have been either a third brother of Hans (2) or, more likely, a son of Lips. This brother could only have been the elder Lips or the elder Hans. In any case, however, the younger Hans (2), Caspar (3/a) Wendel, Lips (3/b) and Andreas must have been closely enough related to each other for family tradition to trace them back to a common origin. The forebears of the Meiningen Bachs were originally farmers, although it is said of the younger Wendel that he could ‘also sing very well’. The descent of Andreas Bach in particular is obscure. He was a councillor of Themar, and his son Johann (59) was first Kantor in Lehnstedt and later a pastor, like several of his descendants. The Ursprung expressly mentions that Johann Stephan's brother was a priest. As Georg Michael (66) was present at his funeral in 1738, the Meiningen and Lehnstedt lines must have felt they were closely related, and in that case it can hardly be doubted that they were connected with the main Wechmar line.

In accordance with their origins, nearly all the Bachs were first and foremost instrumentalists. Keyboard instruments headed the list of the instruments they played, but almost all other kinds are also represented. In the true Stadtpfeifer tradition, most of the Bachs learnt several instruments. A number of them were also instrument makers, for instance Johann Christoph (12), Johann Michael (14), Johann Günther (15), Johann Michael (30) and Johann Nicolaus (27), who is credited with the invention of the lute-harpsichord. Johann Sebastian, who was a great expert on the organ, promoted the development of the viola pomposa and criticized Gottfried Silbermann's construction of pianos, clearly shows this aspect of the family's talents. The tendency of most of the Bachs to become instrumentalists made composition a subsidiary pursuit, reserved for those who both had the necessary training and were expected to provide musical works. At least in the 17th century, this meant almost exclusively organists, so it is not surprising that no compositions by Johann Ambrosius (11) are extant. As a court trumpeter, if he composed at all it must have been only as a marginal activity. On the other hand his two organist cousins, Johann Michael and Johann Christoph, were very productive as composers, primarily of works for non-liturgical use (sacred works were the responsibility of the church Kantors). In particular, they wrote funeral motets, no doubt a profitable sideline.

By 1700 the musical Bach family was so widespread in Thuringia that the name ‘Bach’ was often used as a synonym for ‘musician’. In many towns, particularly Erfurt and Arnstadt, they occupied all the key musical positions, and it was typical for a Bach in any post to be succeeded by another Bach. For instance, when Johann Christoph (13) left Arnstadt his younger brother (14) succeeded him, and Johann Sebastian was succeeded in Arnstadt by his cousin Johann Ernst (25) and in Mühlhausen by another cousin, Johann Friedrich (29). The post occupied by Johann Christoph (22) was even passed down through two generations. That of organist at St Georg in Eisenach was held by members of the family for almost 150 years, and it was in the same tradition that C.P.E. Bach applied for his father's position as Thomaskantor in Leipzig.

However, this almost automatic inheritance of musical positions became more difficult when the old institutions, which had enabled musicians to function as a guild, began to break up. It was these institutions that had provided the means of existence for such musical families as the Bachs, who rose gradually from their simple Spielmann origins to all positions in the musical hierarchies of the courts, towns and churches. They had been court musicians – Konzertmeisters or Kapellmeisters – Stadtpfeifers, directors of town musical ensembles, organists and Kantors. After the middle of the 18th century at the latest, structural changes were taking place that ran counter to the Bach family's old way of life. Moreover, the family now belonged to the middle class, and its sons had new educational opportunities (almost all the members of the generation of J.S. Bach's sons attended university) fitting them for a number of different professions, whereas previously they had few alternatives to becoming musicians. It is only natural, therefore, that fewer and fewer of them turned to music as a career. Some family members moved into another artistic field, that of painting: the descendants of Johann Ludwig (3/64) were court painters, and the younger Johann Sebastian (1748–78), son of C.P.E. Bach, went to Italy with a high reputation as a gifted painter and died in Rome at the age of 30. In view of the abundance of musical talent in over six generations of the Bach family, it may at first seem surprising, but is understandable if we look back at the circumstances in which they lived and worked, that at the unveiling of the Bach monument donated by Mendelssohn and erected outside the Thomaskirche in Leipzig in 1843 Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach (76) was the last and only representative of a family tradition that had lasted for over 250 years.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §II: Family history

BIBLIOGRAPHY

catalogues, bibliographies

M. Schneider: Thematisches Verzeichnis der musikalischen Werke der Familie Bach (I. Teil)’, BJb 1907, 103–77 [continuations never appeared]

P. Kast: Die Bach-Handschriften der Berliner Staatsbibliothek, (Trossingen, 1958)

J.F. Richter: Johann Sebastian Bach und seine Familie in Thüringen’, Deutsches Bachfest, no.39 (1964), 50–60

K. Beisswenger: Johann Sebastian Bachs Notenbibliothek (Kassel, 1992)

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

sources

‘Alt-Bachisches Archive’ [MSS of works by older Bach family members], Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art (formerly Berlin Singakademie)

[J.S. Bach]: Ursprung der musicalisch-Bachischen Familie, 1735 [orig. MS lost]; ed. M. Schneider, Bach-Urkunden (Leipzig, 1917); ed. W. Neumann and H.-J. Schulze, Bach-Dokumente, i (Leipzig and Kassel, 1963), no.184; Eng. trans. in H.T. David and A. Mendel, eds., The Bach Reader (New York, 1945, rev. and enlarged 3/1998 by C. Wolff as The New Bach Reader), 283–94

M. Korabinsky: Beschreibung der königlichen ungarischen Haupt-Frey- und Krönungsstadt Pressburg, i (Pressburg, 1784), 110ff

C.S. Terry: The Origin of the Family of Bach Musicians (London, 1929)

J. Müller-Blattau: Genealogie der musikalisch-Bachischen Familie (Kassel, 1950)

P. Wollny: Alte Bach Funde’, BJb 1998, 137–48

monographs

MGG1 (R. Benecke)

RiemannL12

C.F.M.: Bemerkungen zu dem Stammbaum der Bachischen Familie’, AMZ, xxv (1823), 187–91

Kawaczynsky: Über die Familie Bach: eine genealogische Mitteilung’, AMZ, xlv (1843), 537–41

P. Spitta: Johann Sebastian Bach (Leipzig, 1873–80, 5/1962; Eng. trans., 1884, 2/1889/R), i

A. Lorenz: Ein alter Bach-Stammbaum’, NZM, Jg.82 (1915), 281–2

G. Thiele: Die Familie Bach in Mühlhausen’, Mühlhäuser Geschichtsblätter, xxi (1920–21), 62–84

H. Lämmerhirt: Bachs Mutter und ihre Sippe’, BJb 1925, 101–37

C.S. Terry: Bach: a Biography (London, 1928, 2/1933/R)

E. Borkowsky: Die Musikerfamilie Bach (Jena, 1930)

H. Helmbold: Die Söhne von Johann Christoph und Johann Ambrosius Bach auf der Eisenacher Schule’, BJb 1930, 49–55

C.S. Terry: Has Bach Surviving Descendants?’, MT, lxxi (1930), 511–13

E. Lux: Der Familienstamm Bach in Gräfenroda’, BJb 1931, 107–11

H. Miesner: Urkundliche Nachrichten über die Familie Bach in Berlin’, BJb 1932, 157–63

H. Lämmerhirt: Ein hessischer Bach-Stamm’, BJb 1936, 53–89

L. Bach: Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zu dem Beitrag “Ein hessischer Bach-Stamm” von Hugo Lämmerhirt’, BJb 1937, 118–31

K. Fischer: Das Freundschaftsbuch des Apothekers Friedrich Thomas Bach: eine Quelle zur Geschichte der Musikerfamilie Bach’, BJb 1938, 95–102

C.U. von Ulmenstein: Die Nachkommen des Bückeburger Bach’, AMf, iv (1939), 12–20

W.G. Whittaker: The Bachs and Eisenach’, Collected Essays (London, 1940/R)

H. Löffler: “Bache” bei Bach’, BJb 1949–50, 106–24

Bach in Thüringen:Gabe der Thüringer Kirche an das Thüringer Volk zum Bach-Gedenkjahr 1950 (Berlin, 1950)

H. Besseler and G. Kraft, eds.: Johann Sebastian Bach in Thüringen: Festgabe zum Gedenkjahr 1950 (Weimar, 1950)

K. Geiringer: Artistic Interrelations of the Bachs’, MQ, xxxvi (1950), 363–74

W. Rauschenberger: Die Familien Bach’, Genealogie und Heraldik, ii (1949–50), 149–53

E. Wölfer: Naumburg und die Musikerfamilie Bach’, Programmheft zu den Bach-Tagen (Naumburg, 1950), 9–14

C. Schubart: Anna Magdalena Bach: neue Beiträge zu ihrer Herkunft und ihren Jugendjahren’, BJb 1953, 29–50

K. and I. Geiringer: The Bach Family: Seven Generations of Creative Genius (London, 1954/R; Ger. trans., enlarged, 1958, 2/1977)

C. Freyse: Wieviel Geschwister hatte J.S. Bach?’, BJb 1955, 103–7

G. Kraft: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des “Hochzeitsquodlibet” (bwv 524)’, BJb 1956, 140–54

G. von Dadelsen: Bemerkungen zur Handschrift Johann Sebastian Bachs, seiner Familie und seines Kreises (Trossingen, 1957)

K. Müller and F. Wiegand: Arnstädter Bachbuch: Johann Sebastian Bach und seine Verwandten in Arnstadt (Arnstadt, 1957)

K. Geiringer: Unbekannte Werke von Nachkommen J.S. Bachs in amerikanischen Sammlungen’, IMSCR: Cologne 1958, 110–12

G. Kraft: Neue Beiträge zur Bach-Genealogie’, BMw, i/2 (1959), 29–61

A. Schmiedecke: Johann Sebastian Bachs Verwandte in Weissenfels’, Mf, xiv (1961), 195–200

H.-J. Schulze: Marginalien zu einigen Bach-Dokumenten’, BJb 1961, 79–99

G. Kraft: Entstehung und Ausbreitung des musikalischen Bach-Geschlechtes in Thüringen: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Wechmarer Stammes (Habilitationsschrift, U. of Halle, 1964)

F. Wiegand: Die mütterlichen Verwandten Johann Sebastian Bachs in Erfurt: Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zur Bachforschung’, BJb 1967, 5–20

E. Zavarsky: Zur angeblichen Pressburger Herkunft der Familie Bach’, BJb, liii (1967), 21

G. Kraft: Das mittelthüringische Siedlungszentrum der Familien Bach und Wölcken’, Musa – mens – musici: im Gedenken an Walther Vetter (Leipzig, 1969), 153–64

P.M. Young: The Bachs, 1500–1850 (London, 1970)

I. Lehmann: Die Wirkungsstätten der Bach-Familie in Thüringen (Eisenach, 1984)

C. Oefner: Die Musikerfamilie Bach in Eisenach (Eisenach, 1984)

H.-J. Schulze: Studien zur Bach-Überlieferung des 18. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1984)

R. Hill: The Möller Manuscript and the Andreas Bach Book: Two Keyboard Anthologies from the Circle of the Young Johann Sebastian Bach (diss., Harvard U., 1987)

H.-J. Schulze: “Die Bachen stammen aus Ungarn her”: ein unbekannter Brief Johann Nicolaus Bachs aus dem Jahre 1728’, BJb 1989, 213–20

H. Brück: Die Brüder Johann, Christoph und Heinrich Bach und die “Erffurtische musicalische Compagnie”’, BJb 1990, 71–7

H. Brück: Die Andislebener Bache’, BJb 1991, 199–206

H. Kock: Genealogisches Lexikon der Familie Bach, ed. R. Siegel (Wechmar, 1995)

D.R. Melamed: The History of the Altbachisches Archiv’, J.S. Bach and the German Motet (Cambridge, 1995), 161–77

H. Brück: Die Erfurter Bach-Familien von 1635 bis 1805’, BJb 1996, 101–31

Bach

III. Individual members

(1) Hans [Johann] Bach

(2) Johann Christoph Bach

(3) Johann Michael Bach

(4) Johann Nicolaus Bach

(5) Johann Bernhard Bach

(6) Johann Ludwig Bach

(7) Johann Sebastian Bach

(8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

(9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

(10) Johann Ernst Bach

(11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

(12) Johann [John] Christian Bach

(13) Johann Michael Bach

(14) Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach

Bach, §III: Individual members

(1) Hans [Johann] Bach

(b Andelsbuch, Vorarlberg, c1555; d Nürtingen, 1 Dec 1615). Violinist and court musician. He became a Spielmann (violinist) and jester at the Stuttgart court of Duke Ludwig of Württemberg about 1585, and in 1593 he followed the widowed Duchess Ursula to the court of Nürtingen, where he remained until his death. He apparently often travelled, both alone and in the court entourage. Of his work all that survives is the text of a narrative song of 1614 describing a visit to the town of Weil (Hanss Baachens Lobspruch zur Weil der Statt: ‘Es ist nun über zwantzig Jahr’); its manner is reminiscent of the late medieval style of Oswald von Wolkenstein. There are two extant portraits of him, an etching of about 1605 and an engraving of 1617. The etching bears the inscription:

Hie siehst du geigen/Hansen Bachen
Wenn du es hörst/so mustu lachen
Er geigt gleichwol/nach seiner Art
Und tregt ein hipschen/Hans Bachen Bart.

Nothing is known of his extraction; he was probably related in some way to Veit Bach (1) of the Wechmar line – Hans was Protestant (no matter of course in the Catholic south) and like Veit he came from Habsburg lands. His portrait of 1617 was in the collection owned by C.P.E. Bach, but since C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlassverzeichnis of 1790 cited him as ‘Bach (Hans), a Gotha musician’ his ownership of the picture cannot be taken as confirmation that Hans was a member of the family. He had obviously been confused with the Spielmann Hans Bach (2), who trained in Gotha.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

W. Wolffheim: Hans Bach der Spielman’, BJb 1910, 70–85

W. Irtenkauf and H. Maier: Gehört der Spielmann Hans Bach zur Musikerfamilie Bach?’, Mf, ix (1956), 450–52

Bach, §III: Individual members

(2) Johann Christoph Bach

(13) (b Arnstadt, bap. 8 Dec 1642; d Eisenach, bur. 2 April 1703). Composer and organist, son of Heinrich Bach (6). He was probably the most important member of the family before (7) Johann Sebastian (24). He received a thorough musical grounding from his father, and on 20 November 1663 was appointed organist of the Arnstadt castle chapel. Two years later he was invited by the Eisenach town council to apply for the post of organist at St Georg, and after an audition on 10 December 1665 he was appointed to that position and also to the post of harpsichordist in the court Kapelle of the Duke of Eisenach. He retained both positions until his death.

Little is known of his work in the court Kapelle. From 1675 the Kapellmeister was Daniel Eberlin, later to become the father-in-law of Telemann, who also conducted the Kapelle on occasion, and for a short while (1677–8) Pachelbel was a member of the Kapelle. During much of his time there Johann Christoph’s most important colleague must have been his cousin, the violinist Johann Ambrosius (11); Ambrosius often served as his copyist, and their relationship was doubtless a close one. The young Johann Sebastian must also have received his first impressions of organ music from his father’s cousin. While Johann Christoph’s court position was one of high standing, his tenure of the civic one was marred by a succession of quarrels between him and the town council, for which he was not entirely blameless. It must be said in extenuation that throughout his years in Eisenach he was constantly beset by severe family difficulties, particularly the illnesses of his wife and children. His quarrels with the town council were mostly about his salary and the council’s refusal to provide an official residence for him, a deficiency eventually made good by the court. For many years he also battled with the council over the long-overdue restoration (or reconstruction) of the organ at St Georg; he was successful only in 1696, and then did not live to see the completion (by G.C. Stertzing) of the famous instrument in 1707 (his copious, expert notes on the organ’s reconstruction are extant; see Freyse). He died in 1703, just ten days after the death of his wife.

Within the family Johann Christoph was highly respected as a composer (a ‘profound’ one according to the Ursprung). In Johann Sebastian’s obituary notice of 1754 he is mentioned expressly as one who ‘was as good at inventing beautiful thoughts as he was at expressing words. He composed, to the extent that current taste permitted, in a galant and cantabile style, uncommonly full-textured … On the organ and the keyboard [he] never played with fewer than five independent parts’. Johann Sebastian performed some of his motets and vocal concertos in Leipzig, as also did C.P.E. Bach later in Hamburg. Although Johann Christoph was primarily an organist and harpsichordist, his extant keyboard works are few, but they show him as a capable composer, stylistically akin to Pachelbel though in general less pedantic. His organ chorales (probably in effect written-down improvisations) demonstrate his mastery of the small form, while the strength of his artistry is developed in his extended harpsichord variations. His vocal works, in particular the motets and concertos, are notable for the variety of their settings. The concertos are characterized by their full instrumental writing, with unusually interesting inner part-writing. While the vocal writing is for the most part technically undemanding (the choral sections were intended for school choirs), the instrumental parts are usually highly elaborate and often call for a virtuoso solo violin (as in the two lamenti and the wedding concerto Meine Freundin, du bist schön). Johann Sebastian and Carl Philipp Emanuel thought particularly highly of his 22-part concerto for Michaelmas, Es erhub sich ein Streit, one of the finest vocal works of the late 17th century. Basically his double-choir motets follow the traditional central German model including both Spruch and chorale, with cantabile melodies and often lively alternation of tutti and soloists – a genre which indeed reached its peak in the works of Johann Christoph and his brother (3) Johann Michael (14). In both composers’ works the older style of writing, with alternating chordal and imitative sections, still predominated, for instance in the motet Der Gerechte, ob er gleich zu zeitlich stirbt, which is also a particularly fine example of Johann Christoph’s expressive harmony; but the newer style, with its livelier lines (including melismatic semiquaver passages) and looser, more concertante writing, is found in Sei getreu bis in den Tod and Der Mensch, vom Weibe geboren, obviously later works. The lack of documentation and the small number of the surviving works preclude the establishment of a reliable chronology of Johann Christoph’s music.

WORKS

vocal

Editions: Altbachisches Archiv, i, ed. M. Schneider, EDM, 1st ser., i (1935) [S]Johann Christoph Bach: Sämtliche Motetten, ed. E. Franke (Leipzig, 1982) [F]

Arias: Es ist nun aus mit meinem Leben, SATB, bc, S, F; Mit Weinen hebt sichs an, SATB, bc, 1691, S, F

Motets: Der Gerechte, ob er gleich zu zeitlich stirbt, SATTB, bc, 1676, S, F, ed. in Musica sacra, xxxix (Berlin, 1860); Der Mensch, vom Weibe geboren, SSATB, bc, S, F, ed. R. Kubik (Stuttgart, c1984); Fürchte dich nicht, SSATB, bc, F, ed. G. Graulich (Stuttgart, c1992); Herr, nun lässet du deinen Diener, SATB, SATB, bc, F, ed. G. Graulich (Stuttgart, c1980); Herr, wenn ich nur dich habe, SATB, SATB, bc, D-Bsb (anon.), F; Ich weiss, dass mein Erlöser lebt, SATTB, bc, F, ed. G. Graulich (Stuttgart, 1994); Lieber Herr Gott, wecke uns auf, SATB, SATB, bc, 1672, F, ed. G. Graulich (Stuttgart, c1994); Merk auf mein Herz, SATB, SATB, bc, bwv Anh.III.163, ed. P. Wollny (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1991); Sei getreu bis in den Tod, SSATB, bc, S, F, ed. R. Kubik (Stuttgart, c1983); Unsers Herzens Freude, SATB, SATB, bc, F; Was kein Aug gesehen hat, SATB, SATB, bc, Bsb (anon.), F

Vocal concertos: Ach, dass ich Wassers gnug hätte (Lamento), A, vn, 3 va, bc, ed. T. Fedtke (Stuttgart, c1976); Die Furcht des Herren, SSATB, SATTB, 2 vn, 2 va, bc, S, ed. H. Bergmann (Stuttgart, c1986); Es erhub sich ein Streit, SATBB, SATBB, 4 tpt, timp, 2 vn, 4 va, bc, ed. D. Krüger (Stuttgart, c1960); Es ist nun aus, SATB, bc Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art (formerly Berlin, Singakademie); Herr, wende dich und sei mir gnädig (Dialogus), SATB, 2 vn, 2 va, bc, ed. H. Bergmann (Stuttgart, c1988); Mein Freundin, du bist schön (Dialogus, wedding piece), SATB, 4 vn, 3 va, bc, S, ed. H. Bergmann (Stuttgart, c1989); Mit Weinen hebt sichs an , SATB, bc , Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art (formerly Berlin, Singakademie); Wie bist du denn o Gott (Lamentation), B, vn, 3 va da gamba, ed. in DTB, x, Jg.vi/1 (1905; attrib. J.P. Krieger), ed. D. Hellmann (Stuttgart, c1976)

Lost: Auf, lasst uns den Herren loben, S, insts, listed in Schweinfurt inventory, 1689; Der Herr ist König, B, insts, listed in Schweinfurt inventory, 1689; Gott schweig doch nicht also, 5vv, insts, listed in Schweinfurt inventory, 1689; Nun gehe ich hin, B, insts, listed in Schweinfurt inventory, 1689; Unsere Tage fahren alle dahin, a 10, listed in Stettin inventory, 1702

instrumental

Aria Eberliniana (15 variations], hpd, 1690, D-EIb (facs. (Leipzig, 1992)); ed. C. Freyse, Veröffentlichungen der Neuen Bachgesellschaft, Jg.xxxix/2 (1940)

Sarabande, G [12 variations], hpd; ed. H. Riemann (Leipzig, n.d.)

Aria, a [15 variations]; ed. G. Birkner (Zürich, 1973)

Praeludium und Fuge, E, org, doubtful; ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967)

44 chorales with preludes, org, ed. M. Fischer (Kassel, 1936)

4 chorales, org: Ach Herr, mich armen Sünder; Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr; An Wasserflüssen Babylon; Wer Gott vertraut, hat wohl gebaut; ed. C. Wolff, appx to Johann Michael Bach: Sämtliche Orgelchoräle (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1987)

Lost: 8 chorales, org , listed in GerberNL, i, 209

BIBLIOGRAPHY

MGG1 (R. Benecke)

M. Schneider: Thematisches Verzeichnis der musikalischen Werke der Familie Bach’, BJb 1907, 103–77

M. Fischer: Die organistische Improvisation im 17. Jahrhundert, dargestellt an den ‘Vieruntvierzig Chorälen zum Präambulieren von Johann Christoph Bach (BA 285) (Kassel, 1929)

F. Rollberg: Johann Christoph Bach: Organist zu Eisenach 1665–1703’, ZMw, xi (1928–9), 549–61

C. Freyse: Johann Christoph Bach’, BJb 1956, 36–51

P. Wollny: Materialen zur Schweinfurter Musikpflege im 17. Jahrhundert: von 1592 bis zum Tod Georg Christoph Bachs (1642–1697)’, Schütz Jb 1997, 113–63

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(3) Johann Michael Bach

(14) (b Arnstadt, bap. 9 Aug 1648, d Gehren, 17 May 1694). Composer, son of Heinrich Bach (6). He received a sound musical education from his father and the Arnstadt Kantor Jonas de Fletin; the latter's influence may account for his early interest in vocal music. In 1665 he succeeded his brother (2) Johann Christoph (13) as organist of the Arnstadt castle chapel. After an audition on 5 October 1673 he succeeded Johann Effler (who later preceded Johann Sebastian as castle organist in Weimar) as town organist in Gehren. He was also active as an instrument maker there and held the important administrative post of town clerk. On 17 October 1707 his youngest daughter, Maria Barbara (b Gehren, 20 Oct 1684), married her distant cousin (7) Johann Sebastian (24).

A pamphlet issued by the Gehren council refers to Johann Michael as a ‘quiet, reserved and artistically experienced subject’; within the family he was considered a ‘skilful composer’ (Ursprung). As a composer, in fact, he is on almost the same level as his brother Johann Christoph. Especially in the chorale motet, a genre to which he devoted himself with particular intensity, he composed works of real distinction, and his strophic arias, with their parts for obbligato instruments and their resourceful and expressive ritornellos, are also of undisputed value. A notable feature of his music is his varied, natural and convincing treatment of vocal declamation, whether in biblical texts, chorale verses or free poetry. In his motets, as in his brother's, the older, strongly homophonic style predominates; but in such works as Sei lieber Tag willkommen he turned to the freer and more modern style with melismatic passages. His works for double chorus stand firmly in the tradition of Schütz's Psalmen Davids, but go beyond their models. The nine-part funeral motet Unser Leben ist ein Schatten, which has been erroneously attributed to Johann Bach (4), is particularly moving in its illustrative and expressive qualities. His vocal concertos are less extended than those of his brother, but he too favoured a full-textured orchestral palette, which is often quite sophisticated and frequently includes a virtuoso solo violin part.

Almost all the extant keyboard compositions by Johann Michael Bach are organ chorales. They are mainly in the central German tradition of concise, contrapuntal and practical settings, showing a clear relationship to similar works by Johann Pachelbel. Recent discoveries have trebled the number of Johann Michael's extant chorale settings and, although the total remains considerably less than the ‘72 verschiedene fugirte und figurirte Choralvorspiele’ cited by Gerber, these permit a fairer assessment of Bach's merits as an organ composer than was previously possible. The central German organ chorale underwent a slight shift of emphasis in the work of Johann Michael Bach. His four-part figured chorales with the melody in the highest part, as well as others that combine forms more freely, show him to have been a decidedly independent composer, and he must have influenced the young Johann Sebastian in particular. Gerber wrote of him in 1812: ‘There is great variety and diversity in the preludes, after the manner of that period, and none is entirely unworthy of the name of Bach’.

WORKS

vocal

Edition: Altbachisches Archiv, ed. M. Schneider, EDM, 1st ser., i–ii (1935) [S i–ii]Arias: Ach, wie sehnlich wart ich der Zeit, S, vn, 3 va da gamba, bc; Auf, lasst uns den Herrn loben, A, vn, 3 va da gamba, bc: ed. in S ii, ed. H. Bergmann (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1985)Motets, SATB, SATB, bc unless otherwise stated: Benedictus, SATTB, ?bc, ed.; Das Blut Jesu Christi, SATTB, bc, ed. in S i, ed. R. Kubik (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1981); Dem Menschen ist gesetzt einmal zu sterben, ed. in S i, ed. R. Kubik (Kirchheim, c1985); Ehre sei Gott in der Höhe, ed. in DDT, xlix–l (1915), ed. D. Melamed (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1992); Fürchtet euch nicht, ed. in S i, ed. R. Kubik (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1980); Halt, was du hast, ed. in S i; Herr, du lässest mich erfahren, ed. in S i; Herr, ich warte auf dein Heil, ed. in S i, ed. R. Kubik (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1984); Herr wenn ich nur dich habe, SATTB, bc, ed. in S i, ed. R. Kubik (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1984); Ich weiss, dass mein Erlöser lebet, SATTB, bc, ed. in S i; Nun hab ich überwunden, ed. in S i; Nun treten wir ins neue Jahr, ed. D. Melamed (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1992); Sei lieber Tag willkommen, SSAATTB, bc, ed. in S i; Sei nun wieder zufrieden, ed. G. Graulich (Stuttgart, 1993); Unser Leben ist ein Schatten, SSAATTB, ATB, bc, ed. in S i (attrib. Johann Bach (4)); Unser Leben währet siebenzig Jahr, SATTB, bc, ed. in S iVocal concertos: Ach bleib bei uns, Herr Jesu Christ, SATB, 2 vn, 3 va, bc, ed. in S ii, ed. H. Bergmann (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1985); Es ist ein grosser Gewinn, S, 4 vn, bc, ed. in S ii, ed. H. Bergmann (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1985); Herr, komm hinab, SATB, 2 vn, 2 va, bc, ed. H.M. Balz (Merseburger, 1995); Liebster Jesu, hör mein Flehen (Dialogus), SATB, 2 vn, 2 va, bc, ed. in S ii, ed. H. Bergmann (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1985)Lost, listed in Ansbach inventory, 1686 (see Schaal): Conditor coeli, a 8; Der Herr is König, a 12; Ich freue mich des, a 15; Lobet, ihr Knechte des Herrn, a 12; Mein Sünd betrüben mich, a 8; Miserere, a 15; Omnipotens Deus, a 12; Pater noster, a 12; Siehe, lobe den Herrn, a 12; Was willtu meine Seele, a 6; Welche ich lieb habe, a 10Lost, listed in Schweinfurt inventory, 1689 (see Wollny): Auf meinen lieben Gott, SATB, 2 vn, bc (also formerly in Berlin, Singakademie); Benedicat tibi Dominus ex Sion, 5vv, insts; Der Gott Abraham, der Gott Isaac, 5vv, insts; Dies ist der Tag, 6vv, insts; Gott ist mein Heil, 4vv, insts; Herr, lehre uns bedenken, 5vv, insts; Mag, 4vv, insts; Sit nomen Domini benedictum, 5vv, insts; Unser Herr Jesus Christus, B, insts; Wem ein tugendsam Weib, 5vv, insts; Wenn mein Stündlein vorhanden ist, 5vv, insts; Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein, 5vv, insts; Wie bin ich doch so herzlich froh, 5vv, instsOthers lost: Ist nicht Ephraim, SATB, 4 va, bc, formerly in Berlin, Singakademie; Wie lieblich sind deine Wohnungen (see Brück); Zion spricht: Der Herr hat mich verlassen, listed in Stettin inventory, c1702

instrumental

Edition: Johann Michael Bach: Sämtliche Orgelchoräle, ed. C. Wolff (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1987) [W]Chorales, org, ed. in W: Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr; Auf meinen lieben Gott; Der du bist drei in Einigkeit; Derr Herr ist mein getreuer Hirt; Dies sind die heiligen zehn Gebot, also ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967); Es spricht der Unweisen Mund wohl; Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, bwv 723; Gott hat das Evangelium; Gott Vater, der du deine Sohn (anon. in source); Herr Christ, der einig Gottes Sohn; In dich hab ich gehoffet, Herr, also ed. in EDM, 1st ser., ix (1937); In dulci jubilo, bwv 751; Jesus Christus, unser Heiland, der den Tod; Komm, Gott schöpfer, Heiliger Geist (anon. in source); Kommt her zu mir, spricht Gotte Sohn; Mag ich Unglück nicht widerstahn; Meine Seele erhebt den Herren; Nun freut euch lieben Christen gmein; Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland; Nun lasst uns Gott dem Herren; O Herre Gott, Vater in Ewigkeit; Von Gott will ich nicht lassen; Warum betrübst du dich, mein Herz; Wenn mein Stündlein vorhanden ist, also ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967); Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein, also ed. in EDM, 1st ser., ix (1937) and ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967); Wo Gott der Herr nicht bei uns hält, also ed. in EDM, 1st ser., ix (1937)Other works: Partita, a, hpd, US-NH; Stark besetzte Sonaten, lost, cited in GerberL and WaltherML

BIBLIOGRAPHY

GerberL

WaltherML

M. Schneider: Thematsiches Verzeichnis der musikalischen Werke der Familie Bach’, BJb 1907, 103–77, esp. 109

W. Freytag: Musikgeschichte der Stadt Stettin im 18. Jahrhundert (Greifswald, 1936), 138–42

R. Schaal: Die Musikhandschriften des Ansbacher Inventars von 1686 (Wilhelmshaven, 1966)

D. Sackmann: Johann Michael, der “Gehrener Bach” (1648–1694)’, Musik und Gottesdienst, xlviii (1994), 49–57

P. Wollny: Materialien zur Schweinfurter Musikpflege im 17. Jahrhundert: von 1592 bis zum Tod Georg Christoph Bachs (1642–1697)’, Schütz Jb 1997, 113–63

H. Brück: Eine “Verordnung der Music” der Kaufmannskirche zu Erfurt von 1671 als Nachweis unbekannter Kompositionen von Johann Michael Bach (1648–1694)’, BJb 1998, 183–5

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(4) Johann Nicolaus Bach

(27) (b Eisenach, 10 Oct 1669, d Jena, 4 Nov 1753). Composer and organist, son of (2) Johann Christoph Bach (13). After his early musical training at home, he entered the University of Jena in 1690, pursuing his musical studies with J.N. Knüpfer (son of Sebastian Knüpfer, Thomaskantor in Leipzig). After a journey to Italy, the purpose and duration of which are not known, he succeeded Knüpfer in 1694 as organist of the town church in Jena. The university authorities were however reluctant to allow him to act in addition as organist at the Kollegienkirche, as Knüpfer had done, and it was not until 1719 that he finally took on the double post of town and university organist. In 1703 he had refused an appointment at St Georg, Eisenach, as successor to his father, primarily, no doubt, because of the better salary in Jena, where he lived in modest prosperity. Presumably he was in contact with his relative Johann Georg Bernhard (47) during the latter’s period of study in Jena, 1737–9. From 1745, in consideration of his age, he was provided with an assistant organist. In the Ursprung Johann Sebastian called him ‘present senior of all the Bachs still living’.

Johann Nicolaus was a skilful composer, but his few extant works – some student music, Der Jenaische Wein- und Bierrufer (ed. F. Stein, Leipzig, 1921), and an organ chorale, Nun freut euch lieben Christen gmein (D-Bsb) – hardly permit an assessment of his style. There are, however, no noticeable italianate aspects such as might have resulted from his stay in Italy. Apart from being an organist, the leader of the university’s collegium musicum and a composer, he was also an instrument maker, particularly of harpsichords. Adlung called him the inventor of the Lautenklavier, and in a letter of 1728 Bach referred explicitly to a ‘Lauten Clavier’ which he had sold to a Hungarian nobleman in Jena. As an expert on organs he supervised the reconstruction of an instrument with three manuals and 44 stops in the Kollegienkirche, 1704–6. Among his pupils was F.E. Niedt, author of a well-known thoroughbass method, Musicalische Handleitung (Hamburg, 1700–17).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

H. Koch: Johann Nicolaus, der “Jenaer” Bach’, Mf, xxi (1968), 290–304

H.-J. Schulze: “Die Bachen stammen aus Ungarn her”: ein unbekannter Brief Johann Nicolaus Bachs aus dem Jahre 1728’, BJb 1989, 213–20

T. Christensen: Johann Nikolaus Bach als Musiktheoretiker’, BJb 1996, 93–100

H.-J. Schulz and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(5) Johann Bernhard Bach

(18) (b Erfurt, bap. 25 Nov 1676; d Eisenach, 11 June 1749). Composer and organist, son of Johann Aegidius Bach (8). He studied with his father and about 1695 took up his first post, as organist at the Kaufmannskirche in Erfurt; in 1699 he went to Magdeburg, and in 1703 he replaced his kinsman (2) Johann Christoph (13) as town organist and court harpsichordist in Eisenach, a post which Johann Christoph’s son Johann Nicolaus (27) had declined. Repeated rises in salary show the esteem in which he was held, particularly in the court Kapelle, which was directed by Telemann in 1708–12.

His only extant works are instrumental; some of the organ works are in copies made by his pupils in Erfurt, who included J.G. Walther (according to Walther himself). Johann Sebastian Bach evidently valued his orchestral suites, for he had five of them copied (he himself was involved in some of the copying) for his collegium musicum in Leipzig. J.S. Bach’s obituary notice of 1754 says that Johann Bernhard ‘composed many beautiful overtures in the manner of Telemann’, no doubt referring particularly to the forces he employed (dessus, haute-contre, taille and continuo) and to the programmatic movement titles (‘Les plaisirs’, ‘La toge’) in the French tradition.

WORKS

4 ovs., orch, D-Bsb: g, ed. A. Fareanu (Leipzig, 1920); G; e; D, ed. K. Geiringer, Music of the Bach Family (Cambridge, Mass., 1955); all ed. H. Bergmann and H. Max (Stuttgart, 1985–8)

Ov., g, lost, listed in C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlassverzeichnis

Org works: fugue, F, ed. H. Riemann (Leipzig, n.d.); fugue, D, ed. in FrotscherG

Org chorales: Du Friedefürst, Herr Jesu Christ; Vom Himmel hoch: both ed. D. Hellmann, Orgelwerke der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1967); Christ lag in Todesbanden; Nun freut euch lieben Christen: both ed. in EDM, 1st ser., ix (1937); Wir glauben all an einen Gott [3 versions]

Chaconne, B, hpd

BIBLIOGRAPHY

FrotscherG

H. Kühn: Vier Organisten Eisenachs aus bachischem Geschlecht’, Bach in Thüringen: Gabe der Thüringer Kirche (Berlin, 1950), 103–19

S. Orth: Zu den Erfurter Jahren Johann Bernhard Bachs (1676–1749)’, BJb 1971, 106–11

C. Oefner: Die Musikerfamilie Bach in Eisenach (Eisenach, 1984)

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(6) Johann Ludwig Bach

(b Thal, nr Eisenach, 4 Feb 1677; d Meiningen, bur. 1 May 1731). Composer, son of Johann Jacob Bach (3/60). Nothing is known of his musical training, but he probably received some early instruction from his father before attending the Gotha Gymnasium in 1688–93. From 1699 he was a court musician at Meiningen, from 1703 Kantor and from 1711 court Kapellmeister. In 1706 he had unsuccessfully applied to succeed A.C. Dedekind as Kantor of St Georg, Eisenach, although he had been interested only in the musical and not the teaching duties of the post. His patron of many years, Duke Ernst Ludwig, died in 1724 and Johann Ludwig wrote the music for his funeral.

Johann Ludwig wrote an imposing number of vocal works. Although orchestral music was probably his principal activity from 1711 onwards, hardly any music at that type is extant. The preservation of the cantatas is due primarily to Johann Sebastian, who performed 18 of them, as well as the two masses, in Leipzig in 1726; some were given again between 1735 and 1750. Denn du wirst meine Seele was long considered an early work by Johann Sebastian (bwv15). The cantatas constitute the most important part of Johann Ludwig’s work; in contrast with the main corpus of Johann Sebastian’s cantatas, they represent the older type of mixed cantata, consisting essentially of biblical text and chorale in the following scheme: text from the Old Testament; recitative; aria; text from the New Testament; aria; recitative; chorus; chorale. The standard scoring is for four-part choir, strings and (usually) two oboes; in one cantata two horns are required, but there are no solo woodwind. These works had at least some small influence on Johann Sebastian, for example in his use of a string ensemble to accompany the words of Jesus.

WORKS

manuscripts in D-Bsb unless otherwise stated

Messe sopra cantilena Allein Gott in der Höh, e, 1716, bwv Anh.III.166 [opening of Gl by J.S. Bach]; ed. K. Hofmann (Stuttgart, 1976)

Mass, G, bwv Anh.III.167

Magnificat, 8vv

23 church cants.: Darum säet euch Gerechtigkeit; Darum will ich auch erwählen; Denn du wirst meine Seele nicht in der Hölle lassen, bwv15, ed. in Johann Sebastian Bachs Werke, ii (Leipzig, 1851/R); Der Gottlosen Arbeit wird fehlen; Der Herr wird ein neues im Land erschaffen; Die mit Tränen säen, ed. H. Hornung and M.G. Schneider (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1980); Die Weisheit kommt nicht in eine boshafte Seele; Du sollst lieben Gott, D-Gs; Durch sein Erkenntnis; Er machet uns lebendig; Es ist aus der Angst und Gericht; Es wird des Herrn Tag kommen, F-Pn; Gott ist unser Zuversicht, ed. A.M. Owen (St Louis, n.d.); Ich aber ging für dir über; Ich will meinen Geist in euch geben; Ja, mir hast du Arbeit gemacht, ed. H. Max (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1984); Kommt, es ist alles bereit, lost, formerly in Berlin, Singakademie; Küsset den Sohn, dass er nicht zürne (frag.); Mache dich auf, werde Licht, ed. H. Max (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1984); Siehe ich will meinen Engel senden; Siehe, ich will viele Fischer ausssenden (frag.); Und ich will ihnen einen einigen Hirten erwecken; Wie lieblich sind auf den Bergen

11 motets: Das Blut Jesu Christi; Das ist meine Freude, ed. G. Graulich (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1980); Die richtig für sich gewandelt haben; Gedenke meiner, mein Gott; Gott sei mir gnädig; Ich habe dich ein klein Augenblick; Ich will auf den Herrn schauen; Sei nun wieder zufrieden, ed. in Cw, xcix (1964); Unser Trübsal, ed. in Cw, xcix (1964); Uns ist ein Kind geboren, ed. R. Moser (Leipzig, 1930), ed. K. Hofmann (Stuttgart, 1984); Wir wissen so unser irdisches Haus

Klingt vergnügt, secular cant.

Funeral music, 1724, 3 pts; pt 2 ed. K. Geiringer, Music of the Bach Family (Cambridge, MA, 1955)

Passion; cant. cycle for 1713, cited in S. Kümmerle: Enzyclopädie der evangelischen Kirchenmusik, i (Gütersloh, 1888/R), 67

 

Suite, G. orch, 1715; ed. K. Hofmann (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, c1984)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. Dörffel: Verzeichnis der Kirchenkompositionen des Johann Ludwig Bach in Meiningen’, Johann Sebastian Bachs Werke, xli (1894), 275–6

A.M. Jaffé: The Cantatas of Johann Ludwig Bach (diss., Boston U., 1957)

W.H. Scheide: Johann Sebastian Bachs Sammlung von Kantaten seines Vetters Johann Ludwig Bach’, BJb 1959, 52–94; BJb 1961, 5–24; BJb 1962, 5–32

W. Blankenburg: Eine neue Textquelle zu sieben Kantaten J.M. Bachs und achtzehn Kantaten Johann Ludwig Bachs’, BJb 1977, 7–25

K. Hofmann: Forkel und die “Köthener Trauermusik” Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1983, 115–18

K.Küster: Meininger Kantatentexte um Johann Ludwig Bach’, BJb 1987, 159–64

K. Küster: Die Frankfurter und Leipziger Überlieferung der Kantaten Johann Ludwig Bachs’, BJb 1989, 65–106

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff, eds.: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(7) Johann Sebastian Bach

(24) (b Eisenach, 21 March 1685, d Leipzig; 28 July 1750). Composer and organist. The most important member of the family, his genius combined outstanding performing musicianship with supreme creative powers in which forceful and original inventiveness, technical mastery and intellectual control are perfectly balanced. While it was in the former capacity, as a keyboard virtuoso, that in his lifetime he acquired an almost legendary fame, it is the latter virtues and accomplishments, as a composer, that by the end of the 18th century earned him a unique historical position. His musical language was distinctive and extraordinarily varied, drawing together and surmounting the techniques, the styles and the general achievements of his own and earlier generations and leading on to new perspectives which later ages have received and understood in a great variety of ways.

The first authentic posthumous account of his life, with a summary catalogue of his works, was put together by his son Carl Philipp Emanuel and his pupil J.F. Agricola soon after his death and certainly before March 1751 (published as Nekrolog, 1754). J.N. Forkel planned a detailed Bach biography in the early 1770s and carefully collected first-hand information on Bach, chiefly from his two eldest sons; the book appeared in 1802, by when the Bach Revival had begun and various projected collected editions of Bach’s works were under way; it continues to serve, together with the 1754 obituary and the other 18th-century documents, as the foundation of Bach biography.

1. Childhood.

2. Lüneburg.

3. Arnstadt.

4. Mühlhausen.

5. Weimar.

6. Cöthen.

7. Leipzig, 1723–9.

8. Leipzig, 1729–39.

9. Leipzig, 1739–50.

10. Iconography.

11. Sources, repertory.

12. Background, style, influences.

13. Cantatas.

14. Oratorios, Passions, Latin works.

15. Motets, chorales, songs.

16. Organ music.

17. Music for harpsichord, lute etc.

18. Orchestral music.

19. Chamber music.

20. Canons, ‘Musical Offering’, ‘Art of Fugue’.

21. Methods of composition.

WORKS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

1. Childhood.

The parents of Johann Sebastian were Johann Ambrosius Bach (11) and Maria Elisabeth Lämmerhirt (1644–94), daughter of a furrier and town councillor in Erfurt, Valentin Lämmerhirt (d 1665). Another Lämmerhirt daughter became the mother of Bach’s cousin J.G. Walther, suggesting that Lämmerhirt blood was perhaps not unimportant for the musical talents of the Bach family’s greatest son. Elisabeth’s elder half-sister Hedwig Lämmerhirt was the second wife of Ambrosius Bach’s uncle, Johann Bach (4), organist of the Predigerkirche in Erfurt. Elisabeth and Ambrosius, who had worked in Eisenach since 1671 as Hausmann and also as a musician at the ducal court of Saxe-Eisenach, were married on 8 April 1668, and had eight children, five of whom survived infancy; as well as Johann Sebastian, the last, these were three sons (nos.22, 71 and 23) and a daughter, Maria Salome. The date of Johann Sebastian’s birth, 21 March 1685, was carefully recorded by Walther in his Lexicon, by Sebastian himself in the family genealogy, and by his son as the co-author of the obituary. It is supported by the date of baptism (23 March; these dates are old-style) in the register of St Georg. His godfathers were Johann Georg Koch, a forestry official, and Sebastian Nagel, a Gotha Stadtpfeifer. The house of his birth no longer stands; it is not the handsome old structure (Frauenplan 21) acquired by the Neue Bachgesellschaft in 1907 as the ‘Bachhaus’ and established as a Bach Museum. He would have been born in the house in the Fleischgasse (now the Lutherstrasse) that Ambrosius Bach bought in 1674 after gaining Eisenach citizenship.

After the time of the Reformation all children in Eisenach were obliged to go to school between the ages of five and 12, and (although there is no documentary evidence of it) Sebastian must have entered one of the town’s German schools in 1690. From 1692 he attended the Lateinschule (as had Luther, also an Eisenach boy); this offered a sound humanistic and theological education. At Easter 1693 he was 47th in the fifth class, having been absent 96 half-days; in 1694 he lost 59 half-days, but rose to 14th and was promoted; at Easter 1695 he was 23rd in the fourth class, in spite of having lost 103 half-days (perhaps owing to illness, but probably also to the deaths of his parents). He stood one or two places above his brother Jacob, who was three years older and less frequently absent. Nothing more is known about his Eisenach career; but he is said to have been an unusually good treble and probably sang under Kantor A.C. Dedekind at St Georg, where his father made instrumental music before and after the sermon and where his relation (2) Johann Christoph Bach (13) was organist. His musical education is matter for conjecture; presumably his father taught him the rudiments of string playing, but (according to Emanuel) he had no formal tuition on keyboard instruments until he went to Ohrdruf. He later described Johann Christoph as ‘a profound composer’; no doubt he was impressed by the latter’s organ playing as well as by his compositions.

Elisabeth Bach was buried on 3 May 1694, and on 27 November Ambrosius married Barbara Margaretha, née Keul, the daughter of a former mayor of Arnstadt. Aged 35, she had already been twice widowed. Her first husband had been a musician, Johann Günther Bach (15), and her second a theologian, Jacobus Bartholomaei (both marriages had taken place in Arnstadt), and she brought to her third marriage two little daughters, Catharina Margareta and Christina Maria, one by each of her earlier husbands. A month before Ambrosius's own second marriage, on 23 October 1694, he and his family had celebrated the wedding of the eldest son, Johann Christoph (22) in Ohrdruf. The music on that occasion was by Ambrosius Bach, Johann Pachelbel from nearby Gotha and other friends and family members. This was probably the only occasion on which the then nine-year-old Sebastian met Pachelbel, his brother’s teacher. Barely three months after re-marrying, on 20 February 1695, Ambrosius Bach died after a long and serious illness. On 4 March the widow appealed to the town council for help; but she received only her legal due, and the household broke up. Sebastian and Jacob were taken in by their elder brother Johann Christoph, organist at Ohrdruf.

Both were sent to the Lyceum. Jacob left at the age of 14 to be apprenticed to his father’s successor at Eisenach; Sebastian stayed on until 1700, when he was nearly 15, and thus came under the influence of an exceptionally enlightened curriculum. Inspired by the educationist Comenius, it embraced religion, reading, writing, arithmetic, singing, history and natural science. Sebastian entered the fourth class probably about March 1695, and was promoted to the third in July: on 20 July 1696 he was first among the seven new boys and fourth in the class; on 19 July 1697 he was first, and was promoted to the second class; on 13 July 1698 he was fifth; on 24 July 1699 second, and promoted to the first class, in which he was fourth when he left the school on 15 March 1700 and went to Lüneburg.

In the obituary Emanuel stated that his father had his first keyboard lessons from Christoph, at Ohrdruf; in 1775, replying to Forkel, he said that Christoph might have trained him simply as an organist, and that Sebastian became ‘a pure and strong fuguist’ through his own efforts. That is likely enough; Christoph is not known to have been a composer. Several early biographers told the story of how Christoph would not allow his brother to use a certain manuscript; how Sebastian copied it by moonlight; how Christoph took the copy away from him; and how he did not recover it until Christoph died. Emanuel and Forkel assumed that Christoph died in 1700, and that Sebastian, left homeless, went to Lüneburg in desperation. Later authors, knowing that Christoph lived on until 1721, and that the brothers had been on good terms, have tended to reject the story – perhaps unnecessarily, for it may illustrate contemporary attitudes to discipline and restraint. In fact, the story fits in well with the little that is known of the Ohrdruf years, and with the idea that Sebastian taught himself composition by copying. Most probably he recovered his copy when he went to Lüneburg. As for its contents, Forkel implied that it contained works by seven famous composers, three of them northerners. He probably misunderstood Emanuel’s reply to another of his questions; according to the obituary, the manuscript was mainly southern (Froberger, Kerll, Pachelbel) – as one would expect, since Johann Christoph had been a Pachelbel pupil. (A good idea of its contents can be obtained from a manuscript collection compiled in 1692 by another of Pachelbel’s pupils, J.V. Eckelt.) The larger of the two organs at Ohrdruf was in almost unplayable condition in 1697, and Sebastian no doubt picked up some of his expert knowledge of organ building while helping his brother with repairs.

No documentary evidence exists to establish when Bach started to compose, but it is reasonable to suppose that it was while he lived in Ohrdruf – not least because other contemporaries, and his own sons in due course, began composing original music before reaching the age of 15. The earliest organ chorales in the Neumeister manuscript, as well as such works as bwv749, 750 and 756, provide plausible examples of pieces composed before and around 1700. They are characterized by sound craftsmanship, observance of models provided by Pachelbel (his teacher’s teacher) and everywhere the sense of an endeavour to break away from musical conventions and find independent answers.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

2. Lüneburg.

According to the school register, Sebastian left Ohrdruf ‘ob defectum hospitiorum’ (‘for lack of board and lodging’); clearly Christoph no longer had room for his brother. Since the latter’s arrival he had had two children; by March 1700 a third was expected; and (if local tradition can be trusted) his house, now destroyed, was a mere cottage. The brothers’ problem seems to have been solved by Elias Herda, Kantor and a master at the Lyceum. He had been educated at Lüneburg, and no doubt it was he who arranged for Sebastian to go north; probably he similarly helped Georg Erdmann, a fellow pupil of Sebastian’s, three years older, who left the school just before Bach (for the same reason). According to the obituary they travelled together. They must have reached Lüneburg before the end of March for both were entered in the register of the Mettenchor (Matins choir) by 3 April 1700 and probably sang in it within a matter of days for Holy Week and Easter.

The Michaeliskirche, Lüneburg, had two schools associated with it: a Ritteracademie for young noblemen, and the Michaelisschule for commoners. There were also two choirs: the ‘chorus symphoniacus’ of about 25 voices was led by the Mettenchor, which numbered about 15, and was limited to poor boys. Members of the Mettenchor received free schooling at the Michaelisschule, up to 1 thaler per month according to seniority, their keep, and a share in fees for weddings and other occasions (Bach’s share in 1700 has been put at 14 marks). From the arrangement of the pay-sheets it has been deduced that they were both trebles. Bach was welcomed for his unusually fine voice; but it soon broke, and for eight days he spoke and sang in octaves. After that he may or may not have sung, but no doubt he made himself useful as an accompanist or string player. As the last extant pay-sheet is that for 29 May 1700, no details are known; but it is clear that the school was short of instrumentalists at just this time.

At school, Bach’s studies embraced orthodox Lutheranism, logic, rhetoric, Latin and Greek, arithmetic, history, geography and German poetry. The Kantor was August Braun, whose compositions have disappeared; the organist, F.C. Morhard, was a nonentity. The organ was repaired in 1701 by J.B. Held, who had worked at Hamburg and Lübeck; he lodged in the school, and may have taught Bach something about organ building. There was a fine music library, which had been carefully kept up to date; but whether choirboys were allowed to consult it is uncertain. If Braun made good use of it, Bach must have learnt a good deal from the music he had to perform; but his chief interests probably lay outside the school. At the Nikolaikirche was J.J. Löwe (1629–1703), distinguished but elderly. The Johanniskirche was another matter, for there the organist was Georg Böhm (1661–1733), who is generally agreed to have influenced Bach. It has been argued that the organist of the Johanniskirche would not have been accessible to a scholar of the Michaelisschule, since the two choirs were not on good terms, and that Bach’s knowledge of Böhm’s music must have come later, through J.G. Walther. But Emanuel Bach stated in writing that his father had studied Böhm’s music; and a correction in a note to Forkel shows that his first thought was to say that Böhm had been his father’s teacher. This hint is supported by the fact that in 1727 Bach named Böhm as his northern agent for the sale of Partitas nos.2 and 3. That seems to imply that the two were on friendly terms; it is likelier that they became so between 1700 and 1702 than at any later date.

Bach went more than once to Hamburg, some 50 km away; probably he visited his cousin Johann Ernst (25), who was evidently studying there about this time. The suggestion that he went to hear Vincent Lübeck cannot be taken seriously, for Lübeck did not go to Hamburg until August 1702, by which time Bach had almost certainly left the area. He may have visited the Hamburg Opera, then directed by Reinhard Keiser, whose St Mark Passion he performed during the early Weimar years and again in 1726; but there is no solid evidence that he was interested in anything but the organ and in particular the organist of St Katharinen, J.A. Reincken, whose influence on the young Bach as both theorist and practitioner it would be difficult to overestimate. Marpurg’s familiar anecdote makes the point neatly: how Bach, returning almost penniless to Lüneburg, once rested outside an inn; how someone threw two herring heads out on the rubbish heap; how Bach – a Thuringian, to whom fish were a delicacy – picked them up to see if any portion were edible; how he found that they contained two Danish ducats, and was thus able not only to have a meal, but also ‘to undertake another and a more comfortable pilgrimage to Herr Reincken’.

J.A. Reincken (?1623–1722), a pupil of Sweelinck and organist of St Katharinen since 1663, was a father figure of the north German school. Böhm may have advised Bach to hear him; and his showy playing, exploiting all the resources of the organ, must have been a revelation to one brought up in the reticent tradition of the south. As for the organ itself, Bach never forgot it; in later years he described it as excellent in every way, said that the 32' Principal was the best he had ever heard, and never tired of praising the 16' reeds. Whether he actually met Reincken before 1720 is uncertain. If he did, Reincken might have given him a copy of his sonatas; Bach’s reworkings of them (the keyboard pieces bwv954, 965 and 966) are more likely to have been made soon after 1700 than 20 years later, when Bach no longer needed to teach himself composition.

The market-place in Lüneburg had been graced since the end of the 17th century by a palace used for the visits of the Duke of Celle-Lüneburg and his court; the principal ducal residence and seat of government lay in Celle, some 80 km to the south. The duke, married to Eléonore d’Olbreuse, a Huguenot of noble birth, was a pronounced francophile and maintained an orchestra consisting largely of Frenchmen, which played in both Celle and Lüneburg. Thomas de la Selle, dancing-master at the Ritteracademie next door to Bach’s school in Lüneburg, was also a member of the Celle orchestra. Emanuel Bach knew that his father was often able to hear this ‘famous orchestra’ and thus to become acquainted with French taste. It cannot be ruled out that Bach occasionally helped out as an instrumentalist when the court orchestra played in the ducal residence in Lüneburg.

The date of Bach’s departure from Lüneburg is not known, but we may suppose that he completed his final school year after two years and left school at Easter 1702. It seems unlikely that he remained in Lüneburg for any length of time after that, for he left without hearing Buxtehude and took extraordinary pains to do so in winter 1705–6. He probably visited relatives in Thuringia after Easter 1702. All that is definitely known is that he competed successfully for the vacant post of organist at St Jacobi in Sangerhausen (the organist was buried on 9 July), but the Duke of Weissenfels intervened and had J.A. Kobelius, a somewhat older man, appointed in November. Bach is next heard of at Weimar, where he was employed at the court as a musician for the first two quarters of 1703; the court accounts have him down as a lackey, but he described himself as a ‘Hofmusikant’ (court musician) in the Ursprung. This was at the minor Weimar court, that of Duke Johann Ernst, younger brother of the Duke Wilhelm Ernst whom Bach served from 1708 to 1717. Possibly the Duke of Weissenfels, having refused to accept Bach at Sangerhausen, found work for him at Weimar; another possibility is that Bach owed his appointment to a distant relation of his, David Hoffmann, another lackey-musician.

Of the musicians with whom Bach now became associated, three are worth mentioning. G.C. Strattner (c1644–1704), a tenor, became vice-Kapellmeister in 1695, and composed in a post-Schütz style. J.P. von Westhoff (1656–1705) was a fine violinist and had travelled widely, apparently as a diplomat, and is said to have been the first to compose a suite for unaccompanied violin (1683). Johann Effler (c1640–1711) was the court organist: he had held posts at Gehren and Erfurt (where Pachelbel was his successor) before coming in 1678 to Weimar, where about 1690 he moved to the court. He may have been willing to hand over some of his duties to Bach, and probably did something of the kind, for a document of 13 July 1703 at Arnstadt, where Bach next moved, describes Bach as court organist at Weimar – a post that was not officially his until 1708.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

3. Arnstadt.

The Bonifaciuskirche at Arnstadt had burnt down in 1581, and was subsequently rebuilt in 1676–83; it then became known as the Neue Kirche, and so remained until 1935, when it was renamed after Bach. In 1699 J.F. Wender contracted to build an organ, which by the end of 1701 had become usable; on 1 January 1702 Andreas Börner was formally appointed organist. The organ was complete by June 1703, and was examined before 3 July; there were more examiners than one, but only Bach was named and paid, and it was he who ‘played the organ for the first time’. The result was that on 9 August Bach was offered the post over Börner’s head; at the same time, ‘to prevent any such “collisions” as are to be feared’, Börner was given other work. Bach accepted the post ‘by handshake’ on 14 August 1703. The exact date of his removal to Arnstadt is not known, nor is his address. As his last board and lodging allowance was paid to Feldhaus, he probably spent at least that year in either the Golden Crown or the Steinhaus, both of which belonged to Feldhaus. Considering his age, and local standards, he was well paid; and his duties, as specified in his contract, were light. Normally, he was required at the church only for two hours on Sunday morning, for a service on Monday, and for two hours on Thursday morning; and he had only to accompany hymns. He thus had plenty of time for composition and organ playing, and he took as his models Bruhns, Reincken, Buxtehude (all northerners) and certain good French organists. There is no evidence as to whether he took part in the theatrical and musical entertainments of the court or the town.

Bach was in no position to put on elaborate music at Arnstadt. The Neue Kirche, like the other churches, drew performers from two groups of schoolboys and senior students. Only one of these groups was capable of singing cantatas; it was supposed to go to the Neue Kirche monthly in the summer, but there does not appear to have been a duty roster. The performers naturally tended to go to the churches that had an established tradition and friendly organists; and Bach had no authority to prevent this, for he was not a schoolmaster and was younger than many of the students. Further, he never had much patience with the semi-competent, and was apt to alienate them by making offensive remarks. One result was his scuffle with J.H. Geyersbach (b 1682). On 4 August 1705 he and his cousin Barbara, elder sister (aged 26) to his future wife, fell in with six students who had been to a christening feast; one of these was Geyersbach, who asked why Bach had insulted him (or his bassoon), and struck him in the face with a stick. Bach drew his sword, but another student separated them. Bach complained to the consistory that it would be unsafe for him to go about the streets if Geyersbach were not punished, and an inquiry was held. The consistory told Bach that he ought not to have insulted Geyersbach and should try to live peaceably with the students; further, he was not (as he claimed) responsible only for the chorales but was expected to help with all kinds of music. Bach replied that if a musical director were appointed, he would be willing enough.

Bach, unimpressed, asked for four weeks’ leave, and set off for Lübeck – ‘what is more, on foot’, says the obituary, adding that he had an overwhelming desire to hear Buxtehude. Dates and distance cast some doubts on his straightforwardness. He left Arnstadt about 18 October, and was therefore due to be back, or well on his way back, by about 15 November; he would thus have been unable to hear even the first of Buxtehude’s special services, which were given on various dates from 15 November to 20 December. Perhaps, like Mattheson and Handel before him, he went primarily to see if there was any chance of succeeding Buxtehude, and was put off by the prospect of marrying Buxtehude’s daughter, aged 30; in any case, by 1705 there was a rival in the field. However that may be, he stayed almost three months at Lübeck, and was absent altogether for about 16 weeks, not returning to Arnstadt until shortly before 7 February 1706, when he communicated.

On 21 February the consistory asked Bach why he had been away for so long; his replies were unsatisfactory and barely civil. They next complained that his accompaniments to chorales were too elaborate for congregational singing, and that he still refused to collaborate with the students in producing cantatas; further, they could not provide a Kapellmeister for him, and if he continued to refuse they would have to find someone more amenable. Bach repeated his demand for a musical director, and was ordered to apologize within eight days. From the next case that the consistory heard that day it seems that there had been actual ‘disordres’ in the church between Bach and the students. There is no evidence that Bach apologized, and the consistory dropped the matter for eight months. They brought it up again on 11 November, and Bach undertook to answer them in writing. They also accused him of inviting a ‘stranger maiden’ to make music in the church, but for this he had obtained the parson’s permission. The girl in question cannot have been his cousin and future wife, for she had long been resident in Arnstadt and therefore would be unlikely to be described as a stranger.

Neither Bach nor the consistory took further action; no doubt they saw that the problem would soon solve itself. Probably Bach had come back from Lübeck with exalted ideas about church music, requiring facilities that Arnstadt could not provide. His ability was becoming known; on 28 November he helped to examine an organ at Langewiesen. Forkel said that various posts were offered to him; and with the death of J.G. Ahle, on 2 December, a sufficiently attractive vacancy seemed to have arisen.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

4. Mühlhausen.

Ahle had been a city councillor of Mühlhausen, organist of St Blasius and a composer of minor rank. Musical standards had fallen during his tenure of office, but the post was a respectable one and various candidates gave trial performances. One was to have been J.G. Walther, the future lexicographer; he sent in two compositions for 27 February 1707 (Sexagesima), but withdrew after being told privately that he had no hope. Bach played at Easter (24 April) and may have performed Cantata no.4. At the city council meeting on 24 May no other name was considered, and on 14 June Bach was interviewed. He asked for the same salary that he was receiving at Arnstadt (some 20 gulden more than Ahle’s); the councillors agreed, and an agreement was signed on 15 June. At Arnstadt his success became known; his cousin Johann Ernst (25) and his predecessor Börner applied for the Neue Kirche on 22 and 23 June. He resigned formally on 29 June, and presumably moved to Mühlhausen within a few days. It was perhaps in July that he wrote Cantata no.131; this was clearly intended for a penitential service, perhaps connected with a disastrous fire of 30 May. It was not Bach’s own Pastor Frohne who commissioned this cantata, but Pastor Eilmar of the Marienkirche – a fact whose possible significance will be seen later. Bach’s responsibilities in Mühlhausen included also the convent of Augustinian nuns where there was an organ by Wender without pedals; his principal duty there was to play for special services.

On 10 August 1707 Tobias Lämmerhirt, Bach’s maternal uncle, died at Erfurt. He left Bach 50 gulden, more than half his salary, and thus facilitated his marriage to Maria Barbara (b 20 Oct 1684), daughter of (3) Johann Michael Bach (14) and Catharina Wedemann. The wedding took place on 17 October at Dornheim, a village near Arnstadt; the pastor, J.L. Stauber (1660–1723), was a friend of the family and himself married Regina Wedemann on 5 June 1708. Pupils began to come to Bach at about this time, or perhaps even earlier. J.M. Schubart (1690–1721) is said to have been with him from 1707 to 1717, and J.C. Vogler (1696–1763) to have arrived at the age of ten (at Arnstadt), to have left for a time, and to have returned from about 1710 until 1715. These two were his immediate successors at Weimar; from their time onwards he was never without pupils.

On 4 February 1708 the annual change of council took place, and Cantata no.71 was performed. It must have made an impression, for the council printed not only the libretto, as was usual, but also the music. Bach next drew up a plan for repairing and enlarging the St Blasius organ; the council considered this on 21 February, and decided to act on it. Cantata no.196 may have been written for Stauber’s wedding on 5 June. At about this time Bach played before the reigning Duke of Weimar, Wilhelm Ernst, who offered him a post at his court. On 25 June Bach wrote to the council asking them to accept his resignation.

No doubt the larger salary at Weimar was an attraction, particularly as Bach’s wife was pregnant. But it is clear, even from his tactful letter to these councillors who had treated him well, that there were other reasons for leaving. He said that he had encouraged ‘well-regulated church music’ not only in his own church, but also in the surrounding villages, where the harmony was often ‘better than that cultivated here’ (Spitta found a fragment, bwv223, at nearby Langula). He had also gone to some expense to collect ‘the choicest sacred music’. But in all this members of his own congregation had opposed him, and were not likely to stop. Some people no doubt disliked the type of music that he was trying to introduce. Further, Pastor Frohne may have distrusted his organist; an active Pietist, he was at daggers drawn with the orthodox Pastor Eilmar of the Marienkirche – Bach had begun his Mühlhausen career by working with Eilmar, and they had become intimate enough for Eilmar and his daughter to be godparents to Bach’s first two children.

The council considered his letter on 26 June and reluctantly let him go, asking him only to supervise the organ building at St Blasius. However badly Bach may have got on with his congregation, he was evidently on good terms with the council. They paid him to come and perform a cantata at the council service in 1709, and possibly also in 1710 (all trace of these works is lost). In 1735 he negotiated on friendly terms with the new council on behalf of his son Johann Gottfried Bernhard (47). He is not known to have been paid for supervising or opening the St Blasius organ, but he may have done so.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

5. Weimar.

When he announced his resignation from Mühlhausen, Bach said that he had been appointed to the Duke of Weimar’s ‘Capelle und Kammermusik’, and it was long thought that he did not become organist at once. In fact, Weimar documents show that on 14 July 1708, when his ‘reception money’ was paid over, he was called ‘the newly appointed court organist’, and that he was almost always so called until March 1714, when he became Konzertmeister as well. Effler, it seems, was pensioned off on full salary (130 florins); on 24 December 1709 he received a small gift as ‘an old sick servant’, and he died at Jena on 4 April 1711.

It is said that Bach wrote most of his organ works at Weimar, and that the duke took pleasure in his playing. His salary was from the outset larger than Effler’s (150 florins, plus some allowances); it was increased to 200 from Michaelmas 1711, 215 from June 1713, and 250 on his promotion in 1714. On 20 March 1715 it was ordered that his share of casual fees was to be the same as the Kapellmeister’s. Moreover, he seems to have had a fair amount of spare time, in which, for instance, to cultivate the acquaintance of Telemann while the latter was at Eisenach (1708–12). Together with the violinist Pisendel he copied a concerto in G of Telemann’s (D-Dl), probably during Pisendel’s visit to Weimar in 1709.

Six of Bach’s children were born at Weimar: Catharina (bap. 29 Dec 1708; d 14 Jan 1774); (8) Wilhelm Friedemann (45) (b 22 Nov 1710); twins (b 23 Feb 1713; both died in a few days); (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel (46) (b 8 March 1714); and Johann Gottfried Bernhard (47) (b 11 May 1715). The various godparents show that Bach and his wife kept in touch with relations and friends from Ohrdruf, Arnstadt and Mühlhausen, besides making fresh contacts at Weimar; it is noteworthy that Telemann was godfather to Emanuel.

On 13 March 1709 Bach, his wife, and one of her sisters (probably the eldest, Friedelena, who died at Leipzig in 1729) were living with Adam Immanuel Weldig, a falsettist and Master of the Pages. They probably stayed there until August 1713, when Weldig gave up his house, having secured a similar post at Weissenfels. Weldig was godfather to Emanuel; Bach (by proxy) to a son of Weldig’s in 1714. Weldig’s house was destroyed in 1944; where Bach lived before and after the given dates is not known.

Since 29 July 1707, J.G. Walther (the lexicographer) had been organist of the Stadtkirche; he was related to Bach through his mother, a Lämmerhirt, and the two became friendly. On 27 September 1712 Bach stood godfather to Walther’s son. Forkel told a story of how Walther played a trick on Bach, to cure him of boasting that there was nothing he could not read at sight. Their relations did not deteriorate, as Spitta supposed; in 1735 Bach negotiated on Walther’s behalf with the Leipzig publisher J.G. Krügner, and Walther’s references to Bach in his letters to Bokemeyer carry no suggestion of any coolness. From one such letter it seems that during his nine years at Weimar Bach gave Walther some 200 pieces of music, some by Buxtehude, others compositions of his own.

Of Bach’s pupils, Schubart and Vogler have already been mentioned. The pupil for whom Bach was paid by Ernst August’s account in 1711–12 was not Duke Ernst August himself but a page called Jagemann. J.G. Ziegler (1688–1747) matriculated at the University of Halle on 12 October 1712, but before that he had studied with Bach for a year or so, and had been taught to play chorales ‘not just superficially, but according to the sense of the words’; Bach’s wife stood godmother to his daughter in 1718, and in 1727 Bach employed him as agent, in Halle, for Partitas nos.2 and 3. P.D. Krauter of Augsburg (1690–1741) set out for Weimar in March 1712, and stayed until about September 1713. Johann Lorenz Bach (38) probably arrived in autumn 1713; he may have left Weimar by July 1717. Johann Tobias Krebs (1690–1762) studied with Walther from 1710, with Bach from about 1714 until 1717. Johann Bernhard Bach (41) worked with his uncle from about 1715 until March 1719, alongside Samuel Gmelin (1695–1752), who appears to have left in 1717. C.H. Dretzel of Nuremberg (1697–1775) may have been briefly with Bach. In 1731, when applying for a post, T.C. Gerlach (1694–1768) implied that Bach had been teaching him by correspondence for 14 years, but his confused phraseology should not be taken literally.

The specification of the organ in the castle chapel, published in 1737, has not always been reprinted correctly; in any case, it does not represent the organ that Bach left in 1717. Extensive alterations were made in 1719–30. Still less does the specification represent the organ that Bach was faced with in 1708, for he himself made even more extensive alterations in 1713–14. The organ is said to have been built by Compenius in 1657–8. It was overhauled in 1707–8, and a Sub-Bass added, by J.C. Weishaupt, who carried out further maintenance work in 1712. A contract for alterations had however been signed on 29 June 1712 with H.N. Trebs (1678–1748), who had moved from Mühlhausen to Weimar in 1709. Bach and he had worked together on a new organ at Taubach in 1709–10, opened by Bach on 26 October 1710; in 1711 he gave Trebs a handsome testimonial, and in 1713 he and Walther became godfathers to Trebs’s son. Bach and Trebs collaborated again about 1742, over an organ at Bad Berka. Trebs’s new organ was usable during 1714; he had done 14 days’ tuning by 19 May, and was paid off on 15 September. Of this rebuild nothing is known, except that either Bach or the duke was determined that the instrument include a Glockenspiel; great trouble was taken over obtaining bells from dealers in Nuremberg and Leipzig, and it seems that the original set of 29 (a number hard to account for) had to be replaced because of difficulties over blend and pitch. In 1737 the organ had a Glockenspiel on the Oberwerk, but alterations had been made in 1719–20 and it does not follow that the Glockenspiel of 1714 was on a manual.

In December 1709 and February 1710 Bach was paid for repairing harpsichords in the household of the junior duke, Ernst August and Prince Johann Ernst. On 17 January 1711 he was godfather to a daughter of J.C. Becker, a local burgher. In February 1711 Prince Johann Ernst went to the University of Utrecht. From 21 February 1713 Bach was lodged in the castle at Weissenfels. Duke Christian’s birthday fell on 23 February, and it is now known that Cantata no.208 was performed in this year, not in 1716. The earlier date is stylistically suitable; moreover, it is compatible both with the watermark of the autograph score and with the fact that in this score Bach contradicted sharps by flats rather than by naturals – an old-fashioned habit that he gave up progressively during 1714.

About May 1713 the young prince returned from Utrecht, apparently with a good deal of music, for in the year from 1 June there were bills for binding, copying and shelving (some of the music came from Halle). In February 1713 he had been in Amsterdam, and may have met the blind organist J.J. de Graff who was in the habit of playing recent Italian concertos as keyboard solos. This may have given rise to the numerous concerto arrangements made by Walther and Bach.

On 7 September 1713 Bach was probably at Ohrdruf, standing godfather to a nephew; and on 6 November he took part in the dedication of the new Jakobskirche at Weimar (there is no evidence that he composed any of the music). On 27 November he was at Weimar, as godfather to Trebs’s son. At about this time he seems to have gone to Halle, perhaps to buy music, and to have become accidentally involved with the authorities of the Liebfrauenkirche. The organist there (Zachow, Handel’s teacher) had died in 1712, and the organ was being enlarged to a three-manual of 65 stops. The story has to be pieced together from hints in an incomplete correspondence; but it looks as if the pastor, J.M. Heineccius, pressed Bach to apply for the vacant post. Bach may have been involved in planning the enlargement of the organ, when Zachow became incapacitated; at all events, he stayed in Halle from 28 November to 15 December at the church authorities’ expense. He also composed and performed a cantata (lost), attended a meeting on 13 December 1713, was offered the post, and let the committee suppose that he had accepted it, although he had not had time to find out what his casual fees would amount to. On 14 December they sent him a formal contract. Bach replied on 14 January 1714, saying cautiously that he had not been released from Weimar, was uneasy about his salary and duties, and would write again within the week. Whether he did so is not known; but on February the committee resolved to tell him that his salary was not likely to be increased. Thus at Halle he could expect a slightly smaller salary than he was already getting; the attraction was the organ, more than twice as large. Bach must then have approached the duke, for on 2 March, ‘at his most humble request’, he became Konzertmeister (ranking after the vice-Kapellmeister), with a basic salary of 250 florins from 25 February. In finally refusing the Halle post, he probably mentioned that figure, for the committee accused him of having used their offer as a lever to extract more money from the duke. This he denied on 19 March, in a letter so reasonable and so obviously honest that he remained on good terms with Halle and was employed there as an organ examiner in 1716. Gottfried Kirchhoff had meanwhile been appointed organist on 30 July 1714.

Few cantatas (apart from the secular no.208) can be ascribed to these early Weimar years. Nos.18, 54 and 199 appear to date from 1713 and clearly have no specific connection with the cantatas composed with an eye to the church calendar from March 1714 onwards. The work performed at Halle in December 1713 was formerly thought to be no.21 (see F. Chrysander: G.F. Händel (Leipzig, 1858–67/R)). The idea that it was no.63 no longer stands up, although the forces required for that work make it extremely unlikely that it was written for the Weimar court; a performance in Halle at Christmas 1715 is conceivable.

On 23 March 1714 it was ordered that cantatas should in future be rehearsed in the chapel, not at home or in lodgings; and on Palm Sunday, 25 March, Bach performed no.182. This was the fourth Sunday after his appointment as Konzertmeister, when he had become responsible for writing a cantata every four weeks. As he evidently hoped to complete an annual cycle in four years, he did not keep strictly to this rule; having written a cantata for Advent Sunday in 1714, he wrote for the last Sunday after Trinity in 1715, and for the second Sunday in Advent in 1716 (in 1717 he was in prison). Apart from such intentional irregularities, there are gaps in the series, and the strange thing is that these gaps became suddenly more numerous after the end of 1715. One of the gaps is accounted for by the death at Frankfurt on 1 August 1715 of the musically gifted Prince Johann Ernst, plunging the duchy into mourning from 11 August to 9 November 1715, when not a note of music might be played. From 1717 there are no cantatas at all. A tentative explanation will be suggested for this; but it is hard to see why Bach’s usual allowance of paper was paid for on 16 May 1716 when he is not known to have performed any church cantatas between 19 January and 6 December.

On 4 April 1716 Bach, like the librettist Salomo Franck and ‘the book-printer’, was paid for ‘Carmina’, bound in green taffeta, that had been ‘presented’ on some unspecified occasion – perhaps on 24 January when Duke Ernst August had married Eleonore, sister of the Prince of Cöthen. Ernst’s birthday was celebrated in April; two horn players from Weissenfels came to Weimar, possibly brought over for a repeat performance of Cantata no.208. Meanwhile, the new organ at Halle had been making progress, and on 17 April the council resolved that Bach, Kuhnau of Leipzig and Rolle of Quedlinburg should be invited to examine it on 29 April. They all accepted; each was to receive 16 thaler, plus food and travelling expenses. The examination began at 7 a.m., and lasted three days – until some time on 1 May, when the experts wrote their report, a sermon was preached and fine music was performed. On 2 May the organist and the three examiners met the builder to discuss details. The council, who behaved liberally, gave a tremendous banquet, whose date is usually given as 3 May (1 May seems more likely).

On 31 July 1716 Bach and an Arnstadt organ builder signed a testimonial for J.G. Schröter, who had built an organ at Erfurt. In 1717 Bach was mentioned in print for the first time: in the preface to Mattheson’s Das beschützte Orchestre, dated 21 February, Mattheson referred to Bach as ‘the famous Weimar organist’ saying that his works, both for the church and for keyboard, led one to rate him highly, and asked for biographical information.

It is against this background that Bach’s departure from Weimar has to be considered. In 1703 he had been employed by Duke Johann Ernst; since his return in 1708, by Duke Wilhelm, Johann’s elder brother. The brothers had been on bad terms, and when Johann Ernst died in 1707 and his son Ernst came of age in 1709, things became no better. For some time the ducal disagreements do not seem to have affected Bach; perhaps they were kept within bounds by Superintendent Lairitz, and Ernst’s younger half-brother (Johann, the composer) may have had some influence. But the latter died in 1715, Lairitz on 4 April 1716, and the new superintendent certainly failed to cope with the ‘court difficulties’; like the rest of Wilhelm’s household, he was forbidden to associate with Ernst. The musicians, though paid by both households, were threatened with fines of 10 thaler if they served Ernst in any way.

No extant Bach cantata can be securely dated between 19 January and 6 December 1716; it may seem unlikely that this long, continuous gap was due to casual losses. It is tempting to suppose that Bach found his position embarrassing (owing to his early connection with the junior court) and expressed disapproval of Duke Wilhelm’s behaviour by evading his own responsibilities. In fact, Bach does not seem to have disapproved of the duke’s behaviour until he discovered that a new Kapellmeister was being sought elsewhere. Drese senior died on 1 December 1716; his son, the vice-Kapellmeister, was by all accounts a nonentity. Bach produced Cantatas nos.70a, 186a and 147a for 6, 13 and 20 December (three successive weeks, not months), but there were no more, as far as is known. By Christmas, Bach may have found out that the duke was angling for Telemann. Negotiations with Telemann came to nothing; but apparently Bach now set about looking for a post as Kapellmeister. He was offered one by Prince Leopold of Cöthen, brother-in-law to Duke Ernst (Bach and the prince had probably met at Ernst’s wedding in January 1716) and the appointment was confirmed on 5 August 1717. No doubt Bach then asked Duke Wilhelm’s permission to leave, and no doubt he was refused – the duke being annoyed because his nephew had obviously had a hand in finding Bach a job that carried more prestige and, at 400 thaler, was better paid.

The duke and Bach must nevertheless have remained on speaking terms for the time being, for at some date hardly earlier than the end of September Bach was in Dresden and free to challenge the French keyboard virtuoso Louis Marchand. Versions of this affair differ, but according to Birnbaum (who wrote in 1739, probably under Bach’s supervision), Bach ‘found himself’ at Dresden, and was not sent for by ‘special coach’. Once there, some court official persuaded him to challenge Marchand to a contest at the harpsichord; the idea that they were to compete at the organ seems to have crept in later. Whatever may be the truth about these and other details, it is universally agreed that Marchand ran away.

On his birthday, 30 October 1717, Duke Wilhelm set up an endowment for his court musicians; and the second centenary of the Reformation was celebrated from 31 October to 2 November. Presumably Bach took part in these ceremonies, though there is no evidence that he set any of the librettos that Franck had provided. Emboldened, perhaps, by the Marchand affair, he then demanded his release in such terms that the duke had him imprisoned from 6 November until his dismissal in disgrace on 2 December. The Cöthen court had paid Bach 50 thaler on 7 August. Some have supposed that this was for travelling expenses, and that Bach had his wife and family moved to Cöthen soon after; but it seems unlikely that the duke would have allowed them to move until he had agreed to let Bach go. The younger Drese became Kapellmeister in his father’s place and Bach’s pupil J.M. Schubart became court organist. The post of Konzertmeister disappeared.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

6. Cöthen.

Except during the few last months of his Weimar period, Bach had been on good terms with Duke Wilhelm; but his relations with that martinet must always have been official. At Cöthen, until the end of 1721, things were different; Prince Leopold was a young man who, as Bach himself said, loved and understood music. He was born in 1694, of a Calvinist father and a Lutheran mother. The father died in 1704, the mother ruled until Leopold came of age on 10 December 1715. There was no court orchestra until October 1707, when Leopold persuaded his mother to take on three musicians. While studying in Berlin in 1708, he met A.R. Stricker; from the end of 1710 to 1713 he was on the usual grand tour, during which he studied with J.D. Heinichen at Rome. He returned capable of singing bass, and of playing the violin, viola da gamba and harpsichord. The Berlin court orchestra had broken up in 1713, and from July 1714 he employed Stricker as Kapellmeister and his wife as soprano and lutenist; by 1716 he had 18 musicians. In August 1717 Stricker and his wife seem to have resigned, leaving the prince free to appoint Bach.

At Cöthen the St Jakob organ was in poor condition. The court chapel was Calvinist; it had an organist, but no elaborate music was performed there, and the two-manual organ had only 13 or 14 stops, though it may have had a complete chromatic compass to pedal e' and manual e'''. The Lutheran St Agnus had a two-manual organ of 27 stops, again with an exceptional pedal compass. There is not the slightest reason to suppose that Bach wrote any particular work to exploit these pedal compasses, but no doubt he used one or both of the organs for teaching and private practice. He communicated at St Agnus, and took part in the baptisms at the court chapel, but had no official duties in either. He may, however, have been involved in the affair of May 1719, when a cantata was put on for the dedication festival of St Agnus, and 150 copies of (presumably) the libretto were printed. The printer’s bill for one thaler and eight groschen was endorsed by the pastor: ‘The churchwardens can give him 16 groschen; if he wants more, he must go to those who gave the order’.

Bach’s basic salary, 400 thaler, was twice Stricker’s, and extra allowances made it up to about 450. Only one court official was paid more, and there is other evidence that Bach was held in high esteem. On 17 November 1718 the last of his children by his first wife (a short-lived son) was named after the prince, who himself was a godfather. Bach’s residence in Cöthen is not definitely known, but it seems likely that he began as a tenant in Stiftstrasse 11; in 1721, when that house was bought by the prince’s mother for the use of the Lutheran pastor, he moved to Holzmarkt 10. The orchestra needed a room for their weekly rehearsals; the prince supplied it by paying rent to Bach (12 thaler a year from 10 December 1717 to 1722). Presumably there was a suitable room in Bach’s first house. Whether he continued to use that room after his move in 1721, and why he was not paid rent after 1722, is not clear.

The date of the first rent payment suggests that Bach and his household moved to Cöthen a day or two after he was released from prison (2 December); and that, after hasty rehearsals, he helped to celebrate the prince’s birthday on 10 December. That would normally have been his duty. The court accounts suggest that something connected with the birthday was either printed or bound in 1717, as also in 1719 and 1720 (Anh.7); Bach certainly wrote a cantata in 1722, and Cantatas nos.66a and Anh.5 in 1718. In 1721 there may have been no birthday celebrations, for the prince was married, at Bernburg, the next day. Cantata no.173a was undoubtedly a birthday work, but Bach probably wrote it after he had left Cöthen; 36a, an arrangement of 36c (1725), was performed at Cöthen on 30 November 1726, for the birthday of the prince’s second wife.

New Year cantatas also were expected. No.134a dates from 1719, Anh.6 from 1720, Anh.8 from 1723. There is no evidence for 1718, 1721 or 1722; printers’ and binders’ bills paid on 5 January 1722 may have been for music performed in December 1721. Bach may well have been unable to put on a wedding cantata, but there seems no reason why he should not have offered something for the prince’s birthday. Nos.184 and 194 (Leipzig, 1724, and Störmthal, 1723) seem to be arrangements of Cöthen works, and so perhaps are parts of no.120. Whether or not Bach performed a cantata at Cöthen on 10 December 1717, he was at Leipzig on 16 December examining the organ at the university church (the Paulinerkirche). The work had been done by Johann Scheibe, with whose son Bach was later in dispute. Bach is not known to have done any other work of this kind while at Cöthen.

On 9 May 1718 the prince went to drink the waters at Carlsbad for about five weeks, taking with him his harpsichord, Bach and five other musicians. Early in 1719 Bach was in Berlin, negotiating for a new harpsichord. About this time he seems to have been busy composing or buying music, for between July 1719 and May 1720 some 26 thaler were spent on binding. During 1719 Handel visited his mother at Halle, only some 30 km away; it is said that Bach tried, but failed, to make contact with him. Bach also disregarded a renewed request from Mattheson for biographical material.

W.F. Bach was nine in 1719; the title-page of his Clavier-Büchlein is dated 22 January 1720. In May Bach again went to Carlsbad with the prince. The date of their return does not seem to have been recorded; but apparently it was after 7 July, for that was the date of Maria Barbara’s funeral, and there is no reason to doubt Emanuel’s story that his father returned to find her dead and already buried. His wife had been nearly 36. Her death may well have unsettled Bach, and even led him to think of returning to the service of the church; but there was a more practical reason for his taking an interest in St Jacobi at Hamburg. The organist there, Heinrich Friese, died on 12 September 1720; Bach had known Hamburg in his youth, and must have been attracted by the organ, a four-manual Schnitger with 60 stops. There is no evidence that Bach was actually invited to apply for the post; but he may well have made inquiries of his own.

At all events, his name was one of eight being considered on 21 November, and he was in Hamburg at about that time. A competition was arranged for 28 November, but Bach had had to leave for Cöthen five days before. Three candidates did not appear, and the judges were not satisfied with the other four. An approach was made to Bach, and the committee met on 12 December; as Bach’s reply had not arrived, they met again a week later, when they found that Bach had refused. Perhaps he was unable, or unwilling, to contribute 4000 marks to the church funds, as the successful candidate actually did.

From the way in which the committee kept the post open for Bach, one may suppose that they had heard his recital at St Katharinen. Exactly how this performance was arranged, no-one knows; but in the obituary Emanuel stated that Bach played before the aged Reincken, the magistracy and other notables; that he played for more than two hours in all; and that he extemporized in different styles on the chorale An Wasserflüssen Babylon for almost half an hour, just as the better Hamburg organists had been accustomed to doing at Saturday Vespers. As a fantasia on this chorale was one of Reincken’s major works, this may seem a tactless choice; but the obituary makes it clear that the chorale was chosen by ‘those present’ and not by Bach himself. Reincken is reported to have said, ‘I thought this art was dead, but I see it still lives in you’, and showed Bach much courtesy. A later remark of Mattheson’s has been taken to imply that Bach also played the G minor Fugue bwv542, but there are good reasons to doubt it.

During 1720 Bach made fair copies of the works for unaccompanied violin, and must have been preparing the Brandenburg Concertos, whose autograph full score was dedicated on 24 March 1721 to the Margrave Christian Ludwig, before whom Bach had played in Berlin while negotiating for the new Cöthen harpsichord, between June 1718 and March 1719. What he played is not known; but he was invited to send in some compositions. As he himself said, he took ‘a couple of years’ over this commission, and then submitted six works written to exploit the resources of Cöthen. Such resources do not seem to have been available to the Margrave of Brandenburg, and it is not really surprising that he did not thank Bach, send a fee or use the score.

One of Bach’s friends at Cöthen was the goldsmith C.H. Bähr; Bach stood godfather to one of Bähr’s sons in 1721, and deputized for a godfather to another in 1723. About the beginning of August 1721 he gave a performance of some unspecified kind for Count Heinrich XI Reuss of Schleiz; this may have been arranged by J.S. Koch, the Kantor there, who had held a post at Mühlhausen, though possibly not in Bach’s time there. On 15 June 1721 Bach was the 65th communicant at St Agnus; one ‘Mar. Magd. Wilken’ was the 14th. This may well have been Bach’s future wife – the mistake in the first name is an easy one – but Anna Magdalena makes no formal appearance until 25 September, when Bach and she were the first two among the five godparents of a child called Hahn. This baptism is recorded in three registers. In two of them Anna is described as ‘court singer’, in the third, simply as ‘chamber musician’ (Musicantin). In September Anna was again a godmother, to a child called Palmarius; again the registers differ in describing her occupation. Her name does not appear in court accounts until summer 1722, when she is referred to as the Kapellmeister’s wife; her salary (half Bach’s) is noted as paid for May and June 1722.

Practically nothing is known of her early years. She was born on 22 September 1701 at Zeitz. Her father, Johann Caspar Wilcke, was a court trumpeter; he worked at Zeitz until about February 1718, when he moved to Weissenfels where he died on 30 November 1731. The surname was variously spelt. Anna’s mother (Margaretha Elisabeth Liebe, d 7 March 1746) was daughter of an organist and sister of J.S. Liebe who, besides being a trumpeter, was organist of two churches at Zeitz from 1694 until his death in 1742. As a trumpeter’s daughter, Anna may well have met the Bachs socially. The stories that she was a public figure, having sung at Cöthen and the other local courts since the age of 15, have been discredited; they are said to have arisen through confusion with her elder brother, a trumpeter. However, she was paid for singing, with her father, in the chapel at Zerbst on some occasion between Easter and midsummer 1721. By September 1721, aged just 20, she was at Cöthen, well acquainted with Bach (aged 36), and ready to marry him on 3 December. The prince saved Bach 10 thaler by giving him permission to be married in his own lodgings. At about this time Bach paid two visits to the city cellars, where he bought first one firkin of Rhine wine, and later two firkins, all at a cut price, 27 instead of 32 groschen per gallon.

On 11 December 1721 the prince married his cousin Friderica, Princess of Anhalt-Bernburg. The marriage was followed by five weeks of illuminations and other entertainments at Cöthen. This was not however an auspicious event for Bach: he was to leave Cöthen partly because the princess was ‘eine Amusa’ (someone not interested in the Muses) and broke up the happy relationship between Bach and her husband. Perhaps her unfortunate influence had made itself felt even before she was married.

A legacy from Tobias Lämmerhirt (Bach’s maternal uncle) had facilitated Bach’s first marriage; Tobias’s widow was buried at Erfurt on 12 September 1721, and Bach received something under her will too, though not in time for his second marriage. On 24 January 1722 Bach’s sister Maria, together with one of the Lämmerhirts, challenged the will, saying that Bach and his brothers Jacob (in Sweden) and Christoph (at Ohrdruf) agreed with them (Christoph had died in 1721). Bach heard of this only by accident; and on 15 March he wrote to the Erfurt council on behalf of Jacob as well as himself. He objected to his sister’s action, and said that he and his absent brother desired no more than was due to them under the will. On 16 April Jacob died; and the matter seems to have been settled on these lines towards the end of the year. Bach’s legacy must have amounted to rather more than a year’s pay.

In summer 1722 there was no Kapellmeister at the court of Anhalt-Zerbst, and Bach was commissioned to write a birthday cantata for the prince; for this he was paid 10 thaler in April and May. The birthday was in August, and payments made during that month presumably refer to the performance. If so, the work, which seems to have disappeared, was scored for two oboes d’amore and ‘other instruments’.

Several didactic works for keyboard belong to the Cöthen period. One is the Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena Bach. 25 leaves are extant, about a third of the original manuscript; there is a kind of title-page, on which Anna Magdalena (probably) wrote the title and the date and Bach (certainly) noted the titles of three theological books. Despite the sceptics, it remains reasonable to suppose that Bach gave the book to his wife early in 1722. It seems to have been filled by 1725. The autograph of Das wohltemperirte Clavier (book 1 of the ‘48’) is dated 1722 on the title-page but 1732 at the end. The writing is uniform in style, and for various reasons it is incredible that he did not finish the manuscript until 1732. This handsome fair copy was preceded by drafts, like those in W.F. Bach’s Clavier-Büchlein (begun in 1720); and some of the movements look earlier than that. Presumably Bach brought them together for convenience, partly to serve as the last step in his keyboard course, partly to exhibit the advantages of equal temperament. As in book 2, no doubt Bach transposed some of the pieces to fill gaps in his key scheme; the odd pairing of the prelude in six flats with the fugue in six sharps suggests that the former was originally in E minor, the latter in D minor.

The title-page was almost certainly the only part of the Orgel-Büchlein that Bach wrote while at Cöthen, but as another educational work it is best mentioned here. It was meant to be a collection of chorale preludes, not only for the ordinary church seasons but also for occasions when such subjects as the Lord’s Prayer, or Penitence, were being emphasized. The paper is of a kind that Bach used, as far as is known, only in 1714. A few items date from about 1740; in the rest, the writing resembles that of the cantatas of 1715–16. Of the 164 preludes Bach allowed for, he completed fewer than 50. Last in this group of works come the Inventions and Sinfonias, whose autograph fair copy is dated ‘Cöthen, 1723’. Its contents had already appeared, in earlier versions and under different titles, in W.F. Bach’s Clavier-Büchlein of 1720.

The story of Bach’s move to Leipzig begins with the death of Kuhnau, Kantor of the Thomasschule there, on 5 June 1722. Six men applied for the post, among them Telemann, who was still remembered for the good work he had done at Leipzig 20 years before. He had been doing a similar job at Hamburg for about a year, and was probably the most famous of German musicians actually living in Germany. One of the Kantor’s duties was to teach Latin. Telemann refused to do that; nevertheless, he was appointed on 13 August. But the Hamburg authorities would not release him, and offered to increase his pay; in November he declined the Leipzig post. At a meeting on 23 November Councillor Platz said that Telemann was no loss; what they needed was a Kantor to teach other subjects besides music. Of the remaining five candidates, three were invited to give trial performances; two dropped out, one because he would not teach Latin. By 21 December two Kapellmeisters had applied, Bach and Graupner. The other candidates were Kauffmann of Merseburg, Schott of the Leipzig Neukirche, and Rolle of Magdeburg. Of the five candidates, Graupner was preferred; he was a reputable musician, and had studied at the Thomasschule. He successfully performed his test (two cantatas) on 17 January 1723. But on 23 March he too withdrew, having been offered more pay at Darmstadt. Meanwhile, Bach had performed his test pieces (Cantatas nos.22 and 23) on 7 February 1723. Rolle and Schott had also been heard, and possibly Kauffmann too. The Princess of Cöthen died on 4 April, too late to affect Bach’s decision. On 9 April the council considered Bach, Kauffmann and Schott. Like Telemann, none of them wished to teach Latin. Councillor Platz said that as the best men could not be got, they must make do with the mediocre. The council evidently resolved to approach Bach, for on 13 April he obtained written permission to leave Cöthen. On 19 April he signed a curious document that reads as if he were not yet free from Cöthen, but could be free within a month; he also said he was willing to pay a deputy to teach Latin. On 22 April the council agreed on Bach, one of them hoping that his music would not be theatrical. On 5 May he came in person to sign an agreement; on 8 and 13 May he was interviewed and sworn in by the ecclesiastical authority; on 15 May the first instalment of his salary was paid; and on 16 May he ‘took up his duties’ at the university church, possibly with Cantata no.59. With family and furniture, he moved in on 22 May, and performed Cantata no.75 at the Nikolaikirche on 30 May. On 1 June, at 8.30 a.m., he was formally presented to the school.

This story has been told in some detail, because it throws light on the circumstances in which Bach worked at Leipzig. To him, the Kantorate was a step downwards in the social scale, and he had little respect for his employers. To the council, Bach was a third-rater, a mediocrity, who would not do what they expected a Kantor to do – teach Latin, as well as organize the city church music. The stage was set for trouble, and in due course trouble came. Councillor Platz on Telemann is curiously echoed by Councillor Stieglitz, ten days after Bach’s death: ‘The school needs a Kantor, not a Kapellmeister; though certainly he ought to understand music’.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

7. Leipzig, 1723–9.

The position of Kantor at the Thomasschule, held conjointly with that of civic director of music, had been associated with a wealth of tradition since the 16th century. It was one of the most notable positions in German musical life both in this and in the esteem it commanded; and there can be little doubt that the general attractiveness of the position in itself played a part – very likely the decisive part – in Bach’s decision to move from Cöthen to Leipzig. His subsequent remark about the social step down from Kapellmeister to Kantor must be seen in the context of his later disagreements with the Leipzig authorities, as indeed the letter in question (to Erdmann, a friend of his youth, on 28 October 1730) makes unequivocally clear. In any event, Bach was not the only Kapellmeister to apply for the post. The duties were incomparably more varied and demanding than those in Cöthen or Weimar (to say nothing of Mühlhausen or Arnstadt) and more or less corresponded to those undertaken by Telemann in Hamburg. It cannot have been mere chance that Bach wanted to tackle a range of duties comparable with those of his friend. Above all he must have preferred the greater economic and political stability of a commercial metropolis governed democratically to the uncertainties of the court of an absolute prince, where personal whim often held sway. The university – the foremost in the German-speaking world at the time – must have been another special attraction in the eyes of a father of growing-up sons.

The ‘Cantor zu St. Thomae et Director Musices Lipsiensis’ was the most important musician in the town; as such, he was primarily responsible for the music of the four principal Leipzig churches – the Thomaskirche, the Nikolaikirche, the Matthäeikirche (or Neukirche) and the Petrikirche – as well as for any other aspects of the town’s musical life controlled by the town council. In carrying out his tasks he could call above all on the pupils of the Thomasschule, the boarding-school attached to the Thomaskirche, whose musical training was his responsibility, as well as the town’s professional musicians. Normally the pupils, about 50 to 60 in number, were split up into four choir classes (Kantoreien) for the four churches. The requirements would vary from class to class: polyphonic music was required for the Thomaskirche, Nikolaikirche (the civic church) and Matthäeikirche, with figural music only in the first two; at the Petrikirche only monodic chants were sung. The first choir class, with the best 12 to 16 singers, was directed by the Kantor himself, and sang alternately in the two principal churches, the Nikolaikirche and Thomaskirche; the other classes were in the charge of prefects, appointed by Bach, who would be older and therefore more experienced pupils of the Thomasschule.

Musical aptitude was a decisive factor in the selection of pupils for the Thomasschule, and it was the Kantor’s responsibility to assess and train them. This was furthered by the daily singing lessons, mostly given by the Kantor. There was also instrumental instruction for the ablest pupils, which Bach had to provide free of charge but was thus enabled to make good any shortage of instrumentalists for his performances. Indeed, the number of professional musicians employed by the town (four Stadtpfeifer, three fiddlers and one apprentice) was held throughout his period of office at the same level as had obtained during the 17th century. For further instrumentalists Bach drew on the university students. In general the age of the Thomasschule pupils ranged between 12 and 23. Remembering that voices then broke at the age of 17 or 18, it is clear that Bach could count on solo trebles and altos who already had some ten years’ practical experience – an ideal situation, impossible in boys’ choirs today.

As far as church music was concerned, Bach’s duties centred on the principal services on Sundays and church feasts, as well as some of the more important subsidiary services, especially Vespers. In addition, he could be asked for music for weddings and funerals, for which he would receive a special fee. Such additional income was important to Bach, as his salary as Kantor of the Thomaskirche and director of music came to only 87 thaler and 12 groschen (besides allowances for wood and candles, and payments in kind, such as corn and wine). In fact, including payments from endowments and bequests as well as additional income, Bach received annually more than 700 thaler. Further, he had the use of a spacious official residence in the south wing of the Thomasschule, which had been renovated at a cost of more than 100 thaler before he moved in in 1723. Inside the Kantor’s residence was the so-called ‘Komponirstube’ (‘composing room’), his professional office containing his personal music library and the school’s. The buildings of the old Thomasschule were, scandalously, demolished in 1903 to make room for what is now the senior minister’s quarters; it was also then that the west façade of the Thomaskirche was rebuilt in the neo-Gothic style.

During his early Leipzig years, Bach involved himself in church music with particular thoroughness and extreme energy. This activity centred on the ‘Hauptmusic’ composed for Sundays and church feasts. The performance of a polyphonic cantata, with a text related as a rule to the Gospel for the day, was a tradition inherited from previous Kantors. Even so, Bach engaged on a musical enterprise without parallel in Leipzig’s musical history: in a relatively short time he composed five complete (or nearly complete) cycles of cantatas for the Church year, with about 60 cantatas in each, making a repertory of roughly 300 sacred cantatas. The first two cycles were prepared immediately, for 1723–4 and 1724–5; the third took rather longer, being composed between 1725 and 1727. The fourth, to texts by Picander, appears to date from 1728–9, while the fifth once again must have occupied a longer period, possibly extending into the 1740s. The established chronology of Bach’s vocal works makes it clear that the main body of the cantatas was in existence by 1729, and that Bach’s development of the cantata was effectively complete by 1735. The existence of the fourth and fifth cycles has been questioned, because of their fragmentary survival compared with the almost complete survival of the first, second and third; but until a positive argument for their non-existence can be put forward the number of five cycles, laid down in the obituary of 1754, must stand. Compared with the high proportion of Bach’s works of other kinds that are lost (orchestral and chamber music, for instance), the disappearance of about 100 cantatas would not be exceptional. (The preservation of Bach’s works is discussed below, §11; see §15 for the correspondence of excess chorales in the Breitkopf collection of 1784–7 to the number of lost cantatas.)

The first cycle begins on the first Sunday after Trinity 1723 with Cantata no.75, which was performed ‘mit gutem applausu’ at the Nikolaikirche, followed by no.76, for the second Sunday after Trinity, performed at the Thomaskirche. The two largest churches in Leipzig are both Gothic in style, and in Bach’s time they contained stone and wooden galleries. The choir lofts were on the west wall of the nave above the council gallery. The organs too were in the choir lofts (the ‘Schüler-Chor’): the Nikolaikirche and the Thomaskirche each had a three-manual organ with 36 and 35 stops respectively (Oberwerk, Brustwerk, Rückpositiv, Pedal). The Thomaskirche had a second organ, fitted to the east wall as a ‘swallow’s nest’, with 21 stops (Oberwerk, Brustwerk, Rückpositiv, Pedal); this fell into dilapidation and was demolished in 1740. The organs were always played before cantata performances, during which they would provide continuo accompaniment; they were played by the respective organists at each church; during Bach’s term of office these were Christian Heinrich Gräbner (at the Thomaskirche until 1729), J.G. Görner (at the Nikolaikirche until 1729, then at the Thomaskirche) and Johann Schneider (at the Nikolaikirche from 1729). Bach himself, who had not held a regular appointment as an organist since his time in Weimar, directed the choir and the orchestra, and would not normally be playing the organ. However, he frequently must have directed his church ensemble from the harpsichord, as is documented for the performance of bwv198 in 1727. At any rate, the harpsichord was often, if not regularly, employed as a continuo instrument in addition to the organ.

The cantata was an integral part of the Leipzig Lutheran liturgy. It followed immediately on the reading from the Gospel, preceding the Creed and the sermon (the second part of a two-part cantata would follow the sermon, ‘sub communione’). Apart from organ playing and the congregational singing of hymns, selected by the Kantor, the other musical constituent of the liturgy was the introit motet, which would be taken from the Florilegium Portense (1618) by Erhard Bodenschatz, a collection mainly drawn from the 16th century (Lassus, Handl etc.), and was performed a cappella with harpsichord continuo. Services began at 7 a.m. and lasted three hours; this allowed a mere half-hour for the cantata, and Bach rarely overstepped this duration. The normal performing forces consisted of some 16 singers and 18 instrumentalists; the precise number varied according to the work, but it was rare for the total number of singers and players to fall below 25 or to exceed 40 (the figure required on exceptional occasions, like the St Matthew Passion, which demanded two Kantoreien and double the normal number of instrumentalists). Ordinarily the performing forces consisted of four groups: pupils from the Thomasschule (the first Kantorei); the eight salaried town musicians, until 1734 headed by J.G. Reiche and thereafter by J.C. Gentzmer; University students (principally Bach’s private pupils); and additional assistants (probably regularly including one or two paid soloists) and guests.

Bach took up his additional duties as musical director to the university, a post traditionally held by the Thomaskantor, in summer 1723, perhaps as early as 16 May, with the performance of Cantata no.59 in the university church, the Paulinerkirche, but in any event by 9 August, when he performed the Latin Ode bwv Anh.20 (now lost) at the university’s festivities marking the birthday of Duke Friedrich II of Saxe-Gotha. The major part of his duties for the university comprised the musical provisions for the so-called quarter-day orations and the ‘old’ services in the Paulinerkirche, employing pupils from the Thomasschule and town musicians on the four major festivals of Christmas Day, Easter Day, Whit Sunday and Reformation Day; Bach was paid 2 thaler and 6 groschen on each occasion. He carried out the most important of his civic duties for the first time on 30 August 1723, when he introduced Cantata no.119 as part of the annual celebration of the change of town council. The enormous scope of Bach’s new responsibilities, as well as his vast workload, may be gauged from the fact that the day before (14th Sunday after Trinity) Cantata no.25 was heard for the first time, and the first performance of no.138 (for the 15th Sunday) was soon to follow.

September 1723 saw the start of Bach’s protracted wrangle with the university. In a written request for payment, he laid claim to the traditional right of the Thomaskantor to be responsible for the ‘old’ services and the quarter-day orations. The university, however, wanted to combine these duties with responsibility for the ‘new’ services (normal Sundays and holy days), which it had in April 1723 entrusted to J.G. Görner, organist of the Nikolaikirche, together with the title of ‘Musikdirektor’. On 28 September Bach’s request was turned down, and he was paid only half the fee. He would not give in, and turned to the Elector of Saxony in Dresden with three petitions. Following the intervention of the Dresden court, the university decided to put Görner in charge of the ‘new’ services only, and awarded Bach his traditional rights with payment as before. Thereafter, as the regular fee payments prove, Bach retained responsibility for the ‘old’ services and quarter-day orations until 1750.

About 2 November 1723 Bach inaugurated a new organ (which he had previously appraised) in Störmthal, outside Leipzig, with Cantata no.194. Then, from the second Sunday in Advent to the fourth, came his first break in the weekly routine of composing and performing cantatas; in Leipzig, unlike Weimar, this period was a ‘tempus clausum’, as was Lent up to and including Palm Sunday. On Christmas Day figural music returned, in a particularly splendid manner, with Cantata no.63 and the D major Sanctus bwv238 at the main service and the Magnificat bwv243a at Vespers; these were Bach’s first large-scale compositions on Latin texts such as were customary in Leipzig on major feast days. At this point in the calendar his duties were unimaginably heavy, yet he carried them out with incomparable creative vigour, producing Cantatas nos.40 and 64 for the feasts of St Stephen and St John the Evangelist, no.190 for New Year, no.153 for the Sunday after New Year (2 January 1724), no.65 for Epiphany (6 January) and no.154 for the following Sunday (9 January); after that, normal weekly services were resumed.

During the next ‘tempus clausum’ Bach composed his first large-scale choral work for Leipzig, the St John Passion, first performed at Vespers in the Nikolaikirche on Good Friday (7 April). This Vespers service had been introduced specially for the performance of a Passion only in 1721; in that year Kuhnau’s St Mark Passion (now lost) had been performed. Performances alternated annually between the Thomaskirche and the Nikolaikirche, an arrangement to which Bach strictly adhered. There is no documentary evidence of a Passion performance under Bach’s direction on Good Friday 1723, from which the older dating of the St John Passion derives. The work had several further performances, each time in a greatly altered version (see §14): on 30 March 1725 (in a second version adapted to the annual cycle of cantatas), probably on 11 April 1732 (in a third version) and on 4 April 1749 (fourth version); in about 1739 Bach undertook a revision of the work which remained unfinished.

With the first Sunday after Trinity 1724 (11 June) Bach began his second cycle; these were chorale cantatas. Not least because it included works composed at Weimar, the first cycle had been thoroughly heterogeneous in character, both musically and textually, but Bach gave the new cycle a unifying concept, with all the works based on texts, and their melodies, from the hymnbook. Unfortunately this series of chorale cantatas, beginning with no.20, O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort, and its programmatic overture, was interrupted early in 1725 and Bach did not complete the cycle. On 25 June he was in Gera for the dedication of the organ at the Salvatorkirche. In July he went to Cöthen with Anna Magdalena for a guest appearance as a performer; he had retained the title of Court Kapellmeister there, and it lapsed only on the death of Prince Leopold in 1728. There is evidence of further visits to Cöthen, with Bach performing alongside his wife (who sang as a soprano), in December 1725 and January 1728. During 1725 Bach started to prepare a second Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena. On 23 February 1725 he performed Cantata no.249a at the Weissenfels court for the birthday of Duke Christian; this was the original version of the Easter Oratorio bwv249, first given at Leipzig the following 1 April. No.249a represents the beginning of a long-standing collaboration with the fluent Leipzig poet Christian Friedrich Henrici (Picander), the chief supplier of texts for Bach’s later Leipzig vocal works.

Bach produced congratulatory cantatas for two Leipzig University professors in May and August (nos.36c and 205). On 19–20 September he played on the Silbermann organ at the Dresden Sophienkirche before the local court musicians, thus continuing his practice of giving virtuoso organ performances on concert tours – and undoubtedly in Leipzig, too, although he no longer held a post as organist. His favourite instrument in Leipzig was evidently the great organ of the Paulinerkirche built by Johann Scheibe in 1716, with 53 stops, three manuals (Hauptwerk, Seitenwerk and Brustwerk) and pedals; Bach had been one of its examiners in 1717. Early in 1726 – during the third cycle, which had started in June 1725 – there was an interruption of Bach’s production of cantatas, for reasons that remain obscure: between February and September 1726 he performed 18 cantatas by his cousin (6) Johann Ludwig Bach (3/72). In particular, between Purification and the fourth Sunday after Easter, he performed none of his own music at the main Sunday services; even on Good Friday he used a work by another composer, Reinhard Keiser’s St Mark Passion, which he had performed once before, in Weimar. Difficulties with performers may have been partly responsible; the instrumental forces required in J.L. Bach’s cantatas are more modest than those Bach himself normally used. Even apart from this, however, the pattern of Bach’s cantata production – as far as can be judged from the available material – changed during the third cycle; there are considerable gaps as early as the period after Trinity Sunday 1725, and it seems that the third cycle, unlike the first two, extended over two years. In the gaps, cantatas by other composers and further performances of Bach’s own works were given.

Michaelmas 1726 saw the appearance in print of Partita no.1, under the general title of Clavier-Übung: with this Bach began his activity, later to increase in scope, as a publisher of keyboard music. Partita no.1, published singly, was followed by nos.2 and 3 (1727), no.4 (1728), no.5 (1730) and no.6 (1730 or 1731; no copy is known). Evidently the series was originally planned to comprise seven partitas. There are early versions of nos.3 and 6 in the second book for Anna Magdalena of 1725. Bach sent no.1, with a dedicatory poem, to the Cöthen court as a form of congratulation on the birth of an heir, Prince Emanuel Ludwig (born 12 September 1726). In December 1726, on the installation of Dr Gottlieb Kortte as university professor, Bach produced a more sizable occasional work, the dramma per musica, Cantata no.207.

In 1727 Bach composed two extremely important works. The St Matthew Passion, for double choir to a libretto by Picander, was performed on Good Friday (11 April; there is evidence that it was repeated in the Thomaskirche in 1729, 1736 and 1742; see §14). The other work was the Trauer Ode (Cantata no.198), performed in October at a memorial ceremony, planned by the university, on the death of the Electress Christiane Eberhardine, who had remained a Protestant when her husband, August the Strong of Saxony, converted to Roman Catholicism. For this Bach was commissioned to set a text by the Leipzig professor of poetry, Johann Christoph Gottsched. This became a somewhat controversial affair, as the university director of music, Görner, felt he had been slighted. Bach however retained the commission and performed the two parts of his work, ‘composed in the Italian manner’, directing it from the harpsichord, in the university church, on 17 October. Between 7 September 1727 and 6 January 1728 there was a period of national mourning, with no other musical performances.

In September 1728 a brief dispute with the church authorities flared up. The sub-deacon, Gaudlitz, demanded that he himself should choose the hymns to be sung before and after the sermon at Vespers; as it was usual for the Kantor to select these hymns, Bach felt that his rights had been encroached upon. The dispute was settled in the sub-deacon’s favour. Bach must have seen this as a setback, for once again his grievances had not been met; but his relations with the ecclesiastical authorities were on the whole good throughout his time at Leipzig. His relations with the town council and the head teachers of the Thomasschule went less smoothly, and were to become even more difficult in the 1730s. Documents dealing with the various disputes show Bach to have been a stubborn defender of the prerogatives of his office who frequently reacted with excessive violence and was often to blame if there was a negative outcome. It would be wrong, however, to draw hasty inferences about Bach’s personality and his relations with the world about him. It is unfortunate that about a half of Bach’s surviving correspondence is concerned with generally trivial but often protracted disputes over rights. This material is extant in public archives, while utterances of kinds not appropriate to archival preservation, which might have complemented this rather austere view of his personality, have survived in only small quantity. From Bach’s behaviour during these disputes it can be seen that, under pressure, he would defy bureaucratic regulations in order to preserve his independence and to clear himself an artistic breathing-space. His taking over of the collegium musicum in 1729, to be directed under his own management, must be seen in this context, as it represents something more than an incidental biographical fact.

Early in 1729 Bach spent some time at the Weissenfels court in connection with the birthday celebrations in February of Duke Christian, with whom he had long been associated. On this occasion the title of court Kapellmeister of Saxe-Weissenfels was conferred on him (his Cöthen title had lately expired); he retained the title until 1736. At the end of March he went to Cöthen to perform the funeral music for his former employer; only the text survives of this large-scale work in four parts (bwv244a), but much of its music can be reconstructed as it consists of parodies of bwv198 and 244. On 15 April (Good Friday) the St Matthew Passion was performed again at the Thomaskirche. On the second day of Whit week (6 June), what was probably the last cantata of the Picander cycle was performed, no.174. The manuscript, uniquely for Bach, is dated (‘1729’); perhaps this represents some sort of final gesture after a heavy, six-year involvement in cantata composition.

Beside the production of cantatas, Passions and other vocal occasional works, both sacred and secular, instrumental music retreated to the background during Bach’s first years in Leipzig. Apart from some keyboard and chamber works (including the sonatas for harpsichord and violin bwv1014–19) there appear to have been only a relatively small number of organ works (preludes and fugues, trio sonatas) which are hard to date individually but will have been primarily connected with Bach’s activities as a recitalist.

In June 1729 an invitation to visit Leipzig was delivered to Handel, then in Halle, by Wilhelm Friedemann, in place of his father who was ill at the time; but nothing came of it. Thus Bach’s second and last attempt to establish contact with his highly esteemed London colleague met with failure. Significantly, in both cases the initiative was taken by Bach.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

8. Leipzig, 1729–39.

On his appointment as director of the collegium musicum, decisive changes came about in Bach’s activities in Leipzig; and at the same time new possibilities were opened up. The collegium had been founded by Telemann in 1702 and had most recently been directed by G.B. Schott (who left to become Kantor at Gotha in March 1729); it was a voluntary association of professional musicians and university students that gave regular weekly (and during the fair season even more frequent) public concerts. Such societies played an important part in the flowering of bourgeois musical culture in the 18th century, and with his highly reputed ensemble, in such an important commercial centre as Leipzig, Bach made his own contribution to this. He took over the direction before the third Sunday after Easter – in other words, by April 1729 – and retained it in the first place until 1737; he resumed it for a few more years in 1739. He must have had strong reasons for wanting to take on this fresh area of work in addition to his other duties. To some extent it is possible to guess those reasons. For six years he had immersed himself in the production of sacred music, and he had created a stock of works sufficient to supply the requirements of his remaining time in office. In his efforts to provide sacred music that was at once fastidious and comprehensive he had met with little appreciation from the authorities, and no additional facilities (for example, much needed professional instrumentalists) had been placed at his disposal: it would be understandable if he now felt resigned to the situation. Further, as a former Kapellmeister, he must have been attracted by the prospect of working with a good instrumental ensemble, and another important incentive must have been the thought that, as director of the collegium, he would be able to establish a wholly independent musical praxis, in accordance with his own ideas. It is not known whether the new position brought him some additional income.

Nothing, unfortunately, is known about the programmes of the ‘ordinaire’ weekly concerts. But the surviving performing parts for such works as the orchestral suites bwv1066–8, the violin concertos bwv1041–3 and the flute sonatas bwv1030 and 1039 demonstrate that Bach performed many of his Cöthen instrumental works (some in revised form) as well as new compositions. The seven harpsichord concertos bwv1052–8, collected together in a Leipzig manuscript, also belong in this context. Bach often performed works by other composers as well, including five orchestral suites by his cousin Johann Ludwig, secular cantatas by Handel and Porpora and the flute quartets that Telemann wrote for Paris. Further, Bach’s many musical acquaintances from other places must have made frequent appearances, including his colleagues in the Dresden court orchestra (there is evidence of visits from J.A. Hasse, Georg Benda, S.L. Weiss, C.H. Graun and J.D. Zelenka). C.P.E. Bach’s remark that ‘it was seldom that a musical master passed through [Leipzig] without getting to know my father and playing for him’ must refer to performances of the collegium musicum, which took place on Wednesdays between 4 and 6 p.m. in the coffee-garden ‘before the Grimmisches Thor’ in the summer and on Fridays between 8 and 10 p.m. in Zimmermann’s coffee-house in the winter. In addition, there were ‘extraordinaire’ concerts, to mark special events; on these occasions, during the 1730s, Bach performed his large-scale secular cantatas. His activities with the collegium must have made heavy demands on him, and the reduction in his production of sacred music is easy to understand.

This does not, however, mean that his interest in sacred music was diminished (as Blume, G1963, claimed, with undue emphasis in the light of the revised dating of his works). Such a view is contradicted not only by the major ecclesiastical works written after 1730 but also by the simple fact that, throughout his period of office, Bach provided performances of his cantatas, a repertory largely completed before 1729, every Sunday at the two main Leipzig churches. His reference to the ‘onus’ of such undertakings, in connection with the performance of a Passion planned for 1739, might just as well have been made in the 1720s. Admittedly, his difficulties became particularly acute around 1730, as his important memorandum of 23 August 1730, dealing with the state of church music in Leipzig and outlining his remedies, testifies. His letter of 28 October that year, to his old friend Erdmann in Danzig, may be read in the same sense; sheer frustration that the memorandum had proved ineffectual drove him to consider leaving Leipzig. It would seem that his work with the collegium musicum had not yet brought about the intended equilibrium in his activities.

The situation had been aggravated by other, external factors. The old headmaster Johann Heinrich Ernesti had died in 1729 (Bach had performed a motet bwv226 at his funeral in October). During the subsequent interim in the Thomasschule’s direction the organization of school life was disturbed. Problems of space appear to have arisen too. It was in this context that complaints were made about Bach’s neglect of his school duties (the dropping of singing lessons, absence on journeys without leave); in August 1730 there was even a question of reducing his salary ‘because the Kantor is incorrigible’. It would appear that things were put right by J.M. Gesner, who took over the headship of the school in the summer, and who seems soon to have established friendly and familiar relations with Bach.

On Good Friday 1730 Bach apparently performed a St Luke Passion, not of his own composition. From 25 to 27 June the bicentenary of the Augsburg Confession was celebrated across Lutheran Germany, and Bach wrote three cantatas for the event (nos.190a, 120b, Anh.4a: all were parody cantatas). They are not untypical of his church compositions of this period, most of which were put together as parodies; and that is true also of the major vocal works like the St Mark Passion, the B minor Mass, the small masses and the Christmas Oratorio. The only sacred cantatas that Bach composed as entirely new works after 1729 are nos.117 (1728–31), 192 (1730), 112 and 140 (1731), 177 (1732), 97 (1734), 9 and 100 (1732–5) and 14 (1735).

In 1731 a collected edition of the six partitas appeared as op.1, under the title I.Teil der Clavier-Übung. From this form of words it is clear that Bach planned further ‘parts’ in a series of ‘keyboard exercises’, and these he now proceeded to produce. His new and continuing interest in publishing his own compositions is a clear sign of a new determination with regard to independent and freely creative activity. The first performance of the St Mark Passion, predominantly a parody work, took place on Good Friday of that year. At the end of June 1731 Bach and his family had to move to temporary quarters while rebuilding and extension work were being carried out on the Thomasschule. His residence must have become increasingly cramped, for his family was growing. In the early years in Leipzig Anna Magdalena had borne a child almost every year, but few of them survived infancy:  Christiana Sophia Henrietta (b spring 1723; d 29 June 1726)
Gottfried Heinrich (48)
Christian Gottlieb (bap. 14 April 1725; d 21 Sept 1728)
Elisabeth Juliane Friederica (bap. 5 April 1726; d Leipzig, 24 Aug 1781)
Ernestus Andreas (bap. 30 Oct 1727; d 1 Nov 1727)
Regina Johanna (bap. 10 Oct 1728; d 25 April 1733)
Christiana Benedicta (bap. 1 Jan 1730; d 4 Jan 1730)
Christiana Dorothea (bap. 18 March 1731; d 31 Aug 1732)
Johann Christoph Friedrich (49)
Johann August Abraham (bap. 5 Nov 1733; d 6 Nov 1733)
Johann Christian (50)
Johanna Carolina (bap. 30 Oct 1737; d Leipzig, 18 Aug 1781)
Regina Susanna (bap. 22 Feb 1742; d Leipzig, 14 Dec 1809)

Joy and sorrow were everyday matters. But Bach’s family life must have been harmonious in more than one sense; in 1730 he reported, as a proud paterfamilias, that with his family he could form a vocal and instrumental concert ensemble. The family moved back into their refurbished apartment the next April. The school was reconsecrated on 5 June 1732 with a cantata, bwv Anh.18. In September 1731 Bach had been to Dresden for the first performance of Hasse’s opera Cleofide and to give concerts at the Sophienkirche and at court (there were enthusiastic reports in the newspapers). In September 1732 he went with his wife to Kassel for the examination and inauguration of the organ of the Martinskirche, where he probably played the ‘Dorian’ Toccata and Fugue in D minor bwv538.

With the death of Elector Friedrich August I of Saxony on 1 February 1733 a five-month period of national mourning began. However, the collegium musicum obtained permission to restart its performances in the middle of June, when a new harpsichord was introduced (possibly in the harpsichord concertos bwv1052–8). During the mourning period Bach composed the D major version of the Magnificat bwv243, which was probably first heard in Leipzig when the mourning was ended on 2 July (Visitation). Above all he worked on the Kyrie and the Gloria of the B minor Mass, which, in the hope of obtaining a title at the court Kapelle, he presented to the new Elector Friedrich August II in Dresden, with a note dated 27 July 1733, as a Missa in a set of parts. There is evidence to suggest that the Missa was performed at this time, perhaps at the Sophienkirche in Dresden, where W.F. Bach had been working as an organist since June 1733. Not until November 1736, however, was the title ‘Hofkomponist’ conferred on Bach, and even then only through the intervention of his patron Count Keyserlingk after a further letter of application. As a gesture of thanks, Bach paid his respects to the Dresden royal household and an enthusiastic public with a two-hour organ recital on the new Silbermann instrument at the Frauenkirche on 1 December 1736.

After the dedication of the Missa in July 1733, Bach kept the Saxon royal family’s interests in mind with his ‘extraordinaire’ concerts of the collegium musicum. On 3 August, the name day of the new elector, Bach began his remarkable series of secular cantatas of congratulation and homage with bwv Anh.12 (music lost), followed by Cantata no.213 (5 September, for the heir to the electorate), no.214 (8 December, for the electress), no.205a (19 February 1734, for the coronation of the elector as King of Poland; music lost), an unknown work (3 August, again for the elector), and no.215 (5 October, also for the elector, who was at the performance). Much of the festive music was performed in the open air with splendid illuminations, and according to newspaper reports the music benefited from a resounding echo. (On the day after the performance of no.215 Bach’s virtuoso trumpeter and the leader of the Leipzig Stadtpfeifer, Gottfried Reiche, died as a result of the exertions of his office.) During the following Christmas season Bach gave the people of Leipzig a chance to hear much of the music from his secular festive cantatas in modified form, as the Christmas Oratorio, which was heard in six sections between Christmas Day 1734 and Epiphany 1735 (and consisted predominantly of parodies of Cantatas nos.213–15).

On 21 November 1734 the new headmaster of the Thomasschule, Johann August Ernesti, was greeted with a cantata, bwv Anh.19 (Gesner had moved to the newly founded University of Göttingen as its first dean). Bach’s dealings with the directors of the school had been untroubled for four years, thanks to his friendly relations with Gesner; but with Ernesti he experienced the most violent controversies of his entire period as Thomaskantor. A dispute flared up in August 1736 over the authority to nominate the choral prefect, in which the interests of the Kantor and the headmaster were diametrically opposed. With his neo-humanist educational ideals, which placed priority on high academic standards, Ernesti showed little appreciation of the musical traditions. The tendency at the Thomasschule, at least from the start of Bach’s period of office, had been to restrict musical activities, or at any rate to reduce their proportions; Bach, on the other hand, demanded the best-qualified pupils to assist him, and certainly he must often have overburdened them (with music copying, rehearsals and so on). Against what were to some extent unfair arguments on the headmaster’s part, his struggles were doomed to failure. The grievances arising from the nomination of the choir prefect were taken before the courts in Dresden; the affair, which led to Bach’s having disciplinary difficulties with his pupils, was settled early in 1738 (the precise outcome is not recorded). The prefect in question, Johann Gottlob Krause, whom Bach refused to acknowledge, had already left the Thomasschule in 1737.

Among the more important events of 1735 was the appearance of the second part of the Clavier-Übung at Easter. In the context of Bach’s activities as a publisher it should also be mentioned that by 1729 he was also involved in the distribution of musical publications by other authors and kept a stock, including Heinichen’s book on figured bass, Walther’s Lexicon and keyboard works by Hurlebusch, Krebs and his own sons. On 19 May the Ascension Oratorio (Cantata no.11) was first performed; probably the Easter Oratorio (a revision of Cantata no.249a) was heard on the preceding Easter Sunday. In June he travelled to Mühlhausen, where he had spent part of his early career, to appraise the rebuilt organ in the Marienkirche, where his son Johann Gottfried Bernhard (47) had just been appointed organist. During Advent 1735, when no music was performed, and Lent 1736 Bach was probably engaged on the revision of the St Matthew Passion and in making a carefully laid-out fair copy of the new version. In this form, characterized by its writing for double chorus (with two continuo parts), the work was performed in the Thomaskirche on 30 March 1736, with the cantus firmus parts in the opening and closing choruses of part 1 played on the ‘swallow’s nest’ organ. Also at Easter the Schemelli Hymnbook, on whose tunes and figured basses Bach had collaborated, was published.

In summer 1737 Bach temporarily resigned the direction of the collegium musicum. For the last ‘extraordinaire’ concert on 7 October 1736 he had written the congratulatory Cantata no.206 on the birthday of the elector. Only two further works of homage are known from 1737–8 (bwv30a and Anh.13), which indicates that Bach was occupied primarily with the other things for which he had time after his release from the work associated with the collegium. He now turned to keyboard music, working on the second part of Das wohltemperirte Clavier, and on the third part of the Clavier-Übung, the largest of his keyboard works. This collection of organ pieces, some freely composed, some based on chorales, with large-scale works for a church organ and small-scale ones for a domestic instrument, appeared at Michaelmas 1739.

Bach obviously also devoted himself more than previously to private teaching in the late 1730s. Between 1738 and 1741, for example, J.P. Kirnberger and J.F. Agricola were studying with him in Leipzig – probably the most important and influential of all his pupils except for his own sons. Over the years Bach had something like 80 private pupils; among them were C.F. Abel (c1743), J.C. Altnickol (1744–8), J.F. Doles (1739–44), G.F. Einicke (1732–7), H.N. Gerber (1724–7), J.C.G. Gerlach (1723–9), J.G. Goldberg (c1740), G.A. Homilius (1735–42), J.C. Kittel (1748–50), J.G. Müthel (1750), J.C. Nichelmann (1730–33), J.G. Schübler (after 1740), G.G. Wagner (1723–6) and C.G. Wecker (1723–8).

In October 1737 Bach’s nephew Johann Elias (39) came to live with the family, as private secretary and tutor for the younger children; he remained until 1742. The surviving drafts of letters he prepared give a lively picture of Bach’s correspondence in these few years – and cause for regret that no other period is similarly documented. At this period Bach gave especially close attention to the study of works by other composers. He was a subscriber to Telemann’s Parisian flute quartets of May 1738; but more typical is his preoccupation with Latin polyphonic liturgical compositions. The stile antico tradition seems to have held a particular fascination for him. In the first place he owed his knowledge of this repertory, to which he marginally contributed by making transcriptions (works by Palestrina, Caldara, Bassani and others), to his connections at Dresden. His knowledge of Pergolesi’s Stabat mater of 1736, which he reworked during the 1740s as a setting of Psalm li, Tilge, Höchster, meine Sünden bwv1083 is also surprising; the earliest trace of Pergolesi’s work north of the Alps thus leads to Bach – a sign of the latter’s remarkable knowledge of the repertory. His interest in Latin liturgical music also relates closely to the composition of the short masses (Kyrie and Gloria) bwv233–6. These may have been written for the Protestant court services in Dresden, but that would not exclude performances in Leipzig.

On 14 May 1737 J.A. Scheibe, in his journal Der critische Musikus, published a weighty criticism of Bach’s manner of composition. This seems to have come as a severe blow to Bach. Evidently at his urging, the Leipzig lecturer in rhetoric Johann Abraham Birnbaum responded with a defence, printed in January 1738, which Bach distributed among his friends and acquaintances. The affair developed into a public controversy, the literary conduct of which, at least, was suspended only in 1739 after further polemical writings by Scheibe and Birnbaum. Scheibe acknowledged Bach’s extraordinary skill as a performer on the organ and the harpsichord, but sharply criticized his compositions, claiming that Bach ‘by his bombastic and intricate procedures deprived them of naturalness and obscured their beauty by an excess of art’. Birnbaum’s not particularly skilful replies fail to recognize the true problem, which lies in a clash of irreconcilable stylistic ideals. Nevertheless, his discussion of naturalness and artificiality in Bach’s style, and his definition of harmony as an accumulation of counterpoint, make some important statements about the premisses and unique character of Bach’s compositional art, and Bach himself must have been involved in their formulation. This is clear above all in the way in which ‘the nature of music’ is represented, with references to biographical details (such as the challenge to Marchand) and express mention of composers and works in Bach’s library (Palestrina, Lotti and Grigny). The controversy smouldered on for several more years. Mizler, too, shook a lance, pointing to ‘the latest taste’ in Bach’s cantata style (‘so well does our Kapellmeister know how to suit himself to his listeners’). In the end Scheibe climbed down, with a conciliatory review (1745) of the Italian Concerto in which he apologized handsomely (‘I did this great man an injustice’).

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

9. Leipzig, 1739–50.

In October 1739 Bach resumed the direction of the collegium musicum, which had in the meantime been in the charge of C.G. Gerlach (organist at the Neukirche and a pupil of Bach). A composition for the birthday of the elector (7 October; the music is lost) dates from this time, but it would seem that Bach’s ambitions and activities in connection with the ‘ordinaire’ and ‘extraordinaire’ concerts were considerably diminished. There were few performances of congratulatory cantatas, and these were probably all repeats of earlier works. There are no signs, however, that Bach’s interest in instrumental ensemble music slackened; if anything, it underwent a certain revival and he continued to produce chamber music steadily throughout the 1730s.

Bach withdrew from the collegium musicum again in 1741. With the death of the coffee-house owner Gottfried Zimmermann (30 May 1741) the collegium had lost its landlord and organizer, and without him it could not long continue, at least as it had been run hitherto. Signs of reduced activity can be traced until 1744, and it is possible that Bach still presided over performances from time to time until that year. The collegium had made an important contribution to musical life in Leipzig for 40 years, both with and without Bach’s leadership, and even its demise was not without consequences for the future. In both its function and its membership it served to prepare the ground for a new focal point in civic musical life, the Grosses Concert, founded in 1743 on the lines of the Parisian Concert Spirituel and destined to be the immediate predecessor of the Gewandhaus concerts.

In August 1741 Bach went to Berlin, probably to visit Carl Philipp Emanuel who in 1738 had been appointed court harpsichord player to Crown Prince Frederick of Prussia (later Frederick the Great). In the two previous years Bach had made brief journeys to Halle (early 1740) and Altenburg (September 1739; he gave a recital on the new Trost organ in the castle church). In November 1741 there was a further journey, this time to Dresden, where he visited Count von Keyserlingk. In the same year, probably in the autumn, the ‘Aria with 30 Variations’, the so-called Goldberg Variations, appeared in print. Bach’s visit to Dresden may lie behind the anecdote related by Forkel, according to which the variations were commissioned by the count as a means of ameliorating sleepless nights, but the lack of any formal dedication in the original edition suggests that the work was not composed to a commission. It is conceivable, on the other hand, that after publication the count received a copy of the work for the use of his young resident harpsichord player Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, who was a pupil of both J.S. and W.F. Bach. In his own copy (which came to light only in 1975) Bach added a series of 14 enigmatically notated canons on the bass of the Aria (bwv1087) in about 1747–8. They place a special and individual accent on the canonic writing that occupied him so intensively at that period.

On 30 August 1742, on the Kleinzschocher estate near Leipzig, a ‘Cantata burlesque’ (known as the Peasant Cantata, no.212) was performed in homage to the new lord of the manor, Carl Heinrich von Dieskau; this work is unique in Bach’s output for its folklike manner (except perhaps for the quodlibet in the Goldberg Variations). The thoroughly up-to-date characteristics of parts of the work show that Bach was not only intimately acquainted with the musical fashions of the times but also knew how to adapt elements of the younger generation’s style for his own purposes (as he also did in the third movement of the trio sonata from the Musical Offering).

Alongside this work, apparently his last secular cantata, Bach’s only vocal compositions of the 1740s were isolated sacred works (including Cantatas nos.118, 195, 197 and 200), some new, some refashioned. There is evidence, on the other hand, that he gave numerous performances of works by other composers, some newly arranged or revised. These included a German parody of Pergolesi’s Stabat mater (Tilge, Höchster, meine Sünden bwv1083, c1745–7), a Latin parody after the Sanctus and ‘Osanna’ from J.C. Kerll’s Missa superba (Sanctus in D bwv241, c1747–8), Handel’s Brockes Passion (c1746–7 and 1748–9) and a pasticcio Passion after C.H. Graun (with inserted movements bwv1088 and ‘Der Gerechte kömmt um’ bc C 8). Bach also often repeated his own earlier sacred works. Evidence does not exist to form a complete picture, but they included revised versions of the St Matthew and St John Passions; the latter was performed for the last time during Bach’s lifetime on Good Friday 1749.

The only new vocal composition of any size was the Credo and following sections of the Mass, which, when added to the Missa of 1773 (bwv232I), produced the B minor Mass – a continuation of Bach’s preoccupation with Latin figural music during the late 1730s. No specific reason for the composition of the B minor Mass, and no evidence of a projected or actual performance, has so far come to light. One of the most plausible hypotheses is that the composition of the work (which is described in C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlass as ‘the large Catholic Mass’) was connected with the consecration of the Catholic Hofkirche in Dresden, planned for the late 1740s and then postponed (building started in 1739). All that is known for certain is that the expansion of the 1733 Missa by the addition of a Credo, a Sanctus (1724) and the movements from ‘Osanna’ to ‘Dona nobis pacem’ and the fusing of the various sections to create a unified score (see also §14) were done in the last years of Bach’s life – more precisely, between August 1748 and October 1749.

Instrumental music, however, once again came to the fore during the 1740s. Bach had begun to sift through his older organ chorales about 1739–42, probably following completion of Clavier-Übung III. Some of the Weimar pieces were extensively reworked and gathered into a new manuscript collection (the ‘18’, bwv651–68). These revisions may have been undertaken with a view to the subsequent appearance of the chorales in print, as happened with the six chorales on movements from cantatas (the ‘Schübler Chorales’) about 1748. Apparently Bach was still engaged in work on the chorales in the last months of his life. The copying from dictation of the chorale Vor deinen Thron bwv668, later the subject of legend, was in fact probably confined to an improvement of an existing work (the chorale bwv641 from the Weimar Orgel-Büchlein).

Bach retained his interest in organ building to the last. In 1746 alone there were two important examinations and inaugurations of organs: on 7 August in Zschortau and on 26–9 September in Naumburg. Bach’s appraisal of the large Hildebrandt organ in the Wenzelskirche, Naumburg, was one of his most important. He customarily subjected instruments to the most searching examinations, both of their technical reliability and of their tone quality. He had also taken a critical interest in the pianos that Gottfried Silbermann was building during the 1730s, proposing alterations in the mechanism which Silbermann evidently adopted. At all events, Bach praised Silbermann’s later pianos and promoted their sale (a receipt for one sold to Poland, dated 6 May 1749, survives). On his visit to Potsdam in 1747 he played on a range of Silbermann pianos of the newer type which had been purchased by the Prussian court.

The visit to the court of Frederick the Great in May 1747 is one of the most notable biographical events in Bach’s otherwise unspectacular life. The invitation probably came about through Count Keyserlingk, who was then in Berlin. Bach’s encounter with Frederick began on 7 May at the palace of Potsdam during the chamber music which was a feature of every evening of court life there. Bach’s execution on the piano of a remarkable improvisation on a theme supplied by the king met with general applause. The next day Bach gave an organ recital in the Heiliggeistkirche in Potsdam, and during chamber music that evening he improvised a six-part fugue on a theme of his own. He also visited the new Berlin opera house, and possibly went to look at organs in Potsdam and Berlin. On his return to Leipzig, probably in the middle of May, he worked industriously on an ‘elaboration of the King of Prussia’s fugue theme’, beginning with writing down the fugue he had improvised (a three-part ricercare), which, while in Potsdam, he had announced that he would print. But he now decided on a larger project and under the title Musikalisches Opfer (‘Musical Offering’) he prepared a work in several movements dedicated to Frederick the Great; this work was printed in its entirety by the end of September (Michaelmas) 1747. The royal theme serves as the basis for all the movements (two ricercares, in three and six parts, for keyboard; a trio sonata for flute, violin and continuo; and various canons for flute, violin and continuo with harpsichord obbligato).

In June 1747, after some hesitation, Bach joined the Correspondirende Societät der Musicalischen Wissenschaften founded by Lorenz Mizler. It was probably in 1747 that he submitted, as a ‘scientific’ piece of work, his canonic composition on Vom Himmel hoch bwv769. At the same time he sent the members an offprint of the six-part canon from the series on the bass of the Goldberg Variations. He seems, however, to have taken no further interest in the society’s affairs as (according to C.P.E. Bach) he thought nothing of the ‘dry, mathematical stuff’ that Mizler wanted to discuss. Besides his long acquaintance with his pupil Mizler, Bach’s most likely reason for joining the society was that prominent colleagues such as Telemann and Graun were fellow members.

The beginnings of his work on Die Kunst der Fuge (‘The Art of Fugue’) seem to date from around 1740, or before. It is impossible to give an exact date as the original composing score is now lost. However, what must be a first version survives in an autograph fair copy containing 14 movements (12 fugues and two canons) and dating from 1742 at the latest. Thereafter Bach expanded and revised the work in readiness for printing. He himself supervised the printing to a large extent, and the process was probably largely complete by about the end of 1749 (in other words, before his son Johann Christoph Friedrich, who had helped to correct the proofs, left to join the court at Bückeburg in January 1750). But Bach was not to see the entire work (eventually comprising 14 fugues and four canons) in print; his sons, probably C.P.E. in particular, took charge of the publication and the work appeared posthumously in spring 1751. Bach had been unable to complete the fair copy of the last movement, a quadruple fugue, and so the fugal cycle ends with an unfinished movement. The editors decided to mitigate the effect of that by adding the organ chorale bwv668, Vor deinen Thron tret ich hiermit, at the end; the revision of this had been the last piece of work to occupy Bach.

In his final years Bach suffered from increasingly severe trouble with his eyes, seriously restricting his ability to work and leading eventually to total blindness. He probably composed nothing after autumn 1749. The last known examples of his handwriting, which give an impression of increasing irregularity, clumsiness and cramping, go up to October 1749 (parts of the score of the B minor Mass). Other documents to which he put his signature date from as late as spring 1750. The cause of the eye disease seems to have lain in untreated (and untreatable) diabetes, which may also have caused neuropathy and degenerative brain disease, evidence of which is found in the dramatic change in his handwriting in manuscripts of 1748–9. He gave a performance of the St John Passion on Good Friday 1749 without completing the revision of the work begun in about 1740. His health must have been very poor by spring 1749 at the latest; otherwise the Leipzig town council would surely not have been so tactless as to submit J.G. Harrer, a protégé of the Dresden prime minister Count Brühl, to examination for the post of Kantor on 8 June 1749. Out of consideration for Bach the cantata performance was in a concert hall rather than one of the churches. The town chronicle reported that the authorities expected Bach’s death. When his grandson Johann Sebastian Altnickol (his pupil Johann Christoph Altnickol had married Elisabeth Juliane Friederica Bach) was baptized on 6 October 1749 in Naumburg Bach was unable to make the short journey to stand godfather in person.

Bach’s state of health and ability to work must have fluctuated during his last year. He appointed Johann Nathanael Bammler, a former choir prefect at the Thomasschule for whom he provided two excellent references in 1749, to deputize for him as occasion warranted. But in spite of everything Bach was not entirely inactive. In spring 1749 he is known to have corresponded with Count Johann Adam vom Questenberg, apparently about a commission or some other project. Although no details are known, this reaffirms Bach’s obviously well-established connections with some major noble patrons from the area of Bohemia (Count Sporck of Lissa and Kukus), Moravia (Count Questenberg of Jaroměřice) and Silesia (the Haugwitz family). From May 1749 to June 1750 he was engaged in a controversial correspondence about the Freiberg headmaster Biedermann. In May 1749 Biedermann had violently attacked the cultivation of music schools; Bach immediately felt himself called into battle, and among other things he gave a repeat performance of the satirical cantata about the controversy between Phoebus and Pan, no.201. His involvement is understandable, for he must have seen parallels with the state of affairs at the Thomasschule, where the same tendency fuelled Ernesti’s reforms. Bach solicited a rejoinder on the part of C.G. Schröter, a member of Mizler’s society, and even Mattheson joined in, from Hamburg. Once again, the affair throws light on the situation in German schools during the early Enlightenment and Bach’s last years as Thomaskantor. The integration of academic and musical traditions, which had been an institution for centuries, was in the process of turning into an irreconcilable confrontation.

At the end of March Bach underwent an eye operation, performed by the English eye specialist John Taylor (who was later to perform a similar operation on Handel). It was only partly successful, however, and had to be repeated during the second week of April. The second operation too was ultimately unsuccessful, and indeed Bach’s physique was considerably weakened. Yet as late as the beginning of May 1750 Johann Gottfried Müthel could go to Leipzig, stay at Bach’s house and become his last pupil. To what extent regular instruction was possible under these circumstances remains uncertain. In the next two months Bach’s health had so deteriorated that, on 22 July, he had to take his last Communion at home. He died only six days later, on the evening of 28 July, after a stroke. He was buried two or three days later at the cemetery of the Johanniskirche. It is not known what form the funeral ceremony took or what music was performed.

Bach’s wife, Anna Magdalena, who in addition to her domestic tasks was a loyal and industrious collaborator, participating in performances and copying out music, survived him by ten years. She died in abject poverty in 1760. On his death Bach had left a modest estate consisting of securities, cash, silver vessels, instruments – including eight harpsichords, two lute-harpsichords, ten string instruments (among them a valuable Stainer violin), a lute and spinet – and other goods, officially valued at 1122 thaler and 22 groschen; this had to be divided between the widow and the nine surviving children of both marriages. Bach himself had evidently given instructions for the disposition of his musical Nachlass, which is ignored in the official valuation. According to Forkel, the eldest son Wilhelm Friedemann ‘got most of it’ (see §11).

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

10. Iconography.

The oak coffin containing Bach’s remains was exhumed in 1894: the detailed anatomical investigation by Professor Wilhelm His confirmed their identity and showed that Bach was of medium build. From a skull impression Carl Seffner, in 1898, modelled a bust, which shows an undoubted similarity with the only likeness of Bach that can be guaranteed as authentic, that of the Leipzig portraitist Elias Gottlob Haussmann. That portrait exists in two versions, one dating from 1746 (Museum für Geschichte der Stadt Leipzig; property of the Thomasschule) and one of 1748 (William H. Scheide Library, Princeton; see below, fig.4). The earlier, signed ‘E.G. Haussmann pinxit 1746’, was presented to the Thomasschule in 1809 by the then Thomaskantor, August Eberhard Müller. It is not known whence Müller had obtained the painting, but is quite probable that it had remained in the possession of one of Bach’s direct descendants until then. Of these the most likely is Wilhelm Friedemann (unless he had another replica of Haussmann’s painting) or Regina Susanna, who lived in Leipzig until her death in 1809. It is often supposed that the Thomasschule portrait is one that members of Mizler’s society were required by statute to donate to that institution, but that is highly unlikely: Bach probably did not present a portrait, at least in the form of a painting, to the society. With the passage of time the Thomasschule picture was severely damaged and repeatedly painted over. Thorough restoration in 1912–13 returned it more or less to its original condition, but it remains inferior to the excellently preserved replica of 1748. This has a reasonably secure provenance, out of C.P.E. Bach’s estate; it was owned privately for many years by the Jenke family in Silesia and then in England, before being exhibited in public by Hans Raupach in 1950.

The authenticity of an unsigned pastel portrait, probably painted after 1750, allegedly by either Gottlieb Friedrich or Johann Philipp Bach, and handed down in the Meiningen branch of the family, is not altogether certain, and neither is that of a group portrait of musicians, executed around 1733 by Johann Balthasar Denner (now in the Internationale Bachakademie, Stuttgart; a replica, in better condition, is in a private collection in the UK), which shows what may well be Johann Sebastian (with violoncello piccolo) and three of his sons.

Doubt hangs over the authenticity of all the other better-known and much reproduced portraits. The oil by Johann Jacob Ihle, dating from about 1720 and purporting to show Bach as Kapellmeister in Cöthen, comes from the palace at Bayreuth and was identified as a ‘picture of Bach’ only in 1897. But there is no concrete support for that identification, and the portrait’s earlier provenance is obscure; it now hangs in the Bachhaus in Eisenach. The portrait by Johann Ernst Rentsch the elder (now in the Städtisches Museum, Erfurt), allegedly representing Bach at the age of about 30, came to light only in 1907 and has no credible documentation. Many other apocryphal portraits, including the ‘portrait in old age’ discovered by Fritz Volbach in Mainz in 1903 (now in a private collection in Fort Worth), are of the ‘old man with a wig’ type and have nothing to do with Bach.

According to GerberL, probably authentic portraits that no longer survive were once owned by J.C. Kittel (from the estate of the Countess of Weissenfels) and by J.N. Forkel. A pastel from C.P.E. Bach’s collection (not the one referred to above) has not survived. During the 18th and 19th centuries many copies were made of the Haussmann portrait, both in oils and in various types of print; an engraving (1794) by Samuel Gottlieb Kütner, an art student at the Zeichenakademie, Leipzig, along with C.P.E. Bach’s son Johann Sebastian (1748–78), was said by Emanuel himself to be ‘a fair likeness’. The nearest we can nowadays get to his true physiognomy is probably in the 1748 version of Haussmann’s portrait, wherein, as a man in his early 60s, Bach is represented as a learned musician, with a copy of the enigmatic six-part canon bwv1076 in his hand to demonstrate his status (fig.4).

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

11. Sources, repertory.

The earliest catalogue of Bach’s compositions – admittedly a very rough one – was included in the obituary that C.P.E. Bach and J.F. Agricola wrote immediately after Bach’s death but did not publish until 1754. It scarcely provides an adequate idea of the extent of Bach’s works, but it shows that nearly everything printed during Bach’s lifetime has survived to the present day: Cantata no.71, composed for the Mühlhausen town council election in 1708 (but not its counterpart of 1709); the four parts of the Clavier-Übung; the Schemelli Hymnbook; the Musical Offering; the Canonic Variations bwv769; the Schübler chorales; the Art of Fugue; and the canons bwv1074 and 1076. The great majority of Bach’s compositions remained unprinted, and most of those survived. The most serious losses occurred among the cantatas: perhaps more than 100, certainly two cycles of church cantatas and several secular occasional works. The funeral music for Prince Leopold of Cöthen (1729) and the St Mark Passion (1731) are among large-scale vocal works of which only the texts survive. A greater proportion of the music for organ and other keyboard instruments has probably survived than that in any other category. Losses among the orchestral and chamber works are almost impossible to estimate, but may be regarded (on the evidence of existing transcriptions, for example) as substantial.

On the assumption that Bach managed to keep his music together as far as possible during his lifetime, it seems that major losses occurred only on the division of his legacy in 1750, when the manuscripts, especially of the vocal works, were divided between the eldest sons and Bach’s widow. Most of them went to Wilhelm Friedemann, but he, unfortunately, was the least succussful at managing his inheritance; he was compelled for financial reasons to sell them off item by item, and the material is not simply scattered but for the most part lost. Only a few of the items inherited by Johann Christoph Friedrich and Johann Christian, including a printed copy of the Musical Offering and the autograph of the organ Prelude and Fugue in B minor bwv544 (signed with Johann Christian’s nickname ‘Christel’), can be traced. C.P.E. Bach’s and Anna Magdalena’s shares were better preserved. Bach’s widow gave her portion (the parts of the cycle of chorale cantatas) to the Thomasschule while most of C.P.E. Bach’s estate passed through Georg Poelchau’s collection into the Berlin Königliche Bibliothek (later the Preussische Staatsbibliothek and now the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin). This collection forms the basis of the most important collection of Bach archives. During the 19th century this library acquired further, smaller Bach collections, notably those from the Singakademie and the estates of Forkel, Franz Hauser and Count Voss-Buch (in some of which fragments from W.F. Bach’s inheritance appear).

Besides the original manuscripts – the autograph scores, and parts prepared for performances under Bach’s direction – which, in their essentials, Bach kept by him, many copies were made in the circle of his pupils, particularly of organ and harpsichord music. As many autographs of the keyboard works are lost, this strand is specially significant for the preservation of Bach’s works. In particular, important copies have come down through members of Bach’s family (including the Möllersche Handschrift and the Andreas-Bach-Buch, both compiled by Sebastian’s brother Johann Christoph), through J.G. Walther and through Bach’s pupils Krebs and Kittel. After Bach’s death Breitkopf in Leipzig became a centre for the dissemination of his music (again, primarily the keyboard music). In Berlin a notable Bach collection was made for Princess Anna Amalia of Prussia, under the direction of Kirnberger, in which all facets of Bach’s creative output were represented (now D-Bsb Amalien-Bibliothek). These secondary sources have to serve when autograph material is not available – relatively often with the instrumental works (e.g. a large percentage of the organ pieces; the English and French Suites, toccatas, fantasias and fugues for harpsichord; duo and trio sonatas; concertos and orchestral works), more rarely with the vocal ones (e.g. Cantatas nos.106 and 159; motets bwv227–30; and the masses bwv233 and 235).

Research into source materials, notably in conjunction with the Neue Bach-Ausgabe, has proved fruitful. The use of diplomatic research methods has allowed most of the copyists who worked for Bach – and all the important ones – to be identified: ‘Hauptkopist A’ was J. Andreas Kuhnau (b 1703); ‘Hauptkopist B’ was C.G. Meissner (1707–60); ‘Hauptkopist C’ was J. Heinrich Bach (1707–83); ‘Hauptkopist D’ was S.G. Heder (b 1713); ‘Hauptkopist E’ was J.G. Haupt (b 1714); ‘Hauptkopist F’ was J.L. Dietel (1715–73); ‘Hauptkopist G’ was Rudolph Straube (b 1717); and ‘Hauptkopist H’ was J.N. Bammler (1722–84). Papers, inks and binding have been evaluated for the purposes of identification and dating; but above all Bach’s own handwriting, in its various stages of development, has served as the criterion for dating. A far-reaching revision of the chronology of Bach’s works (only some 40 of the originals are dated) has been made possible, leading to a substantial revision of previous conceptions, which were based for the most part on Spitta’s work. The new chronology was established in its important details by Dürr and Dadelsen during the 1950s. Since then it has been variously added to, modified and confirmed. For the vocal works it is now essentially complete; sometimes it is precise to the actual day. With the instrumental works the situation is more complicated, because the original manuscripts are often lost; in consequence, results have been less precise since the history of the secondary sources permits of only vague conclusions about composition dates (for example, copies originating from the circle around Krebs and J.G. Walther point to a date in the Weimar period); this makes it unlikely that any complete and exact chronology will be established for the instrumental works, though a relative one is now largely achieved.

Investigations of source material have also led to the solution of crucial questions of authenticity, particularly in connection with the early works but also affecting some of the later ones. For example, Cantata no.15, hitherto regarded as Bach’s earliest cantata, has now been identified as by Johann Ludwig Bach; similarly, Cantatas nos.53, 189 and 142 have been excised from the list of his works. Some instrumental works, such as bwv835–8, 969–70, 1024 and 1036–7, have been assigned to other composers. On the other hand, an important early organ work, bwv739, has now been authenticated and its manuscript ranks as probably Bach’s earliest extant musical autograph. Completely new finds have been made (bwv1081–120 and Anh.205) and numerous copies by Bach of other composers’ works have come to light; these provide additional information about his repertory and its context.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

12. Background, style, influences.

Bach’s output, unparalleled in its encyclopedic character, embraces practically every musical form of his time except opera. The accepted genres were significantly added to by Bach (notably with the harpsichord concerto and chamber music with obbligato keyboard); further, he opened up new dimensions in virtually every department of creative work to which he turned, in format, density and musical quality, and also in technical demands (works such as the St Matthew Passion and the B minor Mass were to remain unique in the history of music for a long time to come). At the same time Bach’s creative production was inextricably bound up with the external factors of his places of work and his employers, as was normal in his time. The composition dates of the various repertories thus reflect Bach’s priorities in his various professional appointments; for instance, most of the organ works were composed while he was active as an organist at Arnstadt, Mühlhausen and Weimar, whereas most of the vocal works belong to the period of his Kantorate at Leipzig. But Bach’s production was by no means wholly dependent on the duties attaching to his office at the time. Thus during his Leipzig period he found time to produce a body of keyboard and chamber music to meet his requirements for concerts, for advertisement, for teaching and other purposes. And his career may be seen as a steady and logical process of development: from organist to Konzertmeister, then to Kapellmeister, and finally to Kantor and director of music – a continual expansion of the scope of his work and responsibilities. This is no matter of chance. Bach chose his appointments, and chose the moment to make each move. If he was unable to accomplish what he required (as was often the case in Leipzig), he was capable of turning his attention elsewhere in pursuit of his creative aims. Bach was a surprisingly emancipated and self-confident artist for his time.

The uncertainty about the dating of Bach’s early works, with so little help in the form of source materials, makes it difficult to reconstruct and assess the beginnings of his work as a composer. It is to be supposed that he started to compose while under the tutelage of his elder brother in Ohrdruf, but although he took no formal lessons with an established composer, as Handel did with Zachow, it would be mistaken to call him self-taught as a composer, for the significance of his belonging to a long-standing family of professional musicians should not be underestimated. Composing was probably overshadowed by instrumental playing in Ambrosius Bach’s family; this must to some extent have applied to the young Johann Sebastian, and probably he devoted more attention to developing his skills as an instrumentalist, especially as an organist, than to composition studies. But the art of improvisation – in those days inseparably bound up with practice on the instrument – would at the very least prepare the ground for his work as a composer. This reciprocity between performing and composing is reflected in the unruly virtuoso and improvisatory elements in Bach’s early works.

As composers who influenced the young Bach, C.P.E. Bach cited (in 1775, in letters to Forkel) Froberger, Kerll, Pachelbel, Frescobaldi, Fischer, Strungk, certain French composers, Bruhns, Buxtehude, Reincken and Böhm – almost exclusively keyboard composers; C.P.E. Bach also said that Bach formed his style through his own efforts and developed his fugal technique basically through private study and reflection. In his letter of resignation from Mühlhausen Bach himself wrote of having procured a good supply of the very best vocal compositions, suggesting that in vocal music too he was decisively stimulated by the study of other composers’ music. Bach came into personal contact with the last three of the composers named by C.P.E.; there was no question of any teacher–pupil relationship. No record survives of what works he collected at Mühlhausen, but they might have included Keiser’s St Mark Passion, a six-part mass by Peranda and an italianate chamber concerto by Biffi, for his early autograph copies of all these survive, demonstrating the breadth of his knowledge of the repertory. As later influences, C.P.E. Bach named Fux, Caldara, Handel, Keiser, Hasse, the two Grauns, Telemann, Zelenka and Benda. This list, though certainly less representative than the earlier one, suggests that Bach’s main interests still lay in his great contemporaries, whose music he not only heard but also studied in transcripts. With them he abandoned his one-sided attention to the organists among older composers, but his interest in the retrospective style represented by Fux and Caldara, complemented by his enthusiasm (mentioned by Birnbaum, 1737) for Palestrina and Lotti, is notable, and is borne out by tendencies in his music from the mid-1730s. Clearly he also became interested in, and ready to follow, more recent stylistic trends, particularly in respect of the music of Hasse, the Graun brothers and Benda (for example in the ‘Christe eleison’ of what was to become the B minor Mass) and in such works as the Peasant Cantata, the Goldberg Variations and the Musical Offering). Mizler, in an article of 1739 on Bach’s cantata style, referring to the Scheibe–Birnbaum controversy, mentioned a work (bwv Anh.13, lost) composed ‘perfectly in accordance with the newest taste’ (‘vollkommen nach dem neuesten Geschmack eingerichtet’).

Curiously, C.P.E. Bach’s list of the masters his father had ‘loved and studied’ contains no mention of Vivaldi and the two Marcellos, or of Corelli, Torelli and other late Baroque Italian composers. Forkel compensated for this by his emphasis on the importance of Vivaldi’s concertos, without citing any particular source to support his claim. Indeed, it was Vivaldi who exercised what was probably the most lasting and distinctive influence on Bach from about 1712–13, when a wide range of the Italian repertory became available to the Weimar court orchestra. Bach drew from Vivaldi his clear melodic contours, the sharp outlines of his outer parts, his motoric and rhythmic conciseness, his unified motivic treatment and his clearly articulated modulation schemes. His confrontation with Vivaldi’s music in 1713–14 provoked what was certainly the strongest single development towards his own personal style. In Forkel's words, Vivaldi ‘taught him to think musically’; his musical language acquired its enduring quality and unmistakable identity through his coupling of italianisms with complex counterpoint, marked by busy interweavings of the inner voices as well as harmonic refinement. It is impossible to describe Bach’s personal style by means of simple formulae; but the process of adaptation and mutation that can be felt throughout his output seems to have taken a particularly characteristic turn at that point in 1713–14 whose principal landmarks are the Orgel-Büchlein and the first Weimar series of cantatas. His adaptation and integration of various contemporary and retrospective styles represent his systematic attempt at shaping and perfecting his personal musical language (‘unlike that of any other composer’, according to C.P.E. Bach) and expanding its structural possibilities and its expressive powers.

An essential component of Bach’s style can be seen in his combination of solid compositional craftsmanship with instrumental and vocal virtuosity. The technical demands made by his music reflect his own prowess as an instrumentalist. Bach’s own versatility – his early involvement in singing (it is not known whether he was later active as a singer), and his experience as a keyboard player, violinist and viola player – was partly responsible for the fact that demanding technical standards became the norm for every type of composition he wrote. This led to Scheibe’s famous criticism: ‘Since he judges according to his own fingers, his pieces are extremely difficult to play; for he demands that singers and instrumentalists should be able to do with their throats and instruments whatever he can play on the keyboard. But this is impossible’. It makes no essential difference at what level these demands are made (for instance between the Inventions and the Goldberg Variations, the four-part chorale and the choral fugue); everywhere Bach’s requirements are the antithesis of conventional simplicity. Yet technical virtuosity never predominates; it becomes a functional element within the composition as a whole. Bach’s impulse towards integration is also manifested in the typically instrumental idiom in which he cast his vocal parts. He thus produced in his music for voices and instruments a homogeneous language of considerable density. Even so, he differentiated between instrumentally and (less often) vocally dominated types of writing; but even in such vocally dominated pieces as the Credo of the B minor Mass he maintained both the density and the uncompromising, yet appropriate technical standard. It is of course significant, as regards both matters of technique and the quality of his music in general, that, as far as we know, he wrote almost exclusively for himself, his own ensembles and his own pupils, and never for a broader public (let alone a non-professional one). This partly explains why his music – unlike, say, Telemann’s or Handel’s – was disseminated within unusually narrow confines.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

13. Cantatas.

About two-fifths of Bach’s sacred cantatas must be considered lost; of the secular cantatas, more are lost than survive. Thus it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the evolution of the cantata in Bach’s hands, even though the surviving repertory is considerable and roughly proportional to the number of cantatas composed at each place where he worked.

The earliest surviving cantatas, and probably Bach’s first, date from the Mühlhausen and perhaps even the Arnstadt period; they include – as the earliest of all – nos.150, 131, 106 and 196 (c1707). The best, in both form and content, are nos.106 and 71. The latter is especially sumptuous, and its appearance in print bore the young composer’s reputation far beyond the boundaries of Mühlhausen. The early vocal works belong almost without exception to the category of ‘organist’s music’, that is they are pieces composed for particular occasions, not regular cantatas for the Sundays and feast days in the church calendar. Nor do they conform to the type established as modern by Neumeister in 1701, but they rely closely on central German tradition. Their texts are mostly taken from the Bible or the chorale repertory; freely conceived poetry is rare (found only in nos.71, 106 and 150). Musically they consist of a succession of different formal types – concerto, motet, (strophic) aria and chorale – adapted and combined to suit the composer’s purpose. Bach did not call them cantatas: as a rule he reserved that term for the solo cantata of the Italian type (like nos.211 and 212), calling his sacred cantatas ‘Concerto’, and in earlier works ‘Motetto’, sometimes ‘Dialogus’ (depending on the text) or simply ‘Music’.

Bach’s early cantatas are distinguished from their central German precursors, which must have been familiar to him from his upbringing, by his tendency to give each movement a unified structure and his development of a broad formal scheme. He found the means to unify movements that for the most part do not function as closed numbers by reducing motivic material (in the solo movements). Reacting against haphazard sequential form, with its danger of formal dissolution, he began to use strictly symmetrical sequences of movements to underpin the overall cyclic structure: for example, chorus–solos–chorus–solos–chorus (no. 106).

During Bach’s early Weimar years, organ music must have dominated his output; on the other hand, the letters written in 1712–13 by his pupil at Weimar, Johann Philipp Kräuter, show that Bach encouraged him to write cantatas. 1713 is the date, too, of what seems to be Bach’s first secular cantata, the Jagd-Kantate no.208, written to a commission from the Weissenfels court (where it had a repeat performance before 1717). The piece shows Bach, obviously newly acquainted with the Italian style, taking up the recitative and the modern kind of aria (for preference the da capo aria), a step which had a decisive effect on the next sacred cantatas, nos.199, 21 and 63 (nos.21 and 63 were probably written in connection with his application to succeed Zachow in Halle in December 1713). With his nomination as court Konzertmeister on 2 March 1714, he started to produce cantatas on the whole regularly from the end of March onwards, in accordance with an agreement ‘to perform a piece of his own composition under his own direction, in the chapel of the royal castle, on every fourth Sunday at all seasons’. This was Bach’s first opportunity to compose a whole cantata cycle, albeit over a fairly long time-span; however, as things turned out, the number he wrote in Weimar amounted to little more than 20. The principle of the annual cycle is closely bound up with the history of the cantata from Neumeister on; the texts were mostly published in cycles, one for each Sunday and feast day in the church year. Bach, admittedly, never adhered strictly to a single poet (except in the lost Picander cycle of 1728–9), preferring to pick and choose. In Weimar he turned for the first time to librettos by Neumeister (nos.18 and 61) and used texts by G.C. Lehms (1684–1717; nos.199 and 54), but evidently preferred texts by the Weimar court poet Salomo Franck (1659–1725), the author of extremely original and profoundly felt sacred and secular poetic texts, among the best Bach set. Nos.21, 63 and 199 are among cantatas dating from before 1714; regular production began with Cantata no.182 on 25 March 1714. There followed, usually at four-week intervals, in 1714 nos.12, 172, 61, 152; in 1715 nos.18, 54, 31, 165, 185, 163, 132; in 1716 nos.155, 80a, 161, 162, 70a, 186a and 147a. Repeat performances of nos.21, 199, 31, 165 and 185 were slotted into the cycle. Gaps are accounted for by the loss of certain cantatas and in one case by the period of mourning from 11 August to 9 November 1715.

Musically the works are of particular importance for the development they show in Bach’s personal style of writing for voices and instruments. The recitatives contain extensive arioso sections to begin with, but these gradually disappear (although the combinatorial element was to remain typical of Bach throughout his life); the arias become longer, in free or (more usually) strict da capo form and occasionally using more complex structures. The choruses embrace a multiplicity of formal principles, among them fugue and canon (no.182), passacaglia (12), concerto (172), motet (21) and French overture (61). Also notable are the overlapping of instrumental and vocal formal schemes (the use of Chor- and Vokaleinbau) and instrumental quotations of chorale melodies. The extraordinarily colourful instrumentation is especially characteristic: within the smallest of performing ensembles Bach tried out a great variety of combinations, for example recorder, oboe, viola d'amore and viola da gamba in Cantata no.152. Following the Italian ideal, his orchestral writing moved away from the French practice of five-part writing, with two violas, which predominates in the early cantatas towards a more flexible four-part style. Instead of the harmonic weight of the middle voices in five-part writing Bach provided a rhythmically and melodically active viola part that is particularly characteristic.

In Cöthen, corresponding to Bach’s official responsibilities, only secular cantatas were composed (with the single exception of bwv Anh.5) and those were mostly written for New Year celebrations or the prince’s birthday. Bach’s librettist was C.F. Hunold (‘Menantes’, 1681–1721). Among the Cöthen cantatas, many survive only as verbal texts (Anh.6–8) or are lost altogether; a substantial part of the music survives only for nos.66a, 134a, 173a, 184a and 194a. These pieces mostly exemplify the ‘serenata’ type of work, with succinct operatic treatment in dialogues between allegorical figures. It is not surprising that they reflect Bach’s study of the instrumental concerto of the period (in part in the solo–tutti differentiation) or that dance characteristics appear, notably in the solo movements. Bach used transverse flutes in Cantata no.173a, evidently for the first time.

At Leipzig the performance of sacred cantatas on Sundays and feast days (some 60 a year) was one of Bach’s chief tasks, and he produced a large number of new works. His vast workload meant that within the first cycle, beginning on the first Sunday after Trinity (30 May), he not only had to rely on repeat performances of earlier sacred cantatas but also had to resort to parodies of secular cantatas written at Cöthen. Nevertheless, his first cycle (1723–4) contains the following new compositions: nos.75, 76, 24, 167, 136, 105, 46, 179, 69a, 77, 25, 119, 138, 95, 148, 48, 109, 89, 60, 90, 40, 64, 190, 153, 65, 154, 155, 73, 81, 83, 144, 181, 67, 104, 166, 86, 37 and 44; to these must be added his test works (nos.22 and 23, for Quinquagesima 1723) and no.194, composed for the consecration of the new organ in Störmthal. Apart from no.24 (Neumeister) and nos.64, 69a and 77, the poet or poets of this first cycle remain for the most part unknown. The use of Knauer’s Gotha cycle of 1720, which provides two texts for each Sunday and feast day, together with the fact that cantatas in two parts, or two separate cantatas, were sometimes performed (before and after the sermon) – such as nos.75, 76, 21, 24+185, 147, 186, 179+199, 70, 181+18, 31+4, 172+59, 194+165 and 22+23 – indicates that Bach designed his first Leipzig cycle, in part at least, as a double cycle.

Thus in his first year at Leipzig Bach furnished himself with an astonishingly concentrated repertory, and his emphasis on the cantata genre also gave him mastery over an incomparable variety of forms, free from any schematicism. Three favourite groundplans are: biblical text–recitative–aria–recitative–aria–chorale (nos.46, 105, 136 etc.); biblical text–recitative–chorale–aria–recitative–aria–chorale (nos.40, 48, 64 etc.); biblical text–aria–chorale–recitative–aria–chorale (nos.86, 144, 166 etc.). A constant feature, characteristic of the Leipzig cantatas as a whole, is the framework, comprising an introductory choral movement in the grand style (solo pieces appear rarely at the start) and closing four-part chorale, simple but expressive. Compared with the Weimar cantatas, the orchestral forces are larger. From no.75 onwards the brass (mainly trumpets and horns) are more strongly deployed, the flute is brought into play increasingly after 1724, and the oboe d’amore (from no.75) and oboe da caccia (from no.167) are introduced as new instruments, as are the violino piccolo and violoncello piccolo at a later date. Instrumental virtuosity is heightened, and the melismatic quality of the vocal writing is further developed. The ‘prelude and fugue’ type of movement is frequently used for the introductory chorus (as in no.46).

The second cycle, dating from 1724–5, consists mainly of a series of freshly composed chorale cantatas (i.e. cantatas of which both text and music are based on hymns): nos.20, 2, 7, 135, 10, 93, 107, 178, 94, 101, 113, 33, 78, 99, 8, 130, 114, 96, 5, 180, 38, 115, 139, 26, 116, 62, 91, 121, 133, 122, 41, 123, 3, 111, 92, 125, 126, 127 and 1. From Easter 1725 this series was continued at first with cantatas of the traditional kind, that is with texts related to the prescribed scriptural readings for the day (nos.249, 6, 42 and 85), and then with nine cantatas to texts by Mariane von Ziegler (1695–1760): 103, 108, 87, 128, 183, 74, 68, 175 and 176, in all of which there is a tendency to use forms closer to those of the first cycle. 1724–5 was not only the most productive year for cantatas, as far as is known from the surviving works at least; it also, with the chorale cantata, saw the beginnings of a type that perhaps represents Bach’s most important contribution to the history of the genre. What is particularly striking is his endeavour to lay out the introductory movements as large-scale cantus firmus compositions, each adhering to a different structural principle. Cantata no.20, and with it the second cycle, opens with a chorale movement for chorus in the form of a French overture which it is possible to regard as a kind of programmatic statement, whereas the opening chorus of no.2 takes the retrospective form of a chorale motet. By this means Bach marked out a broad framework, in terms of both musical style and compositional technique, to indicate the conceptual range of the cycle he was starting. Cohesion between the movements within each cantata is guaranteed, at least from the textual point of view, by their relationship to the fundamental chorale (with chorale paraphrases for the solo pieces, as opposed to the procedure in no.4); often it is further emphasized by references to the cantus firmus and by the use of various ways of intermingling cantus firmus and free material. The author of the texts for the chorale cantatas is not known – Pastor Christian Weiss of the Thomaskirche, who used to preach chorale sermons, is a possibility.

With the third cycle, from 1725–7, the continuous, weekly production of cantatas ends, or so the sources indicate. It appears, however, from a surviving printed textbook of 1725 covering the third to the sixth Sunday after Trinity, that this cycle must have suffered substantial losses. When his production was actually interrupted Bach usually filled the gaps with works by other composers, including no fewer than 18 cantatas by his cousin Johann Ludwig Bach of Meiningen. The cantatas of the third cycle offer no major innovations in the way of musical structure, but they notably include solo (nos.52, 84, 35 etc.) and dialogue cantatas (58, 32, 49 etc.), as well as large-scale works in two parts. There is an absence of overall formal integrity in the planning of this cycle, but Bach reveals a wide variety of ambitions and intentions, among them completing the cycle of chorale cantatas with further works of that type (no.137), reverting to older texts by Neumeister (28), Franck (72), Lehms (110, 57, 151, 16, 32, 13, 170 and 35) or from a Rudolstadt textbook (17, 39, 43, 45, 88, 102 and 187) and experimenting with the use of complementary texts from the Old and New Testaments (the former in the opening movement, the latter in a central one: Rudolstadt texts). One remarkable trait of the cycle is the frequent introduction of older instrumental movements, pre-eminently as sinfonias but sometimes also with choral participation (the reconstruction of the first movement of the Orchestral Suite bwv1069 to open Cantata no.110 is an example of this). A remarkable innovation in summer 1727 was the appearance of obbligato organ parts (nos.34, 146, 169, 49 and 188), found in both sinfonias (recycling instrumental concertos) and arias.

The third cycle was followed by the 1728–9 cycle on texts by Picander, which has disappeared but for a few remnants (1728: nos.149, 188, 197a; 1729: nos.171, 156, 159, Anh.190, 145 and 174). That Bach really did set the whole of Picander’s Cantaten auf die Sonn- und Fest-Tage durch das gantze Jahr (Leipzig, 1728) as his fourth cycle cannot be accepted without reservation. At the same time, the poet must have been expressing something more than a pious hope when he wrote in the preface ‘that any lack of poetic charm may perhaps be compensated for by the gracefulness of the incomparable Herr Kapellmeister Bach and these songs [Lieder] may be performed in the principal churches of prayerful Leipzig’. One of the characteristics of Picander texts is the frequent interpolation of chorale verses in the free poetry, creating attractive opportunities for mingling choruses and arias, which were not wasted on Bach (see nos.156 and 159, or the first movement of the St Matthew Passion). The cantatas written after 1729 offer nothing essentially new in formal terms, as far as can be determined from those that survive, but they show signs of a late style beginning to develop, manifested (in no.195 for example) above all in a more refined shaping of the accompanied recitative and a more integral, polyphonic treatment of the final chorale (entailing some modification of the cantus firmus). Some of the later cantatas (nos.117, 192, 112, 177, 97 and 100) show an interesting modification of the chorale type: they relinquish freely composed texts but (unlike the older per omnes versus type represented by Cantata no.4) set the central movements as recitatives and arias.

It is impossible to reconstruct a fifth cycle worthy of the name from the surviving works (not even given the large number of unattributed four-part chorales: see §15), but it would have had to be composed over a rather longer period of time, mainly in the 1730s. The mention in the obituary of ‘five cycles of church pieces, for every Sunday and holy day’ is just a tantalizing hint of how much has been lost.

Besides the cantatas composed in connection with the church year, Bach also wrote sacred cantatas for other occasions, like changes of town council, weddings, funerals, the bicentenary of the Augsburg Confession (1730) and inaugurations of organs; in style these are essentially indistinguishable from the other works. The body of cantatas, for all its variety, has an unusually self-contained character, maintained above all by its consistently high musical quality and its unfailing expressive profundity. The distinctive expressive power of Bach’s musical language did not merely evolve in the cantatas, in many essential respects, but also finds its most characteristic representation in them. His expressive urge, as seen in individual arias and choruses, was not confined to single words as the primary bearers of expression, but was geared to movements and formal sections as a whole, in keeping with Baroque formal models (like the ABA of the da capo aria). Only within the context of a movement’s structural and expressive unity did he regard the special treatment of single words as possible or meaningful. Among the tools of Bach’s craft the traditions of musica poetica and musical rhetoric (the theory of musical figures) must certainly be reckoned. They were deeply rooted in him. Yet to reduce Bach’s intentions to their rhetorical and figural components, or even to emphasize those components, would be to diminish their true breadth. Over and above this objective of expressive unity, Bach was always primarily concerned with the contrapuntal organization of melodic-rhythmic and harmonic textures to establish coherence. That is a principal reason why his cantata movements lend themselves so readily to parody. The technical prerequisites for producing a parody work – which Bach did so often – are metrical similarity and expressive affinity; the most essential requirement, however, is self-sufficiency of the musical substance, and its flexibility leaves considerable scope for the musical interpretation of a new text.

During his early Leipzig years Bach wrote only isolated secular cantatas, but these became more frequent as time passed. They were produced for various occasions: university ceremonies (nos.36b, 198, 205, 207), celebrations at the Thomasschule (bwv Anh.18, Anh.19, 36c), festivities in the houses of noblemen and prominent citizens (202, 216, 210, 249b, 30a, 210a, 212) and commissions from court (249a, 36a). Most of his large-scale congratulatory and homage cantatas written for the electoral house of Saxony were produced at the collegium musicum. A favourite format was the operatic dramma per musica, with a simple plot suited to the specific nature of the occasion being celebrated (nos.213, 206, 214, 207a, 215). The more lyrical cantatas such as no.204, or the two Italian works, nos.203 and 209, would certainly have been performed at the collegium musicum. The Coffee and Peasant Cantatas (nos.211 and 212), to some extent tinged with folk style, are distinguished by their lifelike and humorous characterization. The librettist of most of the works of 1725–42 was the versatile Picander, the only other important poet for Bach’s cantatas during this period being J.C. Gottsched (1700–66), the influential Leipzig professor of rhetoric (bwv198, Anh.13, Anh.196). There is concrete evidence of just under 40 secular cantatas composed during the Leipzig years, but in most cases only the texts survive. Their occasional nature is the main reason why so many have been lost: few could have been given a second performance, and then only after alterations to the text. Bach was of course aware that their best chance of survival lay in parody, and he took such opportunities as occurred to save the music, as in the case of the Christmas Oratorio (see §14).

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

14. Oratorios, Passions, Latin works.

The three works that Bach called ‘oratorios’ fall within a very short period: the Christmas Oratorio of 1734–5, the Easter Oratorio and Ascension Oratorio of 1735. The librettists are not known for certain. The place for Bach’s oratorios in the Lutheran liturgy was the same as that for the cantata; the only difference between the oratorio and cantata texts is that the former have a self-contained ‘plot’ or take the form of narration with dialogue. This conforms with the history of the genre, although Bach held the tendency to formal expansiveness firmly in check, in comparison with standard Italian practice. In the Christmas Oratorio, especially, the normal character of a single self-contained work is contradicted by its being split into sections for six different services between Christmas Day and Epiphany, and this is further emphasized by Bach in his use of different performing forces for the sections (although these are based on an underlying general scheme, and are grouped round six scenes from the Bible, with certain divergences from the allocation of lessons to be read at the various services). The unusual conception of an oratorio performed over several days is reminiscent of the Lübeck Abendmusiken, and the Christmas Oratorio obviously belongs to the oratorio tradition established by Buxtehude. All three of Bach’s oratorios are essentially based on parodies of secular cantatas whose music, initially associated with a particular occasion, could reasonably be re-used in this way (the Christmas Oratorio from nos.213, 214 and 215 among other works; the Easter Oratorio by a reworking of parts of bwv249a; the Ascension Oratorio above all from bwv Anh.18). However, there is so much that is new and individual in the Christmas Oratorio, especially in the biblical choruses and the chorales, and in the Ascension Oratorio, that the works are in no sense subordinate to their originals. The pervasive use of texts from the Gospels, moreover, gives the works a special status, linking them to the Protestant historia and thus ultimately to the Passion.

Of the five Passions mentioned in the necrology two survive (St Matthew and St John), for one the text survives (St Mark) and the other two are lost. Judging from the source it seems probable that the anonymous St Luke Passion – which is certainly not by Bach – was included among his works in error because the score, dating from about 1730, was copied in his hand and contained additions by him. This means that only one Passion remains to be accounted for. Recent research has shown that various movements in the second version of the St John Passion (1725) were taken from a Passion composed for Weimar, most notably the chorus ‘O Mensch bewein’ and the three arias ‘Himmel, reisse’, ‘Zerschmettert mich’ and ‘Ach windet euch nicht so’. Curiously enough, Hilgenfeldt (1850) mentioned a Passion by Bach dating from 1717, giving no indication of the source of his information, and Bach gave a guest recital at the Gotha court during the Passion period in 1717, making it conceivable that he put on a Passion performance while the post of Kapellmeister was vacant. Also, he performed Keiser’s St Mark Passion in Weimar in about 1713, so his interest in the genre is established for the period. The missing fifth Passion must almost certainly, therefore, be a lost Weimar work, but the traces are too few to allow any conclusions to be drawn about it.

The three known works represent the same type of oratorio Passion, in the tradition of the historia, in which the biblical text is retained as a whole (with ‘parts’ for soloists – Evangelist, Jesus, Pilate etc. – and the turba choruses for disciples, high priests etc.), and is interrupted by contemplative, so-called ‘madrigal’ pieces set to freely composed verse, as well as by chorales. A special feature of Bach’s Passions is the unusual frequency of the chorales, which are set in simple yet extremely expressive four-part writing. The text of the St John Passion of 1724, Bach’s first large-scale vocal work for Leipzig, is not a unified piece of work. The freely composed parts rely heavily on the famous Passion poem by B.H. Brockes (Der für die Sünde der Welt gemarterte und sterbende Jesus, 1712) and on texts by C.H. Postel (c1700) and Christian Weise (1675); besides this, the Evangelist’s part contains interpolations from St Matthew’s Gospel. Unlike any other of Bach’s large-scale works, the St John Passion underwent substantial changes of every kind in the course of its various performances. For the second performance, in 1725, Bach produced a much altered version adapted conceptually to the cycle of chorale cantatas (see §13) by the incorporation of movements based on a cantus firmus. In a third version (probably of 1732) the interpolations from St Matthew were cut and a new aria and sinfonia added (both lost). Finally a fourth version of 1749 saw the work restored to something much closer to its original form; besides some changes to the text, for his last performance of a Passion in Leipzig Bach greatly enlarged the performing forces (by a part for bassono grosso among other things). It seems that Bach began a thorough-going revision of the work in 1739, but for some reason abandoned the process halfway through movement 10 and did not resume it; furthermore the alterations he made at that time were not adopted in the 1749 performance. For all the modifications made over the 25-year period, the setting of the biblical Passion text remained the work’s constant centre, around which the madrigalian movements in particular were fitted in various ways like different settings for a gemstone. Bach skilfully exploited the network of internal textual correspondences which is unique to St John’s Gospel, and convincingly translated it into an ‘architectural’ structure.

The history of the St Matthew Passion, with its double chorus, is less complicated, though not entirely straightforward. In this case the date of the first performance seems now to be established (the Thomaskirche, Good Friday 1727), but some details of that occasion remain unclear because of lacunae in the source material (version bwv244b). Furthermore, some ten movements from the St Matthew Passion were incorporated into the Cöthen funeral music of 1729 (bwv244a), and the consequences of that for the repeat of the Passion in the same year are not known. On the whole the St Matthew Passion is a considerably more unified piece than the St John, for which the primary reason is its use of Picander’s text. Its greater textual and musical scale allows more space for the arias and ‘madrigal’ pieces in which the coupling of arioso with aria is an especially characteristic feature. Another special feature is the way the strings provide an accompanying halo in Jesus’s recitatives. The pervading cyclical formation of the work (from the interrelating of the chorales, tonal organization and paired movements) is in some respects even more pronounced than in the St John Passion, while it lacks the earlier work’s ‘architectural’ centre. After 1729 the St Matthew Passion had at least two more performances under Bach’s direction. In 1736 he made some important changes, chief among them emphasizing the separation of the two choruses and instrumental ensembles by division of the continuo, exchanging the simple chorale at the end of part i for ‘O Mensch bewein’ and replacing the lute in ‘Komm süsses Kreuz’ with bass viol. The additional alterations of about 1742 were mainly a matter of meeting practical performing conditions.

In its main sections, that is in the ‘madrigal’ pieces, the St Mark Passion of 1731 was a parody work whose main sources are the Trauer Ode (Cantata no.198) and the Cöthen funeral music (bwv244a). While only the text survives, the musical design can in part be deduced from these models, although they scarcely permit it to be reconstructed satisfactorily. The Bach literature includes discussion of parody relationships which go further than this, but they seem to raise more questions than they answer. The most plausible suggestion, made by Smend (1940–48), is that some of the exceptionally large number of chorales in the St Mark Passion may have survived in the collections of Bach’s four-part chorales.

In Bach’s time Latin polyphonic music was still often used in ordinary Lutheran Sunday worship, particularly, in Leipzig, at important church feasts. Further, the concerted Magnificat continued to hold its place in Vespers. Bach had been interested in Latin polyphonic music at least since his Weimar period, as his copies of pieces by other composers demonstrate (Peranda, Durante, Pez, Wilderer, Bassani, Caldara, Lotti, Palestrina etc.; catalogue in Wolff, 1968). He also wrote insertions in this style for other composers’ works, and made some arrangements (Sanctus bwv241; Credo intonation for a mass by Bassani; ‘Suscepit Israel’ for a Magnificat by Caldara). His earliest surviving work of this type is probably the Kyrie bwv233a on the cantus firmus ‘Christe, du Lamm Gottes’. Then in his first year at Leipzig came the five-part Magnificat, first the E version with four inserted Christmas pieces (bwv243a), revised in D major in 1733, without the Christmas pieces, for use on any major feast day (bwv243). Among the various Sanctus settings attributed to Bach, apart from bwv232III, probably only bwv237 and 238 (both 1723) are original compositions. The four short masses (bwv233–6), mostly parody works based on cantata movements, date from about 1738. In the careful selection of models and the subsequent reworking of the musical material, these works, together with the B minor Mass, amount to a valuable anthology of Bach’s vocal writing in music of outstandingly high quality. The transposition of German cantata movements into mass settings did more than replace German words, contingent on the time and occasion of their writing, with the timelessness of the Latin (and Greek) texts; it also removed the limitations imposed on the cantatas by their place in the annual church cycle and gave them a more general validity. The longer-term outcome of this was seen soon after 1750, when specifically the Latin sacred music was hailed by connoisseurs like Marpurg, Kirnberger, Hiller and even the south German Prince-Abbot Gerbert as a particularly important sector of Bach’s music.

Bach’s masterpiece in this genre is of course the work known – though not conceived as a unity – as the B minor Mass. Its genesis stretched over more than two decades. Bach’s aim seems originally to have been to bring together a collection of exemplary large-scale mass movements rather than to create a single, cyclical work on an unprecedented scale. In assembling the whole score in 1748–9, however, the composer undoubtedly had the intention of making it a comprehensive work of consistent quality. The oldest section is the Sanctus of 1724. The Kyrie and Gloria come from the 1733 Missa dedicated to the Dresden court, while the Credo or ‘Symbolum Nicenum’ was composed only during Bach’s last years. In many respects these two main sections represent Bach’s ideals not of Latin polyphonic music alone but of vocal music altogether: in their stylistic multiplicity (the contrast of deliberately archaic and modern styles; the experimentation with the widest variety of instrumental and vocal techniques); their abandonment of the da capo aria and the recitative; and in their formal perfection. The 1733 Missa (reminiscent of the Magnificat in its five-part writing) emerges as a completely integrated, unified whole, typified by the inner logic of the tonal organization (B minor–D–F minor–D–A–D–G–B minor–D) and the disposition of the vocal and instrumental solos. The Credo is a particularly good example of Bach’s many-layered and symmetrical layout (Table 1). The Missa and the Credo have a series of parody originals (including movements from Cantatas nos.29, 46, 171, 12 and 120); in the latter the ‘Credo’, ‘Et incarnatus’ and ‘Confiteor’ seem to be the only original compositions.

An earlier version of ‘Credo in unum Deum’ exists, dating from the early 1740s, while ‘Et incarnatus’ may be the last vocal composition that Bach completed. However, Bach’s reworking of earlier material went much further than usual. In ‘Agnus Dei’, in particular, nearly half the movement was completely revised, using new thematic material. When the entire work was nearly finished Bach revised it once more, probably in 1749, adding ‘Et incarnatus’ (the words of which he had originally set as part of the aria ‘Et in unum Dominum’). The music of the new ‘Et incarnatus’ is reminiscent of a movement in Pergolesi’s Stabat mater, and in its combination of unorthodox polyphony and musically expressive gesture points the way forward to a new stylistic sensibility. It is all the more astonishing that Bach successfully followed it with the earliest music in the mass, the ‘Crucifixus’ (from the second movement of Cantata no.12) – though he did bring this up to date with a more empfindsam style of continuo and more subtle instrumentation of the upper parts.

It was obviously not by chance that Bach turned in his old age to the mass genre. With its centuries-old tradition, by comparison with such modern genres as the cantata and oratorio, the setting of the mass had a natural affinity to the historical and theoretical dimensions of Bach's musical thinking, which also bore fruit in the monothematic instrumental works of his last years.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

15. Motets, chorales, songs.

In Bach’s time motets were sung as introits for services and on certain special occasions. The tradition established at Leipzig was to select introit motets from the Florilegium Portense (1603), a classical repertory from the 16th century compiled by Erhard Bodenschatz. For this reason, Bach wrote motets only for special occasions, probably only for burial services, although in only one case, Der Geist hilft (for the funeral of the Thomasschule headmaster Ernesti in 1729), is there documentary evidence of this. Bach’s motet texts, following the tradition, are based on biblical quotations and chorales; freely composed poetry is used in only one case, and even this is hymnbook poetry (Komm, Jesu, komm, Paul Thymich). On the occasions for which the motets were composed, Bach normally had more than the school choristers at his disposal; he was thus able to use between five- and eight-part writing, as he did in six pieces (bwv225–9 and Anh.159). In line with normal central German practice since the 17th century, it was a rule in the performance of motets at Leipzig, including those from Florilegium Portense, that a continuo part should be included – to be precise, organ, harpsichord (in Leipzig the so-called motet harpsichord), lute, with violone, cello, bassoon. In this way the bass of a vocal (choral or polychoral) movement was supported by a larger or smaller continuo depending on the circumstances, in the manner of a basso seguente. Colla parte accompaniment was required only occasionally. The performing parts that have survived for Der Geist hilft, with strings (first chorus) and reed instruments (second chorus) doubling the voices, must be connected with the exceptional nature of the occasion and cannot necessarily be taken as applicable to the other motets; similar special cases, with partly obbligato instruments, are bwv118, O Jesu Christ (both versions) and Der Gerechte kömmt um (not in bwv: bc C 8).

Bach’s use of double chorus and his exposition of forms of chorale treatment link the motets with the central German tradition in which he had grown up. That it was part of his direct family inheritance is illustrated by the fact, which can scarcely be coincidental, that motets are particularly well represented in the Alt-Bachisches Archiv. Bach’s earliest motet, Ich lasse dich nicht bwv Anh.159, long attributed to Johann Christoph Bach of Eisenach, adheres extremely closely to Thuringian models. Composed by 1712 at the latest, the work’s foundations in the tradition are typified by the highlighting of upper parts and the largely homophonic conception of the first section, and by the interweaving of a chorale tune in large note values in the second; by contrast, the harmonic intensity of the work (in F minor) and the unified, almost rondo-like, thematic construction of its first section are innovatory. Among later works, Bach’s debt to the tradition is best illustrated by the closing section of Fürchte dich nicht, in its combination of cantus firmus (‘Warum sollt ich mich denn grämen’) and freely imitative writing, and the opening section of Komm, Jesu, komm, with its chordal writing for double chorus. As a whole, the style of bwv118 too is retrospective, with its archaic instrumentation and its homophonic choral writing.

By contrast, most movements in the motets have a markedly polyphonic vocal manner, dominated by instrumental style and showing unifying motivic work. Another characteristic is the clear formal articulation, with multi-movement works demonstrating different kinds of treatment. Thus Jesu, meine Freude, the longest work of this kind, in 11 movements, is the most strictly (that is, symmetrically) conceived: the opening and closing movements are identical, the second to fifth correspond to the seventh and eighth, and the central sixth movement is a fugue. Der Geist hilft begins with a concerto-like movement, followed by a double fugue and a simple chorale setting. The form of the instrumental concerto (fast–slow–fast) is used in Singet dem Herrn. Precise dating is possible only in the case of Der Geist hilft (24 October 1729). Jesu meine Freude seems to date from a pre-Leipzig period, although there is no tangible evidence for this; it is possible that an earlier motet, with a text from Romans viii, was expanded into a chorale motet by the addition of stanzas from the hymn Jesu meine Freude. The other motets appear to date from the Leipzig years. This is certain in the case of O Jesu Christ (c1737): its instrumentation was revised for a repeat performance in the 1740s, with strings, oboes, bassoons and horns; the original had only two litui, cornets and three trombones. The authenticity of Lobet den Herrn has been questioned, probably groundlessly, but the paucity of material that would permit comparisons weakens the arguments on either side. Bach’s arrangement of Pergolesi’s Stabat mater with the psalm text ‘Tilge, Höchster, meine Sünden’, dating from 1741–6, should be counted among the motets.

Bach’s composition of chorales is most closely associated with his production of cantatas. Four-part chorale style, or stylus simplex, was normal for his closing movements, particularly in the Leipzig cantatas; it also often occurred at the ends of subsections in the Passions and oratorios. Bach’s chorale writing is characterized by the ‘speaking’ quality of the part-writing and the harmonies – meaning that they aim to be a direct interpretation of the text. In its pervasive counterpoint and its expressiveness, Bach’s harmonic style stands out from that of his contemporaries, who preferred plain homophonic textures in their chorales. This simpler approach, found in the chorales of such as Graupner or Telemann, with movement mostly in minims, was well suited to congregational singing, but Bach took no account of that in his chorales, which are deliberately more artistic, rhythmically often more lively (written in crotchets) and frequently bolder in their harmonies. The first four-part chorale settings are in the Weimar cantatas (the last movement of no.12, performed on 22 April 1714, is among the earliest examples), and Bach’s stylistic development in this type of composition reached a final stage 30 years later in the chorales of the Christmas Oratorio, with their elegantly mobile bass lines and their polyphonic refinement of the inner voices. His training as an organist probably contributed to the personal stamp of his style; organ settings such as bwv706 display similar stylistic traits. Chorales such as bwv371, conceived with orchestral forces in mind, act furthermore as reminders that chorales were Bach’s favourite medium of instruction. C.P.E. Bach wrote in 1775: ‘His pupils had to begin by learning four-part thoroughbass. After that he went on with them to chorales; first he used to write the bass himself, then they had to invent the alto and tenor for themselves … this way of leading up to chorales is indisputably the best way of learning composition, including harmony’.

The posthumously published collections (Birnstiel, 2 vols., 1765, 1769; Breitkopf, 4 vols., 1784–7) contain almost all the chorales known from Bach’s vocal works, some under different titles. The Breitkopf edition, prepared by C.P.E. Bach and Kirnberger, contains 371 chorales, among them more than 100 not found in the extant vocal works. This provides an important pointer to the lost vocal music, and though extremely difficult to follow up it has borne some fruits, as in the reconstruction of the St Mark Passion or the Picander cycle. It is worth remarking that the number of excess chorales, that is those that cannot be assigned to extant works, more or less corresponds to the number thought to exist in the lost cantatas and Passions.

Under the generic heading of ‘sacred songs’ come the 69 melodies with figured bass in G.C. Schemelli’s Musicalisches Gesang-Buch (1736). According to the foreword, Bach edited the figured bass for some of the melodies, while others were entirely new compositions by him. Three are demonstrably his (bwv452, 500 and 505); of the rest at least seven pieces for two voices and ten ‘improved’ continuo parts can be associated with him. He seems to have been only peripherally occupied with the composition of songs and strophic arias, for which he took texts from religious poetry of the 17th and 18th centuries: that, at least, is the inference to be drawn from the limited surviving repertory, for which the only source is the second Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena Bach (1725) containing bwv511–14 and 516 – works which probably have a direct association with the Schemelli Gesangbuch. Comparison of bwv512 with 315, and of bwv452 with 299, draws attention to the conceptual association between the composition of chorales for two and for four voices. The collection of four-part chorales which Bach’s pupil J.L. Dietel extracted from his teacher’s works (Leipzig, c1735), like the Schemelli Gesangbuch (1736), indicates that Bach was working on chorales rather intensively and systematically at the time, perhaps with a view to a more compendious publication.

Only exceptionally did Bach compose secular songs. A quodlibet for four voices and continuo (bwv542), surviving only in fragmentary form, is unique among his vocal works. It was probably composed for a wedding in Erfurt, at the latest by mid-1708. With its admixture of various melodies and humorous words, the piece forms a link with the musical games played, so tradition relates, when the Bach family got together (see §1 above). Other rarities, from a later period when he was settled in the university town of Leipzig, are the song addressing a pipe of tobacco (bwv515) and the ‘Murky’ (bwv Anh.40).

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

16. Organ music.

The obituary written immediately after Bach’s death and published in 1754 contains the following statement: ‘For as long as there is nought to confute us other than the mere possibility of the existence of better organists and keyboard players, we cannot be reproached if we are bold enough to persist in the claim that our Bach was the most prodigious organist and keyboard player that there has ever been. It may be that this or that famous man has accomplished much in polyphony on these instruments but was he for that reason as expert – with hands and feet together – as Bach was? Whosoever had the pleasure of hearing him and others, being not otherwise disposed by prejudice, will agree that this doubt is not unfounded. And whosoever looks at Bach’s pieces for the organ and the keyboard, which he himself, as is universally known, performed with the greatest perfection, will likewise have nothing to say in contradiction of the above statement.’ The claim illustrates the well-nigh legendary reputation that Bach enjoyed in his lifetime. His fame had already spread beyond the confines of central Germany by 1717, when he challenged the French virtuoso Louis Marchand to a competition at the court of Dresden and won by default when the Frenchman took flight. ‘It would be wrong to conclude from this defeat of Marchand in Dresden that he must have been a poor musician. Did not as great a one as Handel avoid every opportunity of confronting the late Bach … or of getting involved with him?’ (Marpurg).

Keyboard music as a whole occupies a crucial position in Bach’s life in many respects, but this is even more true of the works for harpsichord than of those for organ. No other genre occupied Bach so consistently and intensively from the beginning of his career to the end. His life as a professional musician began with learning to play on a keyboard, above all in Ohrdruf in 1695–1700 under the tuition of his elder brother Johann Christoph, and his study of keyboard music by the best composers of the 17th century laid the most important foundations of his training as a composer. The compositions for harpsichord, in particular, provide the opportunity to assess Bach’s development at each stage of his creative life.

Bach was bolder than any of his contemporaries: from the first he set no limits to his keyboard skills, and accepted no restrictions to his horizons – from the breadth of the foundations of his style to the comprehensive range of genres in which he composed. The stylistic basis was laid in his youth, and it was undoubtedly important that growing up in the central German environment of his time gave him the opportunity to learn about different stylistic tendencies side by side, without any bias towards one rather than another. As a result his models came from a highly diverse repertory. The north German school, including such masters as Buxtehude, Reincken, Bruhns, Lübeck and Böhm, were ranged alongside central German composers such as Pachelbel’s circle and older pupils (J.H. Buttstedt, for example, or A.N. Vetter) and Witt, Krieger, Kuhnau and Zachow, as well as their southern German colleagues J.J. Froberger, J.C. Kerll and J.C.F. Fischer. Italians such as Frescobaldi and Battiferri confronted Frenchmen such as Lully, Marais, Grigny and Raison. Many of these names are to be found in the large manuscript collections (the so-called Andreas-Bach-Buch and Möllersche Handschrift) copied by the Ohrdruf Bach, Johann Christoph. They give a clear picture of the repertory that the younger brother grew up with, and which showed him – like the young Handel, learning his craft in a similar environment – ‘the manifold ways of writing and composing of various races, together with each single composer’s strengths and weaknesses’. No comparable sphere of influence served to challenge this broadly based group of musicians and exemplars later in Bach’s life. There were, of course, individuals who had an effect on him, such as Vivaldi after 1710, or probably Couperin, or his exact contemporary Handel, but no group of musicians of a comparable range or variety.

Bach’s dedication to every keyboard genre and form appears equally boundless. The range remains constant throughout his career, from the earliest to the last compositions. All the major types are represented: the freely improvisatory (prelude, toccata, fantasia), the imitative and strict (fugue, fantasia, ricercar, canzona, capriccio, invention), the combinatory (multi-part preludes, prelude and fugue) and multi-movement forms (sonata, suite or partita, overture or sinfonia, chaconne or passacaglia, pastorale, concerto and variations); and then there are the various types and forms of chorale arrangement.

Unlike the vocal music and the chamber and orchestral works, Bach’s keyboard output covers his entire creative life. There are quite lengthy periods of heightened activity – organ music before 1717, harpsichord music after that date. As a whole, however, Bach seems to have cultivated the two genres alongside each other. It is thus the more surprising that, right from the beginning, consistently and in defiance of inherited 17th-century tradition, he abandoned the conventional community of repertory between organ and harpsichord, choosing to write specifically for the one or the other. The uncompromising use of obbligato pedals, in particular, is a distinguishing mark of Bach’s organ style. Only exceptionally (for example in the chorale partitas and the small chorale arrangements from the third part of the Clavier-Übung) do the performing possibilities coincide so that organ and harpsichord become truly interchangeable.

Since most of Bach’s keyboard works from the pre-Leipzig years survive in copies (generally made in the circle of Bach’s pupils) rather than in autograph scores, it is not possible to establish a precise chronology. Even a relative one is possible only in general terms, with considerations of style and authenticity holding the balance. In the earliest works the influence of Bach’s models is pronounced. Pachelbel had taught Johann Christoph Bach, and the master’s influence extended to the younger brother, most visibly and prevalently in the earliest of his extant compositions. Besides the little organ chorales which survive individually (bwv749, 750 and 756), regarded by Spitta as Bach’s first musical essays, the chorales in the Neumeister collection, which came to light only recently (bwv1090–1120, and bwv714, 719, 737, 742 and 756), are now taken to be among his earliest works. Although the Neumeister manuscript represents neither an integrated body of work nor a unified collection, in its dazzling variety it embodies some contradictory and simultaneously essential traits of Bach’s early organ music: imperfect technique alongside daring innovation; reliance on models such as Pachelbel, Johann Michael and Johann Christoph Bach and masters from north, south and central Germany, together with a determination to surpass and dispense with such models; and an entirely unorthodox mixture of free composition and strict polyphony, unconventional harmony and pronounced virtuosity.

A subsequent stage in Bach’s development is found in the chorale partitas bwv766–8, mostly wrought in the manner of Böhm (bwv768 was revised and expanded during Bach’s Weimar period). The Canzona bwv588, the Allabreve bwv589 and the Pastorale bwv590 show south German and Italian characteristics, while the Fantasia in G bwv572 looks to the French style. With their sectional layout, the preludes in E and G minor, bwv566 and 535a, must have been written under Buxtehude’s immediate influence.

The extraordinary harmonic boldness and the richness of fermata embellishment in the pieces bwv715, 722 and 732, intended to accompany chorales, imply that they belong to the Arnstadt period when Bach’s treatment of chorales caused confusion among the congregation. The fugues after Legrenzi and Corelli, bwv574 and 579, should probably be placed among the early works. Admittedly, the scarcity of autographs, combined with the complicated situation surrounding the other sources, makes it difficult to establish a reliable chronology. It is scarcely possible even to draw definite conclusions about which of the early keyboard works belong within the period of Bach’s youth, if that is set at about 1700–07.

The models recede in importance from the Mühlhausen period, at the latest, and Bach’s individuality begins to pervade every note of his compositions. This applies particularly to the many extended organ chorale settings probably dating from between 1709 and 1712–13 and already so much in accordance with Bach’s later ideals that he found this group of 18 chorales (bwv651–8) worthy of revising in and after about 1740. In his freely composed organ works (toccatas, preludes, fantasias and fugues) Bach tightened up the formal scheme, preparing the way for the two-movement prelude and fugue through an intermediate type in which the fugue was a long, self-contained complex but the prelude was not yet a unified section (such as the first movement of bwv532). Here is an early manifestation of one of the peculiarities of Bach’s working methods, encountered later in the ‘48’: fugues attain their final form almost instantaneously, preludes often go through several stages of development. Probably the most important work of these years is the Passacaglia in C minor bwv582.

In about 1713–14 a decisive stylistic change came about, stimulated by Vivaldi’s concerto form. Bach’s encounter with Vivaldi’s music found immediate expression in the concertos after Vivaldi’s opp.3 and 7 (bwv593 etc.). Features adapted from Vivaldi include the unifying use of motivic work, the motoric rhythmic character, the modulation schemes and the principle of solo–tutti contrast as means of formal articulation; the influence may be seen in the Toccatas in F and C bwv540 and 564. Apparently Bach experimented for a short while with a free, concerto-like organ form in three movements (fast–slow–fast: cf bwv545 + 529/2 and bwv541 + 528/3) but finally turned to the two-movement form, as in bwv534 and 536. Of comparable importance to the introduction of the concerto element is his tendency towards condensed motivic work, as in the Orgel-Büchlein. Bach’s conception of this new type of miniature organ chorale, combining rhetorical and expressive musical language with refined counterpoint, probably dates back to a relatively early point, possibly the beginning of the Weimar period, but he cannot have started to collect them systematically in the autograph before 1713–14. Among the earliest entered in the manuscript are, among new compositions, bwv608, 627 and 630, and around 1715–16 Bach added bwv615, 623, 640 and 644 (to cite some typical examples). Some of the pieces, such as bwv601 and 639, are of earlier date. By the end of the Weimar period the Orgel-Büchlein was complete in all essentials, although a few isolated pieces were added later, such as bwv620 and 631 (c1730), the fragment O Traurigkeit and bwv613 (c1740). The final total of 45 pieces falls considerably short of the 164 originally projected, but Bach had already ceased to work consistently at this major undertaking as early as 1716. The reason for this is unknown; when he took it up again in Leipzig it was only sporadically and apparently in connection with teaching, or so a copy made about 1727–30 suggests.

Bach composed few organ pieces at Cöthen, but among them is undoubtedly the C major Fantasia bwv573 which he added to Anna Magdalena Bach’s Clavier-Büchlein (1722). In Leipzig, in about 1727, he composed the trio sonatas, a new genre for the organ, which he wrote, according to Forkel, for his eldest son Wilhelm Friedemann. It was probably in conjunction with renewed activity as a recitalist – he is known to have performed in Dresden (1725, 1731 and 1736), Kassel (1732), Altenburg (1739) and Potsdam (1747) – that he returned to the prelude and fugue genre. Now, surely as a consequence of the ‘48’, he always wrote them in two sections, with the preludes as important as the fugues. There was a final flourish of virtuosity (especially in the writing for obbligato pedal) in works such as bwv544 and 548 (both c1730), but always in the context of a clearcut structure (there is a da capo fugue in bwv548).

In 1739, as the third part of the Clavier-Übung, Bach published a comprehensive and varied group of organ works. Framed by a Prelude and Fugue in E (bwv552), there are nine chorale arrangements for Mass and 12 for the catechism, followed by four duets. Bach’s encyclopedic intentions can be seen in the form of the work – that of a collection of specimen organ pieces for large church instruments and smaller domestic ones (including the harpsichord), symbolized in his invariable coupling of a large piece with a small; they can equally be seen in the variety of his contrapuntal methods, whereby he constantly produced fresh kinds of cantus firmus treatment. At the very end of Bach’s output for the organ are such disparate works as the C minor Fantasia and Fugue bwv562 (1747–8), the ‘Schübler’ chorales (arrangements after solo movements from cantatas) and the canonic variations on Vom Himmel hoch bwv769. The variations, written for Mizler’s society in 1747, survive in two original versions, printed and autograph, whose different sequence of movements shows Bach experimenting with symmetrical form and the placing of climaxes.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

17. Music for harpsichord, lute etc.

Just as Bach learnt most about the craft of composition from keyboard music, so too did he use it for preference in teaching others. He was obviously already a sought-after teacher when still in Weimar, but the move to Leipzig brought a decisive expansion of his teaching activities. H.N. Gerber, who studied with him in the early Leipzig years, left an account of Bach’s method of introducing the widest variety of composition by gradual stages, along with the technical premisses of their performance. According to Gerber he used to begin with the Inventions and the French and English suites, and conclude the course with the ‘48’. This canon of characteristic works from the decade 1715–25 constitutes, so to speak, the stylistic core of Bach’s music for keyboard and for that reason served later as the yardstick by which to settle questions of authenticity. Nowadays, however, the yardstick’s usefulness has become somewhat problematic, since it does not take fully into account either the stylistic breadth of Bach’s early output or the unorthodox musical language of the late works.

One of the essential elements of Bach’s art as a keyboard composer is the attention he gave, from the first, to the idiomatic qualities of the individual instruments, respecting not only the differences between organ and harpsichord but also those within the family of string keyboard instruments, of which he used at least four types: harpsichord, clavichord, lute-harpsichord and fortepiano. He is specific about the main kinds of harpsichord in the Clavier-Übung (the first part is for one-manual harpsichord, the second and fourth for a two-manual instrument). One of the earliest manuscript sources refers to the suitability of the E minor suite bwv996 for the lute-harpsichord (‘aufs Lauten Werk’). Bach took an active interest in J.G. Silbermann’s experiments in developing the fortepiano during the 1730s and 40s. There is reliable testimony that he improvised on several new Silbermann fortepianos of different types in the presence of Frederick the Great in Potsdam in 1747, which makes it possible to regard the three-part ricercar of the Musical Offering as conceived primarily for this new kind of keyboard instrument.

There is an obvious association between Bach’s renown as a keyboard virtuoso, together with his work as a teacher, and the fact that his keyboard music is among the most accessible of his entire output, and also that it was the most widely available. Its dissemination shows a marked rising curve during the 18th century, internationally as well as within Germany. Bach’s harpsichord works were available in Italy, France, Austria and England by 1750, and in view of this it is not surprising that the young Beethoven was schooled in the ‘48’. The growing recognition of the significance of this part of his output was reflected in the first complete edition of the works for harpsichord (begun in Leipzig in 1800 by Hoffmeister & Kühnel and continued by C.F. Peters) in which Forkel, among others, was involved.

Bach’s early harpsichord compositions are in a similar situation to the early organ works as regards dating and evaluation. None of the very earliest can be dated precisely. The Capriccio bwv992 has been assigned to 1704; there are no biographical data to support this (it is extremely doubtful that it was written for Bach’s brother Johann Jakob), but it certainly belongs to the period immediately after 1700. Before 1712–13 there were countless individual pieces like toccatas, preludes and fugues (these last mainly using a ‘repercussive’ thematic technique like the early organ fugues); variation form is represented by the Aria variata bwv989. In the toccatas (bwv910 etc.) Italian, north German and French influences conjoin in equal importance (bwv912 is an interesting counterpart to the organ work bwv532); Bach’s penchant for the French style is evident in his abundant use of the style brisé. After 1712 the particular influence of concertos by Vivaldi, Marcello and others can be seen in Bach’s numerous concerto arrangements (bwv972 etc.).

To the last years in Weimar and the early years in Cöthen belong works such as the so-called English Suites and the Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue bwv903, and also the Clavier-Büchlein for Wilhelm Friedemann of 1720, which is predominantly didactic in layout. It is however less important for its instruction in playing technique (the Applicatio bwv994 gives fingering and tables of ornaments after D’Anglebert) than as a book of instruction in composition. For Bach himself, the two could not be dissociated: the Clavier-Büchlein contains the beginnings of the ‘48’ as well as early versions of the Inventions and Sinfonias, under such titles as ‘preambulum’ and ‘fantasia’. To some extent the 1722 Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena is a companion work, though differently laid out.

Then followed, also in 1722, Das wohltemperirte Clavier (book 1 of the ‘48’), with its 24 preludes and fugues in all the major and minor keys, surpassing, in logic, in format and in musical quality, all earlier endeavours of the same kind by other masters, such as J.C.F. Fischer’s Ariadne musica. The work shows a perfectly balanced contrast between free and strict styles, each represented by several different types of prelude and fugue. Bach’s writing in book 1 of the ‘48’ in the most varied fugues – from two- to five-part, in a wide range of styles – represents the culmination of a 20-year process of maturation and stands unparalleled in the history of music. The final version of the two- and three-part Inventions and Sinfonias, also arranged by key but representing a different method of composition whose object (according to Bach’s foreword) was ‘to teach clear playing in two and three obbligato parts, good inventions [i.e. compositional ideas] and a cantabile manner of playing’, dates from 1723.

The first traces of the subsequent great works of the Leipzig period are to be found in the 1725 Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena, which in fact anticipates the so-called French Suites bwv812–17 and the Partitas bwv825–30. The Partitas in particular (appearing in print singly from 1726) represent a further culmination in Bach’s keyboard output; whereas the ‘48’ shows the prelude and fugue type developed to its most consummate maturity, these present similarly matured specimens of the most popular harpsichord genre of the time, the partita, comprising a suite of dance movements and ‘galanteries’. These – the burlesca, capriccio and the like – do not appear in the English or French Suites; as in the English Suites, each partita begins with a large-scale movement, each differently titled and each in a different style. Later, with the collected publication of all six in 1731, Bach inaugurated his series of published works under the general title Clavier-Übung (the title was borrowed from a publication by Kuhnau, his predecessor in office). In 1735 appeared the second part, whose contents were intended to be representative of the most prominent and fashionable styles: the Concerto in the Italian Style bwv971 embodies the ultimate stage in the process of transcribing instrumental concertos for keyboard, and stands in contrast to an Overture in the French Manner bwv831 which, more markedly than the partitas, represents what was specifically French in harmony, rhythm, ornamentation and melodic invention. 1741–2 eventually saw the end of the Clavier-Übung series with the aria and 30 variations known as the Goldberg Variations. Apparently Bach had not cultivated the variation form since his youth, so that the contrast between the Goldberg Variations and the early works (chorale partitas and the Aria variata) is the more marked. This work outshines all others as far as performing technique is concerned (Domenico Scarlatti’s influence is unmistakable in places). The large-scale cyclical layout (based on a sequence of 10 x 3 movements, incorporating a series of nine canons, one at every third variation, arranged in order of ascending intervals to move towards a climax, with a final quodlibet) is without precedent. The basis of the composition is a ground bass of 32 bars, developed from the Ruggiero and related bass patterns, first presented in the aria and then subjected to free and canonic elaboration in a wide variety of ways. In their monothematic and emphatically contrapuntal conception, the Goldberg Variations set the scene for Bach’s last keyboard works – the Musical Offering and Art of Fugue.

Besides the harpsichord works published in the 1730s, the only other major work is the second part of Das wohltemperirte Clavier (not so titled – the complete autograph does not survive). This companion-piece is less unified than book 1 and was partly assembled from existing preludes and fugues, some of them transposed. The freshly composed pieces probably date chiefly from the late 1730s; the work was complete by 1744 at the latest. Apart from this one major undertaking, Bach appears to have composed very few keyboard works at this period: perhaps the Fantasia ‘sur un rondeau’ bwv918, certainly the Fantasia in C minor with fragmentary fugue bwv906.

The dates of composition of the seven surviving works for lute – apparently almost his total output for the instrument – cover at least 30 years. The earliest work is the Suite in E minor bwv996, which dates from the Weimar period; it already shows a surprisingly balanced construction. The Prelude in C minor bwv999 shows an affinity with the ‘48’, and may thus belong to the Cöthen or early Leipzig period. All the other lute works were composed in Leipzig, starting with the Fugue in G minor bwv1000, an expanded polyphonic development from the violin fugue (in bwv1001), which (like bwv997) is in a tablature copied by Bach’s friend, the Leipzig lawyer and lutenist Christian Weyrauch. The Suite in G minor bwv995 (after 1011, for cello) dates from the period 1727–31 and is dedicated in Bach’s autograph to an unidentifiable ‘Monsieur Schouster’. The Suite in E (bwv1006a, after 1006 for violin) also survives in autograph form and is a much less demanding arrangement of its model as compared with bwv1000 and 995; it dates from the second half of the 1730s. Bach must have composed the Suite in C minor bwv997 before 1741; this is an original lute composition and is laid out in a similar virtuoso fashion to the Prelude, Fugue and Allegro in E bwv998 which can be ascribed to the early 1740s. The late works may have been written for the Dresden lutenists S.L. Weiss and Johann Kropffgans, and in any case were probably played by them. There is evidence that Weiss and Kropffgans performed at Bach’s house at least once, in 1739. Bach’s arrangement for violin and harpsichord of Weiss’s lute suite in A major (bwv1025) may have been made in connection with this occasion. His contributions to the repertory of the lute, long past its heyday but enjoying a final flowering in the German-speaking countries, represent, along with the works of Weiss, the culmination of the instrument’s 18th-century repertory. They require an instrument with 10 to 14 strings, but in Bach’s day were at least occasionally played on the lute-harpsichord, an instrument in whose construction Bach had assisted. The indistinct line between lute and harpsichord music is illustrated by the autograph of bwv998, marked ‘pour La Luth ò Cembal’.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

18. Orchestral music.

Many of Bach’s orchestral compositions must be presumed lost. The surviving repertory can in any case give only an incomplete idea of his output for larger instrumental ensembles, for he must have written many further works during his years at Cöthen and while he was working with the collegium musicum in Leipzig. Traces of lost concerto movements may be found in numerous cantatas, such as no.42 (first movement), and other large-scale vocal works, such as the Easter Oratorio (first two movements); and various of the surviving harpsichord concertos, in particular, invite inferences about lost originals.

In the score bearing the dedication to Margrave Christian Ludwig of Brandenburg, the so-called Brandenburg Concertos are dated 24 March 1721. This is merely a terminus ante quem, for the concertos themselves must have been written over a considerable period before being assembled in 1721 as a collection of ‘Concerts avec plusieurs instruments’ (not as a single work in several parts). It cannot be proved that Bach composed instrumental music in his capacity as Konzertmeister in Weimar; but his position there and his preoccupation with the Italian concerto style during those years make it seem probable that he did. Of the Brandenburg Concertos, no.6 in particular points to the Weimar period, partly because of its indebtedness to the Italian type of concerto (above all in the middle movement) and also because of its unusual instrumentation (the particular combination of low strings is otherwise found only in Weimar cantatas). Other concertos (for instance the conjectural early version of no.1) may also belong to the Weimar period, but it is not possible to draw any firmer conclusion about a Weimar orchestral repertory.

The special significance of the Brandenburg Concertos resides in the fact that, like Vivaldi’s, they abandon the standard type of concerto grosso and use a variety of solo combinations. The originality of Bach’s ideas extends far beyond Vivaldi’s, as do the density of the compositional texture and the level of professional virtuosity. The devising of concise head-motifs, particularly in the first movements, shows a strong Italian influence. Most of Bach’s instrumentations are unprecedented. They feature all kinds of combinations, from homogeneous string sound (nos.3 and 6) to the heterogeneous mixing of brass, woodwind, string and keyboard instruments. Just as unusual is Bach’s conflation of the group concerto with the solo concerto in nos.2 and 5. No.5 probably represents the latest stage in composition of the set: it was written for the inauguration of the harpsichord he brought back from Berlin early in 1719 (an earlier version survives from about this date). At the same time it marks the beginnings of the keyboard concerto as a form.

For a long time Bach scholars assigned most of his chamber and ensemble music to the Cöthen years. Recent studies based on original sources and style criticism have led to a thorough revision of the chronology affecting this part of his output. It now seems that only the smaller part of the instrumental ensemble music (or at least of what survives of it) belongs to the Cöthen period, while the greater part was composed at Leipzig, and principally for the collegium musicum which Bach was associated with from 1723 and which he directed from 1729 to the early 1740s. Thus the four Orchestral Suites, with their leaning towards French style, were written in Leipzig: no.1 perhaps as early as 1725, nos.3 and 4 in about 1725 and after 1730 respectively and no.2 about 1739. The B minor Suite (no.2), with its hybrid mixture of concerto elements and suite form and the extraordinary virtuosity of its flute writing, is probably Bach’s very last orchestral work. The only solo concertos to survive in their original form from this time are the violin concertos in A minor and in E and the two-violin concerto in D minor, which again obviously relate to the collegium musicum. Pointers to lost works that may be supposed to have been composed in Cöthen can be obtained from Leipzig pieces showing clear signs of reworking, above all cantata sinfonias with obbligato organ and the harpsichord concertos. Among the putative originals discernible in later recensions are concertos for oboe d’amore (after bwv1053 and 1055), for violin (after bwv1052 and 1060) and for three violins (after bwv1064). The intended instrumentation of the original cannot always be conclusively determined from the later version, and allowance must also be made for substantial differences between the two versions, so that it is extremely rarely the case that reconstruction of a supposed but lost original is really possible. Bach never proceeded in a mechanical way; rather, he strove to give the arrangement an identity of its own by subjecting the model to further development and exhausting its potential. This often involved the addition of fresh contrapuntal parts, the alteration of detail and structural modification. Of special interest are Bach’s adaptations of instrumental works into vocal ones, such as the derivation of the first chorus of Cantata no.110 from bwv1069; also of note is the wresting of the outer movements of an ensemble concerto (bwv1044) out of the Prelude and Fugue in A minor for harpsichord (bwv894).

The most noteworthy of the later concertos composed in the 1730s, with substantial changes to the originals on which they draw, are the Triple Concerto in A minor bwv1044 (sharing several features with Brandenburg Concerto no.5), the seven harpsichord concertos bwv1052–8 and the concertos for two or more harpsichords bwv1060–65, all but one of them reworkings of earlier works by Bach himself (the exception is bwv1064, an arrangement of Vivaldi’s Concerto in B minor for four violins, op.3 no.10). In fact, Bach’s alterations and restructurings are sufficiently important – especially the deployment of the left hand of the harpsichord part and the invention of idiomatic harpsichord figuration – for works of this rank to be considered compositions in their own right. They owe their special historical importance to their occurrence at the beginning of the history of the keyboard concerto, a form which was to be taken up above all by Bach’s sons so that in Germany, until about 1750, it remained the exclusive preserve of the Bach family. A stimulus for the composition of the harpsichord concertos may have been the new instrument introduced on 17 June 1733 (‘a new harpsichord, the like of which no-one here has ever yet heard’), according to the announcement advertising the collegium musicum concert.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

19. Chamber music.

As with the orchestral music, a great many chamber compositions are thought to be lost. Once again the greatest losses affect the Cöthen period, but the Weimar years also suffer. When the summary worklist in the obituary mentions ‘a quantity of other instrumental things, of every kind and for every kind of instrument’, it probably refers first and foremost to works for various chamber ensembles.

The unusual flexibility with which Bach manipulated the conventional genres of sonata and suite is comparable to his orchestral output, as regards formal and compositional aspects as much as textures. Particularly important is his emancipation of the harpsichord from its role as continuo instrument and its deployment as a true partner in the sonatas for harpsichord with violin (bwv1014–19), flute (1030–33) and viola da gamba (1027–9). The cycle of six harpsichord and violin sonatas (c1725–6) were the first in a series of works with obbligato keyboard and paved the way for a new musical genre. The traditional trio sonata with continuo still cast its shadow (for example, in the opening movements of bwv1015 and 1019), but it yielded by stages to a more integrated three-part style (for example, the opening movements of bwv1014 and 1018). The only genuine trio sonatas to survive, apart from the one in the Musical Offering, are bwv1038 and 1039, dating from the 1730s. Bach’s arrangement of the gamba sonata bwv1027, after bwv1039 for two flutes and continuo is an illustration of the development of the new type of trio writing from the trio sonata. A similar procedure stood behind his earlier development of the organ sonata. Most movements of the organ sonatas are based on instrumental trios, as the arrangement of the first movement of bwv528 from a trio sonata movement for oboe d’amore, viola da gamba and continuo in Cantata no.76 illustrates. This same movement preserves a trace of the many lost trio sonatas of the Cöthen years. Yet the trio sonatas of the Leipzig period, too, may represent only a small fraction of their original numbers, if the way the genre lingers on in the Musical Offering is any guide.

The list of surviving duo sonatas with continuo is also relatively short, and again dominated by works of the Leipzig period: the violin sonatas bwv1021 and 1023 and the flute sonatas bwv1034–5. The Fugue in G minor for violin and continuo bwv1026, from before 1712, is not only Bach’s earliest surviving piece of ensemble music, it is also the only chamber-music piece of the pre-Cöthen years to have survived as an independent entity. The only other sources we have for an idea of what kind of chamber music Bach wrote in his early years are the instrumental sonatas and sinfonias of the Weimar cantatas.

Bach’s creative powers in the Cöthen years appear in a special light in the sonatas and partitas for solo violin, dating from 1720, and the suites for solo cello, which are probably earlier. The sonata for solo flute (bwv1013) is not likely to have been composed in Cöthen, for the playing technique is much more advanced than, for example, the writing for flute in Brandenburg Concerto no.5. Yet all the works senza basso not only demonstrate Bach’s intimate knowledge of the typical idioms and performing techniques of each instrument, but also show his ability, even without an accompanying bass part, to bring into effective play dense counterpoint and refined harmony coupled with distinctive rhythms. The special importance of Bach’s chamber music was recognized at a very early date. J.F. Reichardt wrote in 1805, reviewing the first edition of the solo violin music, that the pieces represent ‘perhaps the greatest example in any art of the freedom and certainty with which a great master can move even when he is in chains’.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

20. Canons, ‘Musical Offering’, ‘Art of Fugue’.

Bach’s preoccupation with the canon as the strictest form of counterpoint can be traced back to the Weimar period. In his organ chorales and particularly in the Orgel-Büchlein the canonic principle plays a major role. Canonic elements are present also in several of the early vocal works. Here however it is a matter of canonic technique cropping up in a context of complex contrapuntal construction; as a genre in its own right, the canon, in Bach’s day, would appear almost exclusively as a theoretical example in composition teaching. It was in this sense that it was often favoured – generally in the form of a circular canon – by musicians for entries in students’ albums: such entries were normally notated in enigmatic fashion, setting the would-be solver an intellectual exercise. Bach wrote such canons in albums more than once; for the most part they are probably lost. Except for bwv1076–7, all the surviving individual canons (1072–5, 1078, 1086) were probably dedicatory works of this kind; 1077 was re-used for this purpose. What is probably the earliest of them is dated 2 August 1713 (bwv1073, dedicatee uncertain); the latest is dated 1 March 1749 (bwv1078; dedicatee Benjamin Faber).

A new kind of theoretical canon came into being in connection with the Goldberg Variations, in which the canonic principle played a special part. In his personal copy of the Goldberg Variations Bach wrote in 1747–8 a series of 14 perpetual canons on the first eight bass notes of the aria ground (bwv1087), exploring the most varied canonic possibilities of the subject, subsequently arranging the individual perpetual canons in a progressive order, organized according to their increasing contrapuntal complexity. The types included range from simple, double and triple canons, retrograde canons and stretto canons to a quadruple proportion canon by augmentation and diminution. Nos.11 and 13 of this series are identical with bwv1077 and 1076 (depicted on Haussmann’s Bach portrait of 1746).

Closely related to these (and likewise probably dating from the later 1740s) are the Vom Himmel hoch variations, where Bach first used a strictly canonic scheme for a monothematic work in several movements of progressive difficulty. The Musical Offering (1747) is also plainly influenced by this mode of musical thinking. Here, for a theme incomparably more complex than that of bwv1087, he devised ten canons of differing structural types, notated as puzzle canons in the original printed edition of 1747. The series of canons on the ‘royal theme’ includes a canonic fugue, providing a bridge between the canons, which are primarily theoretical in conception though also intended for performance, and the two keyboard fugues or ricercares in three and six parts. A further constituent part of the Musical Offering is a trio sonata for flute, violin and continuo, also based on the royal theme. In its second slow movement Bach introduced echoes of the fashionable style practised at the Prussian court. The Musical Offering, in effect a compendium in three sections, shows Bach elaborating on the theme supplied to him by Frederick the Great in every imaginable way for an ensemble of up to three instruments.

The Art of Fugue constitutes the final contribution to this group of monothematically conceived works intended as representative examples of a specific principle. As a didactic keyboard work, the Art of Fugue in some ways forms a counterpart to the two books of the ‘48’, with the difference that here it is exclusively the fugue that is in question, and, what is more, the fugues are developed from a single theme. Bach’s work on the Art of Fugue was accomplished in two stages – from about 1740 to about 1745, and then (in connection with preparing the work for publication) in about 1748–50. The extant autograph score represents the conclusion of the first stage, in which the conception of the work already appears clearly: beginning with simple fugues (Bach avoided this term, speaking of ‘contrapunctus’), progressing through ‘counter-fugues’, double fugues and triple fugues, with interpolated canons, and culminating in a mirror fugue. For the printed version the number of movements was not only increased by four (two canons, a fourth simple fugue and most notably a closing quadruple fugue) but their order was rearranged so as to expound more logically the ‘chapter of instruction on fugues’. When Bach died the work may have been more ‘complete’ than it is in the form in which it has survived. In particular the quadruple fugue had surely been completed in all essentials, since the composition of its combinatorial section must necessarily be an early stage in the composition of a quadruple fugue. Only the three opening sections of the exposition, however, are extant, and these – further abbreviated by the editors, give the Art of Fugue the appearance of being a mighty torso.

The Musical Offering and the Art of Fugue mark both the end and the culmination of Bach’s activity as a keyboard composer in the broadest sense. While the two ricercars on the ‘royal theme’ of the Musical Offering represent different fugal styles (forward- and backward-looking) and different textures (three- and six-part polyphony), the Art of Fugue explores a notably more intensive monothematic conception. As a didactic keyboard composition in some sense it counterbalances the two parts of the ‘48’, yet with the difference that it concerns itself with fugue alone, in a series of compositions developed out of a single ‘principal composition’ (theme) – and does so using a technique in which forward- and backward-looking styles operate alongside each other, synoptically as it were. It was probably unintentional, and yet it is hardly by chance, that the initial premiss and the goal of Bach’s keyboard art and his musical thinking come together in the Art of Fugue.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

21. Methods of composition.

Bach’s methods of composition can be outlined only roughly: the sources, musical and literary, present no more than a fragmentary picture. ‘Methods’ here refers to Bach’s general procedures of composition, as far as these can be described objectively (without venturing into conjecture about creative psychology) and can be related to certain essential impulses and particularly characteristic approaches.

Bach’s vast knowledge of the musical repertory was a decisive factor behind his art. He had an intimate knowledge of the types and styles of composition of his time and in particular of the work of his most important contemporaries; moreover, he had a sound idea of the music of the past, extending back as far as Frescobaldi and Palestrina. The study of works by other masters went hand in hand with experimentation in his own. It is thus characteristic that his acquaintance with the works of Buxtehude and Böhm, with Vivaldi’s concertos, with the Passions of Keiser and Handel and with the masses of Lotti and Palestrina should have left an immediate imprint on his compositions in the same genres. It was less a matter of imitation of a model than of an awareness of the possibilities, an expansion of his own manner of writing and a stimulation of his musical ideas. This is confirmed in a contemporary report by T.L. Pitschel on his manner of improvisation, according to which, before beginning his own fantasia, Bach as a rule played from music a work by another master (or perhaps one of his own) which would ignite his imagination. Further, C.P.E. Bach wrote that, in accompanying a trio, his father liked to extemporize a fourth part. This tendency to take compositions by others as a starting-point is paralleled in his late adaptations: in his arrangement of Pergolesi’s Stabat mater an obbligato viola part is added, replacing the one following the continuo in the original; and his version of the ‘Suscepit Israel’ from Caldara’s Magnificat in C expands it from a five-part into a seven-part piece. An important aspect of Bach’s procedure of composition is its systematic and encyclopedic nature. He habitually wrote works of one particular type within a relatively limited period: for example the Orgel-Büchlein, the ‘48’, the solo violin sonatas and partitas, the canons, the chorale cantatas etc. He was concerned to try out, to develop and to exhaust specific principles of composition. There are practically no completely isolated compositions. Relationships, correspondences and connections with other works can constantly be found. This approach to the procedure of composition is at once deep and yet of great natural simplicity; and it never results in mere repetition. Certainly there is repetition, of a kind, in the case of parodies or transcriptions of existing works. Yet even here it is inappropriate to speak of repetition, since in the process of parodying and transcribing, Bach always modified so that the end-product represents a fresh stage in the development of the original composition.

C.P.E. Bach related that his father did not actually compose at the keyboard – apart from some keyboard works whose material originated in improvisations – but that he often tried out his music on the keyboard afterwards. This procedure may be seen in the few instrumental works of which Bach’s autograph draft survives, for example the early versions of the Inventions in the Clavier-Büchlein for Wilhelm Friedemann, where an abundance of inserted corrections are to be found. In the vocal music, where a wealth of source material is available, the main stages of composition can often be reconstructed. In thematically and motivically self-contained movements, like arias and choruses, Bach normally began with the development and formulation of a motif, a phrase or a theme, which would be guided by the prosody of the text; he then added the contrapuntal voices, and continued in the same way, sometimes using ‘continuation sketches’ to plan the music’s progress in advance (see the critical edition of the sketches, Marshall, 1972). In choral fugues he usually began by outlining the thematic entries, and wrote in the accompanying parts afterwards. The decisive step was the embarkation on the writing of a movement, for progress was in its essentials determined by established models (harmonic-tonal groundplan, modulation patterns, aria schemes) and governed by the principle of unified continuation (‘style d’une teneur’ and ‘Affekteinheitlichkeit’ – ensured by a unified motivic organization and interchange, permutation and transposition of component sections). The invention of the central idea was for Bach the critical moment in the process of composition, as the title-page of the Inventions specifies: ‘gute inventiones zu bekommen’ (‘how to achieve good inventions’); and this is borne out by C.P.E. Bach’s report that his first requirement of his composition pupils was the invention of ideas. With this the die was cast, down to a work’s emotional content. Outlines and sketches relating to this operation can sometimes be found in the original manuscripts; typically, however, Bach hardly required more than one or two attempts before arriving at the definitive form of his principal idea. The further elaboration of the idea – the dispositio, elaboratio and decoratio – required mastery of his craft rather than inspiration.

In composing multi-movement vocal works Bach, understandably, began as a rule with the self-contained movements and only afterwards worked at the recitatives and chorales. In the recitatives he normally first wrote out the text and then added the melody and bass, section by section. In the chorales the bass was added to the melody and the middle parts were inserted later. Then all the movements were revised in detail, and sometimes corrections were made. The appearance of Bach’s working drafts is thus unusually clear and neat as a whole, although it is mainly in his fair copies that the particular quality of his handwriting, a quality comparable to that of his music, is expressed. The physical state of the fair copy had to reflect the degree of artistic perfection to which the composer aspired, and the pains taken to achieve neatness and clarity in the copy are not evidence of pedantry. Rather, Bach was aware of the dichotomy between the perfection of the musical idea and that of its representation in performance. For this reason and no other he made the following statement in 1738, through the mouth of his spokesman J.A. Birnbaum: ‘One does not judge a composition first and foremost by the impression of its performance. Yet if such judgment, which can be deceptive, is not to be taken into consideration, then I see no other way of forming an opinion about it except by looking at the work as it is set down in notation.’

Ultimately, for Bach, the process of composition was an unending one. Dynamic markings and indications of articulation would be inserted as he looked through the parts; he would revise and improve a work when he was copying it out, and when giving further performances would make fresh alterations and improvements. He also inserted corrections in works already in print. Throughout his life Bach was his own severest critic. Even in works which went through two or three different versions, like the chorale prelude An Wasserflüssen Babylon bwv653, the ‘final’ version does not represent a definitive one but merely a further stage in the search for perfection – the central and ultimate concern of Bach’s method of composition.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

WORKS

Bach did not always define instruments unambiguously; ‘corno’ could mean the normal horn of his time, the need for a brass player but not necessarily a trumpeter, or possibly the most suitable brass instrument (horn, cornett, slide-trumpet [tromba da tirarsi] etc.); parts for ‘three oboes’ at Leipzig may indicate any combination of oboes, oboes d’amore, tailles (tenor oboes in F, with no solo material) or oboes da caccia (a specific local tenor type, designed for obbligato work); four trombones indicate SATB and three ATB (usually below a cornett)

Dates of later copies or performances are given only if modifications are involved

Editions: J.S. Bach: Werke, ed. Bach-Gesellschaft. i–xlvii (Leipzig, 1851–99/R) [BG]J.S. Bach: Neue Ausgabe sämtlicher Werke (Neue Bach-Ausgabe), ed. Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Institut, Göttingen, and Bach-Archiv, Leipzig, ser. I–VIII (Kassel and Basle, 1954–) [vols. in square brackets are in preparation] [NBA; CC = Critical Commentary]Catalogues: W. Schmieder: Thematisch-systematisches Verzeichnis der musikalischen Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs: Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis (Leipzig, 1950, enlarged 2/1990, rev. and abridged 1998 by A. Dürr, Y. Kobayashi and K. Beisswenger as Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis) [BWV; A = Anhang]H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff: Bach Compendium: analytisch-bibliographisches Repertorium der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Leipzig and Frankfurt, 1985–) [BC]

variant versions exist; see bwv and BC

church cantatas

secular cantatas

latin church music

passions, oratorios

motets

chorales, sacred songs, arias

organ

other keyboard

lute

chamber

orchestral

studies in counterpoint, canons etc.

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

church cantatas

Advent I = 1st Sunday in Advent; Trinity/Easter I = 1st Sunday after Trinity/Easter, etc.; most texts are compilations including at least one chorale; only single text sources given; where the text is entirely or mainly based on that of a chorale, its author’s name is given in parentheses

 

 

BWV

BC

Title (text/librettist)

BG

NBA

 

1

A 173

Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, chorale (P. Nicolai)

i, 1

I/xxviii.2, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Annunciation; 25 March 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

2

A 98

Ach Gott, vom Himmel sieh darein, chorale (M. Luther)

i, 55

I/xvi, 83

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity II; 18 June 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 4 trbn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

3

A 33

Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid, chorale (M. Möller)

i, 75

I/v, 191

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany II; 14 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, trbn, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

†4

A 54

Christ lag in Todes Banden, chorale (Luther)

i, 97

I/ix, 1

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter; probably by 1708

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, str, bc [3 trbn added 1725]

 

 

5

A 145

Wo soll ich fliehen hin, chorale (J. Heermann)

i, 127

I/xxiv, 135

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIX; 15 Oct 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt da tirarsi, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

6

A 57

Bleib bei uns, denn es will Abend werden

i, 153

I/x, 45

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Monday; 2 April 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, ob da caccia, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

7

A 177

Christ unser Herr zum Jordan kam, chorale (Luther)

i, 179

I/xxix, 27

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St John; 24 June 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

†8

A 137

Liebster Gott, wenn werd ich sterben?, chorale (C. Neumann)

i, 213

I/xxiii, 107, 165

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVI; 24 Sept 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

9

A 107

Es ist das Heil uns kommen her, chorale (P. Speratus)

i, 245

I/xvii/2, 93

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VI; c1732–5

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

10

A 175

Meine Seel erhebt den Herren (Luke i.46–55)

i, 277

I/xxviii.2, 10

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Visitation; 2 July 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

12

A 68

Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen (? S. Franck)

ii, 61

I/xi/2, 1

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter III; 22 April 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, ob, str, bc

 

 

13

A 34

Meine Seufzer, meine Tränen (G.C. Lehms)

ii, 81

I/v, 231

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany II; 20 Jan 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

14

A 40

Wär Gott nicht mit uns diese Zeit, chorale (Luther)

ii, 101

I/vi, 139

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany IV; 30 Jan 1735

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

16

A 23

Herr Gott, dich loben wir (Lehms)

ii, 175

I/iv, 105

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

17

A 131

Wer Dank opfert, der preiset mich

ii, 201

I/xxi, 149

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIV; 22 Sept 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

†18

A 44

Gleichwie der Regen und Schnee vom Himmel fällt (E. Neumeister)

ii, 229

I/vii, 109

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Sexagesima; ? 24 Feb 1715 or ? 1713–14

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 4 va, bc [2 fl added 1724]

 

 

19

A 180

Es erhub sich ein Streit (after Picander)

ii, 255

I/xxx, 57

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St Michael; 29 Sept 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, taille, str, bc

 

 

20

A 95

O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort, chorale (J. Rist)

ii, 293

I/xv, 135

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity I; 11 June 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, da tirarsi, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

†21

A 99

Ich hatte viel Bekümmernis (?Franck)

v/1, 1

I/xvi, 111

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity III; 17 June 1714 [part earlier]

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, ob, str, bc incl. bn [4 trbn added 1723]

 

 

22

A 48

Jesus nahm zu sich die Zwölfe

v/1, 67

I/viii.1, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Quinquagesima; 7 Feb 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

†23

A 47

Du wahrer Gott und Davids Sohn

v/1, 95

I/viii.1, 35, 71

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Quinquagesima, 7 Feb 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc [cornett, 3 trbn added 1724]

 

 

24

A 102

Ein ungefärbt Gemüte (Neumeister)

v/1, 127

I/xvii.1, 49

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IV; 20 June 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

25

A 129

Es ist nicht Gesundes an meinem Leibe

v/1, 155

I/xxi, 81

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIV; 29 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, cornett, 3 trbn, 3 rec, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

26

A 162

Ach wie flüchtig, ach wie nichtig, chorale (M. Franck)

v/1, 191

I/xxvii, 31

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXIV; 19 Nov 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

27

A 138

Wer weiss, wie nahe mir mein Ende!

v/1, 219

I/xxiii, 223

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVI; 6 Oct 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, ob da caccia, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

28

A 20

Gottlob! nun geht das Jahr zu Ende (Neumeister)

v/1, 247

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas I; 30 Dec 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, 3 trbn, 2 ob, taille, str, bc

 

 

29

B 8

Wir danken dir, Gott, wir danken dir

v/1, 275

I/xxxii.2, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of town council; 27 Aug 1731

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

30

A 178

Freue dich, erlöste Schar (adapted ?Picander from 30a)

v/1, 323

I/xxix, 61

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St John; 24 June 1738 or later

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

†31

A 55

Der Himmel lacht! die Erde jubilieret (Franck)

vii, 3

I/ix, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter; 21 April 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc [taille added 1724]

 

 

32

A 31

Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, dialogue (Lehms)

vii, 55

I/v, 145

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany I; 13 Jan 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

33

A 127

Allein zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ, chorale (K. Hubert)

vii, 83

I/xxi, 25

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIII; 3 Sept 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

34

A 84

O ewiges Feuer, O Ursprung der Liebe (adapted from 34a)

vii, 117

I/xiii, 131

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Sunday; c1746–7

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

34a

B 13

O ewiges Feuer, O Ursprung der Liebe [partly lost]

xli, 117

I/xxxiii, 29

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

?wedding; 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

35

A 125

Geist und Seele wird verwirret (Lehms) [partly adapted from lost ob conc., cf 1059]

vii, 173

I/xx, 217

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XII; 8 Sept 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, 2 ob, taille, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

†36

A 3

Schwingt freudig euch empor (adapted ?Picander from 36c)

vii, 223

I/i, 19, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent I; c1725–30, rev. 2 Dec 1731

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

37

A 75

Wer da gläubet und getauft wird [inc.]

vii, 261

I/xii, 81

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Ascension; 18 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

38

A 152

Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir, chorale (Luther)

vii, 285

I/xxv, 219

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXI; 29 Oct 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 4 trbn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

39

A 96

Brich dem Hungrigen dein Brot

vii, 303

I/xv, 181

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity I; 23 June 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 rec, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

40

A 12

Darzu ist erschienen der Sohn Gottes

vii, 351

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

2nd day of Christmas; 26 Dec 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

41

A 22

Jesu, nun sei gepreiset, chorale (J. Herman)

x, 3

I/iv, 39

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

42

A 63

Am Abend aber desselbigen Sabbats

x, 65

I/xi.1, 63

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter I; 8 April 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc incl. bn

 

 

43

A 77

Gott fähret auf mit Jauchzen (?Helm)

x, 95

I/xii, 135

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Ascension; 30 May 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

44

A 78

Sie werden euch in den Bann tun

x, 129

I/xii, 167

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Ascension I; 21 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

45

A 113

Es ist dir gesagt, Mensch, was gut ist

x, 153

I/xviii, 199

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VIII; 11 Aug 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

46

A 117

Schauet doch und sehet

x, 189

I/xix, 111

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity X; 1 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, tpt da tirarsi, 2 taille, str, bc

 

 

47

A 141

Wer sich selbst erhöhet (J.F. Helbig)

x, 241

I/xxiii, 321

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVII; 13 Oct 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, 2 ob, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

48

A 144

Ich elender Mensch, wer wird mich erlösen

x, 277

I/xxiv, 107

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIX; 3 Oct 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

49

A 150

Ich geh und suche mit Verlangen, dialogue [sinfonia adapted from lost conc. 1053]

x, 301

I/xxv, 109

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XX; 3 Nov 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, ob d’amore, org obbl, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

50

A 194

Nun ist das Heil und die Kraft (Revelation xii. 10) [movt of inc. or lost cantata]

x, 343

I/xxx, 143

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St Michael

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

51

A 134

Jauchzet Gott in allen Landen!

xii/2, 3

I/xxii, 77

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XV; 17 Sept 1730

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, tpt, str, bc [2 tpt, timp added by W.F. Bach]

 

 

52

A 160

Falsche Welt, dir trau ich nicht

xii/2, 27

I/xxvi, 133

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXIII; 24 Nov 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, 4vv, 2 hn, 3 ob, bn, str, bc

 

 

54

A 51

Widerstehe doch der Sünde (Lehms)

xii/2, 61

I/xviii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Oculi or Trinity VII; 4 March or 15 July 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, str, bc

 

 

55

A 157

Ich armer Mensch, ich Sündenknecht

xii/2, 75

I/xxvi, 57

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXII; 17 Nov 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

T, 4vv, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

56

A 146

Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen

xii/2, 89

I/xxiv, 175

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIX; 27 Oct 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

B, 4vv, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

57

A 14

Selig ist der Mann, dialogue (Lehms)

xii/2, 107

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

2nd day of Christmas; 26 Dec 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

†58

A 26

Ach Gott, wie manches Herzeleid, dialogue

xii/2, 135

I/iv, 219

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year I; 5 Jan 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, str, bc [2 ob, taille added 1733–4]

 

 

59

A 82

Wer mich liebet, der wird mein Wort halten (Neumeister)

xii/2, 153

I/xiii, 67

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Sunday; 28 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, 2 tpt, timp, str, bc

 

 

60

A 161

O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort, dialogue

xii/2, 171

I/xxvii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXIV; 7 Nov 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

61

A 1

Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland (Neumeister)

xvi, 3

I/i, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent I; 2 Dec 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, str, bc

 

 

62

A 2

Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland, chorale (Luther)

xvi, 21

I/i, 77

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent I; 3 Dec 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

†63

A 8

Christen, ätzet diesen Tag (? N. Heineccius)

xvi, 53

I/ii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas; c1714–15

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 4 tpt, timp, 3 ob, str, bc [org obbl added after c1729]

 

 

64

A 15

Sehet, welch eine Leibe (Knauer)

xvi, 113

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

3rd day of Christmas; 27 Dec 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, cornett, 3 trbn, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

65

A 27

Sie werden aus Saba alle kommen

xvi, 135

I/v, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany; 6 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 rec, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

66

A 56

Erfreut euch, ihr Herzen, dialogue [adapted from 66a]

xvi, 169

I/x, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Monday; 10 April 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

67

A 62

Halt im Gedächtnis Jesum Christ

xvi, 217

I/xi.1, 1

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter I; 16 April 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

68

A 86

Also hat Gott die Welt geliebt (M. von Ziegler)

xvi, 249

I/xiv, 33

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Monday; 21 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, hn, cornett, 3 trbn, 2 ob, taille, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

69

B 10

Lobe den Herrn, meine Seele (partly Knauer) [adapted from 69a]

xvi, 283

I/xxxii.2, 113

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of town council; 1742–8

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

69a

A 123

Lobe den Herrn, meine Seele (Knauer)

xvi, 373 (inc.)

I/xx, 119

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XII; 15 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, rec, 3 ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

70

A 165

Wachet! betet! betet! wachet! (partly Franck) [adapted from 70a]

xvi, 329

I/xxvii, 109

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXVI; 21 Nov 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, ob, str, bc

 

 

70a

A 4

Wachet! betet! betet! wachet! (Franck) [music lost]

I/i, CC

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent II; 6 Dec 1716

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

71

B 1

Gott ist mein König

xviii, 3

I/xxxii.1, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of Mühlhausen town council; 4 Feb 1708

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv; 3 tpt, timp; 2 rec, vc; 2 ob; str, bc incl. org obbl

 

 

72

A 37

Alles nur nach Gottes Willen (Franck)

xviii, 57

I/vi, 59

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany III; 27 Jan 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

†73

A 35

Herr, wie du willt, so schick’s mit mir

xviii, 87

I/vi, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany III; 23 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc [later version, 1730s, with org obbl instead of hn]

 

 

74

A 83

Wer mich liebet, der wird mein Wort halten (Ziegler) [partly adapted from 59]

xviii, 107

I/xiii, 85

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Sunday; 20 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

75

A 94

Die Elenden sollen essen

xviii, 149

I/xv, 87

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity I; 30 May 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

†76

A 97, A 185

Die Himmel erzählen die Ehre Gottes

xviii, 191

I/xvi, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity II; 6 June 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, ob d’amore, va da gamba, str, bc

 

 

77

A 126

Du sollt Gott, deinen Herren, lieben (Knauer)

xviii, 235

I/xxi, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIII; 22 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt da tirarsi, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

78

A 130

Jesu, der du meine Seele, chorale (Rist)

xviii, 257

I/xxi, 117

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIV; 10 Sept 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

79

A 184

Gott der Herr ist Sonn und Schild

xviii, 289

I/xxxi, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Reformation Festival; 31 Oct 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 hn, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

†80

A 183

Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott (Franck) [adapted from 80a]

xviii, 319, 381

I/xxxi, 67, 73

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Reformation Festival; 1727–31, rev. 1744–7 or earlier

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc [ob d’amore, taille added c1744–7; 3 tpt, timp added by W.F. Bach]

 

 

80a

A 52

Alles, was von Gott geboren (Franck) [music lost]

I/viii, CC

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Lent III; Oculi, 15 March 1716

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

81

A 39

Jesus schläft, was soll ich hoffen?

xx/1, 3

I/vi, 111

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany IV; 30 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

82

A 169

Ich habe genug

xx/1, 27

I/xxviii.1, 77

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Purification; 2 Feb 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

B, ob, str, bc; other versions for S/A with altered ww

 

 

83

A 167

Erfreute Zeit im neuen Bunde

xx/1, 53

I/xxviii.1, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Purification; 2 Feb 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

84

A 43

Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke (Picander)

xx/1, 79

I/vii, 23

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Septuagesima; 9 Feb 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

85

A 66

Ich bin ein guter Hirt

xx/1, 101

I/xi.1, 157

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter II; 15 April 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

86

A 73

Wahrlich, wahrlich, ich sage euch

xx/1, 121

I/xii, 47

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter V; 14 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

87

A 74

Bisher habt ihr nichts gebeten (Ziegler)

xx/1, 137

I/xii, 63

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter V; 6 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

88

A 105

Siehe, ich will viel Fischer aussenden

xx/1, 155

I/xvii.2, 33

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity V; 21 July 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob d’amore, taille, str, bc

 

 

89

A 155

Was soll ich aus dir machen, Ephraim?

xx/1, 181

I/xxvi, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXII; 24 Oct 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

90

A 163

Es reisset euch ein schrecklich Ende

xx/1, 197

I/xxvii, 61

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXV; 14 Nov 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, str, bc

 

 

†91

A 9

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, chorale (Luther)

xxii, 3

I/ii, 133, 164

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas; 25 Dec 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, timp, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

92

A 42

Ich hab in Gottes Herz und Sinn, chorale (P. Gerhardt)

xxii, 35

I/vii, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Septuagesima; 28 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

93

A 104

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten, chorale (G. Neumark)

xxii, 71

I/xvii.2, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity V; 9 July 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

94

A 115

Was frag ich nach der Welt, chorale (B. Kindermann)

xxii, 97

I/xix, 45

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IX; 6 Aug 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

95

A 136

Christus, der ist mein Leben, stanzas from 3 chorales

xxii, 131

I/xxiii, 67

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVI; 12 Sept 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

96

A 142

Herr Christ, der einge Gottessohn, chorale (E. Kreuziger)

xxii, 157

I/xxiv, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVIII; 8 Oct 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, trbn, fl piccolo, 2 ob, vn piccolo, str, bc

 

 

97

A 189

In allen meinen Taten, chorale (P. Fleming)

xxii, 187

I/xxxiv, 199

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

1734

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

98

A 153

Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan

xxii, 233

I/xxv, 243

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXI; 10 Nov 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

99

A 133

Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan, chorale (P. Rodigast)

xxii, 253

I/xxii, 41

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XV; 17 Sept 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

100

A 191

Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan, chorale (Rodigast)

xxii, 279

I/xxxiv, 241

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

c1732–5

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, timp, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

101

A 118

Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, chorale (Möller)

xxiii, 3

I/xix, 175

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity X; 13 Aug 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, 3 trbn, fl, 2 ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

102

A 119

Herr, deine Augen sehen nach dem Glauben

xxiii, 35

I/xix, 231

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity X; 25 Aug 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

103

A 69

Ihr werdet weinen und heulen (Ziegler)

xxiii, 69

I/xi.2, 25

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter III; 22 April 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, tpt, fl piccolo, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

104

A 65

Du Hirte Israel, höre

xxiii, 97

I/xi.1, 113

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter II; 23 April 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, ob da caccia, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

105

A 114

Herr, gehe nicht ins Gericht

xxiii, 119

I/xix, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IX; 25 July 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

106

B 18

Gottes Zeit ist die allerbeste Zeit (Actus tragicus)

xxiii, 149

I/xxxiv, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

funeral; ?1707–8

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, 2 va da gamba, bc

 

 

107

A 109

Was willst du dich betrüben, chorale (Heermann)

xxiii, 181

I/xviii, 57

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VII; 23 July 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

108

A 72

Es ist euch gut, dass ich hingehe (Ziegler)

xxiii, 205

I/xii, 19

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter IV; 29 April 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

109

A 151

Ich glaube, lieber Herr, hilf meinem Unglauben

xxiii, 233

I/xxv, 159

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXI; 17 Oct 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

110

A 10

Unser Mund sei voll Lachens [cf 1069] (Lehms)

xxiii, 265

I/ii, 73

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas; 25 Dec 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 3 ob, ob d’amore, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

111

A 36

Was mein Gott will, das g’scheh allzeit, chorale (A. von Brandenburg)

xxiv, 3

I/vi, 27

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany III; 21 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

112

A 67

Der Herr ist mein getreuer Hirt, chorale (W. Meuslin)

xxiv, 31

I/xi.1, 179

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter II; 8 April 1731

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

113

A 122

Herr Jesu Christ, du höchstes Gut, chorale (B. Ringwaldt)

xxiv, 51

I/xx, 81

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XI; 20 Aug 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

114

A 139

Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, chorale (J. Gigas)

xxiv, 83

I/xxiii, 289

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVII; 1 Oct 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

115

A 156

Mache dich, mein Geist, bereit, chorale (J.B. Freystein)

xxiv, 111

I/xxvi, 23

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXII; 5 Nov 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, ob d’amore, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

116

A 164

Du Friedefürst, Herr Jesu Christ, chorale (J. Ebert)

xxiv, 135

I/xxvii, 81

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXV; 26 Nov 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

117

A 187

Sei Lob und Ehr dem höchsten Gut, chorale (J.J. Schütz)

xxiv, 161

I/xxxiv, 153

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

c1728–31

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

119

B 3

Preise, Jerusalem, den Herrn

xxiv, 195

I/xxxii.1, 131

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of town council; 30 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 4 tpt, timp, 2 rec, 3 ob, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

120

B 6

Gott, man lobet dich in der Stille

xxiv, 249

I/xxxii.2, 55

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of town council; ? 29 Aug 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

120a

B 15

Herr Gott, Beherrscher aller Dinge [adapted from 120, partly lost]

xli, 149

I/xxxiii, 77

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; ?1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

120b

B 28

Gott, man lobet dich in der Stille (Picander) [adapted from 120, music lost]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

2nd day of 200th anniversary of Augsburg Confession, 26 June 1730

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

121

A 13

Christum wir sollen loben schon, chorale (Luther)

xxvi, 3

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

2nd day of Christmas; 26 Dec 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, 3 trbn, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

122

A 19

Das neugeborne Kindelein, chorale (C. Schneegass)

xxvi, 23

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas I; 31 Dec 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 rec, 2 ob, taille, str, bc

 

 

123

A 28

Liebster Immanuel, Herzog der Frommen, chorale (A. Fritsch)

xxvi, 43

I/v, 49

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany; 6 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

124

A 30

Meinen Jesum lass ich nicht, chorale (C. Keymann)

xxvi, 63

I/v, 117

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany I; 7 Jan 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

125

A 168

Mit Fried und Freud ich fahr dahin, chorale (Luther)

xxvi, 85

I/xxviii.1, 33

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Purification; 2 Feb 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, fl, ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

126

A 46

Erhalt uns, Herr, bei deinem Wort, chorale (Luther)

xxvi, 113

I/vii, 157

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Sexagesima; 4 Feb 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

127

A 49

Herr Jesu Christ, wahr’ Mensch und Gott, chorale (P. Eber)

xxvi, 135

I/viii.1, 107

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Quinquagesima; 11 Feb 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 rec, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

128

A 76

Auf Christi Himmelfahrt allein (Ziegler)

xxvi, 163

I/xii, 103

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Ascension; 10 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 hn, 2 ob d’amore, taille, str, bc

 

 

129

A 93

Gelobet sei der Herr, mein Gott, chorale (J. Olearius)

xxvi, 187

I/xv, 39

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity or Reformation; 16 June or 31 Oct 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

130

A 179

Herr Gott, dich loben alle wir, chorale (Eber)

xxvi, 233

I/xxx, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St Michael; 29 Sept 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, fl, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

131

B 25

Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir (? G.C. Eilmar)

xxviii, 3

I/xxxiv, 69

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

1707

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, ob, bn, vn, 2 va, bc

 

 

132

A 6

Bereitet die Wege, bereitet die Bahn! (Franck)

xxviii, 35

I/i, 101

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent IV; 22 Dec 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

133

A 16

Ich freue mich in dir, chorale (K. Ziegler)

xxviii, 53

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

3rd day of Christmas; 27 Dec 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

134

A 59

Ein Herz, das seinen Jesum lebend weiss [adapted from 134a]

xxviii, 83, 287

I/x, 71

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Tuesday; 11 April 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

135

A 100

Ach Herr, mich armen Sünder, chorale (Schneegass)

xxviii, 121

I/xvi, 199

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity III; 25 June 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, cornett, trbn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

136

A 111

Erforsche mich, Gott, und erfahre mein Herz

xxviii, 139

I/xviii, 131

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VIII; 18 June 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

137

A 124

Lobe den Herren, den mächtigen König der Ehren, chorale (J. Neander)

xxviii, 167

I/xx, 173

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XII; 19 Aug 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

138

A 132

Warum betrübst du dich, mein Herz?, chorale (anon.)

xxviii, 199

I/xxii, 1

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XV; 5 Sept 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

139

A 159

Wohl dem, der sich auf seinen Gott, chorale (J.C. Rüben)

xxviii, 225

I/xxvi, 99

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXIII; 12 Nov 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

140

A 166

Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme, chorale (Nicolai)

xxviii, 251

I/xxvii, 151

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXVII; 25 Nov 1731

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, taille, vn piccolo, str, bc

 

 

144

A 41

Nimm, was dein ist, und gehe hin

xxx, 77

I/vii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Septuagesima; 6 Feb 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, 4vv, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

145

A 60

Ich lebe, mein Herze, zu deinem Ergötzen (Picander)

xxx, 95

I/x, 113

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Tuesday; ?1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, tpt, fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

146

A 70

Wir müssen durch viel Trübsal [partly adapted from lost vn conc.; cf 1052]

xxx, 125

I/xi.2, 65

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter III; ? 12 May 1726 or ? 18 April 1728

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, taille, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

147

A 174

Herz und Mund und Tat und Leben (partly Franck) [adapted from 147a]

xxx, 193

I/xxviii.2, 65

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Visitation; 2 July 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, 2 ob, ob d’amore, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

147a

A 7

Herz und Mund und Tat und Leben (Franck) [music lost]

I/i, CC

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent IV; 20 Dec 1716

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

148

A 140

Bringet dem Herrn Ehre seines Namens (after Picander)

xxx, 237

I/xxiii, 255

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVII; ? 19 Sept 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, tpt, ob, ob d’amore, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

149

A 181

Man singet mit Freuden vom Sieg (Picander)

xxx, 263

I/xxx, 99

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St Michael; ? 29 Sept 1728 or ? 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, bn, str, bc

 

 

150

B 24

Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich [? inc.]

xxx, 303

[I/xli]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

? before 1707

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, bn, 2 vn, bc

 

 

151

A 17

Süsser Trost, mein Jesus kömmt (Lehms)

xxxii, 3

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

3rd day of Christmas; 27 Dec 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, fl, str, bc [ob d’amore added c1727]

 

 

152

A 18

Tritt auf die Glaubensbahn (Franck)

xxxii, 19

[I/iii]

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas I; 30 Dec 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, rec, ob, va d’amore, va da gamba, bc

 

 

153

A 25

Schau, lieber Gott, wie meine Feind

xxxii, 43

I/iv, 201

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year I; 2 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, str, bc

 

 

154

A 29

Mein liebster Jesus ist verloren

xxxii, 61

I/v, 91

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany I; 9 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

155

A 32

Mein Gott, wie lang, ach lange (Franck)

xxxii, 85

I/v, 175

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany II; 19 Jan 1716

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, bn, str, bc

 

 

156

A 38

Ich steh mit einem Fuss im Grabe (Picander) [sinfonia adapted from lost ob conc.; cf 1056]

xxxii, 99

I/vi, 91

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Epiphany III; ? 23 Jan 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

157

A 170, B 20

Ich lasse dich nicht, du segnest mich denn (Picander) [adapted from earlier version as funeral cant.]

xxxii, 117

I/xxxiv, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Purification; ? 2 Feb 1728 or later

 

 

 

Scoring :

T, B, 4vv, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

158

A 61, A 171

Der Friede sei mit dir [? adapted from earlier cant. for Purification] [inc.]

xxxii, 143

I/x, 131

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Tuesday; after 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

B, 4vv, ob, vn, bc

 

 

159

A 50

Sehet, wir gehn hinauf gen Jerusalem (Picander)

xxxii, 157

I/viii.1, 159

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Quinquagesima; ? 27 Feb 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

†161

A 135

Komm, du süsse Todesstunde (Franck)

xxxiii, 3

I/xxiii, 3, 35

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVI; 6 Oct 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 4vv, 2 rec, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

162

A 148

Ach! ich sehe, jetzt, da ich zur Hochzeit gehe (Franck) [inc.]

xxxiii, 31

I/xxv, 3, 23

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XX; 3 Nov 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, hn da tirarsi, str, bc

 

 

163

A 158

Nur jedem das Seine (Franck)

xxxiii, 49

I/xxvi, 79

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXIII; 24 Nov 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, str, bc

 

 

164

A 128

Ihr, die ihr euch von Christo nennet (Franck)

xxxiii, 67

I/xxi, 59

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIII; 26 Aug 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

165

A 90

O heilges Geist- und Wasserbad (Franck)

xxxiii, 91

I/xv, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity; 16 June 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, str, bc

 

 

166

A 71

Wo gehest du hin? [inc.]

xxxiii, 107

I/xii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter IV; 7 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc

 

 

167

A 176

Ihr Menschen, rühmet Gottes Liebe

xxxiii, 125

I/xxix, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St John; 24 June 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt da tirarsi, ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

168

A 116

Tue Rechnung! Donnerwort (Franck)

xxxiii, 149

I/xix, 89

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IX; 29 July 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

169

A 143

Gott soll allein mein Herze haben [partly adapted from lost conc.; cf 1053]

xxxiii, 169

I/xxiv, 61

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XVIII; 20 Oct 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, taille, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

170

A 106

Vergnügte Ruh’, beliebte Seelenlust (Lehms)

xxxiii, 195

I/xvii.2, 61

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VI; 28 July 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, ob, d’amore, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

171

A 24

Gott, wie dein Name, so ist auch dein Ruhm (Picander)

xxxv, 3

I/iv, 133

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan ?1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

†172

A 81

Erschallet, ihr Lieder (?Franck)

xxxv, 37

I/xiii, 3, 35

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Sunday; 20 May 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, ob, str, bc

 

 

173

A 85

Erhöhtes Fleisch und Blut [adapted from 173a]

xxxv, 73

I/xiv, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Monday; ? 29 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, str, bc

 

 

174

A 87

Ich liebe den Höchsten von ganzem Gemüte (Picander)

xxxv, 105

I/xiv, 65

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Monday; 6 June 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob, taille, str, bc

 

 

175

A 89

Er rufet seinen Schafen mit Namen (M. von Ziegler)

xxxv, 161

I/xiv, 149, 165

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Tuesday; 22 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 tpt, 3 rec, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

176

A 92

Es is ein trotzig, und verzagt Ding (M. von Ziegler)

xxxv, 181

I/xv, 19

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity; 27 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 ob, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

177

A 103

Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ, chorale (J. Agricola)

xxxv, 201

I/xvii.1, 79

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IV; 6 July 1732

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, 4vv, 2 ob, taille, bn, str, bc

 

 

178

A 112

Wo Gott der Herr nicht bei uns hält, chorale (J. Jonas)

xxxv, 237; xli, 204

I/xviii, 161

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VIII; 30 July 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, hn, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

179

A 121

Siehe zu, dass deine Gottesfurcht

xxxv, 275

I/xx, 57

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XI; 8 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

180

A 149

Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, chorale (J. Franck)

xxxv, 295

I/xxv, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XX; 22 Oct 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, fl, ob, ob da caccia, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

181

A 45

Leichtgesinnte Flattergeister [? incl. earlier material] [inc.]

xxxvii, 3

I/vii, 135

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Sexagesima; 13 Feb 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, tpt, str, bc [fl, ob added later]

 

 

†182

A 53, A 172

Himmelskönig, sei willkommen (?Franck)

xxxvii, 23

I/viii.2, 3, 43

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Palm Sunday; 25 March 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, rec, str, bc

 

 

183

A 79

Sie werden euch in den Bann tun (Ziegler)

xxxvii, 61

I/xii, 189

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Ascension I; 13 May 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, 2 ob da caccia, vc piccolo, str, bc

 

 

184

A 88

Erwünschtes Freudenlicht [adapted from 184a]

xxxvii, 77

I/xiv, 121

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Whit Tuesday; 30 May 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, 4vv, 2 fl, str, bc

 

 

185

A 101

Barmherziges Herze der ewigen Liebe (Franck)

xxxvii, 103

I/xvii.1, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity IV; 14 July 1715

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, ob, str, bc [later version with tpt da tirarsi instead of ob]

 

 

†186

A 108

Ärgre dich, o Seele, nicht (partly Franck) [adapted from 186a]

xxxvii, 121

I/xviii, 17

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VII; 11 July 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, taille, str, bc

 

 

186a

A 5

Ärgre dich, o Seele, nicht (Franck) [music lost]

I/i, CC

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Advent III; 13 Dec 1716

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

187

A 110

Es wartet alles auf dich

xxxvii, 157

I/xviii, 93

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity VII; 4 Aug 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

188

A 154

Ich habe meine Zuversicht (Picander) [sinfonia adapted from lost vn conc.; cf 1052]

xxxvii, 195; xlv/1, 234

I/xxv, 267

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XXI; ? 17 Oct 1728

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, taille, org obbl, str, bc

 

 

190

A 21

Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied! [partly lost]

xxxvii, 229

I/iv, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan 1724

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, ob d’amore, bn, str, bc

 

 

190a

B 27

Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied! [adapted from 190, lost]

I/xxxiv, CC

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

200th anniversary of Augsburg Confession; 25 June 1730

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

192

A 188

Nun danket alle Gott, chorale (M. Rinkart) [partly lost]

xli, 67

I/xxxiv, 109

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

1730

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

193

B 5

Ihr Tore zu Zion

xli, 93

I/xxxii, 203

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

inauguration of town council; 25 Aug 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

194

A 91, B 31

Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest [adapted from 194a]

xxix, 101

I/xxxi, 147

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

consecration of Störmthal church and org; 2 Nov 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

†195

B 14

Dem Gerechten muss das Licht

xiii/1, 3

I/xxxiii, 17

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; 1727–31, rev. c1742 and 1747–8

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 hn, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

196

B 11

Der Herr denket an uns (Ps cxv)

xiii/1, 73

I/xxxiii, 3

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; ?1707–8

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, str, bc

 

 

197

B 16

Gott ist unsre Zuversicht [partly based on 197a]

xiii/1, 97

I/xxxiii, 119

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; 1736/7

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

197a

A 11

Ehre sei Gott in der Höhe (Picander) [partly lost]

xli, 109

I/ii, 65

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Christmas; 25 Dec ?1728

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, B, 4vv, 2 fl, ob d’amore, vc/bn, str, bc

 

 

†199

A 120

Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut (Lehms)

xli, 202 (inc.)

I/xx, 3, 25, 46, 48

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XI; 12 Aug 1714

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, ob, str, bc

 

 

200

A 192

Bekennen will ich seinen Namen [frag. of lost cantata]

I/xxviii.1, 189

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

?Epiphany or ?Purification; c1742

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, 2 vn, bc

 

 

Lost or incomplete

Doubtful and spurious

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

Lost or incomplete

 

 

BWV

BC

Title (librettist)

BG

NBA, CC

 

 

223

A 186

Meine Seele soll Gott loben

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

 

 

 

Remarks :

only incipit of last movt extant

 

 

244a

B 22

Klagt, Kinder, klagt es aller Welt (Picander)

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

funeral of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 24 March 1729

 

 

 

Remarks :

music lost, text partly same as St Matthew Passion (244), and Trauer Ode (198)

 

 

1045

A 193

[Sinfonia], from lost cant.

xxi/1, 65

I/xxxiv, 307

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

c1743–6

 

 

 

Remarks :

vn, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

1083

Tilge, Höchster, meine Sünden (after Ps li) [arr. of Pergolesi: Stabat mater]

[I/xli]

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

c1745–7

 

 

 

Remarks :

S, A, str, bc

 

 

a2

A 147

[untexted frag.]

xxxix, p.xxix

I/xxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Trinity XIX; 1729

 

 

 

Remarks :

6-bar frag. in autograph of 226

 

 

a3

B 7

Gott, gib dein Gerichte dem Könige (Picander)

I/xxxii.2

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

change of town council; 28 Aug 1730

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a4

B 4

Wünschet Jerusalem Glück (Picander)

I/xxxii.1

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

change of town council; 26 Aug 1726 or 30 Aug 1728

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a4a

B 29

Wünschet Jerusalem Glück (Picander)

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

3rd day of 200th anniversary of Augsburg Confession, 27 June 1730

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a5

B 30

Lobet den Herrn, alle seine Heerscharen (C.F. Hunold)

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 10 Dec 1718

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a14

B 12

Sein Segen fliesst daher wie ein Strom

I/xxxiii

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; 12 Feb 1725

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a15

B 32

Siehe, der Hüter Israel

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

degree ceremony, Leipzig; 1723–49

 

 

 

Remarks :

cited in Breitkopf catalogue, 1761; lost

 

 

a17

 

Mein Gott, nimm die gerechte Seele

I/xxxiv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

funeral

 

 

 

Remarks :

cited in Breitkopf catalogue, 1761; lost

 

 

a193

B 9

Herrscher des Himmels, König der Ehren

I/xxxii

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

change of town council; 29 Aug 1740

 

 

 

Remarks :

last chorus adapted from 208, otherwise lost

 

 

a190

 

Ich bin ein Pilgrim auf der Welt (Picander)

I/xxxiii, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter Monday; ? 18 April 1729

 

 

 

Remarks :

only frag. of 4th movt extant

 

 

a192

B 2

[title unknown]

I/xxxii.1

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

change of Mühlhausen town council; 1709

 

 

 

Remarks :

lost

 

 

a197

 

Ihr wallenden Wolken

I/iv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

? New Year

 

 

 

Remarks :

cited in Forkel: Nachlassverzeichnis, 1819, lost

 

 

a64

 

[title unknown]

xxiii, p.xxxii

I/xi.1

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

Easter I

 

 

 

Remarks :

7-bar sketch in autograph score of 103

 

 

a80

 

Sie werden euch in den Bann tun

I/xxxi.1

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

? Ascension I

 

 

 

Remarks :

6-bar sketch in autograph score of 79

 

 

a182

 

[title unknown]

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

St Michael; Sept 1729

 

 

 

Remarks :

14-bar sketch for opening of cant. in autograph score of 201

 

 

B 19

Was ist, das wir Leben nennen

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

dedication service; 2 April 1716

 

 

 

Remarks :

 

 

B 21

[title unknown]

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

first funeral music for Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 23 March 1729

 

 

 

Remarks :

music lost

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

Doubtful and spurious

15

 

Denn du wirst meine Seele

Easter

by J.L. Bach

ii, 135

53

 

Schlage doch, gewünschte Stunde (?Franck)

funeral

? by M. Hoffmann

xii/2, 53

141

 

Das ist je gewisslich wahr (Helbig)

Advent III

by G.P. Telemann

xxx, 3

142

 

Uns ist ein Kind geboren (Neumeister)

Christmas

 

xxx, 19

143

 

Lobe den Herrn, meine Seele

New Year

 

xxx, 45

I/iv, 167

160

 

Ich weiss, dass mein Erlöser lebt (Neumeister)

Easter

by Telemann

xxxii, 171

189

 

Meine Seele rühmt und preist

?Visitation

probably by M. Hoffmann

xxxvii, 215

217

 

Gedenke, Herr, wie es uns gehet

Epiphany I

 

xli, 207

218

 

Gott der Hoffnung erfülle euch (Neumeister)

Whit Sunday

by Telemann

xli, 223

219

 

Siehe, es hat überwunden der Löwe

St Michael

by Telemann

xli, 239

220

 

Lobt ihn mit Herz und Munde

St John

 

xli, 259

221

 

Wer sucht die Pracht, wer wünscht den Glanz

 

222

 

Mein Odem ist schwach

by (10) J.E. Bach

224

 

Reisst euch los, bekränkte Sinnen

c1733

frag., ? by C.P.E. Bach

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

secular cantatas

 

 

BWV

BC

Title (librettist)

BG

NBA

 

 

30a

G 31

Angenehmes Wiederau, freue dich (Picander)

v/1, 399; xxxiv, 325

I/xxxix, 53

 

 

Occasion; date :

for J.C. von Hennicke; 28 Sept 1737

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

36a

G 12

Steigt freudig in die Luft (Picander) [music lost; arr. from 36c]

I/xxxv, CC; I/xxxix, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday of Princess Charlotte Friedericke Wilhelmine of Anhalt-Cöthen; 30 Nov 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

36b

G 38

Die Freude reget sich [inc.]

xxxiv, 41

I/xxxviii, 257

 

 

Occasion; date :

For member of Rivinus family; 1735

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, 4vv, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

36c

G 35

Schwingt freudig euch empor (?Picander)

xxxiv, 41

I/xxxix, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday; 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 4vv, ob d’amore, va d’amore, str, bc

 

 

66a

G 4

Der Himmel dacht auf Anhalts Ruhm und Glück (C.F. Hunold), serenata [music lost]

I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 10 Dec 1718

 

 

 

Scoring :

2vv, chorus, insts

 

 

134a

G 5

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht (Hunold)

xxix, 209 (inc.)

I/xxxv, 51

 

 

Occasion; date :

New Year; 1 Jan 1719

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

173a

G 9

Durchlauchster Leopold, serenata

xxxiv, 3

I/xxxv, 97

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 10 Dec ?1722

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, 2 fl, bn, str, bc

 

 

184a

G 8

[some music preserved in 184, text lost]

I/xiv, CC; I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

? 10 Dec 1720 or 1 Jan 1721

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

193a

G 15

Ihr Häuser des Himmels, ihr scheinenden Lichter (Picander), dramma per musica [music lost]

I/xxxvi, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

Nameday of August II; 3 Aug 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

194a

G 11

[some music preserved in 194, text lost]

I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

? for court of Anhalt-Cöthen; before Nov 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

198

G 34

Trauer Ode: Lass, Fürstin, lass noch einen Strahl (J.C. Gottsched)

xiii/3, 3

I/xxxviii, 181

 

 

Occasion; date :

memorial service for Electress Christiane Eberhardine; 17 Oct 1727

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, 2 va da gamba, 2 lutes, str, bc

 

 

201

G 46

Der Streit zwischen Phoebus und Pan: Geschwinde, ihr wirbelnden Winde (Picander), dramma per musica

xi/2, 3

I/xl, 119

 

 

Occasion; date :

?1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, T, B, B, 6vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

202

G 41

Weichet nur, betrübte Schatten

xi/2, 75

I/xl, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

Wedding; before 1730

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, ob, str, bc

 

 

203

G 51

Amore traditore [not fully authenticated]

xi/2, 93

[I/xli]

 

 

Occasion; date :

? before 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

B, hpd obbl

 

 

204

G 45

Ich bin in mir vergnügt (Hunold)

xi/2, 105

I/xl, 81

 

 

Occasion; date :

1726–7

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

205

G 36

Der zufriedengestellte Äolus: Zerreisset, zerspringet, zertrümmert die Gruft (Picander), dramma per musica

xi/2, 139

I/xxxviii, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

Nameday of Dr A.F. Müller; 3 Aug 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 hn, 2 fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, va d’amore, va da gamba, str, bc

 

 

205a

G 20

Blast Lärmen, ihr Feinde! [adapted from 205; music lost]

I/xxxvii, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

? coronation of August III; ? 19 Feb 1734

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

†206

G 23, G 26

Schleicht, spielende Wellen, dramma per musica

xx/2, 3

I/xxxvi, 159

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday of August III; 7 Oct 1736; 2nd version, nameday of August III; 3 Aug 1740

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

207

G 37

Vereinigte Zwietracht der wechselnden Saiten, dramma per musica

xx/2, 73

I/xxxviii, 99

 

 

Occasion; date :

Installation of Professor Gottlieb Kortte; c11 Dec 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

207a

G 22

Auf, schmetternde Töne, cant.

xx/2, 141; xxxiv, 345

I/xxxvii, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

Nameday of August III; ? 3 Aug 1735

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

†208

G 1, G 3

Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd! (Franck)

xxix, 3

I/xxxv, 3; I/xxxvii, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

Birthday of Duke Christian of Saxe-Weissenfels; 23 Feb ?1713; later versions ?1713–17 or ? after 1738, ?1742

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, S, T, B, 2 hn, 2 rec, 2 ob, ob da caccia, bn, str, bc

 

 

209

G 50

Non sa che sia dolore

xxix, 45

[I/xli]

 

 

Occasion; date :

departure of scholar (?L. Mizler); after 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, fl, str, bc

 

 

†210

G 44

O holder Tag, erwünschte Zeit

xxix, 69

I/xl, 37

 

 

Occasion; date :

wedding; ? 1738–41, after earlier version

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, fl, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

210a

G 29

O angenehme Melodei! [music lost, mostly = 210]

xxix, 245

I/xxxix, 143

 

 

Occasion; date :

for Joachim Fredrich, Graf von Flemming; before Oct 1740, after earlier version

 

 

211

G 48

Schweigt stille, plaudert nicht (Coffee Cantata) (Picander)

xxix, 141

I/xl, 195

 

 

Occasion; date :

c1734

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, fl, str, bc

 

 

212

G 32

Mer hahn en neue Oberkeet (Peasant Cantata) (Picander)

xxix, 175

I/xxxix, 153

 

 

Occasion; date :

manorial accession celebration for C.H. von Dieskau; 30 Aug 1742

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, B, hn, fl, str, bc

 

 

213

G 18

Hercules auf dem Scheidewege: Lasst uns sorgen, lasst uns wachen (Picander), dramma per musica

xxxiv, 121

I/xxxvi, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

birthday of Prince Friedrich Christian; 5 Sept 1733

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

214

G 19

Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten!, dramma per musica

xxxiv, 177

I/xxxvi, 91

 

 

Occasion; date :

birthday of Electress Maria Josepha; 8 Dec 1733

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

215

G 21

Preise dein Glücke, gesegnetes Sachsen (J.C. Clauder), dramma per musica

xxxiv, 245

I/xxxvii, 87

 

 

Occasion; date :

anniversary of election of August III as King of Poland; 5 Oct 1734

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, B, 8vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc incl. bn

 

 

216

G 43

Vergnügte Pleissenstadt (Picander) [only vv extant]

I/xl, 23

 

 

Occasion; date :

wedding; 5 Feb 1728

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, insts

 

 

216a

G 47

Erwählte Pleissenstadt [music lost]

xxxiv, p.xlvi

I/xl, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

for Leipzig city council; after 1728

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

249a

G 2

Entfliehet, verschwindet, entweichet, ihr Sorgen (Picander) [music lost, but most in 249]

I/xxxv, CC; II/vii, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

birthday of Duke Christian of Saxe-Weissenfels; 23 Feb 1725

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 3 tpt, timp, 2 rec, fl, 2 ob, ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

249b

G 28

Die Feier des Genius: Verjaget, zerstreuet, zerrütet, ihr Sterne (Picander), dramma per musica [music lost]

I/xxxix, CC

 

 

Occasion; date :

birthday of Joachim Friedrich, Graf von Flemming; 25 Aug 1726

 

 

 

Scoring :

 

 

Lost

 

 

BWV

BC

Title (librettist)

BG

NBA

 

 

A5

B 30

Lobet den Herren, alle seine Heerscharen (Hunold)

I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 10 Dec 1718

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a6

G 6

Dich loben die lieblichen Strahlen (Hunold)

I/xxxv

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan 1720

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a7

G 7

Heut ist gewiss ein guter Tag (Hunold)

I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Prince Leopold of Anhalt-Cöthen; 10 Dec ?1720

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a8

G 10

[title unknown]

I/xxxv, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

New Year; 1 Jan 1723

 

 

 

Remarks :

lost; ? = 184a

 

 

a9

G 14

Entfernet euch, ihr heitern Sterne (C.F. Haupt)

I/xxxvi, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday visit of August III; 12 May 1727

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a10

G 30

So kämpfet nur, ihr muntern Töne (Picander)

I/xxxix, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Joachim Friedrich, Graf von Flemming; 25 Aug 1731

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a11

G 16

Es lebe der König, der Vater im Lande (Picander)

I/xxxvi, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

nameday of August II; 3 Aug 1732

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a12

G 17

Frohes Volk, vergnügte Sachsen (Picander) [adapted from a18]

I/xxxvi, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

nameday of August III; 3 Aug 1733

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a13

G 24

Willkommen! Ihr herrschenden Götter (Gottsched)

I/xxxvii, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

king’s visit and marriage of Princess Maria Amalia; 28 April 1738

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a18

G 39

Froher Tag, verlangte Stunden (J.H. Winckler)

xxxiv, p.li

I/xxxix, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

opening of Thomasschule after renovation; 5 June 1732

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a19

G 40

Thomana sass annoch betrübt (J.A. Landvoigt)

xxxiv, p.lviii

I/xxxix, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

in honour of new Rektor of Thommasschule J.A. Ernesti; 21 Nov 1734

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a20

G 33

Latin ode [title unknown]

I/xxxviii, CC

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Duke Friedrich II of Saxe-Gotha; 9 Aug 1723

 

 

 

Remarks :

lost

 

 

a196

 

Auf! süss entzückende Gewalt (Gottsched)

I/xl, 22

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

wedding; 27 Nov 1725

 

 

 

Remarks :

only text extant

 

 

a194

 

[title unknown]

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of Johann August of Anhalt-Zerbst; 9 Aug 1722

 

 

 

Remarks :

lost

 

 

G 25

[title unknown]

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

birthday of August III; 7 Oct 1739

 

 

 

Remarks :

lost

 

 

G 49

Wo sind meine Wunderwerke

 

 

Occasion; 1st perf. :

? departure of Rektor J.M. Gesner; 1732–5, ? 4 Oct 1734

 

 

 

Remarks :

frag. of inst parts

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

latin church music

 

 

BWV

BC

Title

BG

NBA

 

 

191

E 16

Gloria in excelsis Deo

xli, 3

I/ii, 173

 

 

Remarks :

perf. Christmas 1745; adapted from Mass 232I

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, T, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

232

E 1

[Mass in B minor]:

vi

II/i

 

 

Remarks :

assembled c1747–9

 

 

 

 

Missa (Kyrie, Gloria)

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

ded. new Elector of Saxony, Friedrich August II, 1733; Gratias agimus from 29, 1731; Qui tollis from 46, 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

2 S, A, T, B, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, hn, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, 2 bn, str, bc

 

 

 

 

†Symbolum Nicenum (Credo)

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

added to autograph score c1747–9; Patrem omnipotentem from 171, ?1729; Crucifixus from 12, 1714; Et exspecto from 120, 1728–9; Credo (early version), c1740

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

 

 

Sanctus

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

1st perf. Christmas Day 1724; added to autograph score c1747–9

 

 

 

Scoring :

6vv, 3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, str, bc

 

 

 

 

Osanna, Benedictus, Agnus Dei et Dona nobis pacem

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

added to autograph score c1747–9; Osanna from a9, 1727, and a11, 1732; Agnus Dei from 11, 1735; Dona nobis pacem from 29, 1731 (cf Gratias agimus, above)

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, 8vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

 

 

4 missae breves:

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

?1738–9 or later; mostly adaptations of cant. movts

 

 

233

E 6

F

viii, 3

II/ii, 199

 

 

Remarks :

from 11, 40, 102, a18

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 hn, ob, bn, str, bc

 

 

233a

E 7

Kyrie, F

xli, 187

II/ii, 287

 

 

Remarks :

?1708–17; orig. Kyrie of 233

 

 

 

Scoring :

5vv, bc

 

 

234

E 3

A

viii, 53

II/ii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

from 67, 79, 136, 179

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, B, 4vv, 2 fl, str, bc

 

 

235

E 5

g

viii, 101

II/ii, 129

 

 

Remarks :

from 72, 102, 187

 

 

 

Scoring :

A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

236

E 4

G

viii, 157

II/ii, 63

 

 

Remarks :

from 17, 79, 138, 179

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

 

 

5 settings of Sanctus:

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

except 237–8, all probably arrs. of music by other composers

 

 

237

E 10

C

xi/1, 69

II/ii, 313

 

 

Remarks :

perf. ? 24 June 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

238

 

D

xi/1, 81

II/ii, 327

 

 

Remarks :

perf. ? Christmas Day 1723

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, cornett, str, bc

 

 

239

 

d

xi/1, 89

[II/ix]

 

 

Remarks :

perf. 1735–46

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, str, bc

 

 

240

 

G

xi/1, 95

[II/ix]

 

 

Remarks :

perf. 1735–46

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

241

E 17

D

xli, 177

[II/ix]

 

 

Remarks :

perf. 1747/8; arr. from piece by J.C. Kerll

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv, 2 ob d’amore, bn, 2 str, bc

 

 

242

E 8

Christe eleison

xli, 197

II/ii, 306

 

 

Remarks :

inserted in Mass, c, by F. Durante

 

 

 

Scoring :

S, A, bc

 

 

243a

E 14

Magnificat, E

II/iii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

perf. Christmas Day 1723; incl. 4 Christmas texts: Vom Himmel hoch; Freut euch und jubiliert; Gloria in excelsis; Virga Jesse floruit

 

 

 

Scoring :

2 S, A, T, B, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 rec, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

243

E 14

Magnificat, D

xi/1, 3

II/iii, 67

 

 

Remarks :

rev. of above, c1732–5; without Christmas texts

 

 

 

Scoring :

2 S, A, T, B, 5vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

1081

E 9

Credo in unum Deum, F

II/ii, CC

 

 

Remarks :

perf. c1747–8; inserted in Mass, F, by G.B. Bassani

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, bc

 

 

1082

E 15

Suscepit Israel, e

 

 

Remarks :

c1740–42, from Magnificat, C, by Caldara with addl 2 ?vn pts.

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, 2 ?vn, bc

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

passions, oratorios

244b

 

Passio secundum Matthaeum (St Matthew Passion) (Picander)

perf. Good Friday, 11 April 1727 and 15 April 1729

scoring similar to 244, but with only 1 bc group

II/va (facs.)

 

†244

D 3

Passio secundum Matthaeum (S Matthew Passion) (Picander)

perf. Good Friday, 30 March 1736, incl. 2 org; also perf. c1742

S in ripieno; chorus I: S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 rec, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, 2 ob da caccia, va da gamba, str, bc; chorus II: S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, va da gamba, str, bc [bc incl. bassono grosso, c1742]

iv, 1

II/v

 

†245

D 2

Passio secundum Joannem (St John Passion) (anon. compilation from B.H. Brockes and others)

perf. Good Friday, 7 April 1724; 30 March 1725 with 5 nos. replaced (see NBA II/v, suppl. ii); ? 11 April 1732 and 4 April 1749 with further revs.

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, 2 ob da caccia, 2 va d’amore, va da gamba, lute/org/hpd, str, bc [bc incl. bassono grosso in late rev., ?1740s]

xii/1, 3

II/iv

 

247

D 4

Passio secundum Marcum (St Mark Passion) (Picander)

perf. Good Friday, 23 March 1731; lost except for 1 movt ? rev. in 248 and 7 movts in orig. form in 198 and 54; see NBA II/v, CC

xx/2, preface

II/v, CC; I/xviii, CC

 

248

D 7

Oratorium … Die heilige Weynacht (Christmas Oratorio) (?Picander)

in 6 pts. for feast days Christmas to Epiphany 1734– 5; pts. of nos.1–5 adapted from secular cants. 213–15, most of no.6 from lost church cant. 248a

 

v/2

II/vi

 

 

 

Jauchzet, frohlocket, auf preiset die Tage

perf. Christmas Day 1734

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

 

 

 

Und es waren Hirten in derselben Gegend

perf. 26 Dec 1734

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 fl, 2 ob d’amore, 2 ob da caccia, str, bc

 

 

 

 

 

Herrscher des Himmels, erhöre das Lallen

perf. 27 Dec 1734

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

 

 

 

Fallt mit Danken, fallt mit Loben

perf. 1 Jan 1735

S, S, T, B, 4vv, 2 hn, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

 

 

 

Ehre sei dir, Gott, gesungen

perf. 2 Jan 1735

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

 

 

 

Herr, wenn die stolzen Feinde schnauben

perf. Epiphany, 6 Jan 1735

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

 

 

 

249

D 8

Oratorium Festo Paschali: Kommt, eilet und laufet (Easter Oratorio)

perf. Easter, 1 April 1725 as cant.; rev. as orat c1738

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 rec, fl, 2 ob d’amore, str, bc

xxi/3

II/vii

 

11

D 9

Oratorium Festo Ascensionis Christi: Lobet Gott in seinen Reichen (Ascension Oratorio)

perf. Ascension, 19 May 1735

S, A, T, B, 4vv, 3 tpt, timp, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc

ii, 1

II/viii, 3

 

1088

 

So heb ich denn mein Auge sehnlich auf

incl. in Passion pasticcio, late Leipzig period; authenticity doubtful

B, insts, bc

[II/9]

 

D 1

[Passion]

?1717, lost; some numbers incl. in St John Passion, 1725

 

 

II/4, CC

 

†D 5

Addns to R. Keiser: St Mark Passion

c1713; perf. 19 April 1726

S, A, T, 4vv, str, bc

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

motets

texts of 225–8 and a159 are compilations, including chorale; other texts and librettist given in parentheses

 

 

BWV

BC

Title

BG

NBA

 

 

225

C 1

Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied

xxxix, 5

III/i, 3

 

 

Occasion; date :

1726–7

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv

 

 

226

C 2

Der Geist hilft unser Schwachheit auf

xxxix, 41, 143

III/i, 39

 

 

Occasion; date :

funeral of J.H. Ernesti; 20 Oct 1729

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv, 2 ob, taille, bn, str, bc

 

 

227

C 5

Jesu, meine Freude

xxxix, 61

III/i, 77

 

 

Occasion; date :

before 1735

 

 

 

Scoring :

5vv

 

 

228

C 4

Fürchte dich nicht

xxxix, 87

III/i, 107

 

 

Scoring :

8vv

 

 

229

C 3

Komm, Jesu, Komm! (P. Thymich)

xxxix, 109

III/i, 127

 

 

Occasion; date :

before 1732

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv

 

 

230

C 6

Lobet den Herrn alle Heiden (Ps cxvii)

xxxix, 129

III/i, 149

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, org

 

 

231

Sei Lob und Preis mit Ehren

xxix, 167 (inc.)

 

 

Occasion; date :

? after 1 Jan 1725; from 28 and Telemann

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv

 

 

a159

C 9

Ich lasse dich nicht, du segnest mich denn

 

 

Occasion; date :

before Sept 1713

 

 

 

Scoring :

8vv

 

 

†118

B 23

O Jesu Christ, meins Lebens Licht (2 versions), chorale

xxiv, 183

III/i, 163, 171

 

 

Occasion; date :

burial or memorial service; 1st version 1736–7, 2nd version c1746–9

 

 

 

Scoring :

4vv, 2 litui, cornett, 3 trbn; 2nd version 4vv, 2 litui, str, bc (2 ob, ob da caccia and bn, ad lib)

 

 

C 8

Der Gerechte kommt um (Isaiah lvii.1–2)

 

 

Occasion; date :

? late Leipzig period; reworking of J. Kuhnau: Tristis est anima mea

 

 

 

Scoring :

5vv, 2 ob, str, bc

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

chorales, sacred songs, arias

 

 

BWV

BC

 

 

 

 

 

Wedding chorales, 4vv, 2 hn, ob, ob d’amore, str, bc, after 1730; BG 143 xiii/1, 147; NBA III/ii.1, 3

 

250

F 193.3

Was Gott tut das ist wohlgetan

 

251

F 59.4

Sei Lob und Ehr’ dem höchsten Gut

 

252

F 148.2

Nun danket alle Gott

 

 

 

Chorales, 4vv, from Joh. Seb. Bachs vierstimmige Choral-gesänge, ed. J.P. Kirnberger and C.P.E. Bach, i–iv (Leipzig, 1784–7) [excluding those within larger works]; BG xxxix, 177; NBA III/ii.2, 3

 

253

F 35.1

Ach bleib bei uns, Herr Jesu Christ

 

254

F 1.1

Ach Gott, erhör’ mein Seufzen

 

255

F 2.1

Ach Gott und Herr

 

256

F 212.1

Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost

 

259

F 5.1

Ach, was soll ich Sünder machen

 

260

F 10.1

Allein Gott in der Höh’ sei Ehr’

 

261

F 11.1

Allein zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ

 

262

F 8.1

Alle Menschen müssen sterben

 

263

F 12.1

Alles ist an Gottes Segen

 

264

F 13.1

Als der gütige Gott

 

265

F 14.1

Als Jesus Christus in der Nacht

 

266

F 15.1

Als vierzig Tag nach Ostern war

 

267

F 17.1

An Wasserflüssen Babylon

 

268

F 19.1

Auf, auf, mein Herz, und du, mein ganzer Sinn

 

269

F 21.1

Aus meines Herzens Grunde

 

270

F 92.1

Befiehl du deine Wege

 

271

F 92.2

Befiehl du deine Wege

 

272

F 136.2

Befiehl du deine Wege

 

273

F 24.1

Christ, der du bist der helle Tag

 

274

F 27.1

Christe, der du bist Tag und Licht

 

275

F 28.1

Christe, du Beistand deiner Kreuzgemeinde

 

276

F 25.1

Christ ist erstanden

 

277

F 26.1

Christ lag in Todes Banden

 

278

F 26.2

Christ lag in Todes Banden

 

279

A 61/4

Christ lag in Todes Banden

 

280

F 65.1

Christ, unser Herr, zum Jordan kam

 

281

F 30.1

Christus, der ist mein Leben

 

282

F 30.2

Christus, der ist mein Leben

 

283

F 31.1

Christus, der uns selig macht

 

284

F 32.1

Christus ist erstanden, hat überwunden

 

285

F 34.1

Da der Herr Christ zu Tische sass

 

286

F 183.1

Danket dem Herren

 

287

F 119.1

Dank sei Gott in der Höhe

 

288

F 36.1

Das alte Jahr vergangen ist

 

289

F 36.2

Das alte Jahr vergangen ist

 

290

F 38.1

Das walt’ Gott Vater und Gott Sohn

 

291

F 39.1

Das walt’ mein Gott, Vater, Sohn und heil'ger Geist

 

292

F 40.1

Den Vater dort oben

 

293

F 42.1

Der du bist drei in Einigkeit

 

294

F 43.1

Der Tag, der ist so freudenreich

 

295

F 178.1

Des heil’gen Geistes reiche Gnad’

 

296

F 44.1

Die Nacht ist kommen

 

297

F 161.1

Die Sonn’ hat sich mit ihrem Glanz gewendet

 

298

F 46.1

Dies sind die heil’gen zehn Gebot’

 

299

F 47.1

Dir, dir, Jehova, will ich singen

 

300

F 51.1

Du grosser Schmerzensmann

 

301

F 50.1

Du, o schönes Weltgebäude

 

302

F 53.1

Ein’ feste Burg ist unser Gott

 

303

F 53.2

Ein’ feste Burg ist unser Gott

 

304

F 54.1

Eins ist Not! ach Herr, dies Eine

 

305

F 55.1

Erbarm’ dich mein, o Herre Gott

 

306

F 58.1

Erstanden ist der heil’ge Christ

 

307

F 150.1

Es ist gewisslich an der Zeit

 

308

F 62.1

Es spricht der Unweisen Mund wohl

 

309

F 63.1

Es steh'n vor Gottes Throne

 

310

F 64.1

Es wird schier der letzte Tag herkommen

 

311

F 66.1

Es woll’ uns Gott genädig sein

 

312

F 66.2

Es woll’ uns Gott genädig sein

 

327

F 105.2

Für deinen Thron tret’ ich hiermit

 

313

F 68.1

Für Freuden lasst uns springen

 

314

F 69.1

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ

 

315

F 70.1

Gib dich zufrieden und sei stille

 

316

F 71.1

Gott, der du selber bist das Licht

 

317

F 72.1

Gott, der Vater, wohn’ uns bei

 

318

F 143.1

Gottes Sohn ist kommen

 

319

F 74.1

Gott hat das Evangelium

 

320

F 75.1

Gott lebet noch

 

321

F 77.1

Gottlob, es geht nunmehr zu Ende

 

322

F 76.1

Gott sei gelobet und gebenedeiet

 

323

F 140.1

Gott sei uns gnädig

 

325

F 79.1

Heilig, heilig

 

326

F 105.1

Herr Gott, dich loben alle wir

 

328

F 83.1

Herr Gott, dich loben wir

 

329

F 134.1

Herr, ich denk’ an jene Zeit

 

330

F 84.1

Herr, ich habe missgehandelt

 

331

F 84.2

Herr, ich habe missgehandelt

 

332

F 85.1

Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend’

 

333

F 86.1

Herr Jesu Christ, du hast bereit’t

 

334

F 202.1

Herr Jesu Christ, du höchstes Gut

 

335

F 170.1

Herr Jesu Christ, mein’s Lebens Licht

 

336

F 88.1

Herr Jesu Christ, wah’r Mensch und Gott

 

337

F 89.1

Herr, nun lass in Friede

 

338

F 90.1

Herr, straf mich nicht in deinem Zorn

 

339

F 23.1

Herr, wie du willst, so schick’s mit mir

 

340

F 91.1

Herzlich lieb hab ich dich, o Herr

 

341

F 94.1a

Heut’ ist, o Mensch, ein grosser Trauertag

 

342

F 95.1

Heut’ triumphieret Gottes Sohn

 

343

F 96.1

Hilf, Gott, lass mir’s gelinge

 

344

F 97.1

Hilf, Herr Jesu, lass gelingen

 

345

F 99.1

Ich bin ja, Herr, in deiner Macht

 

346

F 100.1

Ich dank’ dir, Gott für all’ Wohltat

 

347

F 101.1

Ich dank’ dir, lieber Herre

 

348

F 101.2

Ich dank’ dir, lieber Herre

 

349

F 4.1

Ich dank’ dir schon durch deinen Sohn

 

350

F 139.1

Ich danke dir, o Gott, in deinem Throne

 

351

F 102.1

Ich hab’ mein’ Sach’ Gott heimgestellt

 

366

F 104.1

Ihr Gestirn’, ihr hohlen Lüfte

 

367

F 107.1

In allen meinen Taten

 

368

F 110.1

In dulci jubilo

 

352

F 187.1

Jesu, der du meine Seele

 

353

F 187.2

Jesu, der du meine Seele

 

354

F 187.3

Jesu, der du meine Seele

 

355

F 112.1

Jesu, der du selbsten wohl

 

356

F 113.1

Jesu, du mein liebstes Leben

 

357

F 114.1

Jesu, Jesu, du bist mein

 

358

F 116.1

Jesu, meine Freude

 

359

F 206.1

Jesu meiner Seelen Wonne

 

360

F 206.2

Jesu meiner Seelen Wonne

 

361

F 117.1

Jesu, meines Herzens Freud’

 

362

F 118.1

Jesu, nun sei gepreiset

 

363

F 121.1

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland

 

364

F 120.1

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland

 

365

F 123.1

Jesus, meine Zuversicht

 

369

F 124.1

Keinen hat Gott verlassen

 

370

F 125.1

Komm, Gott Schöpfer, heiliger Geist

 

371

F 129.1

Kyrie, Gott Vater in Ewigkeit

 

372

F 82.1

Lass, o Herr, dein Ohr sich neigen

 

373

F 133.1

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

 

374

F 135.1

Lobet den Herren, denn er ist freundlich

 

375

F 127.1

Lobt Gott, ihr Christen, allzugleich

 

376

F 128.1

Lobt Gott, ihr Christen, allzugleich

 

377

F 137.1

Mach’s mit mir, Gott, nach deiner Güt’

 

378

F 138.1

Meine Augen schliess’ ich jetzt

 

379

F 122.1

Meinen Jesum lass’ ich nicht, Jesus

 

380

F 141.1

Meinen Jesum lass’ ich nicht, weil

 

324

F 140.1

Meine Seele erhebet den Herrn

 

381

F 142.1

Meines Lebens letzte Zeit

 

382

F 144.1

Mit Fried’ und Freud’ ich fahr’ dahin

 

383

F 145.1

Mitten wir im Leben sind

 

384

F 146.1

Nicht so traurig, nicht so sehr

 

385

F 147.1

Nun bitten wir den heiligen Geist

 

386

F 148.1

Nun danket alle Gott

 

387

F 106.1

Nun freut euch, Gottes Kinder all’

 

388

F 149.1

Nun freut euch, lieben Christen g’mein

 

389

F 153.1

Nun lob’, mein’ Seel’, den Herren

 

390

F 153.2

Nun lob’, mein’ Seel’, den Herren

 

391

F 154.1

Nun preiset alle Gottes Barmherzigkeit

 

392

F 166.1

Nun ruhen alle Wälder

 

396

F 155.1

Nun sich der Tag geendet hat

 

397

F 156.1

O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort

 

398

F 45.2b

O Gott, du frommer Gott

 

399

F 157.1

O Gott, du frommer Gott

 

400

F 160.1

O Herzensangst, o Bangigkeit und Zagen!

 

401

F 162.1

O Lamm Gottes, unschuldig

 

402

F 61.1

O Mensch, bewein’ dein’ Sünde gross

 

403

F 163.1

O Mensch, schau Jesum Christum an

 

404

F 165.1

O Traurigkeit, o Herzeleid!

 

393

F 166.2

O Welt, sieh hier dein Leben

 

394

F 166.5

O Welt, sieh hier dein Leben

 

395

F 166.9

O Welt, sieh hier dein Leben

 

405

F 167.1

O wie selig seid ihr doch, ihr Frommen

 

406

F 7.1

O wie selig seid ihr doch, ihr Frommen

 

407

F 168.1

O wir armen Sünder

 

408

F 94.1b

Schaut, ihr Sünder!

 

409

F 173.1

Seelen-Bräutigam

 

410

F 174.1

Sei gegrüsset, Jesu gütig

 

411

F 175.1

Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied

 

412

F 177.1

So gibst du nun, mein Jesu, gute Nacht

 

413

F 130.1

Sollt’ ich meinem Gott nicht singen

 

414

F 35.2

Uns ist ein Kindlein heut’ gebor’n

 

415

F 18.1

Valet will ich dir geben

 

416

F 181.4a

Vater unser im Himmelreich

 

417

F 185.1

Von Gott will ich nicht lassen

 

418

F 185.2

Von Gott will ich nicht lassen

 

419

F 185.3

Von Gott will ich nicht lassen

 

257

F 212.2

Wär Gott nicht mit uns diese Zeit

 

420

F 189.1

Warum betrübst du dich, mein Herz

 

421

F 189.2

Warum betrübst du dich, mein Herz

 

422

F 190.1

Warum sollt’ ich mich denn grämen

 

423

F 191.1

Was betrübst du dich, mein Herze

 

424

F 192.1

Was bist du doch, o Seele, so betrübet

 

425

F 195.1

Was willst du dich, o meine Seele

 

426

F 197.1

Weltlich Ehr’ und zeitlich Gut

 

427

F 200.1

Wenn ich in Angst und Not

 

428

F 201.1

Wenn mein Stündlein vorhanden ist

 

429

F 201.2

Wenn mein Stündlein vorhanden ist

 

430

F 201.3

Wenn mein Stündlein vorhanden ist

 

431

F 203.1

Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein

 

432

F 203.2

Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein

 

433

F 204.1

Wer Gott vertraut, hat wohl gebaut

 

434

F 205.1

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

 

435

F 207.1

Wie bist du, Seele, in mir so gar betrübt

 

436

F 109.1

Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern

 

437

F 211.1

Wir glauben all’ an einen Gott

 

258

F 212.3

Wo Gott der Herr nicht bei uns hält

 

438

F 213.1

Wo Gott zum Haus nicht gibt sein’ Gunst

 

 

 

Sacred songs, 1v, bc, in G.C. Schemelli: Musicalisches Gesang-Buch (Leipzig, 1736) [Bach was involved in the production of Schemelli’s hymnal, but research has discredited the methods by which these items were attrib. him; only bc ? by Bach unless otherwise stated]; BG xxxix, 279; NBA III/ii.1, 104

 

439

F 274

Ach, dass nicht die letzte Stunde

 

440

F 229

Auf, auf! die rechte Zeit ist hier [? melody by Bach]

 

441

F 245

Auf, auf! mein Herz, mit Freuden

 

442

F 257

Beglückter Stand getreuer Seelen

 

443

F 265

Beschränkt, ihr Weisen dieser Welt [? melody by Bach]

 

444

F 242

Brich entzwei, mein armes Herze

 

445

F 247

Brunnquell aller Güter

 

446

F 220

Der lieben Sonnen Licht und Pracht

 

447

F 221

Der Tag ist hin, die Sonne gehet nieder

 

448

F 222

Der Tag mit seinem Lichte

 

449

F 249

Dich bet’ich an, mein höchster Gott [? melody by Bach]

 

450

F 235

Die bittre Leidenszeit beginnet abermal

 

451

F 219

Die goldne Sonne, voll Freud’ und Wonne

 

452

F 250

Dir, dir Jehovah, will ich singen [melody by Bach]

 

453

F 225

Eins ist Noth! ach Herr, diess Eine [? melody by Bach]

 

454

F 230

Ermuntre dich, mein schwacher Geist

 

455

F 261

Erwürgtes Lamm, das die verwahrten Siegel

 

456

F 258

Es glänzet der Christen

 

457

F 275

Es ist nun aus mit meinem Leben

 

458

F 243

Es ist vollbracht! vergiss ja nicht

 

459

F 256

Es kostet viel, ein Christ zu sein

 

460

F 263

Gieb dich zufrieden und sei stille

 

461

F 255

Gott lebet noch; Seele, was verzagst du doch?

 

462

F 248

Gott, wie gross ist deine Güte [? melody by Bach]

 

463

F 223

Herr, nicht schicke deine Rache

 

464

F 276

Ich bin ja, Herr, in deiner Macht

 

465

F 231

Ich freue mich in dir

 

466

F 264

Ich halte treulich still und liebe [? melody by Bach]

 

467

F 269

Ich lass’ dich nicht

 

468

F 270

Ich liebe Jesum alle Stund’ [? melody by Bach]

 

469

F 232

Ich steh’ an deiner Krippen hier [? melody by Bach]

 

476

F 233

Ihr Gestirn’, ihr hohen Lüfte

 

471

F 228

Jesu, deine Liebeswunden [? melody by Bach]

 

470

F 271

Jesu, Jesu, du bist mein [? melody by Bach]

 

472

F 226

Jesu, meines Glaubens Zier

 

473

F 266

Jesu, meines Herzens Freud’

 

474

F 251

Jesus ist das schönste Licht

 

475

F 246

Jesus unser Trost und Leben

 

477

F 278

Kein Stündlein geht dahin

 

478

F 277

Komm, süsser Tod, komm, sel’ge Ruh’! [? melody by Bach]

 

479

F 285

Kommt, Seelen, dieser Tag [? melody by Bach]

 

480

F 286

Kommt wieder aus der finstern Gruft [? melody by Bach]

 

481

F 236

Lasset uns mit Jesu ziehen

 

482

F 252

Liebes Herz, bedenke doch

 

483

F 279

Liebster Gott, wann werd’ ich sterben?

 

484

F 280

Liebster Herr Jesu! wo bleibest du so lange? [? melody by Bach]

 

485

F 272

Liebster Immanuel, Herzog der Frommen

 

488

F 281

Meines Lebens letzte Zeit

 

486

F 227

Mein Jesu, dem die Seraphinen

 

487

F 237

Mein Jesu! was für Seelenweh [? melody by Bach]

 

489

F 259

Nicht so traurig, nicht so sehr

 

490

F 267

Nur mein Jesus ist mein Leben

 

491

F 238

O du Liebe meine Liebe

 

492

F 282

O finstre Nacht [? melody by Bach]

 

493

F 234

O Jesulein süss, o Jesulein mild

 

494

F 260

O liebe Seele, zieh’ die Sinnen [? melody by Bach]

 

495

F 283

O wie selig seid ihr doch, ihr Frommen

 

496

F 253

Seelen-Bräutigam, Jesu, Gottes Lamm!

 

497

F 268

Seelenweide, meine Freude

 

499

F 240

Sei gegrüsset, Jesu gütig

 

498

F 239

Selig, wer an Jesum denkt [? melody by Bach]

 

500

F 241

So gehst du nun, mein Jesu, hin [? melody by Bach]

 

501

F 244

So giebst du nun, mein Jesu, gute Nacht

 

502

F 284

So wünsch’ ich mir zu guter Letzt

 

503

F 287

Steh’ ich bei meinem Gott

 

504

F 254

Vergiss mein nicht, dass ich dein nicht

 

505

F 262

Vergiss mein nicht, vergiss mein nicht [melody by Bach]

 

506

F 273

Was bist du doch, o Seele, so betrübet

 

507

 

Wo ist mein Schäflein, das ich liebe

 

 

 

Pieces in Clavierbüchlein, ii, for Anna Magdalena Bach; BG xxxix, 289; NBA V/iv, 91:

 

511

F 214a

Gib dich zufrieden, chorale, g

 

512

F 214b

Gib dich zufrieden, chorale, e (arr. of 511)

 

513

F 218

O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort, chorale [from 397]

 

514

F 216

Schaffs mit mir, Gott, chorale

 

516

F 215

Warum betrübst du dich, aria

 

524

H 1

Quodlibet, SATB, bc, frag., for wedding, Mühlhausen, by mid-1708

 

a40

 

Murky: Ihr Schönen, höret an, S, bc, before 1736

 

Doubtful

 

 

Pieces in Clavierbüchlein, ii, for Anna Magdalena Bach; BG xxxix, 309; NBA V/iv, 102:

508

 

Bist du bei mir, aria (by G.H. Stölzel)

509

 

Gedenke doch, mein Geist, aria (anon.)

510

 

Gib dich zufrieden, chorale, F (anon. bass added)

†515

H 2

So oft ich meine Tobackspfeife, aria (anon., ? by Gottfried Heinrich Bach, ? arr. J.S. Bach)

517

 

Wie wohl ist mir, o Freund der Seelen (anon.)

 

 

Sacred songs, 5 for 1v, bc (probably spurious); NBA [III/iii]:

519

 

Hier lieg’ ich nun

520

 

Das walt’ mein Gott

521

 

Gott mein Herz dir Dank zusendet

522

 

Meine Seele, lass es gehen

523

 

Ich gnüge mich an meinem Stande

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

organ

independent of chorales

based on chorales

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

independent of chorales

 

 

 

 

BWV

BC

Title

BG

NBA

 

 

 

131a

J 62

Fugue, g

xxxviii, 217

 

 

Remarks :

arr. from 131

 

 

 

525–30

J 1–6

6 sonatas (E, c, d, e, C, G)

xv, 3–66

IV/vii, 2–76

 

 

Remarks :

c1730; no.3: cf 1044; no.4 arr. from 76

 

 

 

531

J 9

Prelude and fugue, C

xv, 81

IV/v, 3

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

†532

J 13, 54, 70

Prelude and fugue, D

xv, 88

IV/v, 58; IV/vi, 95

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1710

 

 

 

†533

J 18, 72

Prelude and fugue, e

xv, 100

IV/v, 90; IV/vi, 106

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

534

J 20

Prelude and fugue, f

xv, 104

IV/v, 130

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1710

 

 

 

†535

J 23

Prelude and fugue, g

xv, 112

IV/v, 157; IV/vi, 109

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705; rev. ?1708–17

 

 

 

536

J 24

Prelude and fugue, A

xv, 120

IV/v, 180; IV/vi, 114

 

 

Remarks :

?1708–17

 

 

 

537

J 40

Fantasia and fugue, c

xv, 129

IV/v, 47

 

 

Remarks :

? after 1723

 

 

 

538

J 38

Toccata and fugue, ‘Dorian’, d

xv, 136

IV/v, 76

 

 

Remarks :

?1712–17

 

 

 

†539

J 15, 71

Prelude and fugue, d

xv, 148

IV/v, 70

 

 

Remarks :

? after 1720; fugue adapted from vn sonata, 1001

 

 

 

†540

J 39, 55, 73

Toccata and fugue, F

xv, 154

IV/v, 112

 

 

Remarks :

toccata ? after 1712; fugue before 1731

 

 

 

†541

J 22

Prelude and fugue, G

xv, 169

IV/v, 146

 

 

Remarks :

? after 1712; rev. c1724–5

 

 

 

†542

J 42, 57, 67

Fantasia and fugue, g

xv, 177

IV/v, 167

 

 

Remarks :

fugue: before 1725; fantasia: c1720

 

 

 

†543

J 26

Prelude and fugue, a

xv, 189

IV/v, 186; IV/vi, 121

 

 

Remarks :

after 1715; fugue: cf 944

 

 

 

544

J 27

Prelude and fugue, b

xv, 199

IV/v, 198

 

 

Remarks :

1727–31

 

 

 

†545

J 10, 51

Prelude and fugue, C

xv, 212

IV/v, 10; IV/vi, 77

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1708; rev. ?1712–17

 

 

 

†546

J 12, 53, 69

Prelude and fugue, c

xv, 218

IV/v, 35

 

 

Remarks :

?1723–9

 

 

 

547

J 11

Prelude and fugue, C

xv, 228

IV/v, 20

 

 

Remarks :

? by 1725

 

 

 

548

J 19

Prelude and fugue, e

xv, 236

IV/v, 95

 

 

Remarks :

rev. 1727–31

 

 

 

†549

J 14

Prelude and fugue, c/d

xxxviii, 3

IV/v, 30; IV/vi, 101

 

 

Remarks :

before 1705; rev. ? after 1723

 

 

 

550

J 21

Prelude and fugue, G

xxxviii, 9

IV/v, 138

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1710

 

 

 

551

J 25

Prelude and fugue, a

xxxviii, 17

IV/vi, 63

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1707

 

 

 

552

J 16

Prelude and fugue, ‘St Anne’, E

iii, 173, 254

IV/vi, 2, 105

 

 

Remarks :

in Clavier-Übung, iii, (Leipzig, 1739), see 669–89

 

 

 

553–60

J 28–35

[8 short preludes and fugues] (C, d, e, F, G, g, a, B)

xxxviii, 23

[IV/ix]

 

†562

J 41, 56

Fantasia and fugue, c

xxxviii, 64, 209

IV/v, 54, 105

 

Remarks :

fantasia: c1730; fugue (inc.) c1740–45

 

 

 

563

J 43

Fantasia, b

xxxviii, 59

IV/vi, 68

 

 

Remarks :

before 1708

 

 

 

564

J 36

Toccata, adagio and fugue, C

xv, 253

IV/vi, 3

 

 

Remarks :

?c1712

 

 

 

565

J 37

Toccata and fugue, d

xv, 267

IV/vi, 31

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1708

 

 

 

†566

J 17

Prelude and fugue, E/C

xv, 276

IV/vi, 40

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1708

 

 

 

568

J 47

Prelude, G

xxxviii, 85

IV/vi, 51

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

569

J 48

Prelude, a

xxxviii, 89

IV/vi, 59

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

570

J 49

Fantasia, C

xxxviii, 62

IV/vi, 16

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

571

J 82

Fantasia, G

xxxviii, 67

 

572

J 83

Pièce d’orgue, G

xxxviii, 75

IV/vii, 130, 154, 156

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1712

 

 

 

573

J 50

Fantasia, C

xxxviii, 209

IV/vi, 18

 

 

Remarks :

c1722; frag. in Clavierbüchlein, i, for Anna Magdalena Bach

 

 

 

†574

J 63

Fugue on theme by Legrenzi, c

xxxviii, 94, 205

IV/vi, 19, 82, 88

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1708

 

 

 

575

J 60

Fugue, c

xxxviii, 101

IV/vi, 26

 

 

Remarks :

? 1708–17

 

 

 

577

J 61

Fugue, G

xxxviii, 111

 

578

J 66

Fugue, g

xxxviii, 116

IV/vi, 55

 

Remarks :

? before 1707

 

 

 

579

J 68

Fugue on theme by Corelli, b

xxxviii, 121

IV/vi, 71

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1710

 

 

 

†582

J 79

Passacaglia, c

xv, 289

IV/vii, 98, 148

 

 

Remarks :

?1708–12

 

 

 

583

J 8

Trio, d

xxxviii, 143

IV/vii, 94

 

 

Remarks :

?1723–9

 

 

 

588

J 80

Canzona, d

xxxviii, 126

IV/vii, 118, 150

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

 

589

J 64

Alla breve, D

xxxvii, 131

IV/vii, 114

 

590

J 81

Pastorella, F

xxxviii, 135

IV/vii, 122

 

Remarks :

? after 1720

 

 

 

591

J 78

Kleine harmonisches Labyrinth

xxxviii, 225

[IV/ix]

 

 

 

5 concertos:

 

 

 

Remarks :

Weimar, c1714; arrs. of works by other composers

 

 

 

†592

J 88, 192

G

xxxviii, 149; xlii, 282

IV/viii, 56

 

 

Remarks :

arr. of conc. by Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar

 

 

 

593

J 86

a

xxxviii, 158

IV/viii

 

 

Remarks :

arr. of Vivaldi op.3 no.8 = rv522

 

 

 

594

J 84

C

xxxviii, 171

IV/viii, 30

 

 

Remarks :

arr. of Vivaldi op.7/ii no.5 = rv208

 

 

 

595

J 87

C

xxxviii, 196

IV/viii, 65

 

 

Remarks :

arr. of conc. by Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar

 

 

 

596

J 85

d

IV/viii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

arr. of Vivaldi op.3 no.11 = rv565

 

 

 

802–5

J 74–7

4 duettos (e, F, G, a)

iii, 242

IV/vi, 92

 

 

Remarks :

in Clavier-Übung, iii (Leipzig, 1739); see also 552, 669–89

 

 

 

1027a

 

Trio, G

 

 

Remarks :

transcr. from last movt of va da gamba sonata, 1027

 

 

 

a205

 

Fantasia, c

 

 

Remarks :

before 1705

 

 

 

Doubtful and spurious

536a

 

Prelude and fugue, A

variant of 536

IV/vi

561

 

Fantasia and fugue, a

spurious

xxxviii, 48

567

 

Prelude, C

by J.L. Krebs

xxxviii, 84

576

 

Fugue, G

spurious

xxxviii, 106

580

J 65

Fugue, D

spurious

xxxviii, 215

581

 

Fugue, G

spurious

584

 

Trio, g

probably spurious

585

 

Trio, c

by J.F. Fasch

xxxviii, 219

IV/viii, 73

586

 

Trio, G

after Telemann

IV/viii, 78

587

 

Aria, F

after Couperin: Les nations

xxxviii, 222

IV/viii, 82

597

 

Concerto, E

 

[IV]

598

Q 2

Pedal-Exercitium

? by C.P.E. Bach

xxxviii, 210

[IV/vii]

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

based on chorales

 

 

BWV

BC

Title

BG

NBA

 

 

599–644

 

Das Orgel-Büchlein, mostly 1713–15; BG xxv/2, 3, 159; NBA IV/i, 3

 

 

 

599

K 28

Nun komm’ der Heiden Heiland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600

K 29

Gott, durch deine Güte

 

 

 

†601

K 30

Herr Christ, der ein’ge Gottes-Sohn

 

 

 

602

K 31

Lob sei dem allmächtigen Gott

 

 

 

603

K 32

Puer natus in Bethlehem

 

 

 

604

K 33

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ

 

 

 

605

K 34

Der Tag, der ist so freudenreich

 

 

 

606

K 35

Vom Himmel hoch, da komm’ ich her

 

 

 

607

K 36

Vom Himmel kam der Engel Schar

 

 

 

608

K 37

In dulci jubilo

 

 

 

609

K 38

Lobt Gott, ihr Christen, allzugleich

 

 

 

610

K 39

Jesu, meine Freude

 

 

 

611

K 40

Christum wir sollen loben schon

 

 

 

612

K 41

Wir Christenleut’

 

 

 

613

K 42

Helft mir Gottes Güte preisen

 

 

 

†614

K 43

Das alte Jahr vergangen ist

 

 

 

615

K 44

In dir ist Freude

 

 

 

616

K 45

Mit Fried’ und Freud’ ich fahr dahin

 

 

 

617

K 46

Herr Gott, nun schleuss den Himmel auf

 

 

 

618

K 47

O Lamm Gottes unschuldig

 

 

 

619

K 48

Christe, du Lamm Gottes

 

 

 

†620

K 49

Christus, der uns selig macht

 

 

 

621

K 50

Da Jesus an dem Kreuze stund’

 

 

 

622

K 51

O Mensch, bewein’ dein’ Sünde gross

 

 

 

623

K 52

Wir danken dir, Herr Jesu Christ

 

 

 

624

K 53

Hilf Gott, das mir’s gelinge

 

 

 

625

K 55

Christ lag in Todesbanden

 

 

 

626

K 56

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland

 

 

 

627

K 57

Christ ist erstanden

 

 

 

628

K 58

Erstanden ist der heil’ge Christ

 

 

 

629

K 59

Erschienen ist der herrliche Tag

 

 

 

†630

K 60

Heut’ triumphieret Gottes Sohn

 

 

 

†631

K 61

Komm, Gott Schöpfer, heilger Geist

 

 

 

632

K 62

Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend’

 

 

 

634

K 63a

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

 

 

 

633

K 63b

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

 

 

 

635

K 64

Dies sind die heil’gen zehn Gebot’

 

 

 

636

K 65

Vater unser im Himmelreich

 

 

 

637

K 66

Durch Adam’s Fall ist ganz verderbt

 

 

 

†638

K 67

Es ist das Heil uns kommen her

 

 

 

†639

K 68

Ich ruf’ zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ

 

 

 

640

K 69

Ich dich hab’ ich gehoffet, Herr

 

 

 

641

K 70

Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein

 

 

 

642

K 71

Wer nun den lieben Gott lässt walten

 

 

 

643

K 72

Alle Menschen müssen sterben

 

 

 

644

K 73

Ach wie nichtig, ach wie flüchtig

 

 

 

a200

K 54

O Trauerigkeit, o Herzeleid (frag.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sechs Choräle [‘Schübler’ chorales]:

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

(Zella, 1748–9), transcrs. of cant. movts pubd by Schübler

 

 

645

K 22

Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme

xxv/2, 63

IV/i, 86

 

 

Remarks :

from 140, movt 4

 

 

646

K 23

Wo soll ich fliehen hin

xxv/2, 66

IV/i, 90

 

 

Remarks :

source unknown; cf 694

 

 

647

K 24

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

xxv/2, 68

IV/i, 92

 

 

Remarks :

from 93, movt 4

 

 

648

K 25

Meine Seele erhebt den Herren

xxv/2, 70

IV/i, 94

 

 

Remarks :

from 10, movt 5

 

 

649

K 26

Ach bleib’ bei uns, Herr Jesu Christ

xxv/2, 71

IV/i, 95

 

 

Remarks :

from 6, movt 3

 

 

650

K 27

Kommst du nun, Jesu, vom Himmel herunter

xxv/2, 74

IV/i, 98

 

 

Remarks :

from 137, movt 2

 

 

 

 

[17 (18) chorales]:

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

all probably begun before 1723, and all but 657 also preserved in an early version; 651–65 assembled as an autograph collection, c1735–45, D-Bsb P271; for 2 manuals, pedal

 

 

†651

K 74

Fantasia super Komm, Heiliger Geist

xxv/2, 79

IV/ii, 3, 117

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno; c.f. in pedal; cf 651a

 

 

†652

K 75

Komm, Heiliger Geist

xxv/2, 86

IV/ii, 13, 121

 

 

Remarks :

alio modo; cf 652a

 

 

†653

K 76

An Wasserflüssen Babylon

xxv/2, 92

IV/ii, 22, 130, 133

 

 

Remarks :

cf 653a and 653b

 

 

†654

K 77

Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele

xxv/2, 95

IV/ii, 26, 136

 

 

Remarks :

cf 654a

 

 

†655

K 78

Trio super Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend

xxv/2, 98

IV/ii, 31, 140

 

 

Remarks :

cf 655a

 

 

†656

K 79

O Lamm Gottes, unschuldig

xxv/2, 102

IV/ii, 38, 146

 

 

Remarks :

cf 656a

 

 

657

K 80

Nun danket alle Gott

xxv/2, 108

IV/ii, 46

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in soprano; see above

 

 

†658

K 81

Von Gott will ich nicht lassen

xxv/2, 112

IV/ii, 51, 154

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in pedal; cf 658a

 

 

†659

K 82

Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland

xxv/2, 114

IV/ii, 55, 157

 

 

Remarks :

cf 659a

 

 

†660

K 83

Trio super Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland

xxv/2, 116

IV/ii, 59, 160

 

 

Remarks :

cf 660a and 660b

 

 

661

K 84

Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland

xxv/2, 118

IV/ii, 62, 164

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno; c.f. in pedal, cf 661a

 

 

†662

K 85

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xxv/2, 122

IV/ii, 67, 168

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in soprano; cf 662a

 

 

†663

K 86

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xxv/2, 125

IV/ii, 72, 172

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in tenor; cf 663a

 

 

†664

K 87

Trio super Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xxv/2, 130

IV/ii, 79, 179

 

 

Remarks :

cf 664a

 

 

†665

K 88

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland

xxv/2, 136

IV/ii, 87, 187

 

 

Remarks :

cf 665; Bach’s last autograph entry in Bsb P271

 

 

†666

K 89

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland

xxv/2, 140

IV/ii, 91, 191

 

 

Remarks :

alio modo; cf 666a; copied into Bsb P271 by J.C. Altnickol, c1744–7

 

 

†667

K 90

Komm, Gott, Schöpfer, Heiliger Geist

xxv/2, 142

IV/ii, 94; IV/i, 58

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno; cf 631; copied into Bsb P271 by Altnickol

 

 

†668

K 91

Vor deinen Thron tret ich hiermit

xxv/2, 145

IV/ii, 113, 212; IV/i, 71

 

 

Remarks :

partly in Bsb P271, copied ? after 1750; with minor variants, 668a, pubd as Wenn wir in höchsten Nöten sein in 1080; cf 641

 

 

 

 

Chorale preludes in Clavier-Übung, iii, bestehend in verschiedenen Vorspielen über die Cathechismus- und andere Gesaenge

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

(Leipzig, 1739); framed by 552; for 2 kbd, pedal unless otherwise stated

 

 

669

K 1

Kyrie, Gott Vater in Ewigkeit

iii, 184

IV/iv, 16

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in soprano

 

 

670

K 2

Christe, aller Welt Trost

iii, 186

IV/iv, 18

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in tenor

 

 

671

K 3

Kyrie, Gott heiliger Geist

iii, 190

IV/iv, 22

 

 

Remarks :

a 5, organo pleno; c.f. in bass

 

 

672

K 4

Kyrie, Gott Vater in Ewigkeit

iii, 194

IV/iv, 27

 

 

Remarks :

alio modo, manuals only

 

 

673

K 5

Christe, aller Welt Trost

iii, 194

IV/iv, 28

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

674

K 6

Kyrie, Gott heiliger Geist

iii, 196

IV/iv, 29

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

675

K 7

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

iii, 197

IV/iv, 33

 

 

Remarks :

a 3; c.f. in alto; manuals only

 

 

†676

K 8

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

iii, 199

IV/iv, 33

 

677

K 9

Fughetta super Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

iii, 205

IV/iv, 41

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

678

K 10

Dies sind die heilgen zehen Gebot

iii, 206

IV/iv, 42

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in canon

 

 

679

K 11

Fughetta super Dies sind die heiligen zehen Gebot

iii, 210

IV/iv, 49

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

680

K 12

Wir gläuben all an einen Gott

iii, 212

IV/iv, 52

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno

 

 

681

K 13

Fughetta super Wir gläuben all an einen Gott

iii, 216

IV/iv, 57

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

682

K 14

Vater unser im Himmelreich

iii, 217

IV/iv, 58

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in canon

 

 

683

K 15

Vater unser im Himmelreich

iii, 223

IV/iv, 66

 

 

Remarks :

alio modo, manuals only

 

 

684

K 16

Christ, unser Herr, zum Jordan kam

iii, 224

IV/iv, 68

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in pedal

 

 

685

K 17

Christ, unser Herr, zum Jordan kam

iii, 228

IV/iv, 73

 

 

Remarks :

alio modo, manuals only

 

 

686

K 18

Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir

iii, 229

IV/iv, 74

 

 

Remarks :

a 6, organo pleno, pedal doppio

 

 

687

K 19

Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir

iii, 232

IV/iv, 78

 

 

Remarks :

a 4, alio modo, manuals only

 

 

688

K 20

Jesus Christus, unser Heiland, der von uns den Zorn Gottes wandt

iii, 234

IV/iv, 81

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in pedal

 

 

689

K 21

Fuga super Jesus Christus unser Heiland

iii, 239

IV/iv, 89

 

 

Remarks :

a 4, manuals only

 

 

690

K 127

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

xl, 3

IV/iii, 98

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only; ? before 1705

 

 

691

K 99

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

xl, 4

IV/iii, 98

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only; autograph in Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach; c1720–23

 

 

694

K 139

Wo soll ich fliehen hin

xl, 6

IV/iii, 103

 

 

Remarks :

2 kbd, pedal; before 1708; cf 646

 

 

695

K 136

Fantasia super Christ lag in Todes Banden

xl, 10

IV/iii, 20

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only; ? before 1708

 

 

696

K 142

Christum wir sollen loben schon

xl, 13

IV/iii, 23

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

697

K 147

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ

xl, 14

IV/iii, 32

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

698

K 149

Herr Christ, der einig Gottes Sohn

xl, 15

IV/iii, 35

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

699

K 155

Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland

xl, 16

IV/iii, 73

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

700

K 156

Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her

xl, 17

IV/iii, 92

 

 

Remarks :

before 1708, rev. 1740s

 

 

701

K 157

Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her

xl, 19

IV/iii, 96

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

702

K 143

Das Jesulein soll doch mein Trost

xl, 20

[IV/ix]

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta

 

 

703

K 148

Gottes Sohn ist kommen

xl, 21

IV/iii, 34

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ?1739–42

 

 

704

K 153

Lob sei dem allmächtigen Gott

xl, 22

IV/iii, 62

 

 

Remarks :

fughetta, manuals only; ? 1739–42

 

 

705

K 144

Durch Adams Fall ist ganz verderbt

xl, 23

[IV/ix]

 

706

K 116

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

xl, 25

IV/iii, 59

 

 

Remarks :

?1708–14; cf 706ii [alio modo]

 

 

707

K 137

Ich hab mein Sach Gott heimgestellt

xl, 26

[IV/ix]

 

708

K 158

Ich hab mein Sach Gott heimgestellt

xl, 30, 152

[IV/ix]

 

709

K 150

Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend

xl, 30

IV/iii, 43

 

 

Remarks :

2 kbd, pedal; ?Weimar, 1708–17

 

 

711

K 140

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xl, 34

IV/iii, 11

 

 

Remarks :

bicinium; ?1708–17; rev. 1740s

 

 

712

K 151

In dich hab ich gehoffet, Herr

xl, 36

IV/iii, 48

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

713

K 138

Fantasia super Jesu, meine Freude

xl, 38

IV/iii, 54

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

714

K 172

Ach Gott und Herr

xl, 43

IV/iii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

per canonem

 

 

715

K 128

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xl, 44

IV/iii, 14

 

716

K 141

Fuga super Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xl, 45

[IV/ix]

 

717

K 106

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

xl, 47

IV/iii, 8

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

718

K 119

Christ lag in Todes Banden

xl, 52

IV/iii, 16

 

 

Remarks :

2 kbd, pedal

 

 

719

K 160

Der Tag, der ist so freudenreich

xl, 55

[IV/ix]

 

720

K 103

Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott

xl, 57

IV/iii, 24

 

721

K 107

Erbarm dich mein, o Herre Gott

xl, 60

IV/iii, 28

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

†722

K 114

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ

xl, 62, 158

IV/iii, 30–31

 

724

K 108

Gott, durch deine Güte (Gottes Sohn ist kommen)

xl, 65

IV/iii, 33

 

 

Remarks :

before 1705; alternative title in bwv, BG

 

 

725

K 199

Herr Gott, dich loben wir

xl, 66

IV/iii, 36

 

 

Remarks :

a 5

 

 

726

K 130

Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend

xl, 72

IV/iii, 45

 

727

K 109

Herzlich tut mich verlangen

xl, 73

IV/iii, 46

 

 

Remarks :

2 kbd, pedal

 

 

728

K 101

Jesus, meine Zuversicht

xl, 74

IV/iii, 58

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only; autograph in Clavierbüchlein, i, for Anna Magdalena Bach

 

 

†729

K 115

In dulci jubilo

xl, 74, 158

IV/iii, 52, 50

 

 

Remarks :

sketch, 729a

 

 

730

K 133

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

xl, 76

IV/iii, 60

 

731

K 134

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

xl, 77

IV/iii, 61

 

 

Remarks :

2 kbd, pedal

 

 

†732

K 117

Lobt Gott, ihr Christen, allzugleich

xl, 78, 159

IV/iii, 63–4

 

 

Remarks :

sketch, 732a

 

 

733

K 120

Meine Seele erhebet den Herren (Fuge über das Magnificat)

xl, 79

IV/iii, 65

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno

 

 

†734

K 125

Nun freut euch, lieben Christen gmein

xl, 160

IV/iii, 70

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only; c.f. in tenor; cf 734a

 

 

†735

K 104

Fantasia super Valet will ich dir geben

xl, 86, 161

IV/iii, 77, 81

 

 

Remarks :

with pedal obbl; Weimar, 1708–17, rev. ? after 1723

 

 

736

K 131

Valet will ich dir geben

xl, 90

IV/iii, 84

 

 

Remarks :

c.f. in pedal

 

 

737

K 112

Vater unser im Himmelreich

xl, 96

IV/iii, 90

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

†738

K 118

Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her

xl, 97, 159

IV/iii, 94

 

 

Remarks :

sketch, 738a

 

 

739

K 97

Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern

xl, 99

[IV/x]

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1705

 

 

741

K 135

Ach Gott vom Himmel sieh darein

xl, 167

IV/iii, 4

 

 

Remarks :

organo pleno

 

 

742

K 173

Ach Herr, mich armen Sünder

[IV/ix]

 

743

K 121

Ach, was ist doch unser Leben

 

744

K 122

Auf meinen lieben Gott

xl, 170

 

747

K 102

Christus, der uns selig macht

 

749

K 195

Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1700

 

 

750

K 196

Herr Jesu Christ, meins Lebens Licht

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1700

 

 

753

K 124

Jesu, meine Freude

xl, 163

V/v

 

 

Remarks :

frag.; ? before 1723

 

 

754

 

Liebster Jesu, wir sind hier

 

756

K 197

Nun ruhen alle Wälder

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1700

 

 

757

K 126

O Herre Gott, dein göttlichs Wort

 

758

K 198

O Vater, allmächtiger Gott

xl, 179

 

762

K 113

Vater unser im Himmelreich

 

764

K 98

Wie schön leuchtet uns der Morgenstern

xl, 164

[IV/x]

 

 

Remarks :

frag.; ? before 1705

 

 

765

K 105

Wir glauben all’ an einen Gott

 

†1085

K 110, 111

O Lamm Gottes, unschuldig

IV/iii, 74

 

 

Remarks :

manuals only

 

 

a49

 

Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott

 

a50

 

Erhalt uns, Herr, bei deinem Wort

 

a58

 

Jesu, meine Freude

 

a75

 

Herr Christ, der einig Gottes Sohn

 

a76

 

Jesu, meine Freude

 

 

 

Partite diverse:

 

 

 

766

K 94

Christ, der du bist der helle Tag

xl, 107

IV/i, 113

 

 

Remarks :

c1700

 

 

767

 

O Gott, du frommer Gott

xl, 114

IV/i, 122

 

 

Remarks :

K 95

 

 

†768

K 96

Sei gegrüsset, Jesu gütig

xl, 122

IV/i, 132

 

 

Remarks :

? before 1710, rev. later

 

 

770

K 93

Ach, was soll ich Sünder machen

xl, 189

 

 

 

Neumeister Chorales

IV/ix

 

 

Remarks :

before 1705; in MS belonging to J.G. Neumeister, incl. also 601, 639, 714, 719, 737, 742

 

 

1090

K 161

Wir Christenleut

 

 

 

1091

K 162

Das alte Jahr vergangen ist

 

 

 

1092

K 163

Herr Gott, nun schleuss den Himmel auf

 

 

 

1093

K 164

Herzliebster, Jesu, was hast du verbrochen

 

 

 

1094

K 165

O Jesu, wie ist dein Gestalt

 

 

 

1095

K 166

O Lamm Gottes unschuldig

 

 

 

1096

K 167

Christe, der du bist Tag und Licht

 

 

 

1097

K 168

Ehre sei dir, Christe

 

 

 

1098

K 169

Wir glauben all an einen Gott

 

 

 

1099

K 170

Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir

 

 

 

1100

K 171

Allein zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ

 

 

 

1101

K 174

Durch Adams Fall ist ganz verderbt

 

 

 

1102

K 175

Du Friedefürst, Herr Jesu Christ

 

 

 

1103

K 176

Erhalt uns, Herr, bei deinem Wort

 

 

 

1104

K 177

Wenn dich Unglück tut greifen an

 

 

 

1105

K 178

Jesu, meine Freude

 

 

 

1106

K 179

Gott ist mein Heil, mein Hilf und Trost

 

 

 

1107

K 180

Jesu, meines Lebens Leben

 

 

 

†1108

K 181

Als Jesus Christus in der Nacht

 

 

 

1109

K 182

Ach Gott, tu dich erbarmen

 

 

 

1110

K 183

O Herre Gott, dein göttlich Wort

 

 

 

1111

K 184

Nun lasst uns den Leib begraben

 

 

 

1112

K 185

Christus, der ist mein Leben

 

 

 

1113

K 186

Ich hab mein Sach Gott heimgestellt

 

 

 

1114

K 187

Herr Jesu Christ, du höchstes Gut

 

 

 

1115

K 188

Herzlieblich lieb hab ich dich, o Herr

 

 

 

1116

K 189

Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan

 

 

 

1117

K 190

Alle Menschen müssen sterben

 

 

 

957

K 191

Machs mit mir, Gott, nach deiner Güt

 

 

 

1118

K 192

Werde munter, mein Gemüte

 

 

 

1119

K 193

Wie nach einer Wasserquelle

 

 

 

1120

K 194

Christ, der du bist der helle Tag

 

 

 

Doubtful and spurious

691a

 

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

 

xl, 151

[IV/x]

692

 

Ach Gott und Herr

by J.G. Walther

xl, 4, 152

693

 

Ach Gott und Herr

by J.G. Walther

xl, 5

695a

 

Fantasia super Christ lag in Todes Banden

c.f. in pedal

xl, 153

713a

 

Fantasia super Jesu, meine Freude

c.f. in pedal

xl, 155

723

 

Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ

 

xl, 63

[IV/x]

734a

 

Nun freut euch, lieben Christen gmein

c.f. in pedal; *734; doubtful

xl, 84

740

 

Wir glauben all’ an einen Gott, Vater

 

xl, 103

[IV/x]

745

 

Aus der Tiefe rufe ich

by C.P.E. Bach

xl, 171

746

 

Christ ist erstanden

by J.C.F. Fischer

xl, 173

748

 

Gott der Vater wohn’ uns bei

by J.G. Walther

xl, 177

751

 

In dulci jubilo

by J.M. Bach

752

 

Jesu, der du meine Seele

 

755

 

Nun freut euch, lieben Christen

 

759

 

Schmüchke dich, o liebe Seele

by G.A. Homilius

xl, 181

760

 

Vater unser im Himmelreich

by G. Böhm

xl, 183

761

 

Vater unser im Himmelreich

by Böhm

xl, 184

763

 

Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern

 

771

 

Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr’

chorale variations; nos.3, 8 (?all) by A.N. Vetter

xl, 195

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

other keyboard

†772–86

L 27–41

15 Inventions (C, c, D, d, E, E, e, F, f, G, g, A, a, B, b)

c1720, rev. 1723

iii, 1; xlv, 213

V/iii; V/v

†787–801

L 42–56

15 Sinfonias (C, c, D, d, E, E, e, F, f, G, g, A, a, B, b)

c1720, rev. 1723

iii, 19

V/iii; V/v

†806–11

L 13–18

6 [English] Suites (A, a, g, F, e, d)

? before 1720

xlv/1, 3

V/vii

†812–17

L 19–24

6 [French] Suites (d, c, b, E, G, E)

c1722–5

xlv/1, 89

V/viii

 

 

Clavier-Übung [i] bestehend in Präludien, Allemanden, Couranten, Sarabanden, Giguen, Menuetten, und anderen Galanterien:

partitas pubd singly (Leipzig, 1726–31) and as op.1 (Leipzig, 1731)

iii, 46

V/i

825–30

L 1–6

6 Partitas (B, c, a, D, G, e)

 

 

 

†831

L 8

Ouvertüre [Partita] nach französischer Art, b

in Clavier-Übung, ii (Leipzig, 1735); see also 971; early version by 1733

iii, 154

V/ii, 20

†846–69

L 80–103

Das wohltemperirte Clavier, oder Praeludia, und Fugen durch alle Tone und Semitonia [i] [The Well-tempered Clavier]: 24 Preludes and fugues (C, c, C, c, D, d, E, e/d, E, e, F, f, F, f, G, g, A, g, A, a, B, b, B, b)

1722, rev. later

xiv

V/vi.1

†870–93

L 104–27

[Das wohltemperirte Clavier, ii]: 24 Preludes and fugues (C, c, C, c, D, d, E, e/d, E, e, F, f, F, f, G, g, A, g, A, a, B, b, B, b)

c1740; some pieces earlier, rev.

xiv

V/iv.2

971

L 7

Concerto nach italiänischem Gusto [Italian Concerto]

in Clavier-Übung, ii, (Leipzig, 1735)

iii, 139

V/ii, 3

988

L 9

Aria mit [30] verschiedenen Veraenderungen [Goldberg Variations]

Clavier-Übung, [iv] (Nuremberg, 1741)

iii, 263

V/ii, 69

 

 

Miscellaneous suites and suite movts:

 

 

 

†818

L 25

Suite, a

c1705

xxxvi, 3

V/viii, 129, 146

†819

L 26

Suite, E

c1725

xxxvi, 8

V/viii, 136

820

L 173

Ouverture, F

c1705

xxxvi, 14

V/x, 43

821

L 169

Suite, B

 

xlii, 213

[V]

822

L 168

Suite, g

before 1707

V/x, 68

823

L 167

Suite, f

frag.; before 1715

xxxvi, 229

V/x, 50

†832

L 174

Partie, A

? before 1708

xlii, 255

V/x, 54

833

L 172

Prelude and partita, F

before 1708

V/10, 54

841–3

L 176

3 minuets, G, g, G

c1720; from Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 209

V/v, 16

 

 

Miscellaneous preludes, fugues, fantasias, toccatas:

 

 

 

894

L 130

Prelude and fugue, a

c1715–25; cf 1044

xxxvi, 91

V/ix.2, 40

895

L 129

Prelude and fugue, a

before 1725

xxxvi, 104

V/xii.2, 69

896

L 128

Prelude and fugue, A

before 1710

xxxvi, 157 [fugue only]

V/ix.2, 72

900

L 77

Prelude and fughetta, e

before 1726

xxxvi, 108

[V/ix]

901

L 78

Prelude and fughetta, F

before 1730; fughetta = early version of 886

xxxvi, 112

[V/ix]

†902

L 79

Prelude and fughetta, G

? before 1730; fughetta = early version of 884

xxxvi, 114, 220

[V/ix]

†903

L 134

Chromatic fantasia and fugue, d

before 1723

xxxvi, 71, 219

V/ix.2, 76

904

L 136

Fantasia and fugue, a

Leipzig, c1725

xxxvi, 81

V/ix.2, 100

906

L 133, 138

Fantasia and fugue, c

fugue (c1704) inc.

xxxvi, 145, 238

V/ix.2, 110

910

L 146

Toccata, f

c1712

iii, 311

V/ix.2, 3

911

L 142

Toccata, c

before 1714

iii, 322

V/ix.1, 15

†912

L 143

Toccata, D

before 1710

xxxvi, 26, 218

V/ix.1, 28

†913

L 144

Toccata, d

? before 1708

xxxvi, 36

V/ix.1, 52

914

L 145, 163

Toccata, e

?c1710; fugue after ? B. Marcello

xxxvi, 47

V/ix.1, 80

915

L 148

Toccata, g

?c1710

xxxvi, 54

V/ix.1, 89

916

L 147

Toccata, G

before 1714

xxxvi, 63

V/ix.1, 102

917

L 140

Fantasia, g

? before 1710

xxxvi, 143

V/ix.2, 14

918

L 139

Fantasia on a rondo, c

? after 1740

xxxvi, 148

V/ix.2, 18

921

J 44, 52

Prelude (Fantasia), c

before 1714

xxxvi, 136

V/ix.2, 24

922

L 141

Fantasia, a

before 1714

xxxvi, 138

V/ix.2, 27

†923

L 131

Prelude, b

before 1725

xlii, 211

V/ix.2, 116

†944

L 135, 164

Fantasia and fugue, a

fugue after Torelli

iii, 334

V/ix.2, 133

946

L 160

Fugue on theme by Albinoni, C

? before 1708

xxxvi, 159

V/ix.2, 153

947

L 157

Fugue, a

 

xxxvi, 161

[V/xii]

948

L 151

Fugue, d

before 1727

xxxvi, 164

V/xii.2, 156

949

L 154

Fugue, A

 

xxxvi, 169

V/xii.2, 163

950

L 161

Fugue on theme by Albinoni, A

?c1710

xxxvi, 173

V/ix.2, 168

†951

L 162

Fugue on theme by Albinoni, b

c1712; *951a of earlier date

xxxvi, 178, 221

V/ix.2, 118

952

L 150

Fugue, C

 

xxxvi, 184

V/xii.2, 176

953

L 149

Fugue, C

after 1723 from Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 186

V/v, 46

954

L 165

Fugue, B

arr. of fugue from J.A. Reincken: Hortus musicus

xlii, 50

V/xi, 200

956

L 152

Fugue, e

 

xlii, 200

[V/xii]

958

L 155

Fugue, a

 

xlii, 205

[V/ix]

959

L 156

Fugue, a

 

xlii, 208

V/ix.2, 178

961

L 158

Fughetta, c

 

xxxvi, 154

V/xii.2, 182

 

 

Pieces from Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach:

Cöthen, 1720–; incl. also 836–7, 841–3, 924a–5, 931–2, 953, 994; see 691, 753, 772ff, 846ff

xxxvi, 118

V/v

924

L 57

Praeambulum, C

 

 

 

926

L 58

Prelude, d

 

 

 

927

L 59

Praeambulum, F

 

 

 

928

L 60

Prelude, F

 

 

 

929

L 61

Trio, g

inserted in Partita, g, by G.H. Stölzel

 

 

930

L 62

Praeambulum, g

 

 

 

 

 

Clavierbüchlein, i, for Anna Magdalena Bach

Cöthen, 1722–5; see 573, 728, 812–16, 841, 991

xliii/2, 3

V/iv, 3

 

 

Clavierbüchlein, ii, for Anna Magdalena Bach

Leipzig, 1725; incl. 82 (recit, aria), 299, 508–18, 691, 812–13, 827, 830, 846 (prelude), 988 (aria); see a183

xliii/2, 6

V/iv, 47

933–8

L 64–9

[6 little preludes] (C, c, d, D, E, e)

 

xxxvi, 128

V/ix.2, 3

939–43

L 70–74

5 Preludes (C, d, e, a, C)

 

xxxvi, 119

[V/ix]

 

 

Sonatas, variations, capriccios, etc.:

 

 

 

963

L 182

Sonata, D

c1704

xxxvi, 19

V/x, 32

964

L 184

Sonata, d

arr. of 1003

xlii, 3

965

L 187

Sonata, a

? before 1705; arr. of sonata from J.A. Reincken: Hortus musicus

xlii, 29

V/xi, 173

966

L 186

Sonata, C

? before 1705; arr. of part of sonata from Reincken: Hortus musicus

xlii, 42

V/xi, 188

967

L 183

Sonata, a

c1705; arr. of 1st movt of anon. chamber sonata

xlv/1, 168

968

L 185

Sonata, a

arr. of 1005, 1st movt

xlii, 27

†989

L 179

Aria variata, a

? before 1710

xxxvi, 203

V/x, 21

990

L 178

Sarabande con partite, C

 

xlii, 221

[V/xii]

991

L 177

Air with variations, c

frag.; in Clavierbüchlein, i, for Anna Magdalena Bach

xliii/2, 4

V/iv, 40

992

L 181

Capriccio sopra la lontananza del suo fratello dilettissimo [Capriccio on the Departure of his Most Beloved Brother], B

? before 1705

xxxvi, 190

V/x, 3

993

L 180

Capriccio, E

 

xxxvi, 197

V/x, 12

994

Q 1

Applicatio, C

early 1720; 1st entry in Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 237

V/v, 4

 

 

16 Concertos:

Weimar, 1713–14; arrs. of works by other composers

 

 

972

L 189

D

after Vivaldi op.3 no.9 = rv230

xlii, 59

V/xi, 3

973

L 191

G

after Vivaldi op.7/ii no.2 = rv299

xlii, 66

V/xi, 12

974

L 194

d

after ob conc. by A. Marcello

xlii, 73

V/xi, 20

975

L 193

g

after Vivaldi op.4 no.6 = rv316

xlii, 80

V/xi, 30

976

L 188

C

after Vivaldi op.3 no.12 = rv265

xlii, 87

V/xi, 39

977

L 202

C

source unknown (?Vivaldi)

xlii, 96

V/xi, 50

978

L 190

F

after Vivaldi op.3 no.3 = rv310

xlii, 101

V/xi, 56

979

L 196

b

after vn conc. by Torelli

xlii, 108

V/xi, 64

980

L 192

G

after Vivaldi op.4 no.1 = rv381

xlii, 119

V/xi, 79

981

L 195

c

after B. Marcello op.1 no.2

xlii, 127

V/xi, 90

982

L 200

B

after conc. by Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar

xlii, 135

V/xi, 100

983

L 204

g

source unknown

xlii, 142

V/xi, 110

984

L 197

C

after conc. by Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar

xlii, 148

V/xi, 118

985

L 201

g

after vn conc. by Telemann

xlii, 155

V/xi, 128

986

L 203

G

source unknown

xlii, 161

V/xi, 137

987

L 198

d

after conc. by Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar

xlii, 165

V/xi, 142

Doubtful and spurious

824

 

Suite, A

frag.; by Telemann

xxxvi, 231

834

 

Allemande, c

 

xlii, 259

[V/xii]

835

 

Allemande, a

by Kirnberger

xlii, 267

836–7

 

2 allemandes, g (1 inc.)

c1720–22; from Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach; ? by W.F. Bach assisted by J.S. Bach

xlv/1, 214

V/v, 8

838

 

Allemande and courante, A

by C. Graupner

xlii, 265

[V/xii]

839

 

Sarabande, g

 

 

840

 

Courante, G

by Telemann

844

 

Scherzo, d

? by W.F. Bach

xlii, 220, 281

845

 

Gigue, f

 

xlii, 263

897

 

Prelude and fugue, a

prelude by C.H. Dretzel

xlii, 173

[V/xii]

898

 

Prelude and fugue, B

 

[V/xii]

899

 

Prelude and fughetta, d

 

[V/xii]

905

 

Fantasia and fugue, d

 

xlii, 179

[V/xii]

907

 

Fantasia and fughetta, B

? by G. Kirchhoff

xlii, 268

[V/xii]

908

 

Fantasia and fughetta, D

? by G. Kirchhoff

xlii, 272

[V/xii]

909

 

Concerto and fugue, c

 

xlii, 190

[V/xii]

919

 

Fantasia, c

? by J. Bernhard Bach

xxxvi, 152

[V/xii]

920

 

Fantasia, g

 

xlii, 183

[V/xii]

945

 

Fugue, e

spurious

xxxvi, 155

[V/xii]

955

 

Fugue, B

before 1730

xlii, 55

[B/ix]

960

 

Fugue, e

 

xlii, 276

[V/xii]

962

 

Fugato, e

by Albrechtsberger

xlii, 198

 

 

Pieces from Clavier-Büchlein for W.F. Bach:

Cöthen, 1720–

 

 

924a

 

Prelude, C

reworking of 924; ? by W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 221

V/v, 41

925

 

Prelude, D

? by W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 121

V/v, 42

931

 

Prelude, a

? by W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 237

V/v, 45

932

L 63

Prelude, e

? by W.F. Bach

xxxvi, 238

V/v, 44

969

 

Andante, g

 

xlii, 218

[V/xii]

970

 

Presto, d

by W.F. Bach

[V/xii]

990

 

Sarabande con partite, C

spurious

xlii, 221

[V/xii]

 

 

Clavierbüchlein, ii, for Anna Magdalena Bach [only anon. pieces listed]:

after 1724; also incl. pieces by C.P.E. Bach (a122–5, 127, 129), J.C. Bach (a131), Böhm (without no.), Couperin (a183), Hasse (a130), Petzoldt (a114–15); remainder anon., ? by members of Bach circle

xliii/2, 25

V/iv, 47

 

 

Minuet, F (a113); Minuet, G (a116); Polonaise, F (a117a, 117b); Minuet, B (a118); †Polonaise, g (a119); Minuet, a (a120); Minuet, c (a121); Musette, D (a126); [Polonaise], d (a128); Polonaise, G (a130); Minuet, d (a132)

 

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

lute

995

 

Suite, g

c1730; arr. of vc suite 1011

V/x, 81

†996

L 166

Suite, e

? after 1712; orig. in d

xlv/1, 149

V/x, 94

997

L 170

Partita, c

c1740

xlv/1, 156

V/x, 102

998

L 132

Prelude, fugue and allegro, E

c1740–45

xlv/1, 141

V/x, 114

999

L 175

Prelude, c

c1720

xxxvi, 119

V/x, 122

1000

 

Fugue, g

after 1720; arr. of fugue from vn sonata 1001

V/x, 124

1006a

L 171

Partita, E: see 1006

c1736–7; ? for lute-harpsichord

xlii, 16

V/x, 134

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

chamber

 


 

BWV

Title, scoring

BG

NBA

 


 

†1001–6

Sonatas and partitas, solo vn:

xxvii/1, 3

VI/i, 3

 

 

Remarks :

1720; 1006 arr. lute = 1006a

 

 

 

Sonata no.1, g; Partita no.1, b; Sonata no.2, a; Partita no.2, d: Sonata no.3, C; Partita no.3, E

 

 

 

1007–12

6 suites, solo vc (G, d, C, E, c, D)

xxvii/1, 59

VI/ii, 1

 

 

Remarks :

c1720

 

 

1013

Partita, a, fl

VI/iii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

after 1723

 

 

1014–19

6 sonatas, hpd, vn

ix, 69

VI/i, 83

 

 

Remarks :

before 1725, rev. before 1740; earlier version of no.5 (Adagio only) = 1018a (BG ix, 250; NBA VI/i, 195); 1st version of no.6 incl. 1019a (BG ix, 252; NBA VI/i, 197); 3 versions of 1019 [9 movts], 2nd version related to 830

 

 

 

no.1, b; no.2, A; no.3, E; no.4, c; †no.5, f; †no.6, G

 

 

 

1021

Sonata, G, vn, bc

VI/i, 65

 

 

Remarks :

1732–5

 

 

1023

Sonata, e, vn, bc

xliii/1, 31

VI/i, 73

 

 

Remarks :

after 1723

 

 

†1025

Suite, A, vn, hpd

ix, 43

 

 

 

Remarks :

c1740; after S.L. Weiss

 

 

1026

Fugue, g, vn, hpd

xliii/1, 39

 

 

 

Remarks :

before 1712

 

 

1027–9

3 sonatas, hpd, va da gamba (G, D, g)

ix, 175

VI/iv

 

 

Remarks :

before 1741

 

 

†1030

Sonata, b, fl, hpd

ix, 3

VI/iii, 33, 89

 

 

Remarks :

c1736; earlier version, g

 

 

1031

Sonata, E, fl, hpd

ix, 22

 

 

 

Remarks :

1730–34

 

 

1032

Sonata, A, fl, hpd

ix, 245, 32

VI/iii, 54

 

 

Remarks :

c1736; 1st movt inc.

 

 

1033

Sonata, C, fl, bc

xliii/1, 3

 

 

 

Remarks :

c1736

 

 

1034

Sonata, e, fl, bc

xliii/1, 9

VI/iii, 11

 

 

Remarks :

c1724

 

 

1035

Sonata, E, fl, bc

xliii/1, 21

VI/iii, 23

 

 

Remarks :

c1741

 

 

1038

Sonata, G, fl, vn, bc

ix, 221

 

 

 

Remarks :

1732–5

 

 

1039

Sonata, G, 2 fl, bc

ix, 260

VI/iii, 71

 

 

Remarks :

c1736–41; cf 1027

 

 

1040

Trio, F, vn, ob, bc

xxix, 250

I/xxxv, 47

 

 

Remarks :

movt based on material from Cantata 208, ? perf. with cant.; later used in Cantata 68

 

 

Doubtful and spurious

1020

Sonata, g, hpd, vn

? by C.P.E. Bach

ix, 274

1022

Sonata, F, vn, hpd

arr. of 1038; ? by one of Bach’s sons or pupils

1024

Sonata, c, vn, bc

? by J.G. Pisendel

1036

Sonata, d, 2 vn, hpd

by C.P.E. Bach

1037

Sonata, C, 2 vn, hpd

by J.G. Goldberg

ix, 231

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

orchestral

where applicable, scoring given as concertino/solo; ripieno

 


 

BWV

Title, key

Scoring

BG

NBA

 


 

1041

Concerto, a

vn; str, bc

xxi/1, 3

VII/iii, 3

 

 

Remarks :

c1730; cf 1058

 

 

1042

Concerto, E

vn; str, bc

xxi/1, 21

VII/iii, 35

 

 

Remarks :

before 1730; cf 1054

 

 

1043

Concerto, d

2 vn; str, bc

xxi/1, 41

VII/iii, 71

 

 

Remarks :

1730–31; cf 1062

 

 

1044

Concerto, a

fl, vn, hpd; str, bc

xvii, 223

VII/iii, 105

 

 

Remarks :

1729–41; movts adapted from prelude and fugue 894 and trio sonata 527

 

 

 

Brandenburg Concertos:

 

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

autograph MS ded. Christian Ludwig, Margrave of Brandenburg, 24 March 1721

 

 

1046

no.1, F

2 hn, ob, vn piccolo; 2 ob, bn, str, bc

xix, 3

VII/ii, 3

 

1046a

Sinfonia, F

2 hn, 3 ob, bn, str, bc

xxxi/1, 96

VII/ii, 225

 

 

Remarks :

formerly 1071; also used in 52

 

 

1047

no.2, F

tpt, rec, ob, vn; str, bc

xix, 33

VII/ii, 43

 

1048

no.3, G

3 vn, 3 va, 3 vc, bc

xix, 59

VII/ii, 73

 

1049

no.4, G

vn, 2 rec; str, bc

xix, 85

VII/ii, 99

 

 

Remarks :

cf 1057

 

 

1050

no.5, D

fl, vn, hpd; str, bc

xix, 127

VII/ii, 145, appx

 

 

Remarks :

*1050a

 

 

1051

no.6, B

2 va, 2 va da gamba, vc, bc

xix, 167

VII/ii, 197

 

 

Harpsichord concertos:

 

 

 

 

 

Remarks :

Leipzig, mostly c1738–9; mostly transcrs. of vn or ob concs; some orig./transcrs. also used in church cants.

 

 

†1052

d

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 3

VII/iv, 3

 

 

Remarks :

from lost vn conc. reconstructed in NBA VII/vii, 3

 

 

1053

E

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 45

VII/iv, 79

 

 

Remarks :

from lost ?ob conc; see NBA VII/vii, CC

 

 

1054

D

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 81

VII/iv, 127

 

 

Remarks :

from 1042

 

 

1055

A

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 109

VII/iv, 161

 

 

Remarks :

from lost ob d’amore conc. reconstructed in NBA VII/vii, 33

 

 

1056

f

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 135

VII/iv, 197

 

 

Remarks :

outer movts from lost ob conc. in g reconstructed in NBA VII/vii, 59

 

 

1057

F

hpd, 2 rec; str, bc

xvii, 153

VII/iv, 221

 

 

Remarks :

from 1049

 

 

1058

g

hpd; str, bc

xvii, 199

VII/iv, 283

 

 

Remarks :

from 1041

 

 

1059

d

hpd, ob; str, bc

xvii, p.xx

VII/iv, 313

 

 

Remarks :

inc., from lost ob conc., see NBA VII/vii, CC

 

 

1060

c

2 hpd; str, bc

xxi/2, 3

VII/v, 3

 

 

Remarks :

c1736; from lost ob and vn conc. reconstructed in NBA VII/vii, 75

 

 

†1061

C

2 hpd; str, bc

xxi/2, 39

VII/v, 83, 109

 

 

Remarks :

1732–5; orig. for 2 hpd, ? without acc.

 

 

1062

c

2 hpd; str, bc

xxi/2, 83

VII/v, 43

 

 

Remarks :

c1736; from 1043

 

 

1063

d

3 hpd; str, bc

xxxi/3, 3

VII/vi, 3

 

 

Remarks :

c1730; source unknown, see NBA VII/vii, CC

 

 

1064

C

3 hpd; str, bc

xxxi/3, 53

VII/vi, 57

 

 

Remarks :

c1730; from lost 3 vn conc. in D reconstructed in NBA VII/vii, 103

 

 

1065

a

4 hpd; str, bc

xliii/1, 71

VII/vi, 117

 

 

Remarks :

c1730; from Vivaldi op.3 no.10 = rv580

 

 

 

4 orchestral suites:

 

 

 

 

1066

C

2 ob, bn, str, bc

xxxi/1, 3

VII/i, 3

 

 

Remarks :

before 1725

 

 

1067

b

fl; str, bc

xxxi/1, 24

VII/i, 27

 

 

Remarks :

c1738–9

 

 

1068

D

3 tpt, timp, 2 ob, str, bc

xxxi/1, 40

VII/i, 49, 119

 

 

Remarks :

c1731

 

 

1069

D

3 tpt, timp, 3 ob, bn, str, bc

xxxi/1, 66

VII/i, 81

 

 

Remarks :

c1725; later version 1729–41

 

 

1070

Overture, g

str, bc

xlv/1, 190

 

 

Remarks :

spurious

 

 

1071

Sinfonia: see 1046a

 

 

 

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Works

studies in counterpoint, canons etc.

 

 

BWV

Title, scoring

Remarks

BG

NBA

 

 

†769

Einige [5] canonische Veränderungen über das Weynacht-Lied, Vom Himmel hoch da komm ich her, org

written on becoming member of Mizler’s Societät der Musicalischen Wissenschaften, June 1747 (Nuremberg, 1748); autograph version 769a, chronology of versions uncertain, several pubd in puzzle form

xl, 137

IV/ii, 197, 98

 

†1079

Musikalisches Opfer [fl, vn, bc, kbd]

May–July 1747 (Leipzig, 1747); 2 Ricercars, a 3, a 6; 10 canons; sonata, fl, vn, bc; insts not fully specified

xxxi/2

VIII/i, 12

 

†1080

Die Kunst der Fuge [kbd]

before 1742, rev. c1745 and 1748–9 (Leipzig, 1751, 2/1752)

xxv/1

VIII/ii.1–2

 

1072

Canon trias harmonica

a 8, in contrary motion; in F.W. Marpurg: Abhandlung von der Fuge, ii (Berlin, 1754)

xlv, 131

VIII/i, 3, 6

 

1073

Canon a 4 perpetuus

2 Aug 1713

xlv, 132

VIII/i, 3, 6

 

1074

Canon a 4

1727; ded. L.F. Hudemann; pubd in G.P. Telemann: Der getreue Music-Meister (Hamburg, 1728) and in J. Mattheson:Der volkkommene Capellmeister (Hamburg, 1739/R)

xlv, 134

VIII/i, 3, 7

 

1075

Canon a 2 perpetuus

10 Jan 1734; ded. ? J.G. Walther (1712–77)

VIII/i, 3, 7

 

†1076

Canon triplex a 6

before 1746; cf 1087

xlv, 138

VIII/i, 3, 8

 

†1077

Canone doppio sopr’il soggetto

15 Oct 1747; ded. J.G. Fulde; cf 1087

VIII/i, 4, 8

 

1078

Canon super fa mi a 7 post tempus musicum

1 March 1749; ded. ? Benjamin Faber; pubd in F.W. Marpurg: Abhandlung von der Fuge, ii (Berlin, 1754)

xlv, 136

VIII/i, 4, 9

 

1086

Canon concordia discors

a 2

VIII/i, 4, 10

 

1087

[14] Verschiedene Canones

after 1745; on first 8 notes of aria ground of 988; incl. earlier versions of 1076–7

V/ii, 119

 

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A Bibliographies, research studies. B Catalogues. C Source studies: manuscripts and prints. D Source studies: documents, letters etc. E Iconography. F Biography: life and works. G Biography: special studies. H Works: general. I Works: special studies. J Vocal works. K Instrumental works. L Performing practice.

a: bibliographies, research studies

b: catalogues

c: source studies: manuscripts and prints

d: source studies: documents, letters etc.

e: iconography

f: biography: life and works

g: biography: special studies

h: works: general

i: works: special studies

j: vocal works

k: instrumental works

l: performing practice

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

a: bibliographies, research studies

M. Schneider: Verzeichnis der bis zum Jahre 1851 gedruckten (und der geschrieben im Handel gewesenen) Werke von Johann Sebastian Bach’, BJb 1906, 84–113

J. Schreyer: Beiträge zur Bach-Kritik, i (Dresden, 1910); ii (Leipzig, 1912)

W. Blankenburg: Zwölf Jahre Bachforschung’, AcM, xxxvii (1965), 95–158

W. Blankenburg: Die Bachforschung seit etwa 1965: Ergebnisse, Probleme, Aufgaben’, AcM, l (1978), 93–154; liv (1982), 162–207; lv (1983), 1–58

R.A. Leaver: Bachs theologische Bibliothek: eine kritische Bibliographie (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1983)

C. Wolff, ed.: Bach-Bibliographie: Nachdruck der Verzeichnisse des Schrifttums über Johann Sebastian Bach (Bach-Jahrbuch 1905–1984), mit einem Supplement und Register (Berlin, 1985)

R. Nestle: Das Bachschrifttum 1981 bis 1985’, BJb 1989, 107–89

R. Nestle: Das Bachschrifttum 1986 bis 1990’, BJb 1994, 75–162

D.R. Melamed and M. Marissen: An Introduction to Bach Studies (Oxford, 1998)

Bach Bibliography On-Line (Belfast, Queen’s University; Y. Tomita) [on-line database]

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

b: catalogues

W. Schmieder: Thematisch-systematisches Verzeichnis der musikalischen Werke von Johann Sebastian Bach: Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis (Leipzig, 1950, enlarged 2/1990, rev. and abridged 1998 by A. Dürr, Y. Kobayashi and K. Beisswenger as Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis)

P. Kast: Die Bach-Handschriften der Berliner Staatsbibliothek (Trossingen, 1958)

S.W. Kenney, ed.: Catalog of the Emilie and Karl Riemenschneider Memorial Bach Library (New York, 1960)

M. deF. McAll, ed.: Melodic Index to the Works of Johann Sebastian Bach (New York, 1962)

H.-J. Schulze: Katalog der Sammlung Manfred Gorke: Bachiana und andere Handschriften und Drucke des 18. und frühen 19. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1977)

R.W. Wade, ed.: The Catalog of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s Estate: a Facsimile of the Edition by Schniebes, Hamburg, 1790 (New York, 1981)

T. Leibnitz, ed.: Katalog der Sammlung Anthony von Hoboken in der Musiksammlung der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek, i: Johann Sebastian Bach und seine Söhne (Tutzing, 1982)

G. Herz: Bach-Quellen in Amerika/Bach Sources in America (Kassel, 1984)

W. Neumann and C. Fröde: Die Bach-Handschriften der Thomasschule Leipzig: Katalog (Leipzig, 1986)

C. Wolff and H.-J. Schulze: Bach Compendium: analytisch-bibliographisches Repertorium der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Leipzig and Frankfurt, 1986–)

U. Balestrini: Catalogo tematico (incipit) delle opere di J.S. Bach: Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis 1–1080 (Milan, 1988)

U. Leisinger: Die “Bachsche Auction” von 1789’, BJb 1991, 97–126

K. Beisswenger: Johann Sebastian Bachs Notenbibliothek (Kassel, 1992)

R. Reeder: The Bach English-Title Index (Berkeley, 1993)

U. Leisinger and P. Wollny: Die Bach-Quellen der Bibliotheken in Brüssel: Katalog (Hildesheim,1997)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

c: source studies: manuscripts and prints

R. Schwartz: Die Bach-Handschriften der Musikbibliothek Peters’, JbMP 1919, 56–73

G. Kinsky: Die Originalausgaben der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Vienna, 1937/R)

W. Schmieder: Die Handschriften Johann Sebastian Bachs’, Bach-Gedenkschrift, ed. K. Matthaei (Zürich, 1950), 190–203

G. von Dadelsen: Originale Daten auf den Handschriften J.S. Bachs’, Hans Albrecht in memoriam, ed. W. Brennecke and H. Haase (Kassel, 1962), 116–20

P. Krause, ed.: Handschriften der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs in der Musikbibliothek der Stadt Leipzig (Leipzig, 1964)

H.-J. Schulze: Beiträge zur Bach-Quellenforschung’, GfMKB: Leipzig 1966, 269–75

H. Zietz: Quellenkritische Untersuchungen an den Bach-Handschriften P 801, P 802 und P 803 aus dem ‘Krebs’schen Nachlass’ unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Choralbearbeitungen des jungen J.S. Bach (Hamburg, 1969)

A. Dürr: Zur Chronologie der Handschrift Johann Christoph Altnickols und Johann Friedrich Agricolas’, BJb 1970, 44–65

K. Engler: Georg Poelchau und seine Musikaliensammlung: ein Beitrag zur Überlieferung Bachscher Musik im 19. Jahrhundert (diss., U. of Tübingen, 1970)

P. Krause, ed.: Originalausgaben und ältere Drucke der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs in der Musikbibliothek der Stadt Leipzig (Leipzig, 1970)

Y. Kobayashi: Zu einem neu entdeckten Autograph Bachs: Choral Aus der Tiefen’, BJb 1971, 5–12

W. Hobohm: Neue “Texte zur Leipziger Kirchen-Musik”’, BJb 1973, 5–32

Y. Kobayashi: Franz Hauser und seine Bach-Handschriftsammlung (diss., U. of Göttingen, 1973)

Johann Sebastian Bach: Studies of the Sources’, Studies in Renaissance and Baroque Music in Honor of Arthur Mendel, ed. R.L. Marshall (Kassel and Hackensack, NJ, 1974), 231–300 [contributions by P. Brainard, A. Dürr, G. Herz, E. May and C. Wolff]

H.-J. Schulze: Wie entstand die Bach-Sammlung Mempell-Preller?’, BJb 1974, 104–22

K.-H. Köhler: Die Bach-Sammlung der Deutschen Staatsbibliothek: Überlieferung und Bedeutung’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 139–46

Y. Kobayashi: Neuerkenntnisse zu einigen Bach-Quellen anhand schriftkundlicher Untersuchungen’, BJb 1978, 43–60

H.-J. Schulze: Das Stück in Goldpapier: Ermittlungen zu einigen Bach-Abschriften des frühen 18. Jahrhunderts’, BJb 1978, 19–42

Y. Kobayashi: Breitkopfs Handel mit Bach-Handschriften’, Beiträge zur Bachforschung, i (1982), 79–84

H.-J. Schulze: “150 Stück von den Bachischen Erben”: zur Überlieferung der vierstimmigen Choräle Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1983, 81–100

A. Dürr: Johann Sebastian Bach: seine Handschrift; Abbild seines Schaffens (Wiesbaden, 1984)

H.-J. Schulze: Studien zur Bach-Überlieferung im 18. Jahrhundert (Leipzig, 1984)

R. Elvers and H.-G. Klein, eds.: Die Handschrift Johann Sebastian Bachs, Musikabteilung der Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin, 22 March – 13 July 1985 (Wiesbaden, 1985) [exhibition catalogue]

H.J. Marx: Wiederaufgefundene Autographe von Carl Philipp Emanuel und Johann Sebastian Bach’, Mf, xli (1988), 150–56

Y. Kobayashi: Die Notenschrift Johann Sebastian Bachs: Dokumentation ihrer Entwicklung, NBA, IX (1989)

C. Wolff: From Berlin to Lodz: the Spitta Collection Resurfaces’, Notes, xlvi (1989–90), 311–27

L.A. Federowskaja: Bachiana in russischen Bibliotheken und Sammlungen: Autographe, Abschriften, Frühdrucke, Bearbeitungen’, BJb 1990, 27–36

H.-J. Schulze: Bach und Buxtehude: eine wenig beachtete Quelle in der Carnegie Library zu Pittsburgh/PA’, BJb 1991, 177–82

U. Leisinger: Die Bach-Quellen der Forschungs- und Landesbibliothek Gotha (Gotha, 1993)

A. Glöckner: Die Teilung des Bachschen Musikaliennachlasses und die Thomana-Stimmen’, BJb 1994, 41–57

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

d: source studies: documents, letters etc.

J.A. Scheibe: Der critische Musikus (Hamburg, 1738–40, 2/1745/R)

L. Mizler: Neu eröffnete musikalische Bibliothek (Leipzig, 1739–54/R)

J.F. Agricola and C.P.E. Bach: Obituary in L. Mizler: Neu eröffnete musikalische Bibliothek, iv/1 (Leipzig, 1754/R), 158–76; repr. in BJb 1920, 11–29

E.H. Müller von Asow: Johann Sebastian Bach: Gesammelte Briefe (Regensburg, 1938, rev. 2/1950 with H. Müller von Asow)

H.T. David and A. Mendel, eds.: The Bach Reader (New York, 1945, enlarged 3/1998 by C. Wolff as The New Bach Reader)

W. Neumann and H.-J. Schulze, eds.: Schriftstücke von der Hand Johann Sebastian Bachs, Bach-Dokumente, i (Leipzig, 1963; Fr. trans., 1976)

W. Neumann and H.-J. Schulze, eds.: Fremdschriftliche und gedruckte Dokumente zur Lebensgeschichte Johann Sebastian Bachs 1685–1750, Bach-Dokumente, ii (Leipzig, 1969)

A. Dürr: Zur Chronologie der Handschrift Johann Christoph Altnickols und Johann Friedrich Agricolas’, BJb 1970, 44–65

H.-J. Schulze, ed.: Dokumente zum Nachwirken Johann Sebastian Bachs 1750–1800, Bach-Dokumente, iii (Leipzig, 1972)

H. Stiehl: Taufzettel für Bachs Kinder: ein Dokumentenfund’, BJb 1979, 7–18

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

e: iconography

H. Besseler: Fünf echte Bildnisse Johann Sebastian Bachs (Kassel, 1956)

H.O.R. van Tuyll van Serooskerken: Probleme des Bachporträts (Bilthoven, 1956)

C. Freyse: Bachs Antlitz (Eisenach, 1964)

W. Neumann, ed.: Bilddokumente zur Lebensgeschichte Johann Sebastian Bachs/Pictorial Documents of the Life of Johann Sebastian Bach, Bach-Dokumente, iv (Leipzig, 1979)

H. Börsch-Supan: Gruppenbild mit Musikern: ein Gemälde von Balthasar Denner und das Problem der Bach-Ikonographie’, Kunst und Antiquitäten, iii (1982), 22–32

H.-J. Schulze: Zur Überlieferung einiger Bach-Porträts’, BJb 1982, 154–6

H. Raupach: Das wahre Bildnis des Johann Sebastian Bach: Bericht und Dokumente (Munich, 1983)

M. Staehelin: Zu einer umstrittenen Bach-Porträtzeichnung des 18. Jahrhunderts’, Bachiana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr, ed. W. Rehm (Kassel, 1983), 260–66

M. Korth and S. Kuhlmann, eds.: J.S. Bach: Bilder und Zeugnisse eines Musikerlebens (Munich, 1985)

G. Wagner: Ein unbekanntes Porträt Johann Sebastian Bachs aus dem 18. Jahrhundert?’, BJb 1988, 231–4

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

f: biography: life and works

J.N. Forkel: Ueber Johann Sebastian Bachs Leben, Kunst und Kunstwerke (Leipzig, 1802/R; Eng. trans., 1820/R)

C.L. Hilgenfeldt: Johann Sebastian Bachs Leben, Wirken und Werke: ein Beitrag zur Kunstgeschichte des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1850/R)

C.H. Bitter: Johann Sebastian Bach (Berlin, 1865, enlarged 2/1881/R; Eng. trans., abridged, 1873)

P. Spitta: Johann Sebastian Bach (Leipzig, 1873–80, 5/1962; Eng. trans., 1884)

A. Schweitzer: J.S. Bach, le musicien-poète (Paris, 1905; Ger. trans., enlarged, 1908; Eng. trans., 1911/R)

A. Pirro: J.-S. Bach (Paris, 1906, rev. 1949; Eng. trans., 1957)

C.H.H. Parry: Johann Sebastian Bach (London, 1909, 2/1934/R)

C.S. Terry: Bach: a Biography (London, 1928, 2/1933/R)

W. Gurlitt: Johann Sebastian Bach: der Meister und sein Werk (Berlin, 1936, enlarged 5/1980; Eng. trans., 1957/R)

W. Neumann: Auf den Lebenswegen Johann Sebastian Bachs (Berlin, 1953, 4/1962; Eng. trans., 1957)

W. Neumann: Bach: eine Bildbiographie (Munich, 1960, 2/1961; Eng. trans., 1961, rev. 2/1969 as Bach and his World)

K. Geiringer: Johann Sebastian Bach: the Culmination of an Era (New York, 1966)

B. Schwendowius and W. Dömling, eds.: Johann Sebastian Bach: Zeit, Leben, Wirken (Kassel, 1976; Eng. trans., 1978)

A. Basso: Frau Musika: la vita e le opere di J.S. Bach (Turin, 1979–83)

M. Boyd: Bach (London, 1983, 3/2000)

D. Arnold: Bach (Oxford, 1984)

W. Felix: Johann Sebastian Bach (Wiesbaden, 1984; Eng. trans., 1985)

P. Buscaroli: Bach (Milan, 1985)

M. Geck: Bach: Leben und Werk (Reinbek, 2000)

C. Wolff: Johann Sebastian Bach: the Learned Musician (New York, 2000)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

g: biography: special studies

C. Scherer: Joh. Seb. Bachs Aufenthalt in Kassel’, MMg, xxv (1893), 129–33

B.F. Richter: Stadtpfeifer und Alumnen der Thomasschule in Leipzig zu Bachs Zeit’, BJb 1907, 32–78

C. Freyse, ed.: Eisenacher Dokumente um Sebastian Bach (Leipzig, 1933)

G. Herz: Bach’s Religion’, JRBM, i (1946), 124–38

G. Fock: Der junge Bach in Lüneburg 1700 bis 1702 (Hamburg, 1950)

K. Müller and F. Wiegand, eds.: Arnstädter Bachbuch: Johann Sebastian Bach und seine Verwandten in Arnstadt (Arnstadt, 1950, 2/1957)

F. Smend: Bach in Köthen (Berlin, 1951; Eng. trans., rev. 1985)

H. Löffler: Die Schüler Joh. Seb. Bachs’, BJb 1953, 5–28

K. Geiringer: The Bach Family: Seven Generations of Creative Genius (London, 1954/R, Ger. trans., enlarged, 1958, 2/1977)

W. Neumann: Das “Bachische Collegium Musicum”’, BJb 1960, 5–27

F. Blume: Outlines of a New Picture of Bach’, ML, xliv (1963), 214–27

G. Stiller: Johann Sebastian Bach und das Leipziger gottesdienstliche Leben seiner Zeit (Kassel, 1970; Eng. trans., 1984)

I. Ahlgrimm: Von Reisen, Kirchererbsen und Fischbeinröcken’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 155–70

R. Eller: Gedanken über Bachs Leipziger Schaffensjahre’, ibid., 7–27

W. Schrammek: Johann Sebastian Bach, Gottfried Silbermann und die französische Orgelkunst’, ibid., 93–107

H.-J. Schulze: Johann Sebastian Bach und Georg Gottfried Wagner: neue Dokumente’, ibid., 147–54

E. Zavarský: J.S. Bachs Entwurf für den Umbau der Orgel in der Kirche Divi Blasii und das Klangideal der Zeit’, ibid., 82–93

W. Siegmund-Schultze: Über die “unvermeidlichen Lücken” in Bachs Lebensbeschreibung’, Bachforschung und Bachinterpretation heute: Marburg 1978, 32–42

C. Wolff: Bachs Leipziger Kantoratsprobe und die Aufführungsgeschichte der Kantate bwv 23’, BJb 1978, 78–94

C. Wolff: Probleme und Neuansätze der Bach-Biographik’, Bachforschung und Bachinterpretation heute: Marburg 1978, 21–31

W. Frei: Bach, das konservative Genie – oder das Schicksal aus seiner Familie’, Musik und Gottesdienst, xxxiv (1980), 1–6

A. Glöckner: Neuerkenntnisse zu Johann Sebastian Bachs Aufführungskalender zwischen 1729 und 1735’, BJb 1981, 43–76

A. Plichta: Johann Sebastian Bach und Johann Adam Graf von Questenberg’, ibid., 23–8

U. Siegele: Bachs Ort in Orthodoxie und Aufklärung’, Musik und Kirche, li (1981), 3–14

W. Blankenburg: Luther und Bach’, Musik und Kirche, liii (1983), 233–42

K. von Fischer: Johann Sebastian Bach: Welt, Umwelt und Frömmigkeit (Wiesbaden, 1983)

M. Petzoldt: Zur Frage nach den Funktion des Kantors Johann Sebastian Bach in Leipzig’, Musik und Kirche, liii (1983), 167–73

W. Rehm, ed.: Bachiana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr (Kassel, 1983) [incl. W. Felix: ‘Johann Sebastian Bach: Leipziger Wirken und Nachwirken’, 88–92; H. Heussner: ‘Zur Musikpflege im Umkreis des Prinzen Maximilian von Hessen: Pietro Locatelli und Johann Sebastian Bach in Kassel’, 108–15; W. Neumann: ‘Über die mutmasslichen Beziehungen zwischen dem Leipziger Thomaskantor Bach und dem Leisniger Matthäikantor Stockmar’, 201–8; W.H. Scheide: ‘Bach vs. Bach: Mühlhausen Dismissal Request vs. Erdmann Letter’, 234–42; H.-J. Schulze: ‘“Monsieur Schouster”, ein vergessener Zeitgenosse Johann Sebastian Bachs’, 243–50; E. Zavarský: ‘Ein Besucher aus der Slowakei bei Johann Sebastian Bach’, 363–7]

U. Siegele: Bachs Stellung in der Leipziger Kulturpolitik seiner Zeit’, BJb 1983, 7–50; 1984, 7–43; 1986, 33–67

J. Bahns, ed.: Ex libris Bachianis II: das Weltbild Johann Sebastian Bachs im Spiegel seiner theologischen Bibliothek, Kurpfälzisches Museum der Stadt Heidelberg, 1 June – 15 July 1985 (Heidelberg, 1985) [exhibition catalogue]

W. Blankenburg: Wandlungen und Probleme des Bachbildes’, Musik und Kirche, lv (1985), 274–84

H.H. Cox: The Calov Bible of J.S. Bach (Ann Arbor, 1985)

W. Hildesheimer: Das ferne Bach: eine Rede (Frankfurt, 1985)

R.A. Leaver: J.S. Bach and Scripture: Glosses from the Calov Bible Commentary (St Louis, 1985)

M. Petzoldt: “Ut probus & doctus reddar”: zum Anteil der Theologie bei der Schulausbildung Johann Sebastian Bachs in Eisenach, Ohrdruf und Lüneburg’, BJb 1985, 7–42

M. Walter: J.S. Bach und die Aufklärung?’, AMw, xlii (1985), 229–40

J.J. Pelikan: Bach Among the Theologians (Philadelphia, 1986)

A. Glöckner: Die Musikpflege an der Leipziger Neukirche zur Zeit (Leipzig, 1990)

D. Kranemann: Johann Sebastian Bachs Krankheit und Todesursache: Versuch einer Deutung’, BJb 1990, 53–64

R. Szeskus: Bach und die Leipziger Universitätsmusik’, BMw, xxxii (1990), 161–70

U. Siegele: “Ich habe fleissig sein müssen …”: zur Vermittlung von Bachs sozialem und musikalischem Charakter’, Musik und Kirche, lxi (1991), 73–8; Eng. trans., Bach, xxii/2 (1991), 5–12

P. Wollny: Bachs Bewerbung um die Organistenstelle an der Marienkirche zu Halle und ihr Kontext’, BJb 1994, 25–39

K. Küster: Der junge Bach (Stuttgart, 1996)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

h: works: general

A. Pirro: L’esthétique de Jean-Sébastien Bach (Paris, 1907)

C.S. Terry: The Music of Bach: an Introduction (London, 1933/R)

G. Herz: Johann Sebastian Bach im Zeitalter des Rationalismus und der Frühromantik (Kassel, 1935)

A.E.F. Dickinson: The Art of J.S. Bach (London, 1936, enlarged 2/1950)

G. Frotscher: Johann Sebastian Bach und die Musik des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts (Wädenswil, 1939)

A. Schering: Johann Sebastian Bach und das Musikleben Leipzigs im 18. Jahrhundert, Musikgeschichte Leipzigs, iii (Leipzig, 1941)

W. Blankenburg: Die innere Einheit von Bachs Werk (diss., U. of Göttingen, 1942)

L. Schrade: Bach: the Conflict between the Sacred and the Secular’, Journal of the History of Ideas, vii (1946), 151–94; pubd separately (New York, 1954/R)

W. Blankenburg: Bach geistlich und weltlich’, Musik und Kirche, xx (1950), 36–46

R. Petzoldt and L. Weinhold, eds.: Johann Sebastian Bach: das Schaffen des Meisters in Spiegel einer Stadt (Leipzig, 1950)

H. Besseler: Bach und das Mittelalter’, Wissenschaftliche Bachtagung: Leipzig 1950, 108–30; Eng. trans. in The Score, no.9 (1954), 31–42

A.T. Davison: Bach and Handel: the Consummation of the Baroque in Music (Cambridge, MA, 1951/R)

P. Hindemith: Johann Sebastian Bach: Heritage and Obligation (New Haven, 1952)

H. Besseler: Bach als Wegbereiter’, AMw, xii (1955), 1–39

W. Mellers: Bach and the Dance of God (London, 1980)

C. Wolff: “Die sonderbaren Vollkommenheiten des Herrn Hof Compositeurs”: Versuch über die Eigenart der Bachschen Musik’, Bachiana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr, ed. W. Rehm (Kassel, 1983), 356–62

A. Dürr: Bachs Werk vom Einfall bis zur Drucklegung (Wiesbaden, 1989)

R.L. Marshall: The Music of Johann Sebastian Bach: the Sources, the Style, the Significance (New York, 1989)

H.H. Eggebrecht: Bach – wer ist das?: zum Verständnis der Musik Johann Sebastian Bachs (Mainz, 1992)

L. Dreyfus: Bach and the Patterns of Invention (Cambridge, MA, 1996)

J. Butt, ed.: The Cambridge Companion to Bach (New York, 1997)

M. Geck: Bach und die Stile (Dortmund, 1999)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

i: works: special studies

E. Kurth: Grundlagen des linearen Kontrapunkts: Einführung in Stil und Technik von Bachs melodischer Polyphonie (Berne, 1917, 5/1956/R)

A. Schering: Über Bachs Parodieverfahren’, BJb 1921, 49–95

K. Geiringer: Symbolism in the Music of Bach (Washington DC, 1956); repr. in Lectures on the History and Art of Music (New York, 1968), 123ff

A. Dürr: Gedanken zu J.S. Bachs Umarbeitungen eigener Werke’, BJb 1956, 93–104

G. von Dadelsen: Bemerkungen zur Handschrift Johann Sebastian Bachs, seiner Familie und seines Kreises (Trossingen, 1957)

G. von Dadelsen: Beiträge zur Chronologie der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Trossingen, 1958)

E. Bodky: The Interpretation of Bach’s Keyboard Works (Cambridge, MA, 1960/R)

A. Mendel: Recent Developments in Bach Chronology’, MQ, xlvi (1960), 283–300

A. Dürr: Neues über Bachs Pergolesi-Bearbeitung’, BJb 1968, 89–100

C. Wolff: Der stile antico in der Musik Johann Sebastian Bachs (Wiesbaden, 1968)

R.L. Marshall: How J.S. Bach Composed Four-part Chorales’, MQ, lvi (1970), 198–220

M. Geck: Bachs Probestück’, Quellenstudien zur Musik: Wolfgang Schmieder zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. K. Dorfmüller and G. von Dadelsen (Frankfurt, 1972), 55–68

Johann Sebastian Bach: Approaches to Analysis and Interpretation’, Studies in Renaissance and Baroque Music in Honor of Arthur Mendel, ed. R.L. Marshall (Kassel and Hackensack, NJ, 1974), 139–230 [contributions by W. Blankenburg, E.T. Cone, W. Emery, R.L. Marshall, F. Neumann, N. Rubin and W.H. Scheide]

W. Emery: A Note on Bach’s Use of Triplets’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 109–11

H. Eppstein: Zum Formproblem bei J.S. Bach’, ibid., 29–42

H. Grüss: Tempofragen der Bachzeit’, ibid., 73–81

R.L. Marshall: Bach the Progressive: Observations on his Later Works’, MQ, lxii (1976), 313–57

U. Meyer: Zum Problem der Zahlen in Johann Sebastian Bachs Werk’, Musik und Kirche, xlix (1979), 58–71

U. Prinz: Studien zum Instrumentarium J.S. Bachs mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Kantaten (Tübingen, 1979)

G.G. Butler: Leipziger Stecher in Bachs Originaldrucken’, BJb 1980, 9–26

L. Prautzsch: Vor deinen Thron tret ich hiermit: Figuren und Symbole in den letzten Werken Johann Sebastian Bachs (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1980)

K.-J. Sachs: Die “Anleitung …, auff allerhand Arth einen Choral durchzuführen” als Paradigma der Lehre und die Satzkunst Johann Sebastian Bachs’, AMw, xxxvii (1980), 135–54

W. Neumann: Über das funktionale Wechselverhältnis von Vokalität und Instrumentalität als kompositionstechnisches Grundphänomen, dargestellt am Schaffen Johann Sebastian Bachs (Berlin, 1982)

G.A. Theill: Beiträge zur Symbolsprache Johann Sebastian Bachs (Bonn, 1983–)

Q. Faulkner: J.S. Bach’s Keyboard Technique: a Historical Introduction (St Louis, MO, 1984)

Bach und die italienische Musik: Venice 1985

M. Dankwardt: Instrumentale und vokale Kompositionsweise bei Johann Sebastian Bach (Tutzing, 1985)

M. Petzoldt, ed.: Bach als Ausleger der Bibel: theologische und musikwissenschaftliche Studien zum Werk Johann Sebastian Bachs (Göttingen, 1985)

G. Wagner: Traditionsbezug im musikhistorischen Prozess zwischen 1720 und 1740 am Beispiel von Johann Sebastian und Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: musikalische Analyse und musikhistorische Bewertung (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1985)

C. Wolff: Johann Adam Reinken und Johann Sebastian Bach: zum Kontext des Bachschen Frühwerkes’, BJb 1985, 99–118; Eng. trans., rev. in J.S. Bach as Organist, ed. G. Stauffer and E. May (Bloomington, IN, 1986), 57–80, and in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 56–71

G. Stauffer and E. May, eds.: J.S. Bach as Organist: his Instruments, Music, and Performance Practices (Bloomington, IN, 1986)

W. Elders: Kompositionsverfahren in der Musik der alten Niederländer und die Kunst J.S. Bachs’, Beiträge zur Bachforschung, vi (1987), 110–34

W.F. Hindermann: “Seine Einsicht in die Dichtkunst … ”: Bachs Rhetorik-Verständnis im Spiegel von Quintilians Institutio oratoria’, Musik und Kirche, lvii (1987), 284–97

H.-J. Schulze: The Parody Process in Bach's Music: an Old Problem Reconsidered’, Bach, xx/3 (1989), 15–33

K. Beisswenger: Bachs Eingriffe in Werke fremder Komponisten: Beobachtungen an den Notenhandschriften aus seiner Bibliothek unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der lateinischen Kirchenmusik’, BJb 1991, 127–58

M. Little and N. Jenne: Dance and the Music of Bach (Bloomington, IN, 1991)

R. Tatlow: Bach and the Riddle of the Number Alphabet (Cambridge, 1991)

E. Kooiman, G. Weinberger and H.J. Busch: Zur Interpretation der Orgelmusik Johann Sebastian Bachs (Kassel, 1995)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

j: vocal works

BlumeEK

K. Ziebler: Das Symbol in der Kirchenmusik Joh. Seb. Bachs (Kassel, 1930)

A. Schering: Johann Sebastian Bachs Leipziger Kirchenmusik (Leipzig, 1936)

W. Neumann: J.S. Bachs Chorfuge (Leipzig, 1938, 3/1953)

F. Smend: Bachs Markus-Passion’, BJb 1940–48, 1–35

A. Schering: Über Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs (Leipzig, 1942, 3/1950)

F. Smend: Neue Bach-Funde’, AMf, vii (1942), 1–16; repr. in Friedrich Smend: Bach-Studien, ed. C. Wolff (Kassel, 1969), 137–52

A. Mendel: On the Keyboard Accompaniments to Bach’s Leipzig Church Music’, MQ, xxxvi (1950), 339–62

A. Dürr: Zur Chronologie der Leipziger Vokalwerke J.S. Bachs’, BJb 1957, 5–162; pubd separately (Berlin, 1958, 2/1976)

W. Neumann: Über Ausmass und Wesen des Bachschen Parodieverfahrens’, BJb 1965, 63–85

R.L. Marshall: The Compositional Process of J.S. Bach: a Study of the Autograph Scores of the Vocal Works (Princeton, NJ, 1972)

W. Neumann, ed.: Sämtliche von Johann Sebastian Bach vertonte Texte (Leipzig, 1974)

U. Siegele: Bachs Endzweck einer regulierten und Entwurf einer wohlbestallten Kirchenmusik’, Festschrift Georg von Dadelsen zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. T. Kohlhase and V. Scherliess (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1978), 313–51

L. Dreyfus: J.S. Bach's Experiment in Differentiated Accompaniment: Tacet Indications in Organ Parts’, JAMS, xxxii (1979), 321–34

J. Rifkin: Bach's Chorus: a Preliminary Report’, MT, cxxiii (1982), 747–54

W. Blankenburg: Johann Sebastian Bach und das evangelische Kirchenlied zu seiner Zeit’, Bachiana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr, ed. W. Rehm (Kassel, 1983), 31–8

G. von Dadelsen: Anmerkungen zu Bachs Parodieverfahren’, ibid., 52–7

R. Marshall: Bach's Chorus: a Preliminary Reply to Joshua Rifkin’, MT, cxxiv (1983), 19–22

J. Rifkin: Bach's Chorus: a Response to Robert Marshall’, ibid., 161–2

G. Wagner: Die Chorbesetzung bei J.S. Bach und ihre Vorgeschichte: Anmerkungen zur “hinlänglichen” Besetzung im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert’, AMw, xliii (1986), 278–304

K. Häfner: Aspekte des Parodieverfahrens bei Johann Sebastian Bach: Beiträge zur Wiederentdeckung verschollener Vokalwerke (Laaber, 1987)

S.A. Crist: Aria Forms in the Vocal Works of J.S. Bach, 1714–24 (diss., Brandeis U., 1988)

H.H. Eggebrecht: Sinnbildlichkeit in Text und Musik bei Johann Sebastian Bach’, Musik und Kirche, lviii (1988), 176–84

E.T. Chafe: Tonal Allegory in the Vocal Music of J.S. Bach (Berkeley, 1991)

M. Walter: Musik-Sprache des Glaubens: zum geistlichen Vokalwerk Johann Sebastian Bachs (Frankfurt, 1994)

S.A. Crist: Bach, Theology, and Harmony: a New Look at the Arias’, Bach, xxvii/1 (1996), 1–30

D.E. Freeman: J.S. Bach's “Concerto” Arias: a Study in the Amalgamation of Eighteenth-Century Genres’, Studi musicali, xxvii (1998), 123–62

cantatas

R. Wustmann, ed.: Johann Sebastian Bachs Kantatentexte (Leipzig, 1913, rev. 2/1967 as Geistliche und weltliche Kantatentexte)

C.S. Terry: Joh. Seb. Bach: Cantata Texts, Sacred and Secular, with a Reconstruction of the Leipzig Liturgy of his Period (London, 1926/R)

W. Neumann: Handbuch der Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs (Leipzig, 1947, 5/1984)

F. Smend: Joh. Seb. Bach: Kirchen-Kantaten (Berlin, 1947–9, 3/1966)

I. Finlay: Johann Sebastian Bachs weltliche Kantaten (Göttingen, 1950)

I. Finlay: Bach's Secular Cantata Texts’, ML, xxxi (1950), 189–95

A. Dürr: Studien über die frühen Kantaten J.S. Bachs (Leipzig, 1951, 2/1977)

A. Dürr: Zur Echtheit einiger Bach zugeschreibener Kantaten’, BJb 1951–2, 30–46

K.F. Tagliavini: Studi sui testi delle cantate sacre di J.S. Bach (Padua, 1956)

P. Mies: Die geistlichen Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs und der Hörer von heute, i (Wiesbaden, 1959, 2/1966); ii (1960, 2/1968); iii (1964)

W.H. Scheide: Johann Sebastian Bachs Sammlung von Kantaten seines Vetters Johann Ludwig Bach’, BJb 1959, 52–94; 1961, 5–24; 1962, 5–32

W.G. Whittaker: The Cantatas of Johann Sebastian Bach (London, 1959)

J. Day: The Literary Background to Bach’s Cantatas (London, 1961)

P. Mies: Die weltlichen Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs und der Hörer von heute, i (Wiesbaden, 1966–7)

A. Dürr: Die Kantaten von Johann Sebastian Bach (Kassel, 1971, 6/1995)

R. Gerlach: Besetzung und Instrumentation der Kirchenkantaten J.S. Bachs und ihre Bedingungen’, BJb 1971, 53–71

W. Hobohm: Neue Texte zur Leipziger Kirchen-Musik’, BJb 1973, 5–32

A. Dürr: Bachs Kantatentexte: Probleme und Aufgaben der Forschung’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 63–71

K. Häfner: Der Picander-Jahrgang’, BJb 1975, 70–113

W. Blankenburg: Eine neue Textquelle zu sieben Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs und achtzehn Kantaten Johann Ludwig Bachs’, BJb 1977, 7–25

W.H. Scheide: Bach und der Picander-Jahrgang’, BJb 1980, 47–52

K. Häfner: Picander, der Textdichter von Bachs viertem Kantatenjahrgang: ein neuer Hinweis’, Mf, xxxv (1982), 156–62

C. Wolff: Wo bleib Bachs fünfter Kantatenjahrgang?’, ibid., 151–2

W.H. Scheide: Eindeutigkeit und Mehrdeutigkeit in Picanders Kantatenjahrgangs-Vorbemerkung und im Werkverzeichnis des Nekrologs auf Johann Sebastian Bach’, BJb 1983, 109–14

L. Dreyfus: The Metaphorical Soloist: Concerted Organ Parts in Bach's Cantatas’, EMc, xiii (1985), 237–47

A. Glöckner: Zur Chronologie der Weimarer Kantaten Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1985, 159–64

A. Dürr: Noch einmal: Wo blieb Bachs fünfter Kantatenjahrgang?’, BJb 1986, 121–2

A. Hirsch: Die Zahl im Kantatenwerk Johann Sebastian Bachs (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1986)

H.K. Krausse: Erdmann Neumeister und die Kantatentexte Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1986, 7–31

A. Dürr: Merkwürdiges in den Quellen zu Weimarer Kantaten Bachs’, BJb 1987, 151–7

A. Glöckner: Überlegungen zu J.S. Bachs Kantatenschaffen nach 1730’, Beiträge zur Bachforschung, vi (1987), 54–64

W.M. Young: The Cantatas of J.S. Bach: an Analytical Guide (Jefferson, NC, 1989)

H.-J. Schulze: Bach's Secular Cantatas: a New Look at the Sources’, Bach, xxi/1 (1990), 26–41

F. Krummacher: Bachs frühe Kantaten im Kontext der Tradition’, Mf, xliv (1991), 9–32

L. and R. Steiger: Sehet! Wir gehn hinauf gen Jerusalem: Johann Sebastian Bachs Kantaten auf den Sonntag Estomihi (Göttingen, 1992)

K. Hofmann: Neue Überlegungen zu Bachs Weimarer Kantaten-Kalender’, BJb 1993, 9–29

D.R. Melamed: Mehr zur Chronologie von Bachs Weimarer Kantaten’, ibid., 213–16

U. Meyer: “Flügel her! Flügel her!”: gepredigte Sterbekunst als Hintergrund Bachscher Kantatentexte’, Musik und Kirche, lxiii (1993), 258–65

M. Petzoldt: Texte zur Leipziger Kirchen-music: zum Verständnis der Kantatentexte Johann Sebastian Bachs (Wiesbaden, 1993)

R. Steiger: So lerne nun die neue Evangelische Sprache: Elemente einer musikalischen Sprache des Trostes in J.S. Bachs Sterbekantaten’, Musik und Kirche, lxiv (1994), 255–63

F. Krummacher: Bachs Zyklus der Choralkantaten: Aufgaben und Lösungen (Göttingen, 1995)

D.L. Smithers: The Original Circumstances in the Performance of Bach's Leipzig Church Cantatas, “Wegen seiner sonn- und festtätigen Amts-Verrichtungen’, Bach, xxvi/1–2 (1995), 28–47

C. Wolff and T. Koopman, eds.: De wereld van de Bach-cantates, i, Johann Sebastian Bachs geestelijke cantates van Arnstadt tot Köthen (Abcoude, 1995; Eng. trans., 1997)

Passions and oratorios

SmitherHO, ii

W. Werker: Die Matthäus-Passion (Leipzig, 1923)

F. Smend: Die Johannes-Passion von Bach’, BJb 1926, 105–28; repr. in Friedrich Smend: Bach-Studien, ed. C. Wolff (Kassel, 1969), 11–23

C.S. Terry: The Spurious Bach “Lukas-Passion”’, ML, xiv (1933), 207–21

A. Schering: Zur Markus-Passion und zur “vierten” Passion’, BJb 1939, 1–32

F. Smend: Bachs Markus Passion’, BJb 1940–48, 1–35; repr. in Friedrich Smend: Bach-Studien, ed. C. Wolff (Kassel, 1969), 110–36

A. Dürr: Zu den verschollenen Passionen Bachs’, BJb 1949–50, 81–99

F. Smend: Bachs Himmelsfahrts-Oratorium’, Bach-Gedenkschrift, ed. K. Matthaei (Zürich, 1950), 42–65; repr. in Friedrich Smend: Bach-Studien, ed. C. Wolff (Kassel, 1969), 195–211

W. Serauky: Die “Johannes-Passion” von Joh. Seb. Bach und ihr Vorbild’, BJb 1954, 29–39

B. Smallman: The Background of Passion Music: J.S. Bach and his Predecessors (London, 1957, enlarged 2/1970)

J. Chailley: Les Passions de J.-S. Bach (Paris, 1963, 2/1984)

A. Mendel: Traces of the Pre-History of Bach's St John and St Matthew Passions’, Festschrift Otto Erich Deutsch, ed. W. Gerstenberg, J. LaRue and W. Rehm (Kassel, 1963), 31–48

D. Gojowy: Zur Frage der Köthener Trauermusik und der Matthäuspassion’, BJb 1965, 86–134

P. Brainard: Bach's Parody Procedure and the St. Matthew Passion’, JAMS, xxii (1969), 241–60

A. Glöckner: Bach and the Passion Music of his Contemporaries’, MT, cxvi (1975), 613–16

J. Rifkin: The Chronology of Bach's Saint Matthew Passion’, MQ, lxi (1975), 360–87

E. Axmacher: Ein Quellenfund zum Text der Matthäus-Passion’, BJb 1978, 181–91

G.A. Theill: Die Markuspassion von Johann Sebastian Bach (bwv247): Entstehung, Vergessen, Wiederentdeckung, Rekonstruktion (Steinfeld, 1978, 2/1981)

P. Steinitz: Bach’s Passions (London, 1979)

E.T. Chafe: Key Structure and Tonal Allegory in the Passions of J.S. Bach: an Introduction’, CMc, no.31 (1981), 39–54

R. Steiger: Die Einheit des Weinachtsoratoriums von J.S. Bach’, Musik und Kirche, li (1981), 273–80; lii (1982), 9–15

W. Blankenburg: Das Weinachts-Oratorium von Johann Sebastian Bach (Munich and Kassel, 1982)

E.T. Chafe: J.S. Bach's St. Matthew Passion; Aspects of Planning, Structure, and Chronology’, JAMS, xxxv (1982), 49–114

R.A. Leaver: Music as Preaching: Bach, Passions and Music in Worship (Oxford, 1982)

E. Axmacher: ‘Aus Liebe will mein Heyland sterben’: Untersuchungen zum Wandel des Passionverständnisses im frühen 18. Jahrhundert (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1984)

W.F. Hindermann: Johann Sebastian Bach, Himmelfahrts-Oratorium: Gestalt und Gehalt (Hofheim am Taunus, 1985)

C. Wolff: Bachs Unvollendete: die Johannes-Passion. Mehrbändiges Kompendium erschliesst das monumentale Werk des Komponisten’, Neue Musikzeitung, xxxvi/2 (1987), 39 only

A. Dürr: Die Johannes-Passion von Johann Sebastian Bach: Entstehung, Überlieferung, Werkeinführung (Munich and Kassel, 1988)

C. Wolff: Musical Forms and Dramatic Structure in Bach's Saint Matthew Passion’, Bach, xix/1 (1988), 6–20

M. Geck: Johann Sebastian Bach, Johannespassion bwv245 (Munich, 1991)

K. Hofmann: Zur Tonartenordnung der Johannes-Passion von Johann Sebastian Bach’, Musik und Kirche, lxi (1991), 78–86

E. Platen: Die Matthäus-Passion von Johann Sebastian Bach: Entstehung, Werkbeschreibung, Rezeption (Munich and Kassel, 1991)

W.M. Young: The Sacred Dramas of J.S. Bach: a Reference and Textual Interpretation (Jefferson, NC, 1994)

Latin church music, motets and chorales

C.S. Terry: Bach’s Chorals (Cambridge, 1915–21/R)

A. Schering: Die Höhe Messe in h-moll’, BJb 1936, 1–30

F. Smend: Bachs h-moll-Messe: Entstehung, Uberlieferung, Bedeutung’, BJb 1937, 1–58

W. Blankenburg: Einführung in Bachs h-moll-Messe (Kassel, 1950, 3/1974)

R. Bullivant: Zum Problem der Begleitung der Bachschen Motetten’, BJb 1966, 59–68

F. Smend: Zu den ältesten Sammlungen der vierstimmigen Choräle J.S. Bachs’, ibid., 5–40; repr. in Friedrich Smend: Bach-Studien, ed. C. Wolff (Kassel, 1969), 237–69

R. Leavis: Bach's Setting of Psalm CXVII (bwv230)’, ML, lii (1971), 19–26

F. Krummacher: Textauslegung und Satzstruktur in J.S. Bachs Motetten’, BJb 1974, 5–43

M. Geck: Zur Datierung, Verwendung und Aufführungspraxis von Bachs Motetten’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 63–71

H. Rilling: Johann Sebastian Bachs h-Moll-Messe (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1979, 2/1986)

G.J. Buelow: Symbol and Structure in the “Kyrie” of Bach's B-minor Mass’, Essays on the Music of J.S. Bach and Other Divers Subjects: a Tribute to Gerhard Herz, ed. R.L. Weaver (Louisville, KY, 1981), 21–41

A. Mann: Bach's A major Mass; a Nativity Mass?’, ibid., 43–7

R.M. Cammarota: The Sources of the Christmas Interpolations in J.S. Bach's Magnificat in E-flat Major’, CMc, no.36 (1983), 79–99

H.-J. Schulze: “150 Stück von den Bachischen Erben”: zur Überlieferung der vierstimmigen Choräle Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1983, 81–100

G. Wachowski: Die vierstimmigen Choräle Johann Sebastian Bachs: Untersuchungen zu den Druckausgaben von 1765 bis 1932 und zur Frage der Authentizität’, ibid., 51–79

A. Mann: Missa Brevis and Historia: Bach's A Major Mass’, Bach, xvi/1 (1985), 6–11

Y. Kobayashi: Die Universalität in Bachs h-moll-Messe: ein Beitrag zum Bach-Bild der Letzten Lebensjahre’, Musik und Kirche, lvii (1987), 9–24

R.A. Leaver: Bach, Kirchenlieder und Gesangbücher’, ibid., 169–74

W. Breig: Grundzüge einer Geschichte von Bachs vierstimmigen Choralsatz’, AMw, xlv (1988), 300–19

C. Wolff: Bach the Cantor, the Capellmeister, and the Musical Scholar: Aspects of the B-Minor Mass’, Bach, xx/1 (1989), 55–64

R.A. Leaver: Parody and Theological Consistency: Notes on Bach's A-major Mass’, Bach, xxi/3 (1990), 30–43

J. Butt: Bach: Mass in B Minor (Cambridge, 1991)

P. Wollny: Bachs Sanctus bwv 241 und Kerlls “Missa superba”’, BJb 1991, 173–6

A. Durr: Zur Parodiefrage in Bachs h-moll-Messe: eine Bestandsaufnahme’, Mf, xlv (1992), 117–38

R. Stinson: Some Thoughts on Bach's Neumeister Chorales’, JM, xi (1993), 455–77

P. Wollny: Ein Quellenfund zur Enstehungsgeschichte der h-Moll-Messe’, BJb 1994, 163–9

R.L. Marshall: Luther, Bach, and the Early Reformation Chorale (Atlanta, GA, 1995)

D.R. Melamed: J.S. Bach and the German Motet (Cambridge, 1995)

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

k: instrumental works

general

K.A. Rosenthal: Über Sonatenvorformen in den Instrumentalmusikwerken Joh. Seb. Bachs’, BJb 1926, 68–89

C.S. Terry: Bach’s Orchestra (London, 1932/R)

J.M. Barbour: Bach and “The Art of Temperament”’, MQ, xxxiii (1947), 64–89

A.E.F. Dickinson: Bach’s Fugal Works (London, 1956/R)

C. Dahlhaus: Bach und der “lineare Kontrapunkt”’, BJb 1962, 58–79

H.-G. Klein: Der Einfluss der Vivaldischen Konzertform im Instrumentalwerk Johann Sebastian Bachs (Strasbourg, 1970)

C. Wolff: Ordnungsprinzipien in den Originaldrucken Bachscher Werke’, Bach-Interpretationen, ed. M. Geck (Göttingen, 1969), 144–67; Eng. trans. in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 340–58

U. Siegele: Kompositionsweise und Bearbeitungstechnik in der Instrumentalmusik Johann Sebastian Bachs (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1975)

J.R. Fuchs: Studien zu Artikulationsangaben in Orgel- und Clavierwerken von Joh. Seb. Bach (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1985)

H.-J. Schulze: The French Influence in Bach's Instrumental Music’, EMc, xiii (1985), 180–84

R. Stinson: Toward a Chronology of Bach's Instrumental Music: Observations on Three Keyboard Works’, JM, vii (1989), 440–70

organ works

FrotscherG

H. Grace: The Organ Works of Bach (London and New York, 1922)

F. Dietrich: Analogieformen in Bachs Tokkaten und Präludien für die Orgel’, BJb 1931, 51–71

H. Klotz: Über die Orgelkunst der Gotik, der Renaissance und des Barock (Kassel, 1934, 3/1986)

H. Keller: Unechte Orgelwerke Bachs’, BJb 1937, 59–82

S. de B. Taylor: The Chorale Preludes of J.S. Bach (London, 1942)

H. Keller: Die Orgelwerke Bachs: ein Beitrag zu ihrer Geschichte, Form, Deutung und Wiedergabe (Leipzig, 1948/R; Eng. trans., 1967)

H. Klotz: Bachs Orgeln und seine Orgelmusik’, Mf, iii (1950), 189–203

K. Matthaei: Johann Sebastian Bachs Orgel’, Bach-Gedenkschrift, ed. K. Matthaei (Zürich, 1950), 118–149

P. Aldrich: Ornamentation in J.S. Bach’s Organ Works (New York, 1950/R)

W. Emery: Notes on Bach’s Organ Works: a Companion to the Revised Novello Edition (London, 1952–7)

W. Schrammek: Die musikgeschichtliche Stellung der Orgeltrio sonaten von Joh. Seb. Bach’, BJb 1954, 7–28

R. Donington: Tempo and Rhythm in Bach’s Organ Music (London, 1960)

G. von Dadelsen: Zur Entstehung des Bachschen Orgelbüchleins’, Festschrift Friedrich Blume, ed. A.A. Abert and W. Pfannkuch (Kassel, 1963), 74–9

P.F. Williams: J.S. Bach and English Organ Music’, ML, xliv (1963), 140–51

E.D. May: Breitkopf’s Role in the Transmission of J.S. Bach’s Organ Chorales (diss., Princeton U., 1974)

E. May: Eine neue Quelle für J.S. Bachs einzeln überlieferte Orgelchoräle’, BJb 1974, 98–103

U. Meyer: Zur Einordnung von J.S. Bachs einzeln überlieferten Orgelchorälen’, BJb 1977, 75–89

C. Wolff: Bachs Handexemplar der Schübler-Chorale’, ibid., 120–29

T.F. Harmon: The Registration of J.S. Bach’s Organ Works (Buren, 1978)

G.B. Stauffer: The Organ Preludes of Johann Sebastian Bach (Ann Arbor, 1980)

P. Williams: The Organ Music of J.S. Bach (Cambridge, 1980–84)

P. Williams: The Musical Aims of J.S. Bach's “Clavierübung III”’, Source Materials and the Interpretation of Music: a Memorial Volume to Thurston Dart, ed. I. Bent (London, 1981), 259–78

D. Humphreys: The Esoteric Structure of Bach’s Clavierübung III (Cardiff, 1983)

D. Kilian: Zu einem Bachschen Tabulatorautograph’, Bachiana et alia musicologica: Festschrift Alfred Dürr, ed. W. Rehm (Kassel, 1983), 161–7

H. Klotz: Studien zu Bachs Registrierkunst (Wiesbaden, 1985)

F. Krummacher: Bach und die norddeutsche Orgeltoccata: Fragen und Überlegungen’, BJb 1985, 119–34

R.A. Leaver: Bach and Hymnody: the Evidence of the Orgelbüchlein’, EMc, xiii (1985), 227–36

C. Wolff: Bach's Organ Music: Studies and Discoveries’, MT, cxxvi (1985), 149–52

G.B. Stauffer and E. May, eds.: J.S. Bach as Organist: his Instruments, Music, and Performance Practices (Bloomington, IN, 1986)

J.-C. Zehnder: Georg Böhm und Johann Sebastian Bach: zur Chronologie der Bachschen Stilentwicklung’, BJb 1988, 73–110

G. Butler: Bach’s Clavier-Übung III: the Making of a Print, with a Companion Study of the Canonic Variations on ‘Vom Himmel hoch’ BWV 769 (Durham, NC, 1990)

W. Breig: Formprobleme in Bachs frühen Orgelfugen’, BJb 1992, 7–21

G.B. Stauffer: Boyvin, Grigny, D'Anglebert, and Bach's Assimilation of French Classical Organ Music’, EMc, xxi (1993), 83–96

W. Breig: Versuch einer Theorie der Bachschen Orgelfuge’, Mf, xlviii (1995), 14–52

R.D. Claus: Zur Echtheit von Toccata und Fuge d-moll BWV 565 (Cologne, 1995)

Q. Faulkner: Die Registrierung der Orgelwerke J.S. Bachs’, BJb 1995, 7–30

R. Stinson: Bach: the Orgelbüchlein (New York, 1996)

keyboard and lute music

W. Werker: Studien über die Symmetrie im Bau der Fugen und die motivische Zusammengehörigkeit der Präludien und Fugen des ‘Wohltemperierten Klaviers’ von Johann Sebastian Bach (Leipzig, 1922/R)

H. David: Die Gestalt von Bachs Chromatischer Fantasie’, BJb 1926, 2–67

H. Neeman: J.S. Bachs Lautenkompositionen’, BJb 1931, 72–87

H. Keller: Die Klavierwerke Bachs (Leipzig, 1950)

J.N. David: Das wohltemperierte Klavier: der Versuch einer Synopsis (Göttingen, 1962)

H. Keller: Das Wohltemperierte Klavier von Johann Sebastian Bach: Werke und Wiedergabe (Kassel, 1965, 4/1994; Eng. trans., 1976)

W. Breig: Bachs Goldberg-Variationen als zyklisches Werk’, AMw, xxxii (1975), 243–65

H. Eichberg: Unechtes unter Johann Sebastian Bachs Klavierwerken’, BJb 1975, 7–49

H.-J. Schulze: Melodiezitate und Mehrtextigkeit in der Bauernkantate und in den Goldberg-Variationen’, BJb 1976, 58–72

C. Wolff: Bach's Handexemplar of the Goldberg Variations: a New Source’, JAMS, xxix (1976), 224–41; repr. in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 162–77

A. Burguéte: Die Lautenkompositionen Johann Sebastian Bachs’, BJb 1977, 26–54

J. Barnes: Bach's Keyboard Temperament: Internal Evidence from the Well-Tempered Clavier’, EMc, vii (1979), 236–49

C. Wolff: Textkritische Bemerkungen zum Originaldruck der Bachschen Partiten’, BJb 1979, 65–74; Eng. trans. in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 214–22

A. Dürr: Zur Frühgeschichte des Wohltemperierten Klaviers I von Johann Sebastian Bach (Göttingen, 1984)

P. Williams: J.S. Bach's Well-Tempered Clavier: a New Approach’, EMc, xi (1983), 46–52, 332–9

D. Humphreys: More on the Cosmological Allegory in Bach's Goldberg Variations’, Soundings, xii (1984–5), 25–45

I. Kaussler: Die Goldberg-Variationen von J.S. Bach (Stuttgart, 1985)

R. Dammann: Johann Sebastian Bachs ‘Goldberg-Variationen’ (Mainz, 1986)

A. Street: The Rhetorico-Musical Structure of the Goldberg Variations: Bach's Clavier-Übung IV and the Institutio oratoria of Quintilian’, MAn, vi (1987), 89–131

G. Butler: Neues zur Datierung der Goldberg-Variationen’, BJb 1988, 219–23

D. Schulenberg: The Keyboard Music of J.S. Bach (New York, 1992)

Y. Tomita: J.S. Bach’s ‘Das Wohltemperierte Clavier II’: a Critical Commentary (Leeds, 1993–5)

orchestral and chamber music

ScheringGIK

N. Carrell: Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos (London, 1963, 2/1985)

H. Eppstein: Studien über J.S. Bachs Sonaten für ein Melodieinstrument und obligates Cembalo (Stockholm, 1966)

H. Eppstein: Grundzüge in J.S. Bachs Sonatenschaffen’, BJb 1969, 5–30

L. Hoffmann-Erbrecht: Johann Sebastian Bach als Schöpfer des Klavier Konzerts’, Quellenstudien zur Musik: Wolfgang Schmieder zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. K. Dorfmüller and G. von Dadelsen (Frankfurt, 1972), 69–77

H.-J. Schulze: Johann Sebastian Bachs Konzertbearbeitungen nach Vivaldi und anderen: Studien- oder Auftragswerke?’, DJbM, xviii (1973–7), 80–100

A. Dürr: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des 5. Brandenburgischen Konzerts’, BJb 1975, 63–9

W. Breig: Bachs Violinkonzert d-moll: Studien zu seiner Gestalt und Entstehungsgeschichte’, BJb 1976, 7–34

H. Eppstein: Chronologieprobleme in Johann Sebastian Bachs Suiten für Soloinstrument’, ibid., 35–57

W. Breig: Johann Sebastian Bach und die Entstehung des Klavierkonzerts’, AMw, xxxvi (1979), 21–48

R. Leavis: Zur Frage der Authentizität von Bachs Violinkonzert d-Moll’, BJb 1979, 19–28

R.L. Marshall: J.S. Bach's Compositions for Solo Flute: a Reconsideration of their Authenticity and Chronology’, JAMS, xxxii (1979), 463–98

H.-J. Schulze: Ein “Dresdner Menuett” im zweiten Klavierbüchlein der Anna Magdalena Bach, nebst Hinweisen zur Überlieferung einiger Kammermusikwerke Bachs’, BJb 1979, 45–64

P. Ahnsehl, K. Heller and H.-J. Schulze, eds.: Beiträge zum Konzertschaffen J. S. Bachs’, Bach-Studien, vi (1981)

H. Vogt: Johann Sebastian Bachs Kammermusik (Stuttgart, 1981; Eng. trans., 1988)

W. Breig: Zur Chronologie von Johann Sebastian Bachs Konzertschaffen: Versuch eines neuen Zugangs’, AMw, xl (1983), 77–101

L. Dreyfus: J.S. Bach's Concerto Ritornellos and the Question of Invention’, MQ, lxxi (1985), 327–58

C. Wolff: Bach's Leipzig Chamber Music’, EMc, xiii (1985), 165–75; repr. in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 223–38

L. Dreyfus: J.S. Bach and the Status of Genre: Problems of Style in the G-minor Sonata bwv 1029’, JM, v (1987), 55–78

M. Marissen: A Critical Reappraisal of J.S. Bach's A-major Flute Sonata’, JM, vi (1988), 367–86

C. Berger: J.S. Bachs Cembalokonzerte’, AMw, xlvii (1990), 207–16

E. Lang-Becker: Johann Sebastian Bach: die Brandenburgischen Konzerte (Munich, 1990)

M. Boyd: Bach: the Brandenburg Concertos (Cambridge, 1993)

J. Swack: On the Origins of the “Sonate auf Concertenart”’, JAMS, xlvi (1993), 369–414

C. Wolff: Das Trio A-Dur bwv 1025: eine Lautensonate von Silvius Leopold Weiss, bearbeitet und erweitert von Johann Sebastian Bach’, BJb 1993, 47–67

M. Geck: Köthen oder Leipzig?: zur Datierung der nun in Leipziger Quellen erhaltenen Orchesterwerke Johann Sebastian Bachs’, Mf, xlvii (1994), 17–24

M. Marissen: The Social and Religious Designs of J.S. Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos (Princeton, NJ, 1995)

M. Geck: Bachs Orchesterwerke (Witten, 1997)

Art of Fugue, Musical Offering, canons

W. Graeser: Bachs “Kunst der Fuge”’, BJb 1924, 1–104

D.F. Tovey: A Companion to ‘The Art of Fugue’ (London, 1931)

H.T. David: J.S. Bach’s Musical Offering: History, Interpretation and Analysis (New York, 1945/R)

G.M. Leonhardt: The Art of Fugue, Bach’s Last Harpsichord Work: an Argument (The Hague, 1952)

H.-J. Schulze: Johann Sebastian Bachs Kanonwidmungen’, BJb 1967, 82–92

C. Wolff: Der Terminus “Ricercar” in Bachs Musikalischen Opfer’, ibid., 70–81

C. Wolff: New Research on Bach's Musical Offering’, MQ, lvii (1971), 379–408

C. Wolff: Überlegungen zum “Thema Regium”’, BJb 1973, 33–8

C. Wolff and others: Bach's “Art of Fugue”: an Examination of the Sources’, CMc, no.19 (1975), 47–77

N. Kenyon: A Newly Discovered Group of Canons by Bach’, MT, cxvii (1976), 391–3

W. Kolneder: Die Kunst der Fuge: Mythen des 20. Jahrhunderts (Wilhelmshaven, 1977, 2/1983)

W. Wiemer: Die wiederhergestellte Ordnung in Johann Sebastian Bachs Kunst der Fuge: Untersuchungen am Originaldruck (Wiesbaden, 1977)

U. Kirkendale: The Source for Bach's Musical Offering: the Institutio oratoria of Quintilian’, JAMS, xxxiii (1980), 88–141

G.G. Butler: Ordering Problems in J.S. Bach's Art of Fugue Resolved’, MQ, lxix (1983), 44–61

C. Wolff: Zur Chronologie und Kompositionsgeschichte von Bachs “Kunst der Fuge”’, BMw, xxv (1983), 130–42; Eng. trans. in Bach: Essays on his Life and Music (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 265–81

E.T. Chafe: Allegorical Music: the Symbolism of Tonal Language in the Bach Canons’, JM, iii (1984), 340–62

H.H. Eggebrecht: Bachs Kunst der Fuge: Erscheinung und Deutung (Munich, 1984; Eng. trans., 1993)

E. Bergel: Bachs letzte Fuge, die ‘Kunst der Fuge’, ein zyklisches Werk: Entstehungsgeschichte, Erstausgabe, Ordnungsprinzipien (Bonn, 1985)

R. Boss: Die Kunst des Rätselkanons im Musikalischen Opfer (Wilhelmshaven, 1991)

P. Schleuning: Johann Sebastian Bachs ‘Kunst der Fuge’: Ideologien, Entstehung, Analyse (Munich and Kassel, 1993)

P. Dirksen: Studien zur Kunst der Fuge von Johann Sebastian Bach: Untersuchungen zur Enstehungsgeschichte, Struktur und Aufführungspraxis (Wilhelmshaven, 1994)

M. Marissen: More Source-Critical Research on Bach's Musical Offering’, Bach, xxv/1 (1994), 11–27

Bach, §III: (7) Johann Sebastian Bach: Bibliography

l: performing practice

W. Emery: Bach’s Ornaments (London, 1953)

F. Rothschild: The Lost Tradition in Music: Rhythm and Tempo in J.S. Bach’s Time (London, 1953/R)

A. Mendel: On the Pitches in Use in Bach's Time’, MQ, xli (1955), 332–54, 466–80

W. Emery: Is your Bach Playing Authentic?’, MT, cxii (1971), 483–8, 697–8, 796–7

H. Grüss: Tempofragen der Bachzeit’, Bach-Studien, v (1975), 73–81

F. Neumann: Ornamentation in Baroque and Post-Baroque Music with Special Emphasis on J.S. Bach (Princeton, NJ, 1978)

K. Hochreiter: Zur Aufführungspraxis der Vokal-Instrumentalwerke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Berlin, 1983)

R. Kirkpatrick: Interpreting Bach’s Well-tempered Clavier: a Performer’s Discourse of Method (New Haven, CT, 1984)

H. Klotz: Die Ornamentik der Klavier- und Orgelwerke von Johann Sebastian Bach: Bedeutung der Zeichen, Möglichkeiten der Ausführung (Kassel, 1984)

A. Newman: Bach and the Baroque: a Performing Guide to Baroque Music with Special Emphasis on the Music of J.S. Bach (New York, 1985)

G. Stauffer and E. May, eds.: J.S. Bach as Organist: his Instruments, Music, and Performance Practices (Bloomington, IN, 1986)

R. Szeskus and H. Gruss, eds.: Aufführungspraktische Probleme der Werke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Leipzig, 1987)

H.-J. Schulze: Johann Sebastian Bach's Orchestra: Some Unanswered Questions’, EMc, xvii (1989), 3–15

P. Badura-Skoda: Bach-Interpretation: die Klavierwerke Johann Sebastian Bachs (Laaber, 1990; Eng. trans., 1993)

J. Butt: Bach Interpretation: Articulation Marks in Primary Sources of J.S. Bach (Cambridge, 1990)

H.-J. Schulze: Bach stilgericht aufführen, Wunschbild und Wirklichkeit: einige aufführungspraktische Aspekte von Johann Sebastian Bachs Leipziger Kirchenmusik (Wiesbaden, 1991)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

(45) (b Weimar, 22 Nov 1710; d Berlin, 1 July 1784). Composer and organist, eldest son of (7) Johann Sebastian (24) and Maria Barbara Bach. Trained by his father and endowed with brilliant gifts, he expressed himself in the genres of his time in a sensitive and highly cultivated musical language.

1. Leipzig, Dresden, 1710–46.

2. Halle, Brunswick, Berlin, 1746–84.

3. Works, reception.

WORKS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §III: (8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

1. Leipzig, Dresden, 1710–46.

He was baptized on 24 November 1710; his godparents were the Weimar chamberlain Wilhelm Ferdinand von Lynker, Anna Dorothea Hagedorn and Friedemann Meckbach, the last two acquaintances of J.S. Bach from Mühlhausen. Friedemann attended the Lutheran Lateinschule in Cöthen (1717–23), and from 14 June 1723 he was a day-boy at the Thomasschule in Leipzig. On 5 March 1729 he matriculated at Leipzig University, where his father had already registered him as a depositus on 22 December 1723; he attended lectures on law, philosophy, mathematics and other subjects. His early musical education, provided by his father, is documented in the Clavier-Büchlein vor W.F. Bach, begun on 22 January 1720 and containing entries (mainly in the hands of J.S. and W.F. Bach) up to about 1725–6. It is unlikely that this keyboard book reflects his very first systematic music lessons, since even the earliest entries are technically demanding. More plausibly it may be regarded as instruction in composition. Its repertory consists of works (inventions, sinfonias and preludes) that J.S. Bach probably wrote specifically for educational purposes, as well as several pieces by other authors (Telemann, G.H. Stölzel, J.C. Richter). It also contains fingering instructions, a table of ornaments after D’Anglebert, and Friedemann’s own first attempts at composition, written with paternal guidance around 1720 and 1725–6 (two allemandes bwv836–7 and four preludes bwv924a, 925, 932 and 931). From Christmas 1724 until August or September 1726 (i.e. while he was a pupil at the Thomasschule) W.F. Bach is known to have copied performing parts for his father, and around 1726 he took violin lessons from J.G. Graun in Merseburg ‘to enable him to compose according to the nature of that instrument’ (Marpurg).

At this period Friedemann accompanied his father several times to Dresden and thus became familiar with the city where he was later to live and work. He also visited Halle in 1729, when he delivered an invitation from his father to Handel, and on 29 March that year he performed in J.S. Bach’s funeral music for Prince Leopold in Cöthen. In December 1732 he stood godfather, in Udestedt, to Dorothea Wilhelmine, the youngest daughter of his cousin Tobias Friedrich Bach (40). Little is known about his musical development during his last few years in the parental home. Copies in his hand of organ works by his father (the C major concerto arranged from Vivaldi, bwv594, and the sonatas bwv525–8) suggest that he took a particular interest in organ playing at this period. By about 1730 he must already have acquired a considerable reputation as a virtuoso organist and harpsichordist, since he took over the teaching of Christoph Nichelmann that year, perhaps to lighten his father’s workload. Except for the attempts in the Clavier-Büchlein mentioned above, there is no certain evidence of any compositions written in Leipzig.

After failing in a competition for a post at Halberstadt in March 1731, Friedemann applied for the post of organist at the Dresden Sophienkirche which had fallen vacant on the death of Christian Petzold; his father wrote the letter of application and signed it in his name. He probably played J.S. Bach’s Prelude and Fugue in G bwv541 in the competition for this post. Christoph Schaffrath and Johann Christian Stoy were the other two short-listed candidates. Documents pertaining to the competition state that the deputy Kapellmeister Pantaleon Hebenstreit, who had been invited to adjudicate, praised ‘the skill of the younger Bach … adding that he was the best of these three well-qualified candidates’. Bach took up his duties on 1 August 1733; he was required only to play the organ for divine service and for the figural music performed on feast days, for which he was paid a modest salary of about 80 reichsthaler. However, the appointment gave him time to pursue other interests. He cultivated the acquaintance of Dresden court musicians such as J.G. Pisendel and S.L. Weiss, and presumably took an active part in the musical life of the court. A glimpse of his activities is provided by his mention of musical evenings at the house of the Electress Maria Antonia Walpurgis of Saxony, recalled in his dedication to her (in 1767) of his Harpsichord Concerto in E minor brC 12. It seems certain that he made close contacts with music-loving aristocrats, including the Russian ambassador Count von Keyserlingk, to whom Bach dedicated a harpsichord sonata from Halle in 1763, and the directeur des plaisirs C.H. von Dieskau, whose wife was godmother to Bach’s first son, Wilhelm Adolf, in 1752. At the same time Bach was teaching J.G. Goldberg, and continuing the study of mathematics he had begun in Leipzig under Johann Gottlieb Waltz (later court mathematician and Kommissionsrat). Bach is known to have been in Leipzig for four weeks in summer 1739, accompanied by the lutenists S.L. Weiss and Johann Kropfgans.

In Dresden Bach was also increasingly active as a composer. About 1735 he wrote the harpsichord concertos in A minor and D major (brC 14 and 9), several sinfonias (brC 1–6) and trio sonatas (brB 13–15) and a number of harpsichord sonatas and smaller keyboard works. The compositions of the later part of his Dresden period (c1740–46) include such works as the Concerto for two harpsichords in F major brA 12, the Harpsichord Concerto in F major brC 13 and the Sinfonia in D minor brC 7. The Harpsichord Sonata in D major brA 4 was Friedemann’s first work to be printed; it was published in spring 1745 and sold by his father in Leipzig and his brother Emanuel in Berlin. The intention of following it with another five sonatas was abandoned because of poor sales.

Bach, §III: (8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

2. Halle, Brunswick, Berlin, 1746–84.

On 16 April 1746, the day that he signed the certificate of his appointment as organist to the Liebfrauenkirche in Halle, W.F. Bach also submitted a letter of resignation to the Dresden city council. He suggested that his father’s pupil J.C. Altnickol should replace him in Dresden, but Altnickol was not in fact chosen. For Bach, the move to Halle meant exchanging a city dominated by court life for a middle-class town, and a subordinate position for one of the most important organist posts in central Germany. In Halle he also held the title of director musices, and as well as playing the organ his duties included performing figural music on a regular basis, that is on all feast days, but only on every third ordinary Sunday. In his own compositions, Bach therefore concentrated on cantatas for special occasions, since these works could be re-used annually. With the increase in his official duties Bach’s income also improved, and indeed was more than doubled, for he now received an annual salary of some 180 reichsthaler. When he officially took up his post on Whit Sunday, 29 May 1746, he performed the cantata Wer mich liebet (brF 13). With its large-scale opening chorus and a virtuoso aria with organ obbligato, it is obviously intended for a grand occasion; the paper used for the autograph manuscript shows that he composed it while still in Dresden.

During his early years in Halle, Friedemann seems to have been in close contact with his father in Leipzig. He accompanied J.S. Bach to Berlin in 1747 on his visit to Frederick the Great, and in 1749–50 he and his father together supported the appointment of the organ builder Heinrich Andreas Contius to Frankfurt an der Oder. Friedemann seems also to have borrowed compositions of his father’s for performance in Halle (e.g. bwv31, 34 and 51). He made extensive use of his father’s compositions, especially after inheriting many of his cantatas in 1750. According to an (unverifiable) anecdote told by Marpurg, he was suspected of plagiarism on the occasion of a university ceremony in 1749, when he performed parody arias from one of his father’s Passions under his own name. Also in 1749, a performance was given in Leipzig of his Advent cantata Lasset uns ablegen (brF 1), perhaps with the purpose of influencing the choice of a successor to J.S. Bach there, a matter under early discussion by the Leipzig city council. Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Sonnenkalb, a pupil at the Thomasschule, mentioned performances by W.F. Bach, both at private concerts in his father’s house and publicly in the Grosse Concert.

Bach was embroiled in several conflicts over issues of responsibility and charges of exceeding his authority, including a dispute in 1749 with his Kantor, Johann Gottfried Mittag, who had misappropriated money due to Bach. In 1750 he was reprimanded for overstaying a leave of absence after his father’s death; he had gone to Leipzig to settle the estate, and had then escorted his half-brother Johann Christian to the care of Emanuel in Berlin, where he himself stayed for several months. It is difficult to establish the veracity of the many other anecdotes about Bach’s neglect of his official duties.

On 25 February 1751 Bach married Dorothea Elisabeth Georgi (1725–91), eldest daughter of the tax collector Johann Gotthilf Georgi. The marriage produced three children, two sons who died in infancy and a daughter, Friederica Sophia (b 27 Feb 1757). Bach seems to have had numerous pupils in Halle. As well as his distant relative Johann Christian Bach (77, the so-called ‘Halle Clavier-Bach’), who acquired important original sources from Friedemann, and F.W. Rust, whose estate contained invaluable copies of some of Friedemann’s keyboard works, they included Daniel Christoph Vahlkamp, J.S. Petri, Samuel Friedrich Brede, Christian Leberecht Zimmermann and Johann Carl Angerstein, who gave an account of W.F. Bach’s style of chorale accompaniment in his treatise Theoretisch-practische Anweisung, Choralgesänge nicht nur richtig sondern auch schön spielen zu lernen (Stendal, 1800). Bach was also in contact with the Halle printer J.J. Gebauer, who owned a collection of his keyboard works, and with Marpurg, the second part of whose Abhandlung von der Fuge (Berlin, 1754), containing 13 canons by Friedemann, is dedicated to the brothers W.F. and C.P.E. Bach. Godparental ties also connected him with the family of the organ builder H.A. Contius, and he seems to have maintained a connection with the court at Cöthen, since the princely couple were godparents to his daughter and Friedemann composed a set of pieces for a grandfather clock mechanism at the castle there (brA 63–80, previously ascribed to J.S. Bach as bwv Anh.133–50).

Bach’s increasing dissatisfaction with his Halle post is evident in his repeated, but unsuccessful, attempts to leave. In 1753 he applied for the post of organist at the Johanniskirche in Zittau, in competition with his brother Emanuel and his father’s pupils J.C. Altnickol, J.L. Krebs and Johann Trier; in 1758 and 1759 he applied for the position of Kapellmeister in Frankfurt, with a letter of recommendation from Telemann; and in 1762 he was involved in negotiations with the Landgrave of Hesse for the post of Hofkapellmeister in Darmstadt, which had fallen vacant on the death of Christoph Graupner. He seems to have drawn these negotiations out at some length intentionally, and to have broken them off in the end for unexplained reasons; however, in the dedication of the Harpsichord Concerto in E minor brC 12 to the Electress of Saxony in 1767 he credits himself with the title of Hofkapellmeister at Darmstadt, so it seems that the title had at some point been granted to him. After 1756 Bach’s attempts to leave Halle may well have been reinforced by the hardships of the Seven Years War, which bore down with particular severity on the city and its inhabitants. The authorities placed Bach in a high tax bracket because of his wife’s landed property, so that the taxes regularly levied on account of the war weighed heavily on him, and in about 1759 he was obliged to sell some of the music he had inherited from his father to Johann Georg Nacke, Kantor at Oelsnitz. The tension in Halle led to Bach’s leaving his post in May 1764, a decision he took without the security of any other prospective employment. In a letter written at the end of June 1764 he mentioned plans for leaving the city, perhaps in the hope of a position in Fulda. However, he stayed in Halle until at least October 1770, and seems to have supported himself chiefly by private lessons, though his financial situation was obviously deteriorating so drastically in these years that in February 1768 he re-applied (unsuccessfully) for his old post, which had become vacant again after the death of Johann Christoph Rühlmann.

While discharging his duties as organist and music director of the Liebfrauenkirche, Bach also resumed the publication of his keyboard works: in 1748 his Sonata in E flat major brA 7 appeared with a dedication to Privy Councillor Wilhelm von Happe, and the same piece was published again in November 1763 (not 1739 or 1768, as has variously been claimed), with a dedication to Count von Keyserlingk. In about 1765 Friedemann announced the publication of his 12 polonaises brA 27–38 and in October 1767 that of the Harpsichord Concerto in E minor brC 12, but nothing came of these plans. In manuscript both works were dedicated to noble patrons: the first half of the cycle of polonaises to the then director of the Petersburg Academy of Sciences, Vladimir Grigoryevich von Orlov, and the concerto to Maria Antonia Walpurgis, Electress of Saxony. The dedications of brA 7, 27–38 and C 12 are obviously connected with Bach’s search for employment outside Halle. A now lost Abhandlung vom harmonischen Dreyklang, mentioned by Marpurg in 1758 and announced by Friedemann himself in several advertisements in the same year, also remained unpublished. The content and purpose of this treatise is unknown, but it may have dealt with mathematical and philosophical issues.

The rest of Bach’s life was a tale of steadily deteriorating circumstances and unsuccessful attempts to obtain permanent employment. In 1770 his wife had to sell part of her property. The family left Halle and moved first to Brunswick, where they lived from about 1771 to the beginning of 1774. In summer 1773 Bach visited J.N. Forkel in Göttingen and in April 1774 he moved to Berlin, where he lived until his death. He applied for posts as organist at the Stadtkirche, Wolfenbüttel, and St Katharina, Brunswick, in 1771, and at the Marienkirche, Berlin, in 1779; documents relating to the Wolfenbüttel and Berlin posts reveal that the reason for his lack of success was his difficult character and unsteady way of life. In 1778 it seems that his efforts to find a permanent post even led him to try ousting J.P. Kirnberger as musician to Princess Anna Amalia of Prussia, whereupon the princess withdrew the financial support she had previously been granting Bach. This intrigue is known to us only from Kirnberger’s account of it; his rival Marpurg, in whose house Bach was living during these years, seems to have been involved as well.

In his later years Bach performed in public as an organ virtuoso on many occasions: in Göttingen in summer 1773, Brunswick (22 August 1773) and Berlin (4 May 1774 in the Garnisonkirche, 15 May 1774 in the Nikolaikirche and the Marienkirche, 9 June 1774 in the Marienkirche, and 10 October and 3 December 1776 in the Dreifaltigkeitskirche). These recitals contributed substantially to his reputation as the greatest living organ virtuoso and improviser, but this increase in improvising seems to have gone hand in hand with a decline in his ambitions as a composer. He apparently wrote only a few works in the last years of his life; they include the viola duets brB 7–9 (in part revisions of earlier works) and two of the six flute duets brB 1–6, the eight fugues dedicated to Princess Anna Amalia brA 81–8 (dedicatory copy dated 1778), the harpsichord sonatas in D and G brA 5, 14 and probably most of the fantasies. In 1778–9 Friedemann was working on an opera, Lausus und Lydie (a later libretto gives the title as Laurus und Lydie), but it was never completed and is now lost. The only pupil he is known for certain to have had in Berlin was Sara Levy, née Itzig, Felix Mendelssohn’s great-aunt.

Financial circumstances eventually forced Bach into the piecemeal sale of his music library and those of his father’s works he had inherited, as well as compositions of his own. On leaving Brunswick he entrusted the sale by auction of some of his music to J.J. Eschenburg, but whether the auction actually took place is not known; Bach himself did not make inquiries about the proceeds until four years later. It was presumably at this time, and in connection with the sale of manuscripts, that he manipulated the attribution of certain works. For instance, he gave the Vivaldi arrangement bwv596 the misleading inscription, ‘di W.F. Bach manu mei patris descriptum’, while he conversely ascribed works of his own to his father (e.g. Dienet dem Herrn, brF 25). During his last years Bach suffered from poor health and became increasingly resigned to retirement from public musical life, but he seems still to have been widely known at the time of his death, as the obituary in Cramer’s Magazin der Musik (1784) makes clear: ‘In him Germany has lost its foremost organist, and the musical world in general has lost a man who cannot be replaced’. Bach left his wife and daughter in great poverty; a benefit performance of Handel’s Messiah was given for them the following year.

Bach, §III: (8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

3. Works, reception.

Little is known about the extent and location of Bach’s musical estate. Part of it was acquired second-hand in Berlin at the beginning of the 19th century by Carl Philipp Heinrich Pistor (1778–1847). Other items found their way into the library of the Berlin Singakademie through Sara Levy and C.F. Zelter, and some music evidently remained in the hands of Bach’s daughter and was taken by her descendants to the USA, where it was accidentally destroyed in recent years. The provenance of Georg Poelchau’s autograph manuscripts (now in D-Bsb) is still largely unexplained; some seem to have come from the organist Johann Nikolaus Julius Kötschau, others may have been acquired in Berlin in the early 19th century. The early dispersal of his works makes it difficult to assess W.F. Bach’s creative achievement satisfactorily. Extensive losses had probably occurred as early as 1800. Evaluations of Bach’s work have often been based on pieces incorrectly attributed (for instance the keyboard pieces in D-Bsb Mus.ms.Bach P 883–4).

In Leipzig Bach clearly concentrated more on virtuoso performance than on his career as a composer, perhaps in the depressing realization that he could never attain his father’s perfection in all musical genres. His creative energies were therefore expressed more readily in free improvisation, and particularly in his late years the improvisation of fantasies on the organ and harpsichord was very important to him. Only when he became relatively independent from his father in Dresden did Friedemann develop more fully as a composer, especially of keyboard music. Some of his early works (the Bourlesca brA 51, the Clavierstück brA 54) appear to derive from ideas that came to him while improvising. From the first, his compositions were marked by distinctly virtuoso tendencies; pieces like the harpsichord concertos in A minor and D major (brC 14, 9) and the Sonata in D major brA 4 are among the most difficult harpsichord works of their time. The last-named work is unique in its fusion of different stylistic and formal models; only the ‘Württemberg’ sonatas of C.P.E. Bach can to some extent compare with it. The Dresden compositions in particular employ many technical and stylistic features of J.S. Bach’s Clavier-Übung I, but even in these early works Friedemann’s individual and original style is strongly marked, above all in its characteristic melodic phrasings and a tendency to contrapuntal or imitative development. The capricious style of his ensemble music is obviously modelled on J.D. Zelenka.

In his cantatas, which were all probably written while he was in Halle, Bach employed melodic idioms of the Dresden operatic style, but in many details he followed his father’s style of vocal writing. In a series of cantatas probably composed about 1755, for instance, he included instrumental introductory movements, and his large-scale choral movements contain a number of complex fugues. Apart from this, his vocal style must have been strongly influenced by Telemann’s cantatas, which formed part of his performance repertory in Halle. Bach’s cantata Ach Gott, vom Himmel sieh darein (brF 19) is obviously modelled on Telemann’s setting of the same text (tvwv I:14). Bach’s vocal works illustrate the great demands he made on the technical abilities of singers and instrumentalists. He was rather conservative in his choice of texts, his favourite sources being Johann Jacob Rambach’s Geistliche Poesien (Halle, 1720) and Johann Friedrich Möhring’s Gott geheiligtes Beth- und Lob-Opffer der Christen (Zerbst, 1723).

The late keyboard works follow new stylistic ideals. There is a noticeable tendency towards formal, technical and melodic clarity in the sonatas, while some of the virtuoso fantasias anticipate 19th-century keyboard techniques. At the same time Bach obviously had a predilection for older forms such as the toccata and fugue.

The judgment of posterity on Friedemann Bach was chiefly influenced in the 19th century by the many anecdotes about his personal life that were spread after his death, particularly by Marpurg, J.F. Reichardt and J.F. Rochlitz – an image maintained to this day in A.E. Brachvogel’s popular pseudo-biographical novel. Scholarly study of W.F. Bach began with the works by Friedrich Chrysander and C.H. Bitter, although the work of the latter in particular suffers from prejudice, especially in discussion of the works. Martin Falck’s dissertation, published in 1913, is the first comprehensive monograph on the composer’s life and work, although many details are in need of revision. Falck’s work has been complemented by a series of specialist studies (including those of Braun, Miesner and Schulze) and individual groups of works have been more thoroughly discussed in studies of their genres (by Kelletat, Müller-Blattau and Schleuning).

Only a few of Bach’s works were at all widely known in his lifetime, among them the two printed harpsichord sonatas brA 4 and 7. Even better known were the 12 polonaises brA 27–38 (c1765) and the collection of eight fugues brA 81–8 (before 1778); more than 20 contemporary manuscript copies of the first collection, and almost 30 copies of the second, are known to have been in circulation. The polonaises were so popular, even at the beginning of the 19th century, that Friedrich Konrad Griepenkerl published them in 1819. Adverse circumstances prevented publication by Hoffmeister & Kühnel of Forkel’s planned edition of selected works. Bach’s sonatas and fantasies are now available in reliable editions, and a critical edition of the complete works was inaugurated by Carus-Verlag, Stuttgart, in 2000.

Although Friedemann Bach’s work is more limited in both quantity and stylistic variety than the music of his brother Emanuel, he must be ranked beside C.P.E. Bach as one of the major composers representing the period between Baroque and Classical composition.

Bach, §III: (8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

WORKS

Catalogues: M. Falck: ‘Thematisches Verzeichnis der Kompositionen Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs’, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach: Sein Leben und seine Werke (Leipzig, 1913) [Fk; † = addn from Wollny (1993)]P. Wollny: Thematisch-systematisches Verzeichnis der Werke Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs, Bach-Repertorium, ii (in preparation) [BR]

keyboard, organ

Edition: Wilhelm Friedemann Bach: Orgelwerke, ed. T. Fedtke (Frankfurt, 1968) [FO]

 

 


 

 

BR

Fk

 


 

 

A 1

†200

Sonata (C), c1735–40, D-Bsb

A 2a

1b

Sonata (C) (early version), c1735–40, Bsb; 2nd movt. ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 2b

1a

Sonata (C) (later version), ? after c1750, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*; ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 3

2

Sonata (C), c1760–75, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*; ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 4

3

Sonata (D) (Dresden, 1745); ed. in NM lxxviii (1930)

A 5

4

Sonata (D), c1760–75, rev. c1778, Bsb*; ed. in NM, lxxviii (1930)

A 6

11

Sonata (D), 2 hpd, lost, listed in J.C. Westphal catalogue, 1782

A 7

5

Sonata (E) (Halle 1748, 1763); ed. in NM, lxxviii (1930)

A 8

†201

Sonata (Eb), c1775, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*

A 9

†204

Sonata (e), ?c1735–40, lost, formerly RUS-KA

A 10

†202

Sonata (F), c1735, D-Bsb

A 11a

6c

Sonata (F) (1st version), c1735–40, Bsb; 2nd movt. ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 11b

6b

Sonata (F) (2nd version), c1740, Bsb; 2nd movt. ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 11c

6a

Sonata (F) (3rd version), ? after 1750, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art* [Trio from 2nd movt. = brA 80]; ed. in NM, clvi (1941)

A 12

10

Concerto (F), 2 hpd, c1740, Bsb*; ed. in J.S. Bach: Werke, xliii [attrib. J.S. Bach]

A 13a–b

40

Concerto (G) (2 versions), c1740, rev. ?c1775, Bsb

A 14

7

Sonata (G), c1775–80, Bsb*; ed. in NM, lxiii (1930)

A 15

8

Sonata (A), c1750–70, Bsb; ed. in NM, lxiii (1930)

A 16

9

Sonata (Bb), ?c1770, Bsb; ed. in NM, lxiii (1930)

A 17

14

Fantasia (C), c1770–75, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 18–19

15–16

2 fantasias (c, c), dedic. to G.U. von Behr, c1770–75, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 20–22

17–19

3 fantasias (D, d, d), c1770–75, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 23

20

Fantasia (e), 1770, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 24

21

Fantasia (e), c1770–75, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 25

22

Fantasia (G), ?c1750, Bsb [= brA 63]

A 26

23

Fantasia (a), c1770–75, Bsb; ed. P. Schleuning (Mainz, 1972)

A 27–38

12

12 polonaises (C, c, D, d, E, e, E, e, F, f, G, g), c1765, rev. c1775, F-Pc, PL-Kj*; ed. A. Böhnert (Munich, 1993)

A 39

24

Suite (g), ?c1730 [4th movt. = brA 48], D-Bsb; ed. A. Böhnert (Munich, 1993)

A 40–41

†205

2 allemandes (g, g), c1725, US-NH* [= bwv836–7]; ed. in NBA, V/5

A 42–43

2 minuets (G, g), c1725, US-NH* [=bwv841–2]; ed. in NBA, V/5

A 44–47

†206

4 preludes (C, D, e, a), c1726, US-NH* [=bwv924a, 925, 932, 931]; ed. in NBA, V/5

A 48

25/1

Minuet (g), D-Bsb

A 49a–c

25/2

Presto (Tempo di Menuet) (d), Bsb, US-NH

A 50

†208

Minuet (F), MS lost, formerly RUS-KA [also attrib. C.P.E. Bach]

A 51a–b

26

Bourleska (Imitation de la chasse) (C), c1735, D-Bsb*

A 52

27

Reveille (C), c1735–9, Bsb

A 53a–b

28

Gigue (G), c1735–9, Bsb

A 54

29

Clavierstück (Präludium) (c), c1740, Bsb*

A 55a–b

Scherzo (d/e), ?c1730–35 [=bwv844/844a]; ed. in J.S. Bach: Werke, xlii [attrib. J.S. Bach]

A 56

30

March (Eb), ?1770, Bsb

A 57

March (F), formerly RUS-KA [=brA 76]

A 58

13

Polonaise (C), D-Bsb [= Trio from 2nd movt of brA 11c; = brA 80]

A 59

Ouverture (E), Bsb

A 60

†209

Andante (e), ?c1775, GB-Cfm [= 2nd movt. of brA 13; see also ‘Secular vocal’, brH 1]

A 61

†203

Allegro non troppo (G), ?c1775, lost, formerly D-Bhm

A 62

Un poco allegro (C), c1775, LEm*

A63–80

†207

18 pieces for musical clock, 1759 [=bwvAnh.133–50]; ed. A. Klughardt [attrib. J.S. Bach] (Leipzig, 1897)

A 81–88

31

8 fugues (C, c, D, d, E, e, B, f), c1774–8, B-Bc*, D-Bsb; ed. in FO

A89

32

Fugue (c), before 1758, Bsb; ed. in FO

A 90

33

Fugue (F), c1740, Bsb; ed. in FO

A 91

36

Fugue (F), org, Bsb; ed. in FO

A 92

37

Fugue (g), org, US-NH; ed. in FO

A 93–99

38/1

7 chorale preludes, org, D-LEm; ed. in FO

A 100

38/2

Trio on ‘Allein Gott in der Höh’, org, lost

A 101–104

4 chorale preludes, doubtful, MS lost, formerly RUS-KA

chamber

B 1–6

54–9

6 duets (e, E, E, F, f, G), 2 fl, D-Bsb, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art* (1745–70); ed. G. Braun (Wiesbaden, 1988)

B 7–9

60–62

3 duets (C, G, g), 2 va, c1775, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*; ed. Y. Morgan (Winterthur, 1994)

B 10–12

51–3

3 sonatas (F, a, D), fl, bc, lost, cited in Breitkopf catalogues, 1761, 1763

B 13–15

47–9

3 trios (D, D, a), 2 fl, bc, c1740, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*

B 16

50

Trio (B), vn/fl, vn, bc, before 1762, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art

Trio (B), vn, hpd, US-CA, doubtful

orchestral

C 1–5

63, 67–69, 71

5 sinfonias (C, F, G, G, B), str (no.1 with 2 hn, 2 ob ad lib; no.3 with 2 ob, bn), c1735–40, MS lost, formerly D-Bsa

C 6

70

Sinfonia (A), 2 ob, bn, str, c1735–40, Bsb* (frag.)

C 7

65

Sinfonia (d), 2 fl, str, c1740–45, Bsb*; ed. W. Lebermann (Mainz, 1971)

C 8

64

Sinfonia (D), 2 ob/fl, bn, 2 hn, str, c1755, A-Wn* [used as introduction to brF 14 and ? G 1]; ed. W. Lebermann (Mainz, 1971)

C 9

41

Conc. (D), hpd, str, c1735–40, D-Bsb; ed. in SBA

C 10

42

Conc. (E), hpd, str, c1740–45, Bsb* (frag.)

C 11

46

Conc. (E), 2 hpd, orch, ?c1745, Bsb, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art

C 12

43

Conc. (e), hpd, str, c1767, Bsb, Dl; ed. W. Upmeyer (Berlin, 1931)

C 13

44

Conc. (F), hpd, str, c1740–45, Bsb

C 14

45

Conc. (a), hpd, str, c1735–40, Bsb*

Conc. (D), fl, str, c1775, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art

Conc. (g), hpd, str, Bsb, doubtful (? by J.C. Altnickol)

church cantatas

for SATB, instruments and continuo; MSS in D-Bsb unless otherwise stated

 

 

 

F 1

80

Lasset uns ablegen (J.F. Möhring), 1749

F 2

92

O Wunder, wer kann dieses fassen? (Möhring)

F 3

93

Ach, daß du den Himmel zerrissest (J.J. Rambach), 1755–60

F 4

†250

Ehre sei Gott in der Höhe, ?1759, F-Pc*; ed. K. Schultz-Hauser (Berlin, 1964)

F 5

73

Der Herr zu deiner Rechten (partly by Möhring), c1755

F 6

74

Wir sind Gottes Werke (Möhring), c1755

F 7

82

Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, ?1764 [partly parody of brF 6 and 18]

F 8

74a

[cantata for Palm Sunday; parody of brF 6], lost

F 9

83

Erzittert und fallet, c1750–55; ed. in SBA

F 10

95

Auf, Christen, posaunt, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art [parody of brF 24]

F 11

75

Gott fähret auf mit Jauchzen (Rambach), ?c1760–64

F 12

91

Wo geht die Lebensreise hin? (Möhring), c1755

F 13

72

Wer mich liebet, 1746

F 14

85

Dies ist der Tag (Möhring), c1755, F-Pc* [sinfonia = brC 8]; ed. in SBA

F 15

88

Ertönt, ihr seligen Völker (partly by D. Stoppe), c1755–60 [parody of brF 19]

F 16

[93]

Ach, daß du den Himmel zerrissest (after Rambach), c1755–60 [parody of brF 3]

F 17

89

Es ist eine Stimme (Möhring), ?1753

F 18

81

Der Herr wird mit Gerechtigkeit (Möhring), c1750–55

F 19

96

Ach Gott, vom Himmel sieh darein (Stoppe), 1752/3

F 20

76

Wohl dem, der den Herrn fürchtet, catechism music, c1750

F 22

86

Der Höchste erhöret das Flehen der Armen, on departure of G.L. Herrnschmidt, 3 Oct 1756 [partly parody of brF 18]

F 23

87

Verhängnis, dein Wüten entkräftet die Armen, for memorial service for Sophia Dorothea of Prussia, 24 July 1757 [parody of brF 22], PL-Kj*

F 24

95

Auf, Christen, posaunt, for the peace of Hubertusburg, 1763, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art

other sacred

for SATB, instruments and continuo; MSS in D-Bsb unless otherwise stated

E 1

100

Missa (g), formerly D-LEm*

E 2

98

Missa (d)

E 3

78a

Heilig ist Gott, chorus

E 4

98b

Agnus Dei [= brE 2/5]

E 5

99/1

Amen, chorus, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*

E 6

99/2

Halleluja, chorus, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*

E 7

78b

Lobet Gott, unsern Herrn Zebaoth, chorus; ed. in SBA

F 21

77

Wie ruhig ist doch meine Seele, recit from catechism music, A, bc, ?c1753 [from pasticcio after bwv170/i and 147/i]

F 25

84

Dienet dem Herrn (Ps c.1–2), 1755, Kiev*, Archive for Literature and Art, US-CA

F 26

89/iii

Der Trost gehöret nur für Kinder (Möhring), aria, S, org, bc [= brF 17/iii], GB-Lbl*

F 27

94

Zerbrecht, zerreißt, ihr schnöden Banden (Rambach), aria, S, hn, org [? from lost cantata]

F 28

96/iv

Laß dein Wehen in mir spielen (Stoppe), aria, S, Fl, ob, org, bc, ?c1755 [= br F19/iv]

F 29

79

... Gnaden ein, aria (frag.), B, 2 fl, 2 ob, str, bc, ?c1750

secular vocal

G 1

90

O Himmel, schone, for birthday of Frederick the Great, 24 Jan 1756, SSATB, fl, tpt, 2 hn, timp, str, bc [partly parody of brF 9 and F 24; movts 1 and 7 lost, ? = brC 8]

G 2

106

Lausus und Lydie (op, C.M. Plümicke), 1778–9, inc., lost

H 1

97

Herz, mein Herz, sei ruhig, S, hpd, ?1780, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*

didactic

I 1

39

canons and contrapuntal sketches, c1735–40, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art*; some in F.W. Marpurg: Abhandlung von der Fuge, ii (Berlin, 1754)

I 2–5

4 triple canons a 6; in J.P. Kirnberger: Die Kunst des reinen Satzes, ii (Berlin and Königsberg, 1776–9), 226–30

I 6

35

Fugal exposition (C), org, 14 June 1771, D-BS* [for organists’ audition at Katharinenkirche, Brunswick]

I 7

Fugal exposition on BACH, 25 July 1773, KIl * [in album of C.F. Cramer]

theoretical works

I 8

Abhandlung vom harmonischen Dreiklang, before 1754, announced 1758, unpubd, lost

Bach, §III: (8) Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

BIBLIOGRAPHY

F. Chrysander: Johann Sebastian Bach und sein Sohn Friedemann Bach in Halle, 1713–1768’, Jb für musikalische Wissenschaften, ii (1867), 235–48, esp. 241–8

C.H. Bitter: Carl Philipp Emanuel und Wilhelm Friedemann Bach und deren Brüder (Berlin, 1868)

W. Nagel: W.F. Bach’s Berufung nach Darmstadt’, SIMG, i (1899–1900), 290–94

C. Zehler: W.F. Bach und seine hallische Wirksamkeit’, BJb 1910, 103–32

M. Falck: Wilhelm Friedemann Bach: sein Leben und seine Werke, mit thematischem Verzeichnis und zwei Bildern (Leipzig, 1913/R)

P. Epstein: W. Fr. Bachs Bewerbung in Frankfurt’, BJb 1925, 138–9

W. Guericke: Friedemann Bach in Wolfenbüttel und Braunschweig, 1771–1774 (Brunswick, 1929)

H. Miesner: Einige neu entdeckte Notizen über die Familie Friedemann Bachs’, BJb 1931, 147–8

H. Miesner: Urkundliche Nachrichten über die Familie Bach in Berlin’, BJb 1932, 157–63

H. Kelletat: Zur Geschichte der deutschen Orgelmusik in der Frühklassik (Kassel, 1933)

H. Miesner: Beziehungen zwischen den Familien Stahl und Bach’, BJb 1933, 71–6

H. Miesner: Graf v. Keyserlingk und Minister v. Happe: zwei Gönner der Familie Bach’, BJb 1934, 101–15

H. Miesner: Portraits aus dem Kreise Philipp Emanuel und Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs’, Musik und Bild: Festschrift Max Seiffert, ed. H. Besseler (Kassel, 1938), 101–12

W. Serauky: Musikgeschichte der Stadt Halle, ii/2 (Halle, 1942/R)

C. Freyse: Die Schulhefte Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs’, BJb 1951–2, 103–19

J. Müller-Blattau: Bindung und Freiheit: zu W.F. Bachs Fugen und Polonaisen’, Festschrift Wilhelm Fischer, ed. H. von Zingerle (Innsbruck, 1956)

G.B. Weston: Some Works Falsely Ascribed to Friedemann Bach’, Essays on Music in Honor of Archibald Thompson Davison (Cambridge, MA, 1957), 247–52

E. Simon: Mechanische Musikinstrumente früherer Zeiten und ihre Musik (Wiesbaden, 1960)

W. Strube: Ein unbekanntes Probespiel Friedemann Bachs in Halberstadt’, Walcker-Hausmitteilungen, xxxi (July 1963), 42–3

W. Braun: ‘Material zu Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs Kantatenaufführungen in Halle (1746–1764)’ Mf, xviii (1965), 267–76

P. Schleuning: Die Freie Fantasie: ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der klassischen Klaviermusik (Göppingen, 1973)

H.-J. Schulze: Ein “Drama per musica” als Kirchenmusik: zu Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs Aufführungen der Huldigungskantate bwv205a’, BJb 1975, 133–40

E. Borysenko: The Cantatas of Wilhelm Friedemann Bach (diss., U. of Rochester, 1981)

H.-J. Schulze: Ein dubioses “Menuetto con Trio di J.S. Bach”’, BJb 1982, 143–50

H.-J. Schulze: Studien zur Bach-Überlieferung im 18. Jahrhundert (Leipzig und Dresden, 1984)

C. Henzel: Zu Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs Berliner Jahren’, BJb 1992, 107–12

P. Wollny: Studies in the Music of Wilhelm Friedemann Bach: Sources and Style (diss., Harvard U., 1993)

P. Wollny: Sara Levy and the Making of Musical Taste in Berlin’, MQ, lxxvii (1993), 651–88

P. Wollny: Ein unbekanntes Autograph von Wilhelm Friedemann Bach’, BJb 1994, 185–90

P. Wollny: Wilhelm Friedemann Bach’s Halle Performances of Cantatas by his Father’, Bach Studies 2, ed. D. Melamed (Cambridge, 1995), 202–28

Bach, §III: Individual members

(9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

(46) (b Weimar, 8 March 1714; d Hamburg, 14 Dec 1788). Composer and church musician, the second surviving son of (7) Johann Sebastian Bach (24) and his first wife, Maria Barbara. He was the most important composer in Protestant Germany during the second half of the 18th century, and enjoyed unqualified admiration and recognition particularly as a teacher and keyboard composer.

1. Early years.

2. Berlin.

3. Hamburg.

4. Character and temperament.

5. Works: general.

6. Keyboard music.

7. The ‘Essay’.

8. Chamber music.

9. Orchestral works.

10. Vocal music.

11. Reception.

WORKS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

1. Early years.

He was baptized on 10 March 1714, with Telemann as one of his godfathers. In 1717 he moved with the family to Cöthen, where his father had been appointed Kapellmeister. His mother died in 1720, and in spring 1723 the family moved to Leipzig, where Emanuel began attending the Thomasschule as a day-boy on 14 June 1723. J.S. Bach said later that one of his reasons for accepting the post of Kantor at the Thomasschule was that his sons’ intellectual development suggested that they would benefit from a university education. Emanuel Bach received his musical training from his father, who gave him keyboard and organ lessons. There may once have been some kind of Clavierbüchlein für Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach containing early compositions by Wilhelm Friedemann and works by the young C.P.E. Bach himself, as well as educational pieces by his father. J.F. Reichardt’s reference to the difficulty of playing the string parts in Bach’s orchestral works may be taken to indicate that he also learnt the violin or viola, but the argument that the difficulties result from his having held the violin incorrectly because he was left-handed is not convincing. From the age of about 15 he took part in his father’s musical performances in church and in the collegium musicum. He appears relatively seldom as a copyist, no doubt because, as an able musician himself, he was usually excused such duties. The one large-scale work of sacred music in Leipzig mainly copied by him is the anonymous St Luke Passion bwv246, obviously arranged by J.S. Bach to an urgent deadline for Good Friday 1730. On 1 October 1731 Emanuel matriculated at Leipzig University. Following his godfather’s example, he studied law, although he was obviously destined for a musical career. His first compositions were probably written about 1730. They consisted mainly of keyboard pieces and chamber music as it was understood in the 18th century (i.e. solos with continuo, trios and concertos).

At the age of 19 Emanuel applied unsuccessfully for the position of organist at St Wenzel in Naumburg (the letter of application, dated 19 August 1733, refers incorrectly to the cathedral of St Peter und Paul). In September 1734 he moved to the university in Frankfurt an der Oder, where he was prominent in musical activities; the Musikalische Akademie mentioned in his autobiography would have been a student collegium musicum. Besides his own compositions, he performed works by his father in Frankfurt, including the Ouverture in D major bwv1068, the Coffee Cantata and the Concerto in D minor bwv1052 in what was probably his own arrangement (bwv1052a). He also wrote occasional pieces for university events and for weddings. The genealogy of the Bach family compiled by J.S. Bach about 1735 makes it clear that C.P.E. Bach was also teaching the keyboard in Frankfurt. In about 1738 he was offered the opportunity to go on an educational tour abroad as companion to Heinrich Christian von Keyserlingk, a son of Reichsgraf Hermann Carl von Keyserlingk, a patron of J.S. and W.F. Bach. However, his appointment to the service of Crown Prince Frederick of Prussia prevented him from accepting.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

2. Berlin.

The background to Bach’s entry into the service of the Prussian court is not clear. He says in his autobiography that his appointment became official only after the prince succeeded to the throne (as Frederick II) on 31 May 1740, but he then had the honour of accompanying the ‘first flute solo’ played by the new king ‘alone at the harpsichord’. The first mention of Bach in the court budget is as one of ‘those who joined the Kapelle in 1741’, so he must initially have been paid from the prince’s privy purse. The orchestra consisted of some 40 musicians and was one of the largest in Germany. It had grown out of the crown prince’s Kapelle in Ruppin and Rheinsberg, which was regarded as an outstanding ensemble, with Carl Heinrich Graun as Kapellmeister and his brother Johann Gottlieb as leader. Frederick, who took flute lessons from J.J. Quantz and studied composition with J.S. Bach’s pupil J.F. Agricola, usually played in the concerts himself. He was an enthusiastic advocate of the new italianate style of the time, and was also interested in Italian opera, which he promoted in the opera house inaugurated on 7 December 1742. As an absolute, though enlightened, monarch, Frederick dictated large areas of the musical life of Berlin and exerted considerable influence on the lively development of music in the city between about 1740 and 1755, but from the beginning of the Seven Years War at the latest his taste ceased to develop, and he eventually contributed to the stultification of musical life at court. The belief that Bach was poorly paid for his services is unfounded. His salary was 300 thalers a year from the time he took up his duties, as much as was paid to any of the other musicians engaged at the same time. Only those above him in the hierarchy – the Kapell- and Konzertmeister and the singers at the opera – were paid a distinctly higher salary.

Unless they were busy with chamber music, which was initially played to Frederick the Great daily, the court musicians took part in the performances of the Berlin Hofoper. Bach’s duties were considerably reduced from 1742 at the latest, when Christian Friedrich Schale was appointed second harpsichordist (succeeded by Christoph Nichelmann in 1745); the harpsichordists alternated monthly, and each drew a full salary. This meant that Bach could pursue other activities as a keyboard teacher and composer. His teaching in Berlin inspired the writing of his Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen (Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments; see §7 below), the most important 18th-century German-language treatise on the subject. However, Bach never won recognition at court as a composer and virtuoso: Frederick would allow only Hasse, the Graun brothers, Quantz and Agricola that status. Even the dedication to him of Bach’s first published work, the Prussian Sonatas h24–9 (w48) made no lasting impression on the king.

As early as 1743 an attack of the gout that was to trouble Bach all his life obliged him to visit the Bohemian spa of Teplitz for treatment. Early in 1744 he married Johanna Maria Dannemann, the daughter of a Berlin wine merchant. Of the three children of the marriage who lived to adulthood – Johann Adam (1745–89), Anna Carolina Philippina (1747–1804) and Johann Sebastian, also known as Johann Samuel (1748–78) – only the youngest showed any artistic inclinations. He became a painter, but died at the age of 30 in Rome. On 7 May 1747 the famous meeting between Johann Sebastian Bach and Frederick II, to which we owe the Musical Offering bwv1079, took place in Potsdam. However, it brought no improvement in Emanuel Bach’s position at court, and his efforts to leave Berlin can be traced from that time. On 25 August he completed an impressive and ornate vocal work, his Magnificat h772 (w215), which was intended to pave his way to a post as a church musician and was evidently performed in Leipzig during his father’s lifetime, but his applications for the position of Thomaskantor in Leipzig in 1750 and 1755 failed, even though he had Telemann’s support, and so did an application for the post of organist at the Johanniskirche in Zittau in 1753. A journey in early summer 1751 took him to Bückeburg, where his younger half-brother Johann Christoph Friedrich had been a court musician since early 1750. The occasion for the visit was the award of the Order of the Great Eagle by Frederick II to his childhood friend Count Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst zu Schaumburg-Lippe, and Bach dedicated his two trios h578–9 (w161) to the art-loving count. He travelled home by way of Halberstadt, Brunswick and Hamburg, where he visited Johann Mattheson on 15 June, and no doubt he also took the opportunity of visiting his godfather Telemann, with whom he regularly corresponded. Three years later, on 21 June 1754, he stood godfather to his cousin Johann Ernst Bach’s son Johann Carl Philipp in Eisenach; he combined this private reason for travelling with his professional interests, and gave concerts in Gotha and Kassel.

C.P.E. Bach took part in the première of Graun’s Tod Jesu on 26 March 1755, playing continuo. Tensions at the Berlin court came to a head that year. In his treatise Die Melodie, nach ihrem Wesen sowohl, als nach ihren Eigenschaften (Danzig, 1755) Christoph Nichelmann had criticized Emanuel Bach’s style for its affectation; Bach commissioned a polemical riposte by ‘Caspar Dünkelfeind’ – in all probability the organist Christoph Gottlieb Schröter of Nordhausen, a friend of the Bach family – and this in turn unleashed a further onslaught from Nichelmann. Early in May 1755, in a memorandum which survives only in extracts, Bach complained to the king about what he regarded as Nichelmann’s unwarrantedly preferential financial treatment, and threatened to give notice. Although the details are not known, this dispute finally led to Nichelmann’s leaving the service of the court, while Bach’s salary was raised by 200 thalers. On 1 February 1756 the young C.F.C. Fasch was appointed second harpsichordist at the standard salary of 300 thalers.

As a result of these quarrels Bach evidently distanced himself still further from court life. He mingled more in the private musical circles of Berlin, although again not many details are known. Some conclusions about the people who were Bach’s friends may be drawn from the character pieces in h79–82, 89–98 etc. (w117), most of them portraying prominent characters in the cultural life of the city, and from certain secular occasional compositions such as the aria La Sophie h125 (w117.40) and the song L'Ernestine h24 (w117.38). Bach was a member of the so-called first Berlin lied school, founded by Christian Gottfried Krause, and played a prominent, but not central, part in it. His songwriting brought him into close touch with F.W. Marpurg, the leading Berlin music critic at the time. Bach assisted Marpurg by providing music examples for his treatises (e.g. the fugues h76 and 99 (w119.1 and 2) and two Allegros h338 (w116.16 and 17)), and he also wrote a short essay on double counterpoint printed in Marpurg’s Historisch-kritische Beyträge, iii (Berlin, 1757/R). His merits were appreciated at this period in the circle around Princess Anna Amalia and Kirnberger. He composed most of the organ sonatas for the princess, and possibly the two organ concertos h444 and 446 (w34 and 35) as well. The importance of these private musical circles increased after 1756, for the outbreak of the Seven Years War meant that Frederick II visited Berlin only occasionally, and on the whole there was no court life. The war brought with it conditions of great austerity for the people of Berlin. Salaries were paid in paper money which had only a fifth of its supposed purchasing power. In view of the military threat, Bach joined the militia, but when Berlin was occupied by the Russian army in 1758 he moved to Zerbst to stay with Carl Fasch’s family. He made a brief visit to the court of Mecklenburg in Strelitz in 1762.

The close relationship of the character pieces to the sonatinas for one or two harpsichords and orchestra, written between 1762 and 1764, suggests that they were intended for domestic performance, like some of the keyboard and chamber music works, for example h143 and 507 (w65.33 and w74). Bach composed most of his symphonies at the same time, and probably for the same kind of milieu. He made his name throughout Germany with a quantity of publications in almost all musical genres apart from vocal compositions with orchestral accompaniment. Typically, it was he rather than his brother Wilhelm Friedemann, director of church music in Halle, who was commissioned to write a festive work for trumpets and drums to celebrate in that city the Peace of Hubertusburg in 1763 (the piece is now lost, unless it is identical with the march h621 (w188), which bears the still unexplained epithet ‘für die Arche’. After Telemann’s death on 25 June 1767 Bach applied to succeed him as music director of the principal churches of Hamburg. His competitors for the post were H.F. Raupach, J.H. Rolle (music director at Magdeburg), and his own half-brother Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach; he narrowly defeated Rolle in the second and deciding ballot. There is no evidence to support the statement in his autobiography of 1773 that he had previously turned down several other offers. Although he was appointed to Hamburg on 6 November 1767, he did not arrive there until March 1768: at first Frederick II refused to release him, and then a particularly hard winter made it impossible for him to leave Berlin any earlier. Meanwhile Georg Michael Telemann, the composer’s grandson, acted as interim director of church music in Hamburg. By appointing Bach her honorary Kapellmeister Princess Amalia brought a note of conciliation to the close of his period in Berlin. Johann Christian Schramm (c1711–96) from Dresden was appointed his successor in the royal Kapelle.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

3. Hamburg.

Bach took over as director of sacred music in Hamburg on Easter Saturday (2 April) 1768, but he was not officially inaugurated in his new post until 19 April. A festive work written for the occasion by G.M. Telemann exists (in D-Bsb Mus.ms.21729), but Bach’s inaugural address, De nobilissimo artis musicae fine, is lost. His duties in Hamburg were much like his father’s in Leipzig. He was on the staff of the Hamburg Lateinschule (still in existence today as the Johanneum) and was responsible for the teaching of music there. However, he claimed one of Telemann’s privileges, that of engaging a deputy at his own expense to teach at the school. His main task was the organization of the music in Hamburg’s five principal churches, the Michaeliskirche, Jakobikirche, St Katharinen, Nikolaikirche and Petrikirche. According to a report made after Bach’s death, the number of musical performances was almost 200 a year – a difficult task for a small choral establishment consisting of pupils from the Johanneum and a few professional singers.

Telemann’s 40 years and more in Hamburg and his extraordinary creative powers, which remained with him into old age, had aroused expectations which Bach certainly could not satisfy. He worked relatively slowly, and consequently tried to avoid the pressure of deadlines by planning well ahead. For instance, the Passion music for 1768 was evidently written for the most part while Bach was still in Berlin (and its performance was postponed until 1769 because of his delayed move to Hamburg), and in subsequent years he usually completed his Easter preparations by the previous Christmas. A plan to compose two cantata cycles for the church year, mentioned to G.M. Telemann in 1771, was never realized. Instead, much of the music he performed was by other composers (in particular Georg Benda, G.A. Homilius and G.P. Telemann), which Bach adapted, as was usual at the time, by changing the instrumentation, composing additional movements and, in particular, revising recitatives. Only for the ‘Quartalsmusiken’ – performed in turn in all the principal churches at the main festivals of Easter, Michaelmas and Christmas – did he write works of his own in appreciable numbers. In line with a tradition dating from the 17th century, Bach annually compiled Passions based on the accounts from the four Gospels in strict rotation, and these were performed in several smaller churches as well as in the principal churches of Hamburg. The official sacred music of the city thus consisted to a great extent of works by other composers and pasticcios, laying Bach open at first to accusations of performing his duties only vicariously. On the other hand, he took great pains with works commissioned for special occasions, such as the inauguration of clerical or administrative officials or mayoral funerals. Twice, in 1780 and 1783, he composed music for the celebrations of the ‘Bürgerkapitäne’, and in 1770 an Italian festive chorus for a visit by the Crown Prince of Sweden, later King Gustav III. He turned his attention in particular to oratorio, which was performed as often in churches as in concert halls, although obviously not within regular church services, since female singers took part (including Elisabeth Winthem, Klopstock’s wife). All three of Bach’s sacred oratorios – Die Israeliten in der Wüste, Die Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu and the cantata h776 (w233), derived from the first Passion music Bach composed for Hamburg – were performed beyond Hamburg itself; they are among the most important Protestant vocal works of the second half of the 18th century.

Bach’s circle of friends during his early years in Hamburg included Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, whom he had known in Berlin, and the syndics Hans Jacob Faber and Jacob Schuback; later, his friends included theologians such as Christoph Christian Strum, the professor of mathematics Johann Georg Büsch, who with Christoph Daniel Ebeling was head of the Handlungsakademie, and the physicians Friedrich Ludwig Christian Cropp, Johann Albert Heinrich Reimarus and Johann August Unzer. Bach was also a close friend of F.G. Klopstock, living in retirement, and he took care to maintain friendships outside Hamburg: with J.N. Forkel in Göttingen, J.J. Eschenburg in Brunswick, J.G.I. Breitkopf in Leipzig, Johann Friedrich Hering in Berlin, Ewald von Grotthus in Gieddatz (Curland) and Johann Jacob Heinrich Westphal in Schwerin. Bach was regarded as the undisputed leading figure in the musical society of Hamburg, and many musicians, men of letters and other artists visiting the city sought him out. The accounts relating to his early years in Hamburg by Matthias Claudius, Charles Burney and J.F. Reichardt are particularly informative. At this time Bach was much involved in teaching, and his pupils included professional musicians such as J.D. Holland, C.F.G. Schwencke and Nils Schiørring, and the future mayor of Altona, Casper Siegfried Gähler.

Besides performing his official duties as director of church music – a post that (except during a severe illness from February to April 1772) he filled conscientiously until his last years while (unlike Telemann and Schwencke) remaining on good terms with the contentious Hamburg clergy – Bach assumed from the beginning a leading position in the city’s concert life. In winter 1768–9 he announced a series of 20 subscription concerts; the following winter there were at least six concerts, and 12 Wednesday concerts were advertised for winter 1771–2. Over the next few years there were considerably fewer concerts in which Bach featured as a keyboard player; as far as is known, he stopped giving public concerts when he was 65. As well as his own oratorios he performed a number of other composers’ works in Hamburg, including Graun’s Tod Jesu and Telemann’s Seliges Erwägen and the Donnerode. Bach brought his public appearances (outside his official duties) to a close with a ‘historical’ concert on 9 April 1786, consisting of one of his own orchestral symphonies, isolated movements from works by J.S. Bach (the Credo from the Mass in B minor with a newly composed introduction) and Handel’s ‘I know that my Redeemer liveth’ from Messiah and his own two most powerful compositions, the Magnificat and the Heilig for double choir h778 (w217). Bach remained actively creative until the last year of his life, although he was in poor health after summer 1788. The double concerto for keyboard, piano and orchestra w47 (probably commissioned for Sara Levy in Berlin), the three quartets for harpsichord, flute and viola h537–9 (w93–5), preparations for a collection of songs, h700–60 (w200), published by Donatius in Lübeck in 1789, and a pasticcio Passion for 1789 were all written in Bach’s last year. He died on 14 December 1788 of a ‘chest ailment’, and was buried on 19 December in the crypt of the Michaeliskirche (the location of his grave was identified only in 1925). After his death Johanna Maria Bach temporarily administered the office of music director. Proposals for a reorganization of church music in Hamburg meant that a successor to her husband was not appointed until autumn 1789, and it was only in December that year that she handed the post over to C.F.G. Schwencke, who had been elected on 1 October in preference to J.A. Hiller and Bach’s own protégé J.N. Forkel.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

4. Character and temperament.

Among his contemporaries Emanuel Bach had the reputation of being a pleasant, sociable man with a gift for wordplay, who was not afraid of making critical remarks even to persons of high rank. He seldom took sides in musical controversies, but when he did he expressed himself vigorously; some light is shed on his own views by his comment, printed in the Hamburgischer Unpartheyischer Correspondent of 20 September 1785, on an English newspaper report claiming that there was tension between him and Haydn: ‘It is my belief that every master has his own true worth. Praise and blame can do nothing to alter it. The work alone allots praise or blame to the master, and I therefore take everyone as I find him’. He reacted angrily to criticism of his father and to the publication of unauthorized editions, vehemently attacking Birnstiel’s edition of J.S. Bach’s chorales and Rellstab’s reprints of his own works issued when Rellstab took over the publishing firm of Emanuel’s friend G.L. Winter. Nor did he conceal his dislike of the modern Italian music of the time, in particular of such excesses as the intrusion into sacred music of stylistic elements from comic opera. He also had a low opinion of the style developed by Johann Schobert and by his own half-brother Johann Christian.

Bach was a good businessman. Most of his publications were commercially successful, and indeed he preferred not to publish a work if he thought it unlikely to sell, as in the case of his Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu in 1784. His business acumen was sometimes interpreted as avarice, but he was extremely generous to his friends and family, and would give them copies of his printed works and autograph manuscripts that he no longer needed, or let them have copies at cost price to himself. He took his half-brother Johann Christian into his family after their father’s death and later did the same for his nephew Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst on the latter’s return from England; he also provided regular financial support for his widowed half-sister Elisabeth Juliana Friederica. He was particularly close to his half-brother Johann Christoph Friedrich, exchanging sheet music with him on a regular basis.

Bach would often play for hours to visitors, his favourite instrument being a clavichord built by Gottfried Silbermann which he passed on to his pupil and friend Ewald von Grotthuss in 1781, together with the rondo Abschied von meinem Silbermannischen Claviere h272 (w66); Grotthuss responded with thanks in the form of a rondo composed by himself. Writing about rhetoric in his Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments, Bach emphasized that the musician must be able to place himself in the same emotional state as he wishes to arouse in his hearers, and warned against mannerisms and exaggerations. When improvising he seemed quite enraptured; his playing as a whole was notable for its clarity and cantabile style, and left a lasting impression on his audience.

Like many other musicians and music lovers of the time, Bach owned a large collection of portraits of musicians, which he was always seeking to extend through purchase and exchange. He even toyed with the idea of publishing a catalogue of his collection, but that project was realized only after his death.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

5. Works: general.

In a composing career of almost 60 years Emanuel Bach wrote over 1000 separate works, ranging from songs to oratorios and from keyboard dance movements to orchestral symphonies. He must have begun compiling a catalogue of his own works at an early date, and it served as the basis for the Nachlass-Verzeichnis, or catalogue of his musical estate, printed in Hamburg in 1790. By about 1770 at the latest Bach had lists available enabling him to choose works for customers outside Hamburg who gave him details of the compositions they wanted and those they already owned. The Nachlass-Verzeichnis lists his works systematically classified into groups, with dates and places of composition. It gives information about published editions, while unpublished works are identified by their titles and the first words of the text where applicable, or by the opening bars in the case of instrumental works. The Nachlass-Verzeichnis is probably the earliest catalogue of the works of a single composer that can still satisfy the requirements of scholars today. Its publication served as both a record of Bach’s creative activity and part of the provision he made in old age for his wife and children, since it was intended to facilitate the purchase of compositions by interested parties outside Hamburg. The relatively large number of extant copies made in Hamburg around 1790 shows that the opportunity was taken up.

The Nachlass-Verzeichnis is our major source for the precise details of Bach’s output, and in many cases it gives more information about dates and places of composition than the autograph manuscripts. However, it is reliable only on the works of Bach’s prime. In the course of a systematic survey of his music collection made in 1786, he destroyed a number of juvenilia, sketches and rejected versions (the precise details cannot now be determined), as we learn from a letter he wrote to Eschenburg on 21 January 1786. Moreover, certain occasional works, such as the cantatas of his Frankfurt period, may no longer have been available to him at this date.

Bach’s musical estate remained intact until about 1797, apart from a few items auctioned in 1789. After Johanna Maria Bach’s death, however, the composer’s daughter Anna Carolina Philippina began disposing of some items, particularly works by other composers and portraits. After her death what remained of the estate was sold at auction. Much of it came into the hands of such collectors as Casper Siegfried Gähler in Altona and Georg Poelchau in Hamburg, and passed from their collections to Berlin before the great fire of 1842 in Hamburg. At the beginning of the 20th century, consequently, almost all the works were still extant in Bach’s autograph or in copies made under his supervision, and were available for modern scholarly evaluation. However, considerable losses, particularly of the occasional works written in Hamburg, were sustained during World War II when sources in the Berlin Singakademie and the library of Königsberg University were removed or destroyed. Those from the Berlin Singakademie were, however, recovered in Kiev in 1999. The next most important collection after Poelchau’s was made by the Schwerin organist Johann Jacob Heinrich Westphal (1756–1825). It comprised almost all the instrumental works in original prints and manuscript copies, as well as many vocal compositions. Most of it is now in the library of the Brussels Conservatory, which also acquired original manuscripts of symphonies and chamber works from the Guido Richard Wagener collection; a smaller portion passed with the Fétis collection to the Bibliothèque Royale Albert Ier, also in Brussels. There are also particularly valuable collections in the Library of Congress, Washington (purchased mainly in the Berlin antiquarian market around 1900), the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris (including autographs from the Charles Malherbe and Auguste Vincent collections), and the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Vienna (domestic copies and autographs from Brahms’s estate and gifts from Anthony van Hoboken). In spite of losses the source material is good, and scholars face few problems of authenticity or chronology.

We have no information about Bach’s methods of composing. However, the few extant sketches (most of which survive only because he wrote them on blank spaces in manuscripts of other works destined to be kept) suggest that after the 1740s he sketched his compositions extensively before polishing them. Interim sketches of vocal works are usually set out on two systems (voice and bass), with only minimal indication of the text. Instrumental works are usually notated on one system only, though with indications of harmony or important subsidiary parts. Final versions often diverge only slightly from the sketches; however, some sketches do not fit any of the extant works, and we may surmise that the composer quite often noted down ideas which he never developed. There is support for this theory in a comment Bach made, on the composition of keyboard fantasias, in a letter to Forkel of 10 February 1775, saying that he had ‘a great many collectanea for that purpose’, and in the existence of a manuscript entitled Miscellanea musica h867 (w121, unfortunately extant only in a copy), only part of which coincides with the collectanea mentioned in the letter.

Bach’s ornamentation, arrangements and revisions pose considerable musicological problems because of the complex relations between the sources, Bach’s own mingling of procedures and the terminological inconsistency that still persists. His ornamentation entailed the writing down of procedures adopted in performance, as he remarked in a letter of 28 April 1784 to Johann Heinrich Grave in Greifswald, accompanying a copy of the Concerto in C minor h441 (w31) of 1753: ‘The concerto in C minor used to be one of my showpieces. The recitative is written out very much as I played it’. Prominent among his ornamental devices are the ‘varied repeats’, probably used for the first time in the third movement of the Probestück h74 (w63.5) in the Essay and developed further in the six sonatas h126, 136–40 (w50: 1760) dedicated to Princess Anna Amalia of Prussia. In his preface to the collection he described its aesthetic background, commenting that ‘variation in repeats is indispensable today’. It is expected to such a degree in performance, he adds, that the clumsiest of variations receive more applause than a faithful note-by-note rendering of the music as set down by the composer. He believed, he said, that ornamentation must suit the emotional affect of the piece, taking harmonic requirements into account, and must have some claim to be at least as good as the original. Here Bach was entering the debate on the variations of musical ideas expressed, for instance, in a series of articles signed ‘T.S.’ and published in the Berlinischer Magazin (reprinted in J.A. Hiller’s Wöchentliche Nachrichten) and in a contribution by F.W. Riedt to Marpurg’s Historisch-kritische Beyträge (ii, 1756). G.S. Löhlein’s op.2 sonatas (1768) are in direct line of descent from Bach. Except in the ‘Short and Easy Keyboard Pieces’ h193–203, 228–38 (w113, 1766;w114, 1766), Bach himself continued the practice of varied repeats only occasionally, for instance in the sonatas h240, 83 and 135 (w62.24, 65.29 and 65.32). However, a number of other sonatas and slow movements from concertos were varied and ornamented at dates that cannot now be determined; the Sonata in C major h150 (w51.1) even exists in two different ornamented versions, h157 and 174 (w65.36, 37). It is clear from the section ‘Variations and ornaments to certain sonatas and concertos for students’ in the Nachlass-Verzeichnis (p.53 no.11) that these ornaments were written down for teaching purposes. The original versions remained concurrent with, or were even preferred to, the ornamented versions and circulated in prints and authorized copies to which the ornamented versions represent alternatives. Ornamentation in the wider sense includes the cadenzas h264 (w120), numbering over 70. A striking feature is that several concerto movements are allotted more than one cadenza; a few bear general descriptions such as ‘cadenza for the Adagio’ and cannot be assigned to any of the surviving works.

Bach’s arrangements involve alterations in the scoring of a work. In the simplest cases they are merely alternative versions. Many of the Berlin trio sonatas exist in versions for two melody instruments and continuo or for one melody instrument and obbligato harpsichord; the Sonata in C h515 (w87), a special case, exists also in a version for two harpsichords. The composer’s arrangements here are chiefly limited to octave transpositions to suit the chosen instruments. There are variant settings among the concertos too: the Concerto in A minor of 1750 exists in authentic versions for cello (h432; w170), flute (h431; w166) and harpsichord (h430; w26); in all three versions the accompanying parts are the same except for some slight changes to the continuo. It is not always possible to be sure which is the original version. Other arrangements entail the rescoring of works for larger forces, particularly frequent in Bach’s symphonies. He also rearranged several songs with keyboard accompaniment for chorus; but it is debatable whether the term ‘arrangement’ is adequate for such processes of revision as occur in the reworking of Bitten, a strophic song with keyboard (h686.9; w194.9), as a four-part through-composed song motet (h826.3; w208.3).

Revision proper differs from the procedures described above in that the composer made substantial changes to the actual musical material and intended the second version to supersede the first. Revisions include newly composed or substitute movements (for example the new version of ‘Et misericordia’ in the Magnificat and that of ‘O Petrus, folge nicht’ in the Passion cantata), but above all reworkings of existing compositions, chiefly instrumental pieces from the Leipzig and Frankfurt periods, some of which Bach himself marked as ‘rewritten’ in the Nachlass-Verzeichnis. Judging from what can be traced in the sources, Bach cut some passages and extended others, eliminated whole movements, and now and then rewrote older works to adapt them to new compositional styles while retaining their form and thematic substance. Many of his early works, for instance the March bwv Anh.127, exist in three or more different versions. A number of major revisions are not noted in the Nachlass-Verzeichnis, including that of h211 (w65.44) the original central movement of which was incorporated in a revised form into the Sonata in B h282 (w59.3) in 1748 and replaced by a few transitional chords in h211 (w65.44), and that of Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu between 1774 and 1778, when Bach added a slow introduction and replaced the dramatis personae in the recitatives with a neutral testo. Although Emanuel Bach, like his father and his elder brother Wilhelm Friedemann, continued working on his compositions all his life, adapting them to changing conditions of performance and to different aesthetic requirements, various main phases of revision can be distinguished. Between 1743 and 1747 he revised works written before 1740; in the context of his publishing activities around 1760 he revised many earlier works, for example h171–2, 216 (w116.1, 2, 5) and h77 (w62.14); and during his Hamburg period he added wind parts to many of the orchestral works. A final phase of revision around 1786 was no doubt carried out so as to leave his musical estate in good order for his heirs; it included the systematic replacement of the slow movements in the sonatinas h7–12 (w64) in order to remove their outmoded tonal unity with a view to publication. There is no suitable term for Bach’s transfer of thematic material to a different musical genre, as occurred with some of the character pieces.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

6. Keyboard music.

The keyboard music that Bach composed almost without interruption from about 1730 to the last years of his life lies at the heart of his creative work. The sources suggest that he began by composing separate dance movements, marches, minuets and polonaises. Some of these were entered in his own hand (c1732) in the Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena Bach. Models were to hand in the first part of J.S. Bach’s Clavier-Übung; the Partita in G major bwv829 seems to have made the greatest impression on him, as can be seen from the minuet with hand-crossing, h1·5 (w111), and the G major suite (D-Bsb Mus.ms.Bach P 368), which is anonymous but can be shown to be at least partly by C.P.E. Bach. Dance movements could then be put together into cycles, preserving tonal unity; examples may be found in a manuscript volume (D-Hs ND VI 3191), thought until 1991 to have been lost, which contains sources going back to Bach’s years in Frankfurt. The composition of suites seems to have been considerably more important to Bach’s early creative period than the catalogue in the Nachlass-Verzeichnis might suggest. It is noticeable that the young Bach adopted the standard movements of his father’s suites only in exceptional cases; only the allemande and gigue are prominent, and feature in some of the keyboard ‘sonatas’ of the 1730s and 40s. Otherwise the composer showed an early preference for fantasia-like movements, which for all their technical deficiencies display harmonic boldness and a high degree of originality. J.S. Bach’s two- and three-part Inventions also provided an important stimulus (as they did later to Emanuel’s half-brother Johann Christoph Friedrich), for example in the first movement of h3 (w65.1); three-part invention style occurs chiefly in slow movements, including those of the sonatas h26 (w48.3) and h34 (w49.5).

Two collections of six keyboard sonatas, h24–9 (w48; the ‘Prussian’ sonatas, printed in 1742) and h30–34, 36 (w49; the ‘Württemberg’ sonatas, intended for Bach’s pupil Carl Eugen of Württemberg and printed in 1744), form a landmark in the history of keyboard music. They indirectly bear out Mattheson’s polemical statement in Der vollkommene Capellmeister (Hamburg, 1739/R): ‘For some years now composers have been writing sonatas for keyboard to great acclaim, but they do not yet have the right form, wishing to be moved rather than to move; that is to say, they aim more at the touch of the fingers than to touch the heart’. J.F. Reichardt claimed with justice in his Musikalischer Almanach of 1796 that ‘no instrumental music had previously appeared in which as rich and yet well-ordered a harmony was united with such noble song, so much beauty and order with such originality, as in Bach’s first two sonata collections engraved in Nuremberg’. In these collections Bach systematically, and for the first time, showed how it was possible to write affecting keyboard music freed from the suite tradition, and he was able to develop his ideas over the following decades; the experimental instrumental recitative that serves as the central movement of the first Prussian sonata, for example, impressively illustrates a style of utterance to be found in the newest instrumental music. Unity of affect is evident in the dense thematic working of the opening movements of h24 (w48.1) and h30 (w49.1). Fantasia-like elements occur more particularly in the sonatas in E minor and B minor, h33, 36 (w49.3, 6), while the closing movement of h29 (w48.6) is particularly full of surprises. The unusual importance ascribed to these collections even by Bach’s contemporaries is evident from the fact that the Württemberg sonatas were still being reprinted in Vienna and Pest around 1800. Bach established quite early a basic three-movement sonata pattern in these collections, with fast opening and closing movements and a slow central movement in a related key. Later he also experimented with the use of different keys for all three movements, with transitional passages between movements and – particularly in the last years of his life – very short central movements. Like his father, Emanuel Bach regarded his printed collections as models, and made them as different as possible with a view to their usefulness in teaching.

Nowhere in Bach’s work is the distinction so clearly drawn between professional and amateur music-making, and between works written to commission and those for personal development, as in his keyboard compositions. The published works are principally for amateurs, particularly the collections published during the 1760s: the six ‘Easy Sonatas’ h162–3, 180–83 (w53; Leipzig 1766) and the six sonatas ‘à l'usage des dames’ h184–5, 204–7 (w54) eschew the daring of the early works. The Württemberg sonatas, with their greater technical and musical demands, constitute an exception among Bach’s printed works; unusually for Bach, they present public evidence that the composer was undergoing a personal mental crisis (most of the sonatas were written in Teplitz, where he was taking the waters in 1743, when an acute attack of gout at the age of only 30 seemed to endanger his career as a keyboard virtuoso). Most of the other experimental sonatas of this period were distributed by Bach to his friends only in manuscript copies or were published many years later; this group includes the sonatas h46–7 and 51 (w65.16–17 and 65.20) and the Sonata in F sharp minor h37 (w52.4).

Bach’s composition and publication of keyboard works temporarily moved into the background to some extent after 1770. He rounded off his keyboard writing with the six collections of keyboard sonatas ‘für Kenner und Liebhaber’; by public demand he included rondos in the second collection and rondos and fantasias in the third and subsequent collections. While the first collection, published in 1779, was a compilation of older compositions (h130 (w55.2) dates from as early as the 1750s), new compositions predominate in the later volumes, which employ a less astringent tonal language than the early keyboard sonatas and earned respect as individual creations fit to stand beside the works of Haydn and Mozart. The rondos were particularly popular, and for a while Bach considered publishing a separate collection of them. The number of subscribers began to fall, however, not necessarily because of any slackening of interest in Bach’s works but perhaps because of the competition provided by the soaring number of published keyboard sonatas by composers from north and central Germany and Vienna after about 1780; there was also a change in market conditions, with series sold in bookshops superseding individual subscriptions. From Bach’s letters to Breitkopf in May 1788, offering all remaining copies of the Clavier-Sonaten für Kenner und Liebhaber at a fixed price (obviously to spare his family the trouble of selling his works after his death), it is clear that at this point over half the entire edition of 6300 copies had been sold, bringing Bach a considerable profit of over 3000 thalers, or 10,000 marks (several times his annual salary).

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

7. The ‘Essay’.

Bach’s keyboard music cannot be assessed in isolation from his didactic writing. Around the middle of the 18th century amateur music-making assumed proportions scarcely imaginable previously. As a result, there was a growing demand for instruction books and performance manuals, particularly in Berlin, where music-making had been encouraged to an extraordinary degree by the example of the flute-playing King Frederick II. In 1750 Marpurg had published a short manual entitled Die Kunst das Clavier zu spielen, which proved so successful that it was reprinted the following year. With his Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments Emanuel Bach provided what was to be the leading keyboard tutor for a long period. Together with Quantz’s flute tutor of 1752, Leopold Mozart’s violin tutor of 1756, and J.F. Agricola’s singing manual of 1757 (after P.F. Tosi), it was the most important work of practical musical instruction of the second half of the 18th century.

The first (self-contained) part, which appeared in 1753, sets out the basics of keyboard performance in three sections, tacitly giving precedence to the elements of harmony. The first section deals with fingering, for, says Bach, ‘more is lost by incorrect fingering than can be compensated for by all the art and good taste in the world’. Bach encouraged the use of the thumb but recommended avoiding it on black keys, and restricted the crossing of fingers still quite common at the time. Naturally, all his examples show the fingering. The second section deals with ornaments, distinguishing between those indicated by signs (Quantz’s ‘essential ornaments’) and those written out in full (‘optional ornaments’). The third section deals with ‘good performance’, comprising both practical and aesthetic criteria. Bach saw the absence of practical examples in the existing keyboard tutors of the time as a great drawback, and accordingly added 18 Probestücke (‘sample pieces’) as an integral part of the Essay, in different keys and in ascending order of difficulty; put together, they form the six three-movement sonatas h70–75 (w63). These pieces could be used either as studies or for performance; the sonata in F minor in particular, with hand-crossing, circulated widely in manuscript copies.

The Essay was complemented in 1762 by a second part containing mainly instruction in continuo playing and correct accompaniment. It clearly reflects Bach’s own activity at court. In it he moves systematically from simple intervals and their description to ‘refinements’ and ‘necessary precautions’ in accompaniment. Together with Quantz’s Versuch einer Anweisung die Flöte traversiere zu spielen, Bach’s Essay is our most important source of information about performing practices and issues of taste prevalent in Berlin in the mid-18th century. Bach’s introduction is also of particular interest today, dealing as it does with the choice of instruments and basic questions of accompaniment, and so too is the final chapter on improvisation (with the Fantasia in D h160 (w117.14) as a practical illustration), which was unique in its time. The Essay held an undisputed position in the 18th century, and its influence was not confined to north Germany; Haydn bought and studied it as a young man and Christian Gottlieb Neefe introduced Beethoven to it. Both composers continued into the 19th century to use the Essay in their own teaching.

The first part was reprinted in 1759, and a revised edition (1787) contained six new single-movement sonatinas that Bach hoped would make up for the excessively rapid increase in difficulty of the Probestücke. A new edition of the second part, also with corrections and additions by the author, did not appear until 1797. The two collections of piano pieces with varied repeats, h193–203 (w113) and h228–38 (w114), were also very popular; h193–7 (w113.1–5) were reprinted in rival editions in Berlin, Vienna and Linz until 1800. Bach’s immense influence as a keyboard teacher made the ‘Bach manner’ accepted as a general term for an elegant style of performance throughout the second half of the 18th century.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

8. Chamber music.

Next to keyboard writing, chamber music was the most important experimental medium for Bach, particularly that with obbligato keyboard. His compositions in the genre from the 1730s onwards are notable for their originality and variety, and, like the keyboard compositions, they employ the whole spectrum of keys: the compositions for keyboard and violin, for instance, range from A to A major and from C to B minor. The trio in all its forms lies at the heart of his chamber music; solos (sonatas) featured less prominently after the 1740s, and in the last years of his life Bach turned to the quartet.

The early solos have continuo accompaniment, except for the flute solo in A minor h562 (w132), presumably composed for Frederick II. They correspond to the basic three-movement type described by J.A. Scheibe in the Critische Musikus (Leipzig, 2/1745, pp.681–3), and are succinctly written. All three movements are in the tonic key. The first is usually the slowest, and is followed by an Allegro (rarely, as in h554 (w127), in fugal style), followed in its turn by either a dance (usually a minuet with variations) or another Allegro. Locatelli’s flute sonatas op.2 (Amsterdam, 1732) may be regarded as the model.

Both numerically and in its importance for the history of the genre, the trio takes pre-eminence among Bach’s chamber compositions. The term ‘trio’ refers to the number of obbligato parts, not the number of participants. Trios with obbligato keyboard and those with continuo accompaniment are roughly equal in number; many survive in variant scorings, most of which may be regarded as authentic. While the solos aim at idiomatic treatment of the leading instrument, the upper parts of the trios, with the exception of some works with obbligato keyboard, are treated almost identically. There are contrapuntal trios, such as h567 and 569 (w143 and 145), in which the bass shares in the thematic material, and homophonic works in the Italian style, such as h578 (w161.2), in which the bass serves only as a harmonic foundation. The programmatic trio ‘Sanguineus und Melancholicus’ h579 (w161.1), published in 1751, made a great sensation.

Trios are found among Bach’s earliest compositions; they include a work (now lost) for violin, viola and bass, which according to the Nachlass-Verzeichnis (p.65, no.1) was ‘prepared together with Johann Sebastian Bach’. These works were revised while Bach was in Berlin; only in the case of h569 (w145) has the original version survived (as bwv1036). Comparison of the two versions shows Bach’s outstanding early talent and the tremendous progress he made by the time he produced the later version: the introductory fantasia and closing movement were cut, the two other movements thoroughly revised and a new opening movement added. In the 1740s, then, Bach entirely abandoned the basic four-movement form of the trio, which was initially at least as important to him as the three-movement form.

After the early 1760s figured bass played a less important role in Bach’s chamber music. During the process of composing the central movement of the Trio in C minor h514 (w78; 1763) he decided to write out the keyboard accompaniment instead of merely figuring the bass; the Trio in C major h515 (w87; 1766) has a fully written-out keyboard part. The pre-eminence of the keyboard is most in evidence in the three printed collections of keyboard trios, h522–34 (w89–91); the title-page of the English first edition of h525–30 (w89) fails even to mention the accompanying violin and cello parts. The type of rondo used by Bach in his trios and further developed later in his solo keyboard music, with the theme reappearing in different keys and varied, was noticed as a pointer to the future by Forkel (Musikalisch-kiritische Bibliothek, ii, 1778, pp.275–300) and was copied in England in particular (by Muzio Clementi and by A.F.C. Kollmann in his Essay on Practical Musical Composition, 1799). In his last year Bach composed three quartets (i.e. works with four obbligato parts) for keyboard, flute and viola, h537–9 (w93–5). Publication of these particularly attractive works was abandoned because of the composer’s death. During his Hamburg period he also wrote several smaller works for wind instruments; the occasion for their composition is not known. He wrote no chamber music for string instruments without continuo, a genre central to the development of the Classical style.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

9. Orchestral works.

All the known orchestral works by Bach belong to the ‘modern’ genres of symphony and concerto. A special part was also occupied in the early 1760s by a genre evidently of his own invention, the sonatina for one or two harpsichords and orchestra, which no other composer imitated; Bach’s sonatinas differ from the Viennese divertimento for keyboard and strings, which they outwardly resemble and which may have influenced the composer, in the enormous technical demands made on the soloists.

The symphonies of the Berlin period are all in three movements and most of them were conceived as string symphonies; in many cases wind parts were added only during Bach’s Hamburg period. The absence of repeat signs in the opening movements is noticeable; slow movements are often not separated from the others, and in many cases serve as a transition. The famous four-part string symphonies h657–62 (w182) owe their existence to a commission from Baron Gottfried van Swieten, and the composer was subject to no restrictions. J.F. Reichardt wrote an account of the rehearsals of these daring works, admiring their ‘great variety and novelty of form and modulation’. Their importance was also recognized by music dealers; manuscript copies made for van Swieten’s private use were sold, against Bach’s will, by Johann Traeg in Vienna, C.G. Thomas in Leipzig and J.C. Westphal in Hamburg. There must have been similar interest in the four orchestral symphonies h663–6 (w183), which Bach had published in 1780 with a dedication to Crown Prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia; they show an advanced handling of the wind instruments.

The keyboard concertos, numbering over 50, represent an early peak in the genre, the importance of which has not been fully appreciated. The first ones, like W.F. Bach’s early concertos, were written just after 1730. Their relationship to the concertos of J.S. Bach has yet to be studied, but it must be remembered that most of J.S. Bach’s harpsichord concertos did not take the shape in which they are familiar today until about 1738–9. C.P.E. Bach remained faithful to the ritornello form, and did not adopt dance, variation or rondo structures. Concertos such as h403, 409, 414, 420–22 and 442 (w1, 6, 11, 17–19 and 32) were widely distributed in their time. The orchestra here has equal importance with the soloist. The opening ritornello is usually on a broad scale, setting disparate musical ideas side by side, and these ideas recur in varying order in subsequent ritornellos. In the solo sections the orchestra continues to share in the thematic development. The uniformity of their overall structure, their consistent thematic development and their wide emotional range made the concertos of Bach’s early and middle Berlin period a model for other composers (e.g. J.F. Reichardt, J.W. Hertel and J.G. Müthel) and for the teaching of composition (H.C. Koch). The concertos of his later Berlin years and of his Hamburg period, written in the 1760s, contain more experimental features and are sometimes almost reminiscent of chamber music. With the exception of the six ‘easy’ concertos h471–6 (w43; Hamburg 1772) Bach prevented their dissemination during his lifetime.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

10. Vocal music.

Emanuel Bach was a member of the first Berlin lied school, although he did not play a leading role in it and took no part in the controversies about the particular merits of French, Italian and German music. He was particularly fond of humorous texts such as those by Lessing and Gleim, and did not set odes (as Karl Wilhelm Ramler and Moses Mendelssohn understood the term) or foreign-language texts. It was also only at the beginning that Bach contributed to the joint publications of the Berlin lied school. In 1762 he published a collection of his own which was reprinted soon after with a new title-page and reissued in 1774. Contemporary song composition distinguished between Sing-Oden and Spiel-Oden; Bach’s songs fall predominantly into the latter category, with keyboard accompaniment an integral component. This does not mean that the keyboard part is entirely obbligato – the songs are notated on two, not three staves – but that its melodic phrases and harmony contribute to the emotional effect. The melodies are not therefore primarily intended to be catchy, and Bach only occasionally composed songs ‘in the folk style’ (e.g. the drinking-song Der Wirt und die Gäste, to a text by Gleim). The vocal compass is large by the criteria of the time and does not exclude extreme registers, particularly in the holding of high notes.

The collection of 54 sacred songs and odes by C.F. Gellert, which Bach set to music immediately after publication of the texts in 1757, was of particular historical importance. By 1784 it had been issued five times in all and influenced many other composers (right up to the time of Beethoven and his Gellert songs op.48). Many of the songs were included in hymnals. During his Hamburg period Bach followed the success of the Gellert settings with a collection of psalm settings (h733; w196) in the translation by the Copenhagen superintendent Johann Andreas Cramer and two collections of sacred songs to texts by his friend the principal pastor of Hamburg, Christian Carl Sturm. Bach’s compositions of this type cover the entire contemporary spectrum: the Cramer psalms, for instance, include chorale melodies with bass, songs with continuo and some with a fully composed keyboard accompaniment (e.g. the setting of Psalm viii, ‘Wer ist so würdig als du’, which Bach later arranged as a chorus). In Hamburg he frequently adapted solo songs for choral performance, often giving the separate verses individual form and making song motets of them.

Bach had a hand in the compilation of the Danish psalter of 1778, edited by his pupil N. Schiørring, the Schleswig-Holstein hymnal (Altona 1780 and 1783) and the Hamburg hymnal which in 1787 superseded Telemann’s of 1730. His secular songs were much sought after by the editors of the Musenalmanach volumes which became fashionable in the 1770s. They met with a good deal of criticism, however, for by comparison with typical Musenalmanach works by F.W. Weis, C.G. Neefe, J.F. Reichardt and others Bach’s songs seemed sometimes rather contrived and stiff. C.F. Cramer’s plan to publish in his Polyhymnia the secular songs previously printed elsewhere could not immediately be realized. Bach supervised the preparation of an incomplete edition of his unpublished songs (h700–60 passim; w200) which appeared in Lübeck in 1789.

With the exception of the Magnificat of 1749 and the Easter cantata Gott hat den Herrn auferweckt (1756; the text, by the Berlin court preacher Leonhard Cochius, was set at the same time by Telemann, twv1:615), Bach’s sacred vocal works date from his Hamburg period. Most of them were composed for particular functions; Bach did not expect them to be widely distributed and in general he restricted his efforts on their preparation to what was essential. The Passions provide an illuminating example: according to Miesner, the six St Matthew Passions (most of which perished in World War II) all employed the same biblical framework. Bach composed the recitatives himself, but he usually used the turba choruses from his father’s St Matthew Passion. This framework was repeated unchanged every four years, with new arias, choruses and chorales for which Bach again often resorted to works by other composers. Similarly, the St John Passions are based on Telemann’s printed Passion music for 1745 (Ein Lämmlein geht und trägt die Schuld, twv5:30) and the St Mark Passions on a work by G.A. Homilius. The model for the St Luke Passions is not known. The Passions are thus pasticcios made up of a biblical framework, Bach’s own inserted movements (particularly arias and choruses, and in the 1770s and 80s hymns) and music by other composers. In this way he satisfied the constant demand for new Passion music without having to compose a new work himself each year.

Most of Bach’s occasional works are, however, original creations, particularly those for inaugurations of the clergy and the oratorios and serenatas he wrote for the ‘civic captains’ of Hamburg in 1780 and 1783 (the commission for 1788 came too late for him to meet it). His prime models were G.A. Homilius and Georg Benda. A certain development of the repertory in the inaugural music can be traced: the 1780s saw many repeat performances of older works and on occasion, at the request of the pastors, Bach even resorted to works in his library by Telemann. He distinguished meticulously between the price for composing a piece and that for simply performing or arranging one. The paucity of contrapuntal movements in his Hamburg church music is striking. An exception is the Heilig for double choir (composed in 1776), with its magnificent double fugue, ‘Herr, es ist dir keiner gleich’, which became an established part of the Michaelmas music and other festive music performed in Hamburg, and came to be regarded as one of the most important sacred vocal works of its time after its publication in 1779. Bach ascribed particular importance to his oratorios. The score of Die Israeliten in der Wüste, composed for the consecration of the Lazarethkirche in 1769, was printed in 1775. Die Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu, probably written in 1774 and revised 1778 at the latest, was offered for subscription in 1784 but did not appear in print until 1787. The third oratorio, the Passion cantata h776 (w233) derived from the composer’s first St Matthew Passion, was not printed but was nevertheless widely distributed: performances were given during the 18th century in Copenhagen, Berlin, Göttingen, Schwerin and Breslau, as well as in smaller places such as Halberstadt and Colditz. Bach himself owned two copies of the score, one of which he would lend to friends so that they could copy it. Because of the nature of the text, the distribution of the Passion cantata remained limited to Protestant Germany, but Die Auferstehung and Die Israeliten also reached Catholic parts of southern Germany and were occasionally even performed outside the German-language area (in England and Italy). Die Israeliten in particular maintained its place in the repertory as a concert oratorio until well into the 19th century.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

11. Reception.

Between 1740 and 1775 Bach’s many publications ensured a wide distribution for his works, which substantially influenced the development of instrumental music in Germany. With Gluck and later Haydn, he was regarded by his contemporaries as the leading representative of a specifically German musical taste, as is evident from J.K.F. Triest’s description of him after his death as ‘a Klopstock using notes instead of words’. His sphere of influence was not confined to northern Germany, where J.C.F. and J.E. Bach, J.F. Reichardt, J.A.P. Schulz, J.W. Hässler and others were directly subject to it; soon after 1760 it spread to south German and Austrian areas as well, particularly through the Essay and the printed collections of keyboard works. Although accounts of the esteem in which he was held by Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven are partly anecdotal and cannot be verified in detail, they are a strong indication that the north German master also influenced the Classical Viennese style, not so much formally as in matters of thematic development and the idiomatic treatment of instruments. However, the late keyboard works, the double concerto h479 (w47) and the quartets h537–9 (w93–5) make it clear that C.P.E. Bach should by no means be regarded merely as a precursor of Viennese Classicism, but as a composer who wrote in his own independent style throughout his life. The posthumous publication of his compositions between 1790 and about 1802 in Berlin, Leipzig and Vienna bears witness to his enduring fame.

Developments during the 19th century made Vienna the musical capital of the German-speaking part of Europe, even superseding Leipzig as the centre of the music-publishing industry, and to the extent that J.S. Bach was rediscovered as the ‘father’ of German keyboard music, so Emanuel Bach’s reputation began to fade.

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

WORKS

Catalogues:J.M. Bach, ed.: Verzeichniss des musikalischen nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790/R) [NV]A. Wotquenne: Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (1714–1788) (Leipzig, 1905/R) [W; addns from Kast (1958) shown as n.v.]E.E. Helm: Thematic Catalogue of the Works of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (New Haven, CT, 1989) [H]

Principal MS sources: A-Wgm, B-Bc, Br, D-Bsb, F-Pc, GB-Lbl, Kiev, Archive for Literature and Art; for full information see H

composition dates of instrumental works are from NV unless otherwise stated

solo keyboard

two keyboards

organ

chamber

orchestral

Oratorios and passions

sacred latin

sacred cantatas and choruses

secular arias and cantatas

songs, motets and chorales

theoretical works

arrangements

misattributed works

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

solo keyboard

Editions:Le trésor de pianistes (Paris, 1861–72) [T]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Die Sechs Sammlungen von Sonaten, freien Fantasien und Rondos für Kenner und Liebhaber, ed. C. Krebs (Leipzig, 1895, rev. 2/1953 by L. Hoffmann-Erbrecht) [K]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Klavierwerke, ed. H. Schenker (Vienna, 1902–3) [S]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Ausgewählte Kompositionen, ed. H. Riemann (Leipzig, n.d.) [R]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Kleine Stücke für Klavier, ed. O. Vrieslander (Hanover, 1930) [VK]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Vier leichte Sonaten, ed. O. Vrieslander (Hanover, 1932) [VL]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Sonaten und Stücke, ed. K. Hermann (Leipzig, 1938) [HS]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Leichte Tänze und Stücke für Klavier, ed. K. Hermann (Hamburg, 1949) [HL]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Six Sonatas for Keyboard, ed. P. Friedheim (New York, 1967) [F]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach 1714–1788: The Collected Works for Solo Keyboard, ed. D. Berg (New York, 1985) [facs.] [B i–vi]

Musikalisches Allerley (Berlin, 1761) [1761]

Musikalisches Mancherley (Berlin 1762–3) [1762]

Clavierstücke verschiedener Art (Berlin, 1765) [1765]

Kurze und leichte Clavierstücke mit veränderten Reprisen, i (Berlin, 1766) [17661]

Kurze und leichte Clavierstücke mit veränderten Reprisen, ii (Berlin, 1766) [17662]

Musikalisches Vielerley, ed. C.P.E. Bach (Hamburg, 1770) [1770]

sonatas: printed collections

 

 

 

 

H

W

 

 

 

 

24–9

48

Sei sonate per cembalo (Prussian sonatas), F, B, E, c, C, A, 1740–42 (Nuremberg, 1742/R in B i); ed. R. Steglich (Kassel, c1988), ed. in T, 29 ed. in R

 

30–31, 33, 32, 34, 36

49

Sei sonate per cembalo (Württemberg sonatas), a, A, e, B, E, b, 1742–3 (Nuremberg, 1744/R in B vi); ed. R. Steglich (Kassel, c1987), ed. in T

136–9, 126, 140

50

Sechs Sonaten für Clavier mit veränderten Reprisen, F, G, a, d, B, c, 1758–9 (Berlin, 1760/R in B i); ed. E. Darbellay (Winterthur, 1976), ed. E. Hashimoto (Tokyo, c1984), ed. P. Lescat (Courlay, c1992), 126 ed. in HS

 

150–51, 127–8 141, 62

51

Fortsetzung von Sechs Sonaten fürs Clavier, C, B, c, d, G, g, 1758–60 (Berlin, 1761/R in B i); ed. J.M. Rose (Bryn Mawr, PA, 1973), ed. E. Hashimoto (Tokyo, c1984), 127–8 ed. in HS

50, 142, 158, 37, 161, 129

52

Zweyte Fortsetzung von Sechs Sonaten fürs Clavier, E, d, g, f, E, e, 1744– 62 (Berlin, 1763/R in B i); ed. E. Hashimoto (Tokyo, c1984), 50 ed. in SBA, 142 ed. in F, 158 ed. in HS, 37 ed. in R

 

162, 180–82, 163, 183

53

Sechs leichte Clavier-Sonaten, C, B, a, D, C, F, 1762–4 (Leipzig, 1766/R in B i) [see also h 156–7]; 182 ed. in F

204–5, 184, 206, 185, 207

54

Six sonates pour le claveçin à l’usage des dames, F, C, d, B, D, A, 1765–6 (Amsterdam, 1770/R in B i); ed. K. Johnen (Frankfurt, 1950)

 

244, 130, 245, 186, 243, 187

55

Sechs Clavier-Sonaten für Kenner und Liebhaber, i, C, F, b, A, F, G, 1758–74 (Leipzig, 1779/R in B ii); ed. in K, S, 130, 186–7, 244 ed. in T

260, 246, 261, 269, 262, 270

56

Clavier-Sonaten nebst einigen Rondos … für Kenner und Liebhaber, ii: Rondo, C; Sonata, G; Rondo, D; Sonata, F; Rondo. a; Sonata, A: 1774–80 (Leipzig, 1780/R in B ii); ed. in K, 246, 269–70 ed. in T, 246 ed. in S

 

265, 247, 271, 208, 266, 173

57

Clavier-Sonaten nebst einigen Rondos … für Kenner und Liebhaber, iii: Rondo, E; Sonata, a; Rondo, G; Sonata, d; Rondo, F; Sonata, f: 1763–80 (Leipzig, 1781/R in B ii); ed. in K, 173, 208, 247 ed. in T, S, 173, 165 ed. in R

276, 273–4, 188, 267, 277–8

58

Clavier-Sonaten und freye Fantasien nebst einigen Rondos … für Kenner und Liebhaber, iv: Rondo, A; Sonata, G/E; Rondo, E; Sonata, e; Rondo, B; Fantasia, E; Fantasia, A: 1779–82 (Leipzig, 1783); ed. in K, 267, 274, 276 ed. in T, 188 ed. in S (inc.)

 

281, 268, 282–3, 279, 284

59

Clavier-Sonaten und freye Fantasien nebst einigen Rondos … für Kenner und Liebhaber, v: Sonata, e; Rondo, G; Sonata, B; Rondo, c; Fantasia, F; Fantasia, C: 1779–84 (Leipzig, 1785/R in B ii); ed. in K, 282–3 ed. in T, 268, 282 (inc.) ed. in S

288, 286, 289–90, 287, 291

61

Clavier-Sonaten und freye Fantasien nebst einigen Rondos … für Kenner und Liebhaber, vi: Rondo, E; Sonata, D; Fantasia, B; Rondo, d; Sonata, e; Fantasia, C: 1785–6 (Leipzig, 1787/R in B ii); ed. in K, 286 ed. in HS, 291 ed. in R

 

sonatas printed separately

 

 

H

W

 

 

 

2

62.1

Sonata, B, 1731, rev. 1744 (1761/R in B iii); ed. in T

 

20

62.2

Sonata, G, 1739, in Nebenstunden der berlinischen Musen (Berlin, 1762/R in B vi)

 

22

62.3

Sonata, D, 1740, in F.W. Marpurg: Clavier-Stücke mit einem practischen Unterricht für Anfänger und Geübtere, iii (Berlin, 1763/R in B vi)

 

38

62.4

Sonata, d, 1744, in Oeuvres mêlées, iii (Nuremberg, 1757/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

39

62.5

Sonata, E, 1744, in Oeuvres mêlées, iv (Nuremberg, 1758–9/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

40

62.6

Sonata, f, 1744 (1761/R in B iii); ed. in T, ed. D. Schulenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xviii (Oxford, 1995)

 

41

62.7

Sonata, C, 1744, in Collection récréative, ii (Nuremberg, 1761/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

55

62.8

Sonata, F, 1748, in Tonstücke für das Clavier vom Herrn C.P.E. Bach und andern classischen Meistern (Berlin, 1762/R in B vi, 2/1774 as C.P.E. Bachs, Nichelmanns und Händels Sonaten und Fugen); ed. in T

 

58

62.9

Sonata, F, 1749, in Oeuvres mêlées, i (Nuremberg, 1755/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

59

62.10

Sonata, C, 1749 (1762/R in B iii); ed. in T

 

63

62.11

Sonata, G, 1750 (1761/R in B iii)

 

66

62.12

Sonata, e, 1730s, rev. 1751 (1761/R in B iii), ed. in T

 

67

62.13

Sonata, D, in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1756/R in B iii)

 

70–75

63.1–6

18 Probestücke in 6 Sonaten, C, d, A, b, E, f, 1753 [exx. for h868, see ‘Theoretical works’]; facs. in B i, vi, 71–5 ed. in T, 75 ed. in R

 

77

62.14

Sonata, G, 1754 (1762/R in B iii)

 

105

62.15

Sonata, d, in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1757/R in B iii); ed. in T

 

116

62.16

Sonata, B, 1757, in Oeuvres mêlées, v (Nuremberg, 1759/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

117

62.17

Sonata, E, 1757, in Oeuvres mêlées, xii (Nuremberg, c1765/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

118–20

62.18–20

3 sonatas, g, G, C, 1757 (1762/R in B iii); 118–19 ed. in T, B, 119 ed. in F

 

131

62.21

Sonata, a, 1758, in Oeuvres mêlées, xi (Nuremberg, 1765/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

132

62.22

Sonata, b, 1758, in Collection récréative, i (Nuremberg, 1760/R in B vi); ed. in T

 

179

112.7

Sonata, d (1765/R in B ii); ed. in T

 

209

60

Sonata, c, 1766, ? rev. later (Leipzig and Dresden, 1785/R in B vi)

 

210

62.23

Sonata, g, 1766 (1770/R in B iii)

 

240

62.24

Sonata, F, 1769 (1770/R in B iii)

 

sonatas: manuscript

3–6

65.1–4

4 sonatas, F, a, d, e, 1731–3, rev. 1744; 3–5 facs. in B iii, 6 facs. in B iv, 5 ed. in T

7–12

64

6 sonatas, G, G, a, e, D, c, 1734, rev. 1744 and ?c1786; facs. in B iii, ed. K. Johnen (Frankfurt, 1952)

13

65.5

Sonata, e, 1735, rev. 1744; facs. in B iii

15–19

65.6–10

5 sonatas, G, E, C, B, A, 1736–8, rev. 1743–4; facs. in B iii, 15 ed. in T, 18 ed. in F

21

65.11

Sonata, g, 1739, rev. later; facs. in B iii, ed. in T, VL

23

65.12

Sonata, G, 1740, rev. later; facs. in B iii

32·5

65.13

Sonata, b, 1743; facs. in B iii, ed. in T

42–3

65.14–15

2 sonatas, D, G, 1744–5; facs. in B iii, 42 ed. in VL, 43 ed. D. Schulenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xviii (Oxford, 1995)

46–8

65.16–18

3 sonatas, C, g, F, 1746; facs. in B iii, ed. D. Schulenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xviii (Oxford, 1995), 46 ed. in F, 47 ed. in T

49

65.19

Sonata, F, c1786 (1746 acc. NV); facs. in B vi, ed. D. Schulenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xviii (Oxford, 1995)

51–2

65.20–21

2 sonatas, B, F, 1747; ed. in T, R, 51 facs. in B iii, 51 ed. D. Schulenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xviii (Oxford, 1995), 52 facs. in B iv

53

69

Sonata per il cembalo a due tastature, 1749; facs. in B iii

56–7

65.22–3

2 sonatas, G, d, 1748; facs. in B iv, 56 ed in VL, 57 ed. in F

60, 371·5

65.24

Sonata, d [see also ‘Organ’]; facs. in B iv, ed. in T

61

65.25

Sonata, a, 1749; facs. in B iv

64

65.26

Sonata, G, 1750; facs. in B iv

68

65.27

Sonata, g, 1752; facs. in B iv, ed. in T

78

65.28

Sonata, E, 1754; facs. in B iv, ed. in T

83

65.29

Sonata, E, 1755; facs. in B iv

106

65.30

Sonata, e, 1756; facs. in B iv

121

65.31

Sonata, c, 1757; facs. in B vi, ed. in T

135

65.32

Sonata, A, 1758, rev. later [see also ‘Organ’, h133]; facs. in B vi

143

65.33

Sonata, a, 1759; facs. in B iv, ed. in VL

152

65.34

Sonata, B, 1760; facs. in B iv

156–7

65.35–6

2 sonatas, C, C, after 1760 [revs. of h162–3]; facs. in B i

174–8

65.37–41

5 sonatas, A, B, e, D, C, 1763; facs. in B iv, 174, 176–8 ed. in T, 176–8 ed. C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xxiv (Oxford, 1989)

189

65.42

Sonata, E, 1765; facs. in B iv, ed. in T, ed. C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xxiv (Oxford, 1989)

192

65.43

Sonata, A, 1765–6; facs. in B iv, ed. in T, ed. C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xxiv (Oxford, 1989)

211–13

65.44–6

3 sonatas, B, B, E, 1766, rev. later; facs. in B iv, ed. in T, ed. C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, I/xxiv (Oxford, 1989)

248

65.47

Sonata, C, 1775; facs. in B iv

280

65.48

Sonata für das Bogenklavier, G, 1783; facs. in B iv, ed. in T, HS

298–9

65.49–50

2 sonatas, c, G/a, 1786 [299 based on earlier ww compositions]; facs. in B iv, 298 ed. in T

variations

14

118.7

Minuet (from Locatelli’s Sonata op.2 no.10, fl, bc) with 18 variations, G, 1735; facs. in B vi

44

118.3

Minuet with 5 variations, C, 1745; facs. in B v

54

118.4

Arioso with 7 variations, F, 1747; facs. in B v, ed. in VK

65

118.5

Allegretto with 6 variations, C, 1750; facs. in B v, ed. in HL

69

181.1

Variations on Ich schlief, da träumte mir, F, 1752, enlarged later; 17 variations (1761), 7 variations (1770); facs. in B v, ed. F. Goebels (Mainz, c1986)

155

118.2

?8 variations on an Arietta (? by J.F. Agricola), 1760; contribution to set of 22 variations (collab. C. Fasch, ?J.A. Steffan and others), variations 1–17 (1761), 18–22 (1770); facs. in B v

226

118.6

12 variations on Romance: Colin a peine a seize ans, G, 1766; facs. in B v

259

118.10

Arioso with 20 variations, C, after 1775 [based on h534, see ‘Chamber’]; facs. in B v

263

118.9

12 variations on La folia d’Espagne, d, 1778; facs. in B v, ed. in HS

275

118.8

Canzonetta (? by Luise Dorothea of Saxe-Gotha) with 6 variations, F, 1781; facs. in B v

351

Arioso with 6 variations, A; doubtful, anon. (with 8 variations) in G.S. Löhlein: Clavier-Schule (Leipzig and Züllichau, 1765)

Arioso with 5 variations, A, 1781; see ‘Chamber’, h535

miscellaneous

1

March, D; Polonoise, g; March, G; Polonoise, g; Marche, E; Solo per il cembalo, E: 1730s, in Clavierbüchlein, ii, for Anna Magdalena Bach, bwv Anh.122–5, 127, 129; not listed in NV

1·5

111

Menuet pour le clavessin, C (Leipzig, 1731); facs. in B v

75·5

119.7

Fantasia and fugue, c; in F.W. Marpurg: Abhandlung von der Fuge (Berlin, 1754); facs. in B v

76

119.1

Fuga a 2, a; in F.W. Marpurg: Abhandlung von der Fuge (Berlin, 1754); facs. in B v)

79–82

117.17–18, 26, 37

La Borchward, polonoise, G; La Pott/Lott, tempo di minuet, in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1756); La Böhmer, murky, D; La Gause, F: c1754–5; facs. in B v

89–91

117.19–21

La Gleim, rondeau, a; La Bergius, B; La Prinzette, F: c1754–5, in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1756); 89, 91 facs. in B v, 90 facs. in B vi, 89–90 ed. in R, 91 ed. in HL

92–5

117.23–5, 27

L’Hermann, g; La Buchholtz, d; La Stahl, d; L’Aly Rupalich, C: c1754–5 (1762/R in B v); 92 ed. in HL, 94–5 ed. in R, 94 ed. in HS

96–8

117.34–5, 39

La Philippine, A; La Gabriel, C; La Caroline, a: c1755; facs. in B v, ed. in HL

99

119.2

Fuga a 2, d, by 1755; in F.W. Marpurg: Fugensammlung, i (Berlin, 1758); facs. in B v

100

119.3

Fuga a 3, F, by 1755; in Tonstücke … vom Herrn C.P.E. Bach und andern classischen Meistern (Berlin, 1762, 2/1774 as C.P.E. Bachs, Nichelmanns und Händels Sonaten und Fugen); facs. in B vi

101, 101·5, 102

119.4–6

Fuga a 3, A; Fuga a 3, g; Fuga a 4, E: all by 1755; 101 in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1757), facs. in B v; 102 in F.W. Marpurg: Clavierstücke mit einem practischen Unterricht (Berlin, 176), facs. in B vi; 101·5 (1765)

108

116.18

Andantino, F; in F.W. Marpurg: Kritische Briefe über die Tonkunst (Berlin, 1760); facs. in B v

109–13

117.28, 30–33

La complaisante, B; Les langueurs tendres, f; L’irréssolué, G; La journalière, c; La capricieuse, e: c1754–5 (1761/R in B v)

114

117.36

La Louise, D, c1755; facs. in B v

122–5

117.22, 29, 38, 40

L’Auguste, polonoise, F, in Raccolta delle più nuove composizioni (Leipzig, 1756); La Xénophon–La Sybille, C (1761); L’Ernestine/La Frédérique, D; La Sophie, B: c1754–5; facs. in B v, 122 ed. in HL

144–9

112.2, 4, 8, 10, 15, 18

Fantasia, D; Solfeggio, G; Fantasia, B; Solfeggio, G; Fantasia, F; Solfeggio, G: (1765/R in B ii), 144, 146, 148–9 ed. in VK, 145, 147 ed. in HL

153–4

116.21–2

Allegro, solfeggio, C; Polonoise, g: 1760; 153 ed. in HS

160

117.14

Fantasia, D [ex. for h870, see ‘Theoretical works’]; facs. in B v

165–70

112.3, 5, 9, 11, 16–17 [116.9–14]

Minuet, D; Alla polacca, a; Minuet, D; Alla polacca, g; Minuet, A; Alla polacca, D: (1765/R in B ii); 165, 169 ed. in HL, 166, 168, 170 ed. in VK

171–2

116.1–2

Minuet, E; Polonoise, E: (1762/R in B v)

190

112.1

Conc., C, hpd solo (1765/R in B ii) [orig. intended for kbd, str in D]

191

112.13

Sinfonia, G (1765/R in B ii)

193–203

113

Allegro, G; Arioso, a; Fantasia, d; Minuet, F; Alla polacca, C; Allegretto, d; Alla polacca, D; Allegretto, A; Andante e sostenuto, g; Presto, B; Allegro, d: (17661/R in B ii); ed. O. Vrieslander, Kurze und leichte Klavierstücke (Vienna, 1914), ed. O. Jonas (Vienna, 1962)

214–17, 219

116.3–6, 8

Minuet, D; Alla polacca, C; Minuet, C; Alla polacca, D; Minuet, F; Alla polacca, G: (1762/R in B v); 214–16 ed. in VK

220–22

117.2–4

3 solfeggios, c, E, A: (1770/R in B v); ed. in VK, 220 ed. in R

223–5

117.11–13

3 fantasias, G, d, g: (1770); 223, 225 facs. in B v, 223–4 ed. in VK

228–38

114

Allegro di molto, d; Andantino e grazioso, B; Presto, c; Minuet, G; Alla polacca, D; Alla polacca, E; Fantasia, d; Allegro, E; Allegretto, A; Andante, C; Poco allegro, e: (17662/R in B ii); ed. O. Vrieslander, Kurze und leichte Klavierstücke (Vienna, 1914), ed. O. Jonas (Vienna, 1962), 234 ed. in R

241

117.1

Clavierstück für die rechte oder linke Hand allein, A; facs. in B v, ed. in VK

249–54

116.23–8

Sechs leichte Clavierstückgen, C, F, D, G, g, D, 1775 [no.6 also in variant version]; facs. in B v

256–8

n.v.37–9

Allegro, F; Allegretto, D; Menuet, F: c1775

264

120

Cadenzen , 1778 or later, B-Bc, for his own concs. and sonatas

272

66

Rondo: Abschied von meinem Silbermannischen Claviere, e, 1781; facs. in B v

292–7

63.7–12

6 neue Sonatinen, G, E, D, B, F, d, 1786 [exx. for h868 (2/1787), see ‘Theoretical works’]; facs. in B i, ed. in VK, ed. L. Hoffmann-Erbrecht (Leipzig, 1957)

300

67

Fantasia (Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs Empfindungen), f, 1788 [see also ‘Chamber’, h536]; facs. in B vi, ed. A. Kreutz (Mainz, 1950)

301–2

116.19–20

Allegretto, F; Allegro, D; facs. in B v

338

116.16–17

Allegro, A; Allegro, G; in F.W. Marpurg: Anleitung zum Clavierspielen (Berlin, 1755); ed. in HS

348

Fantasia, E, c1748; attrib. erroneously to C. Nichelmann

Suite, B, c1730, D-Kl; not listed in NV

Suite, E, c1730, Hs; not listed in NV

Suite, G, c1730, Hs; not listed in NV

Suite, G, ?1730s, Bsb; not listed in NV

Menuet, E, 1730s, in Klavierbüchlein attrib. W.A. Mozart; not listed in NV

March, F, 1730s, Hs; not listed in NV

Murqui pour l’amour, A, 1730s, Hs; not listed in NV

Allemande, A, 1730s, Hs; not listed in NV

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

two keyboards

610–13

115

4 kleine Duetten, B, F, a, E, ? after 1768

Sonata, C, after 1766, F-Pc* [based on h515, see ‘Chamber’]

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

organ

sonatas

60, 371·5

65.24

Sonata, d, 1749

133

70.1

Sonata, A, 1758, rev. later [see also ‘Keyboard solo’, h135]; facs. in B iv

134

70.2

Sonata, B, 1758, rev. later, in III sonates … par Mrs. C.P.E. Bach (Nuremberg, 1770); facs. in B iv

84–7

70.3–6

4 sonatas, F, a, D, g, 1755; facs. in B iv

107

70.7

Sonata, D, 1755; facs. in B iv

other pieces, mostly doubtful

336

5 Choräle mit ausgesetzten Mittelstimmen

Pedal-Exercitium (inc.), g, by 1734 [= bwv598]

n.v.66

Adagio, d

Aus der Tiefe rufe ich, e [= bwv745]

Ich ruf zu Dir, Herr Jesu Christ, f [= bwv Anh.73 (after bwv639)]

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

chamber

Edition:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Complete Sonatas for Flute and Obbligato Keyboard, ed. U. Leisinger (Monteux, 1993–) [L]

solos

548

134

Sonata, G, fl, bc, ? by 1735

549

135

Solo, g, ob, bc, ? by 1735, rev. later

550

123

Sonata, G, fl, bc, 1735

551

124

Sonata, e, fl, bc, 1737

552, 560

125, 130

Sonata, B, fl, bc, 1738, rev. 1746

553–5

126–8

3 sonatas, D, G, a, fl, bc, 1738–40

556, 561

129, 131

Sonata, D, fl, bc, 1740, rev. 1747

557

138

Solo, g, vc, bc, 1740, rev. 1769, lost

558–9

136–7

2 solos, C, D, va da gamba, bc, 1745–6

562

132

Sonata, a, fl, 1747 (1763); ed. M. Nastasi (Vienna, c1986)

563

139

Solo, G, harp, 1762 (facs. (Utrecht, c1996))

564

133

Sonata, G, fl, bc, 1786

trios, quartets

502

71

Sonata, D, kbd, vn, 1731, rev. 1746

503, 596

72

Sonata, d, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, kbd), 1731, rev. 1747

504, 573

73, 149

Sonata, C, kbd, vn/fl (or fl, vn, kbd), 1745

505, 575

83, 151

Sonata, D, kbd, fl (or fl, vn, bc), 1747

506, 580

84, 162

Sonata, E, kbd, fl (or 2 fl, bc), 1749

507, 585

 

Sinfonia, D, kbd, vn (or 2 vn, bc), 1754

508, 581, 157

85, 152

Trio, G, kbd, fl (or fl/vn, vn, bc), 1754; ed. C. Hill (Monteux, c1986)

509, 586

86, 153

Sonata, G, kbd, fl (or fl, vn, bc), 1755; ed. C. Hill (Monteux, c1986)

510, 541

88

Sonata, g, kbd, va/va da gamba, 1759

511

75

Sonata, F, kbd, vn, 1763

512

76

Sonata, b, kbd, vn, 1763

513

77

Sonata, B, kbd, vn, 1763

514

78

Sonata, c, kbd, vn, 1763

515

87

Trio, C, kbd, fl, 1766 [also for 2 hpd, F-Pn]

516–21

92

6 qts, E, E, E, B, E, B, after 1768

522–4

90

3 sonatas, a, G, C, kbd, vn, vc (Leipzig, 1776)

525–30

89

6 sonatas, e, B, C, A, E, e, D, kbd, vn, vc (London, 1776; Amsterdam, c1778)

531–4

91

4 sonatas, e, D, F, C, kbd, vn, vc (Leipzig, 1777) [h534 variations]

535

79, n.v.70

Arioso, A, kbd, vn, 1780 [orig. kbd solo]

536

80

Fantasie (C.P.E. Bachs Empfindungen), f, kbd, vn, 1787 [orig. kbd solo]

537–9

93–5

3 qts, a–D–G, kbd, fl, va, 1788

542, 570

146

Sonata, A, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, bc), 1731, rev. 1747

566

Trio, vn, va, bc, c1731, lost [composed under supervision of J.S. Bach]

567

143

Sonata, b, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, bc), 1731, rev. 1747

568

144

Trio, G, fl, vn, bc, 1731, rev. 1747

569

145

Sonata, d, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, bc), 1731, rev. 1747 [early version = bwv1036]

571

147

Sonata, C, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, bc), 1731, rev. 1747

572

148

Sonata, a, kbd, vn (or fl/vn, vn, bc), 1735, rev. 1747

574

150

Trio, G, fl, vn, bc, 1747

576

154

Sonata, F, fl/vn, vn, bc, 1754

577

155

Sonata, e, 2 vn, bc, 1747

578

161.2

Sonata, B, kbd, vn (or fl, vn, kbd), 1748 (Nuremberg, 1751)

579

161.1

Trio (Sangineus und Melancholicus), c, kbd, vn (or 2 vn, bc), 1749 (Nuremberg, 1751)

582

156

Sinfonia, a, 2 vn, bc, 1754

584

158

Sonata, B, 2 vn, bc, 1754

587, 543

159

Trio, B, 2 vn, bc, c1755 [= h588–9]

588–9

163

Trio, F, b fl, va/bn, bc, 1755, rev. later [= h587, 543]

590

160

Sonata, d, 2 vn, bc, 1756, rev. later

600

81

12 kleine Stücke, G g, e, a, D, D, D, B, D, C, F, d, kbd, fl, vn (Berlin, 1758)

628

82

12 … kleine Stücke, e, E, G, g, A, a, D, d, C, c, g, B, kbd, fl, vn (Hamburg, 1770)

miscellaneous

598

140

Duetto, e, fl, vn, D-Bsb*, in Musikalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770)

599

141

Duetto, d, 2 vn, lost

604–5

190.1, 3

2 polonoise, F, a, 2 cl, 2 vn, bc

607–9, 627

190.2, 4–6

4 polonoise, G, D, C, A, 2 vn, bc (with 2 cl in h608)

614–19

185

6 marches, D, C, F, G, E, D, 2 ob, 2 cl, bn, 2 hn

620

186

2 kleine Stücke, a, F, 2 cl, bn, 2 hn, lost

637

187

2 marches, F, D, 2 ob, bn, 2 hn

621

188

Marche für die Arche, C, 3 tpt, timp, after 1767; ed. H.M. Lewis (Monteux, c1988)

629–34

184

6 sonatas, D, F, G, E, A, C, 2 fl, 2 cl, bn, 2 hn

635

193

[30] Stücke für Spieluhren auch Drehorgeln

636

142

Duetto, C, 2 cl [= h635, 26–7)

?Marche, ?3 tpt, timp, 1763, lost (? = h621)

Marche, E, tpt, 2 ob, bn, by 1767

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

orchestral

Editions:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Six Symphonies, ed. C.C. Gallagher and E.E. Helm, in The Symphony 1720–1840, ser. C, viii (New York, 1982) [GH]Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach 1714–1788: The Collected Works for Solo Keyboard, ed. D. Berg (New York, 1985) [facs.] [B i–vi]

solo concertos and sonatinas

190

112.1

Conc., C, hpd solo (1765) [see ‘Solo keyboard’]; facs. in B ii

403

1

Conc., a, hpd, str, 1733, rev. c1740 and 1744

404

2

Conc., E, hpd, str, 1734, rev. 1743; early version (Paris, c1761)

405

3

Conc., G, hpd, str, 1737, rev. 1745

406

4

Conc., G, hpd, str, 1738

407

5

Conc., c, hpd, str, 1739, rev. 1762

409

6

Conc., g, hpd, str, 1740, rev. later

410–13

7–10

4 concs., A, A, G, B, hpd, str, 1740–42

414

11

Conc., D, hpd, str, 1743 (Nuremberg, 1745)

415–16

12–13

2 concs., F, D, hpd, str, 1744; listed as fl. conc. in Ringmacher catalogue (Berlin, 1773)

417

14

Conc., E, hpd, str, 1744 (Berlin, 1760), rev. later; also with 2 hn

418–24

15–21

7 concs., e, G, d, D, A, C, a, hpd, str, 1745–7

425, 484·1

22

Conc., d, fl/hpd, str, 1747, rev. later; also with 2 hn

427–8

23–4

2 concs., d, e, hpd, str, 1748

429

25

Conc., B, hpd, str, 1749 (Nuremberg, 1752)

430–32

26, 166, 170

Conc., a, vc/fl/hpd, str, 1750; 431 ed. U. Leisinger (Monteux, c1992)

433

27

Conc., D, hpd, 2 hn, str, with 2 fl, 2 ob, 2/?3 tpt/hn, timp ad lib, 1750

434–6

28, 167, 171

Conc., B, vc/fl/hpd, str, 1751

437–9

29, 168, 172

Conc., A, vc/fl/hpd, str, 1753

440–43

30–33

4 concs., b, c, g, F, hpd, str, 1753–5

444–5

34, 169

Conc., G, org/hpd/fl, str, 1755

446

35

Conc., E, org/hpd, str, 1759; also with 2 hn

447

36

Conc., B, hpd, str, 1762

448

37

Conc., c, hpd, 2 hn, str, 1762; ed. E.N. Kulukundis and P.G. Wiley, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, II/xv (Oxford, 1989)

449

96

Sonatina, D, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1762, rev. later; also with 2 hn

450–51

97–8

2 sonatinas, G, G, hpd, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1762; 451 ed. P.G. Wiley and C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, II/xxiii (Oxford, 1992)

452, 485

99

Sonatina, F, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1762 [also with 2 hn]; ed. P.G. Wiley and C. Widgery, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, II/xxiii (Oxford, 1992)

454

38

Conc., F, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1763; ed. E.N. Kulukundis and P.G. Wiley, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach Edition, II/xv (Oxford, 1989)

455

100

Sonatina, E, hpd, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1763

456–7

102–3

2 sonatinas, D, C, hpd, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1763

458, 460

106, 101

Sonatina, C, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1763 (Berlin, 1764), rev. later; also with 2 hn

461, 463

107, 104

Sonatina, F, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1764 (Berlin, 1764), rev. later; also with 2 hn

462, 464

108, 105

Sonatina, E, hpd, 2 fl, str, 1764 (Berlin, 1766), rev. later; also with 2 hn

465–6

39, 164

Conc., B, ob/hpd, str, 1765

467–8

40, 165

Conc., E, ob/hpd, str, 1765

469

41

Conc., E, hpd, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1769

470

42

Conc., F, hpd, 2 hn, str, 1770 [also for kbd solo, h242; facs. in B iv]

471–6

43

Sei concerti, F, D, E, c, G, C, hpd, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1771–2 (Hamburg, 1772)

477–8

44–5

2 concs., G, D, hpd, 2 hn, str, 1778

double concertos and sonatinas

408

46

Conc., F, 2 hpd, 2 hn, str, 1740; ed. G. Kiss (Hamburg, c1988)

453

109

Sonatina, D, 2 hpd, 2 fl, 2 ob, bn, 3 tpt, 2 hn, str, 1762; also for 1 hpd, 2 fl, str, h480, 480·5

459

110

Sonatina, B, 2 hpd, 2 fl, str, 1763; also for 1 hpd, 2 fl, str, D-LEm

479

47

Conc., E, hpd, pf, 2 fl, 2 hn, str, 1788

symphonies

648

173

Sinfonie, G, str, 1741; GH, kbd red., 1745, h45 (w122.1), facs. in B iv

649

174

Sinfonia, C, str, 1755, rev. later; also with 2 fl, 2 hn

650

175

Sinfonia, F, str, 1755, rev. later; also with 2 fl, 2 bn, 2 hn; GH, kbd red., h104 (w122.2), by ? F.W. Marpurg, in Raccolta delle megliore sinfonie (Leipzig, 1761), facs. in B iii

651

176

Sinfonia, D, str, 1756, rev. later; also with 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 hn, 2 tpt, timp; GH

652–3

177–8

2 sinfonias, e, e, str, 1756 (Nuremberg, 1759), rev. later; kbd red. listed as h115 (w122.3), unrealized

654

179

Sinfonia, E, str, 1757, rev. later; also with 2 ob, 2 hn; GH

655

180

Sinfonia, G, str, 1758, rev. later, also with 2 ob, 2 hn; GH, kbd red. w122.4 (= h191; w112.13) in Clavierstücke verschiedener Art (Berlin, 1765)

656

181

Sinfonia, F, str, 1758 [not in NV], rev. ?1762, also with 2 fl, 2 hn; GH, kbd red., 1766, h227 (w122.5), in Musikalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770), facs. in B iii

657–62

182

Sei sinfonie, G, B, C, A, b, E, str, for G. van Swieten

663–6

183

[4] Orchester-Sinfonien, D, E, F, G, 1775–6 (Leipzig, 1780)

667

Sinfonia, str, c1751, collab. Count Ferdinand of Lobkowitz [cf NV, 65], lost

Sinfonia, G, str, by 1766, listed in Breitkopf catalogue, 1766, doubtful, lost

Sinfonia, C, by 1766, S-Skma, listed in Breitkopf catalogue, 1766, doubtful

Sinfonia, F, str, by c1766, D-Bsb, doubtful

miscellaneous

601

192

2 minuets, C, C, 2 fl, 2 bn, 3 tpt, timp, 2 vn, bc, in Musikalisches Mancherley (Berlin, 1762)

602–3

189.1–2

2 minuets, D, D, 2 fl, 2 cl, 2 vn, bc

606

189.8

Minuet, G, 2 fl, 2 cl, 2 vn, bc

622–6

189.3–7

5 minuets, G, G, G, F, D, 2 fl, 2 cl, 2 vn, bc

638

191

2 minuets, D, D, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 hn, 3 tpt, timp, str

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

Oratorios and passions

Ich freue mich des, das mir geredet ist, orat, 2 Dec 1736, for consecration of the Unterkirche, Frankfurt an der Oder, lost

775

238

Die Israeliten in der Wüste (D. Schiebeler), orat, 1 Nov 1769 (Hamburg, 1775)

777

240

Die Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu (C.W. Ramler), orat, 1774, rev. by 1778 (Leipzig, 1787); ed. G. Darvas (Adliswil, c1975)

776

233

Du Göttlicher, Passion cant. (A.L. Karsch, C.D. Ebeling and J.J. Eschenburg), 1770, rev. by 1772, rev. later; based on h782; ed. H.-J. Irmen (Vaduz, c1982)

782

St Matthew Passion, 1769, ?inc.

783

St Mark Passion, 1770, inc., based on G.A. Homilius: St Mark Passion

784

St Luke Passion, 1771, frag., incl. movt by G. Benda

785

St John Passion, 1772

786

St Matthew Passion, 1773, frag.

787

St Mark Passion, 1774, frag.

788

St Luke Passion, 1775, frag.

789

St John Passion, 1776, frag.

790

St Matthew Passion, 1777, frag.

791

St Mark Passion, 1778, frag.

792

St Luke Passion, 1779, frag.

793

St John Passion, 1780, frag.

794

 

St Matthew Passion, 1781, inc.

795

St Mark Passion, 1782, frag.

796

St Luke Passion, 1783, frag.

797

St John Passion, 1784, frag.

798

St Matthew Passion, 1785, frag.

799

St Mark Passion, 1786, frag.

800

234

St Luke Passion, 1787, frag.

801

St John Passion, 1788, frag.

802

235

St Matthew Passion, 1789

822ab

Hebt an, ihr Chöre der Freude, orat – Der Trommeln Schlag, serenata (C.W. Alers), 7 Sept 1780

822cd

Schallt Jubel, orat – Schlagt die Trommel, wirbelt Freude, serenata (Alers), 4 Sept 1783; music of orat lost

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

sacred latin

772

215

Magnificat, by 25 Aug 1749, rev. later; alternative version of ‘Et misericordia’, ?c1780–82; ed. G. Darvas (Adliswil, c1971)

825

207

Veni Sancte Spiritus, S, S, bc, after 1768

839–40

209–10

Antiphonia, 4vv; Amen, 4vv: after 1768, lost

828

219

Sanctus, after 1768

855

220

Veni Sancte Spiritus, after/?by Telemann, twv3:84

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

sacred cantatas and choruses

762

231

Er lebt! Ihm tönen unsre Lieder (Freudenlied for F.L.C. Cropp), (P.L. Cropp), 1785

778

217

Heilig, SATB, SATB, 2 ob, bn, 3 tpt, timp, str, bc, 1776 (Hamburg, 1779)

779

239

Morgengesang am Schöpfungsfest (F.G. Klopstock), 1783 (Leipzig, 1784)

803–5, 807

244, 242, 241, 243

4 Oster-Musik: Gott hat den Herrn auferweckt (L. Cochius), Easter 1756, rev. later; Jauchzet, frohlocket [partly from bwv2481], Easter 1778; Nun danket alle Gott, Easter 178; Anbetung dem Erbarmer, Easter 1784

809–10

248, 245

2 Michaelis-Musik: Den Engeln gleich, St Michael 1769; Ich will den Namen des Herrn preisen, St Michael 1772

811

?Weihnachts-Musik: Ehre sei Gott in der Höhe, Christmas ?1772 [also for St Michael 1782]

812

247, 212

Michaelis-Musik: Siehe! Ich begehre deiner Gerechtigkeit, St Michael 1775 [incl. aria ‘Sing ihm voll Rührung’ w212]

814

246

Michaelis-Musik: Der Frevler mag die Wahrheit schmähn, Christmas 1785 [incl. Heilig h778]

815

249

Weihnachts-Musik: Auf schicke dich, Christmas 1775

816

4 Weihnachts-Musik: Die Himmel rühmen die Ehre Gottes, Christmas c1770, music lost; 3 others, Christmas 1782, 1784, 1786, lost

821

15 inauguration cants., 1769–87, music mostly lost

823

Versammelt euch dem Herrn zu Ehren, for completion of the tower of St Michael, 31 Oct 1786 [incl. Heilig h778], lost

824

6 celebratory cantatas, 1765–85, lost

829

216

Spiega, Ammonia fortuna, chorus for visit of Gustav III of Sweden, Hamburg, 1770

830

221

Mein Heiland, meine Zuversicht, chorus for Trinity X, 5 Aug 1787

831

222

Wer ist so würdig als du (J.A. Cramer), chorus, Easter 1780, ? used earlier

832

223

Zeige du mir deine Wege (Cramer), chorus for Trinity VIII, 20 July 1777

224

Lass mich nicht deinen Zorn empfinden (Cramer), chorus, 1775 [after h733.13; used in St Matthew Passion h798]

833

225

Gott, dem ich lebe, des ich bin (C.C. Sturm), chorus

834–5

226—7

2 choruses: Amen, Lob und Preis und Stärke (Sturm) for Quasimodogeniti, 27 April 1783; Leite mich nach deinem Willen (B. Münter) for Quasimodogeniti, ? 27 April 1783

836

Meine Lebenszeit verstreicht, funeral music for M.H. Schele, Dec 1774 [incl. w228], frag.

837

Meinen Leib wird man begraben, funeral music for J. Luis, Feb 1788 [incl. w229], frag.

838

n.v.1

Merkt und seht, chorus, ?1780s

Wedding cant. for J.S. Ungnad and A.E. Thiele, 18 Jan 1736, lost

Birthday cant. for Crown Prince Friedrich of Prussia, 24 Jan 1737, lost

Frankfurt, lass in vollen Chören, cant. for visit of Friedrich Wilhelm I and Sophia Dorothea Maria of Prussia, 18 March 1737, music lost

Entdeckt durch tausend frohe Töne, cant. for visit of Friedrich Wilhelm I, Nov 1737, lost

Vater, deines Sohnes Geist, cant., ? Hamburg, 1770 [perf. with h829]

Oster-Kantate, Ist Christus nicht auferstanden, Easter 1771, lost

Freuet euch, ihr Kinder Zions (C.H.E. Müller), inauguration cant. for J.M. Müller and J.A.G. Schetelig, Hamburg, 7 Nov 1773, music lost

Funeral music for V. Rumpf, March/April 1781 [incl. h833 and movt from h856 (anon.)], frag.

Funeral music for F. Doormann, 7 Sept 1781, music lost

Funeral music for A. Schulte, 10 Jan 1786, lost

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

secular arias and cantatas

669

211

3 arias: Edle Freiheit, Götterglück; Himmelstochter, Ruh der Seelen; Reiche bis zum Wolkensitze: T, 2 fl, bc

697

232

Thirsis, willst du mir gefallen (Phillis und Thirsis) (J.E. Schlegel), S, S, 2 fl, bc, 1765 (Berlin, 1766)

723

237

Freude, du Lust der Götter (Der Frühling), cant., T, str, after 1760 [orch version of h688, see ‘Songs, motets and chorales’]

735

200.22

Als einem Frühlingsabende (Die Grazien) (H.W. von Gerstenberg), cant., S, kbd (Lübeck, 1789)

739

236

Sie liebt, mich liebt die Auserwählte (Selma) (J.H. Voss), S, 2 fl, str, after 1775

761

214

Fürsten sind am Lebensziele, aria, S, str, 1785, lost

767

213

D’amor per te languisco, arietta, S, 2 fl, bc

Reisst euch los, bekränte Sinnen, aria, S, ?orch, by 1734, frag., doubtful [= bwv224]

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

songs, motets and chorales

songs with keyboard or continuo

670–84, 687, 689–92

199

[20] Oden mit Melodien (Berlin, 1762) [incl. 3 in Samlung verschiedener und auserlesener Oden, ii–iv (Halle, 1741–3)]

685

La Sophie, by 1768

686

194

[55] Geistliche Oden und Lieder (C.F. Gellert), 1757 (Leipzig, 1758)

688

202/A

Freude, du Lust der Götter und Menschen (C.M. Wieland), in Drey verschiedene Versuche eines einfachen Gesanges für den Hexameters (Berlin, 1760) [also arr. S, orch, see ‘Secular arias and cantatas’, h723]

693–5

202/B

3 songs: Das Privilegium (N.D. Giseke); Die Landschaft; Belinde (K.W. Müller): in Clavierstücke verschiedener Art (Berlin, 1765)

696

195

Zwölf geistliche Oden und Lieder als ein Anhang zu Gellerts geistliche Oden und Lieder (Leipzig, 1764)

698

202/D

Bachus und Venus (H.W. von Gerstenberg), in Musikalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770)

699

201

Der Wirt und die Gäste (J.W.L Gleim) (Berlin, 1766), rev. later

700–08, 734–5, 740–41, 747–8, 755–60

200

[21] Neue Lieder-Melodien nebst einer Cantate (Lübeck, 1789) [incl. Die Grazien h735, see ‘Secular arias and cantatas’]

709–21

202/C

13 songs in Unterhaltungen (Hamburg, 1768–70)

724–9

202/E

6 songs (B. Münter) in Balthasar Münters 1. Sammlung geistlicher Lieder (Leipzig, 1773)

730

202/O/2

Klagelied eines Bauren (J.M. Miller)

733

196

[42] Psalmen mit Melodien (J.A. Cramer) (Leipzig, 1774)

742

202/O/1

Auf den Flügeln des Morgenrots (C.F. Cramer)

743

202/O/4

Die Trennung (J.J. Eschenburg, after P. Metastasio)

749

197

[30] Geistliche Gesänge mit Melodien (C.C. Sturm) (Hamburg, 1780)

752

198

[30] Geistliche Gesänge mit Melodien, ii (Sturm) (Hamburg, 1781)

763

Die Alster (F. von Hagedorn); Harvstehude (von Hagedorn): after 1768, lost

764

202/N

12 songs in Freymaurer-Lieder mit ganz neuen Melodien von der Herren Capellmeister Bach, Naumann und Schulz (Copenhagen and Leipzig, 1788) [also attrib., erroneously, to W.F.E. Bach]

765

202/O/3

Kommt, lasst uns seine Huld besingen (J.A. Cramer)

766

202/O/5

Die Schönste soll bei Sonnenschein

Allgütiger, gewohnt Gebet zu hören [another version of h700]

 

 

Also 12 songs in various Musenalmanachs (1775–82): h731–2, 736–8, 739·5, 744, 746, 750–51, 753–4 (w202/F–L)

motets

773–4

205–6

2 pss (J.A. Cramer): Warum versammeln sich und dräuen, S, A, T, B; Wenn ich zu dir in meinen Ängsten flehe, S, A, bc

826

208

4 motets: Gedanke, der uns Leben gibt (Gellert), S, A, B, bc; Oft klagt dein Herz, wie schwer es sei (Gellert), S, A, T, B, bc; Gott, deine Güte reicht so weit (Gellert), S, A, bc; Dich bet ich an, Herr Jesu Christ (Sturm), S, A, T, B, bc: arrs. of h686.30, 53, 9, 752.3

chorales

337

n.v.18

Wo Gott zum Haus nicht gibt

780, 871

204

Zwey Litaneien aus dem Schleswig-Holsteinischen Gesangbuch, 1785 (Copenhagen, 1786); ed. in SBA

781

203

[14] Neue Melodien zu einigen Liedern des neuen Hamburger Gesangbuches (Hamburg, 1787): texts mainly by Gellert; nos.3, 6, 13 also with orch

842

[10] Choräle (H.E. zu Stolberg-Wernigerode) (Wernigerode, 1767)

843

Naglet til et Kors paa Jorden (B.J. Sporon), in Kirke-Melodierne til den 1778 udgangne Psalmebog (Copenhagen, 1781)

844

3 chorales: Erheb, erheb, o meine Seele; Des Ewigen und der Sterblichen Sohn; Von ganzem Herzen rühmen wir: in Vollständige Sammlung der Melodien … des neuen allgemeinen Schleswig-Holsteinischen Gesangsbuch (Leipzig, 1785)

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

theoretical works

285

Fughetta on C-F-E-B-A-C-H, by 1784

867

121

Miscellanea musica, B-Bc [incl. canons in J.P. Kirnberger: Die Kunst des reinen Satzes (Berlin, 1771–4)]

868

254

Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen, i (Berlin, 1753/R, 2/1787); Eng. trans., ed. W.J. Mitchell, as Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments (New York, 1949)

869

257

‘Einfall einen doppelten Contrapunct in der Octave … zu machen’, in F.W. Marpurg, ed.: Historisch-kritische Beyträge zur Aufnahme der Musik, iii (Berlin, 1757/R); Eng. trans in Helm (1966)

870

255

Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen, ii (Berlin, 1762/R, 2/1797); Eng. trans., ed. W.J. Mitchell, as Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments (New York, 1949)

Fughetta on B-A-C-H, in J.F. Reichardt: Briefe eines aufmerksamen Reisenden (Hamburg, 1774)

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

arrangements

 

 

Various arrs. of vocal and inst works by J.E., J.C., J.C.F, J.S. and W.F. Bach, G. Benda, C.F.C. Fasch, J.G. Goldberg, C.H. Graun, Handel, G.A. Homilius, Telemann and others: for details see H; others in D-Bsb

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Works

misattributed works

115

122.3

Sinfonia, kbd: planned red. by J.J.H. Westphal of h652, unrealized

159

116.15

Minuet, kbd, C: arr. of h601 by Westphal

303–31

116.29–57

29 kbd pieces: arrs. by Westphal of works for mechanical insts or ww (facs. in Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach 1714–1788: The Collected Works for Solo Keyboard, v (New York, 1985))

333

La Juliane, F, kbd, A-Wn: doubtful, not autograph

540

Largo, e, kbd, melody inst, B-Bc: by C. Schaffrath

874

258

Kurze Anweisung zum Generalbass, B-Br; doubtful, not autograph

202/M

2 fantasias: Socrates: Nein, nein die ernste hohe Gestalt; Hamlet: Sein, oder Nichtsein: = h75, 3rd movt, with text underlay by H.W. von Gerstenberg

Bach, §III: (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach

BIBLIOGRAPHY

a: catalogues, letters, documents

J.M. Bach, ed: Verzeichnis des musikalischen Nachlasses des verstorbenen Capellmeisters Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790/R1981 with preface and annotations by R.W. Wade)

J.J.H. Westphal: Catalogue thématique des oeuvres de Ch.Ph.Emm. Bach (MS, B-Br, Fétis 5218)

A. Wotquenne, ed.: Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (1714–1788) (Leipzig, 1905/R) [in Ger. and Fr.]

H.-J. Schulze, ed.: Dokumente zum Nachwirken Johann Sebastian Bachs 1750–1800, Bach-Dokumente, iii (Kassel, 1972)

H.-G. Ottenberg, ed: Der Critische Musicus an der Spree: Berliner Musikschrifttum von 1748 bis 1799, eine Dokumentation (Leipzig, 1984)

E. Suchalla: Briefe von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach an Johann Gottlob Immanuel Breitkopf (Tutzing, 1985)

R. Angermüller: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachiana: Briefe die bei Ernst Suchalla nicht veröffentlicht wurden’, JbSIM (1985–6), 9–168

E.E. Helm: Thematic Catalogue of the Works of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (New Haven, CT, 1989)

U. Leisinger: Die Bachsche Auktion von 1789’, BJb 1991, 97–126

W.S. Newman, ed.: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Autobiography, Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses (Buren, 1991)

E. Suchalla, ed.: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach im Spiegel seiner Zeit: die Dokumentensammlung Johann Jacob Heinrich Westphals (Hildesheim, 1993)

H.-G. Ottenberg, ed: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Spurensuche: Leben und Werk in Selbstzeugnissen und Dokumenten seiner Zeitgenossen, Carl-Philipp-Emanuel-Bach-Konzepte, Sonderreihe, i (Leipzig, 1994)

E. Suchalla, ed.: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Briefe und Dokumente. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Göttingen, 1994)

E.N. Kulukundis: Die Versteigerung von C.P.E. Bachs musikalischem Nachlass im Jahre 1805’, BJb 1995, 145–76

H.-J. Schulze: Regesten zu einigen verschollenen Briefen Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs’, BJb 1996, 151–4

P. Wollny: Zur Überlieferung der Instrumentalwerke Johann Sebastian Bachs: der Quellenbesitz Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs’, BJb 1996, 7–21

S.L. Clark, ed.: The Letters of C.P.E. Bach (Oxford, 1997)

B. Wiermann: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und Hamburg: Dokumente aus der zeitgenössischen Presse bis 1790 (Hildesheim, forthcoming)

b: sources

J. Müller: Die musikalischen Schätze der Koeniglichen- und Universitaets-Bibliothek zu Königsberg in Pr. aus dem Nachlasse Friedrich August Gotthold’s (Bonn, 1870)

P. Kast: Die Bach-Handschriften der Berliner Staatsbibliothek (Trossingen, 1958)

K. Hortschansky: Katalog der Kieler Musiksammlungen: die Notendrucke, Handschriften, Libretti und Bücher über Musik aus der Zeit bis 1830 (Kassel, 1963)

T. Aigner: Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Johann Mederitsch detto Gallus (Munich, 1974) [incl. list of copies by Mederitsch in A-Sd, Sm]

R.W. Wade: Newly Found Works of C.P.E. Bach’, EMc, xvi (1988), 523–32

U. Leisinger: Die Bach-Quellen der Forschungs- und Landesbibliothek Gotha (Gotha, 1993)

U. Leisinger and P. Wollny: Die Bach-Quellen der Bibliotheken in Brüssel: Katalog (Hildesheim, forthcoming)

c: exhibition catalogues, programme books

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Musik und Literatur in Norddeutschland: Ausstellung zum 200. Todestag Bachs, Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek, Hamburg, 23 Sept – 31 Oct 1988; Schleswig-Holsteinische Landesbibliothek, Kiel 16 Nov 1988 – 29 Jan 1989 (Heide in Holstein, 1988) [exhibition catalogue]

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach 1714–1788, herausgegeben anlässlich der Ausstellung zum 200. Todestag Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs, Staatliches Institut für Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin, 10 July – 4 Sept 1988 (Berlin, 1988) [exhibition catalogue]

H.-G. Klein, ed.: ‘Er ist Original!’: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: sein musikalisches Werk in Autographen und Erstdrucken aus der Musikabteilung der Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin, 14 Dec 1988 – 11 Feb 1989 (Wiesbaden, 1988) [exhibition catalogue]

K. Maehnert and V. Wolf, ed.: Bach-Tage Hamburg ’88 (Hamburg, 1988) [St Michaelis-Chor Hamburg e.V.; programme book]

H.J. Marx, ed: Der Hamburger Bach und die Neue Musik des 18. Jahrhunderts: eine Veranstaltungsreihe anlässlich des 200. Todesjahres von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach 1714–1788 (Hamburg, 1988) [programme book]

d: congress reports, essay collections

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und die europäische Musikkultur: Hamburg 1988

S.L. Clark: C.P.E. Bach Studies (Oxford, 1988)

Fragen der Aufführungspraxis und Interpretation von Werken Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs: Blankenburg, Harz, 1988

Untersuchungen zur Musikkultur des 18. Jahrhunderts: Potsdam 1988

H. Poos, ed: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Beiträge zu Leben und Werk (Mainz, 1993)

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: Frankfurt an der Oder 1994

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und die Romantik: Frankfurt an der Oder 1996

e: biography: general

F. Rochlitz: K.Ph.E. Bach’, Für Freunde der Tonkunst (Leipzig, 2/1832), iv, 271–316

C.H. Bitter: Carl Philipp Emanuel und Wilhelm Friedemann Bach und deren Brüder (Berlin, 1868/R)

O. Vrieslander: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Munich, 1923)

H. Miesner: Philipp Emanuel Bach in Hamburg: Beiträge zu seiner Biographie und zur Musikgeschichte seiner Zeit (Leipzig, 1929/R)

D. Plamenac: New Light on the Last Years of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’, MQ, xxxv (1949), 565–87

H.-G. Ottenberg: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Leipzig, 1982, 2/1987; Eng. trans., 1987)

f: special studies, relationships, reception

H. von Hase: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und Joh.Gottl.Im. Breitkopf’, BJb 1911, 86–104

R. Steglich: Karl Philipp Emanuel Bach und der Dresdner Kreuzkantor Gottfried August Homilius im Musikleben ihrer Zeit: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Stilwandlung im 18. Jahrhundert’, BJb 1915, 39–145

H. von Hase: Beiträge zur Breitkopfschen Geschäftsgeschichte’, ZfMw, ii (1919–20), 454–81

B. Engelke: Gerstenberg und die Musik seiner Zeit’, Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Schleswig-Holsteinische Geschichte, lvi (1927), 417–48

H. Killer: Zur Musik des deutschen Ostens im 18. Jahrhundert’, Königsberger Beiträge: Festgabe zur vierhundertjährigen Jubelfeier der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek zu Königsberg Pr. (Königsberg, 1929), 228–43

E. Fritz Schmid: Joseph Haydn und Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’, ZfMw, xiv (1931–2), 299–312

H. Miesner: Urkundliche Nachrichten über die Familie Bach in Berlin’, BJb 1932, 157–63

H. Miesner: Aus der Umwelt Philipp Emanuel Bachs’, BJb 1937, 132–43

H. Miesner: Porträts aus dem Kreise Philipp Emanuel und Wilhelm Friedemann Bachs’, Musik und Bild: Festschrift Max Seiffert zum siebzigsten Geburtstag, ed. H. Besseler (Kassel, 1938), 101–12

A. Holschneider: C.Ph.E. Bachs Kantate “Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu” und Mozarts Aufführung des Jahres 1788’, MJb 1968–70, 264–80

M. Terry: C.P.E. Bach and J.J.H. Westphal: a Clarification’, JAMS, xxii (1969), 106–15

A. Glöckner: Neuerkenntnisse zu Johann Sebastian Bachs Aufführungskalender zwischen 1729 und 1735’, BJb 1981, 43–75

E.E. Helm: An Honorable Shortcut to the Works of C.P.E. Bach’, Music in the Classic Period: Essays in Honor of Barry S. Brook, ed. A.W. Atlas (New York, 1985), 85–98

R. von Zahn: Johann Maria Bach und das Hamburger Stadtkantorat’, Mf, xliii (1990), 146–50

R. von Zahn: Musikpflege in Hamburg um 1800: der Wandel des Konzertwesens und der Kirchenmusik zwischen dem Tode Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs und dem Tode Christian Friedrich Gottlieb Schwenkes (Hamburg, 1991)

U. Leisinger: Joseph Haydn und die Entwicklung des klassischen Klavierstils (Laaber, 1994)

g: theory, aesthetics

H. Mersmann: Ein Programmtrio K.Ph.E. Bachs’, BJb 1917, 137–70

O. Vrieslander: C.Ph.E. Bach als Theoretiker’, Von Neuer Musik (Cologne, 1925), 222–79

A. Schering: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und das “redende Prinzip” in der Musik’, JbMP 1938, 13–29

N. Fischman: Estetika F.E. Bacha’, SovM (1964), no.8, 59–65

E.E. Helm: Six Random Measures of C.P.E. Bach’, JMT, x (1966), 19–51

C. Dahlhaus: Si vis me flere …’, Mf, xxv (1972), 51–2

E.E. Helm: The “Hamlet” Fantasy and the Literary Element in C.P.E. Bach’s Music’, MQ, lviii (1972), 277–96

P. Cohen: Theorie und Praxis der Clavierästhetik Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs (Hamburg, 1974)

H. Danuser: Das imprévu in der Symphonik: Aspekte einer musikalischen Formkategorie in der Zeit von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach bis Hector Berlioz’, Musiktheorie, i (1986), 61–81

h: keyboard music

I.G. Faisst: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Claviersonate von ihrem erstem Auftreten bis auf C.P. Emanuel Bach’, Caecilia, xxv (1846), 129–58, 201–31; xxvi (1847), 1–28, 73–83; repr. in NBeJb 1924, 7–85

H. Schenker: Ein Beitrag zur Ornamentik als Einführung zu Ph.E. Bachs Klavierwerken (Vienna and Leipzig, 1908)

H. Uldall: Das Klavierkonzert der Berliner Schule mit kurzem Überblick über seine allgemeine Entstehungsgeschichte und spätere Entwicklung (Leipzig, 1928)

S. Clercx: La forme du rondo chez Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’, RdM, xvi (1935), 148–67

E.H. Beurmann: Die Klaviersonaten Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs (diss., U. of Göttingen, 1952)

K. von Fischer: C.Ph.E. Bachs Variationenwerke’, RBM, vi (1952), 190–218

P. Schleuning: Die Freie Fantasie: ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der klassischen Klaviermusik (Göppingen, 1973)

D.M. Berg: The Keyboard Sonatas of C.P.E. Bach: an Expression of the Mannerist Principle (diss., SUNY, 1975)

R.W. Wade: The Keyboard Concertos of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Ann Arbor, 1981)

G. Wagner: Traditionsbezug im musikhistorischen Prozess zwischen 1720 und 1740 am Beispiel von Johann Sebastian und Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1985)

A. Edler: Zwischen Händel und Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: zur Situation des Klavierkonzerts im mittleren 18. Jahrhundert’, AcM, lviii (1986), 180–221

D.M. Berg: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs Umarbeitungen seiner Claviersonaten’, BJb 1988, 123–61

W. Horn: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. Frühe Klaviersonaten: eine Studie zur ‘Form’ der ersten Sätze nebst einer kritischen Untersuchung der Quellen (Hamburg, 1988)

P. Whitmore: Unpremeditated Art: the Cadenza in the Classical Concerto (Oxford, 1991)

D. Schulenberg: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’, Eighteenth-Century Keyboard Music, ed. R.L. Marshall (New York, 1994), 191–229

i: vocal and instrumental music

NewmanSCE

E. Fritz Schmid: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und seine Kammermusik (Kassel, 1931)

G. Busch: Busch: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und seine Lieder (Regensburg, 1957)

E. Simon: Mechanische Musikinstrumente früherer Zeiten und ihre Musik (Wiesbaden, 1960)

E. Suchalla: Die Orchestersinfonien Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs (Augsburg, 1968)

S.L. Clark: The Occasional Choral Works of C.P.E. Bach (diss., Princeton U., 1984)

D. Schulenberg: The Instrumental Music of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Ann Arbor, 1984)

S.L. Clark: C.P.E. Bach and the Tradition of Passion Music in Hamburg’, EMc, xvi (1988), 533–41

W. Maertens: Georg Philipp Telemanns sogenannte Hamburgische Kapitainsmusiken (1723–1765) (Wilhelmshaven, 1988)

L. Miller: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s Flute Sonatas’, JM, xi (1993), 203–49

G. Wagner: Die Sinfonien Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs: Werdende Gattung und Originalgenie (Stuttgart and Weimar, 1994)

A. Nagel: Studien zur Passionskantate von Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Frankfurt, 1995)

G. Quarg: “‘Passions-Cantatte von Ph.E.Bach”: zur Kölner Markus-Passion’, Musik und Kirche, lxv (1995), 62–71

Bach, §III: Individual members

(10) Johann Ernst Bach

(34) (b Eisenach, 28 Jan 1722; d Eisenach, 1 Sept 1777). Composer and organist, son of (5) Johann Bernhard Bach (18). On 16 January 1737 he entered the Thomasschule in Leipzig and became a pupil of his uncle (7) Johann Sebastian (24). After studying law at Leipzig University he returned to Eisenach in 1741 and deputized, without pay, for his ailing father. Plans to go to Frankfurt, Hamburg or Berlin, mentioned in a letter written by his cousin Johann Elias Bach (39), were never realized. In 1748 he became his father's official assistant and the next year his successor. He continued to practise as a lawyer as well, and in addition he was appointed Kapellmeister at the Weimar court in 1756 ‘in view of his well-known skill and musical knowledge’. This entailed regular journeys to Weimar, and during his frequent absences from Eisenach he was permitted to hire a substitute for his organist's duties. When the Hofkapelle was dissolved after the death of Duke Ernst August Constantin in 1758, Johann Ernst returned permanently to Eisenach but retained his Kapellmeister title and salary, for which he had to fulfil certain administrative duties. He wrote the foreword to Adlung's Anleitung zu der musikalischen Gelahrtheit (Erfurt, 1758), in which he criticized the current decay of church music and demanded that this be countered by ‘artistic and regular manners of composing’; as models of sacred cantatas he praised the ‘admirable masterpieces’ of J.S. Bach, Telemann and Stölzel. J.E. Bach was apparently in close contact with his cousin (9) Carl Philipp Emanuel (46), serving as agent for the first part of the Versuch (1753) and the harpsichord concertos w43 (1772). He contributed to the anthology Musicalisches Vielerley published by C.P.E. Bach in 1770.

As a composer Johann Ernst was abreast of the stylistic innovations of his time although, like Johann Sebastian's sons, he did not exclude contrapuntal writing. Characteristic of his personal style is the extended use of chromaticism and syncopated rhythms. His vocal works are often highly dramatic and full of effects. In his time he was particularly known for his ‘beautiful chorale settings’ (Musicalische Realzeitung, ii (1789), 179); these represent an important contribution to the genre of the sacred cantata as they form a link between J.S. Bach's chorale cantatas and the chorale settings of the generation of Doles and Hiller. His songs depend on the older tradition of Görner, Gräfe and Mizler; he wrote galant melodies full of expressive word-painting with lively basses and often elaborate accompaniments. His Passion oratorio is influenced by C.H. Graun's well-known Der Tod Jesu.

WORKS

vocal

O Seele, deren Sehnen (Passion oratorio), 1764, D-GOa, ed. in DDT, xlviii (1914); 2 Passions, lost, cited in GerberNL

Church cantatas: Ach Herr, strafe mich nicht (Ps vi), D-DS, US-CA; Auf und säumt euch nicht, ihr Frommen (Dank-Kantate), AAu; Der Herr ist nahe bei denen, for funeral of Duke Ernst August Constantin, 1758, D-Bsb, US-AAu; Die Liebe Gottes ist ausgegossen, D-Bsb, ed. in SBA; Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott, 1762, LEb; Herzlich lieb hab ich dich (Ps xviii), Bsb, Hs; Kein Stündlein geht dahin, Bsb, Bhm, Hs; Kommt herzu, lasset uns frohlocken (Ps xcv), LEb; Lobe den Herrn, meine Seele, lost, cited in Breitkopf catalogue, 1770; Mein Odem ist schwach (= bwv 222), Bsb, Hs, GB-Lbl, choral movts also as motet, Unser Wandel ist im Himmel (= BWV Anh. 165); Meine Seele erhebet den Herren (i), D-Bsb, ed. in SBA; Meine Seele erhebet den Herren (ii), MLHb; Meine Seele erhebet den Herrn (iii), F-Pn; Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich (Ps xxv), private collection; Sei willkommen, mächtiger Herrscher, D-CR, doubtful, probably by J.E. Bach; Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied (Ps cxlix), BNu, WFmk (erroneously attrib. C.P.E. Bach); So gehst du nun, mein Jesu, hin, US-AAu; Straf mich nicht in deinem Zorn, D-BNu, GOa; Wenn Donnerwolken über dir sich türmen (Das Vertrauen der Christen auf Gott), Bsb (inc.), GOa; Wie der Hirsch schreiet (Ps xlii), lost, cited in Breitkopf catalogue, 1764; Wünschet Jerusalem Glück, NTRE; others (?incl. annual cycle, 1766), lost

Mass [Ky–Gl] on Es woll uns Gott gnädig sein, SATB, bc, D-Bsb

Motets, SATB: Aus der Tiefen, GB-Lbl; Mein Odem ist schwach, in G.P. Weimar: Versuch von kleinen leichten Motetten und Arien (Leipzig, 1785); Unser Wandel ist im Himmel (= bwv Anh. 165), D-DS; 11 others, ARk, doubtful

Secular cantatas: Gesegneten Auftritt, for birthday of Duke Friedrich of Saxe-Gotha, 1756, lost, mentioned in H. Kretschmar, Preface to DDT, xlii (1910); Wer sagt mir doch, was für Entzücken, lost

Sammlung auserlesener Fabeln, i (Nuremberg, 1749) [pt ii ?unpubd]; ed. in DDT, xlii (1910)

Lächerliche Mammonshüter (An die Geizigen), in C.P.E. Bach: Musicalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770)

instrumental

Sinfonia, B, US-BETm; other sinfonias mentioned in GerberNL

3 Sonaten, kbd, vn, pt i (Eisenach, 1770); no.1 ed. in NM, ii (1927)

3 Sonaten, kbd, vn, pt ii (Eisenach, 1772)

Sonata, A, fl, vn, bc, D-Bsb

Sonatas, kbd: G, F, in J.U. Haffner: Oeuvres mêlées, v, vi (Nuremberg, 1759); A, Bsb

Org: Fantasia and fugue, d, Bsb; Fantasia and fugue, a, Bsb, ed. in Mw, xlii (1972); Fantasia and fugue, F, in C.P.E. Bach: Musicalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770), ed. in D. Hellmann: Orgelmusik der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1985); Chorale, Valet will ich dir geben, Bsb, ed. in D. Hellmann: Orgelmusik der Familie Bach (Leipzig, 1985)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

GerberNL

H. Löffler: “‘Bache” bei Seb. Bach’, BJb 1949–50, 106–24

H. Kühn: Vier Organisten Eisenachs aus Bachischem Geschlecht’, Bach in Thüringen (Berlin, 1950), 103–19

C. Oefner: Die Musikerfamilie Bach in Eisenach (Eisenach, 1984)

H. Max: Verwandtes im Werk Bachs, seiner Schüler und SöhneJohann Sebastian Bachs Spätwerk und dessen Umfeld: Duisburg 1986, 117–47

E. Odrich and P. Wollny: Die Briefkonzepte des Johann Elias Bach (Hildesheim, 2000)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

(b Leipzig, 21 June 1732; d Bückeburg, 26 Jan 1795). Composer, son of (7) Johann Sebastian Bach (24) and Anna Magdalena Bach. He is known as the ‘Bückeburg Bach’.

1. Life.

2. Works.

WORKS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §III: (11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

1. Life.

He received his musical education from his father. After leaving the Thomasschule, Leipzig, he is thought to have studied law briefly, but there is no record of his matriculation at Leipzig University. At the express wish of Count Wilhelm of Schaumburg-Lippe he was appointed harpsichordist to the court in Bückeburg, where he may at first have been subordinate to the court organist Ludolf Münchhausen. In June 1751 his brother Carl Philipp Emanuel visited him in the retinue of Frederick the Great when the king awarded the Order of the Great Eagle to Count Wilhelm. At this time the musical life of the court in Bückeburg was dominated by the Konzertmeister Angelo Colonna and the court composer Giovanni Battista Serini; they left Bückeburg in the middle of 1756 for reasons which remain obscure. On 8 January 1755 Bach had married Münchhausen’s daughter Lucia Elisabeth, who was trained as a singer by Serini and held a position at court, probably as an alto, with an annual salary of 100 thaler. The Seven Years War imposed considerable restrictions on the court of Bückeburg. Bückeburg itself was occupied by French troops in 1757 and Count Wilhelm, with a few trusted courtiers including Bach, withdrew to his estate of Niensteden on the Elbe, near Pinneberg, from October 1757 to April 1758. Bach took this opportunity to apply, successfully, for the vacant post of organist at the German church in Altona, then under Danish rule, but for unknown reasons he never took it up. On 18 February 1759 he was appointed Konzertmeister of the Bückeburg Hofkapelle, with a rise in his annual salary to 400 thaler (later, temporarily, to 416 thaler), and he also received the usual allowances in kind. However, court life did not return to normal until after the Peace of Hubertusburg, for which Bach wrote a thanksgiving cantata performed on Ascension Day 1763, and the return of Count Wilhelm from his military missions in Portugal in November 1764. The Hofkapelle usually gave concerts twice a week; the ensemble consisted of about 15 musicians, with assistance when necessary from outside performers and military bandsmen. Bach was responsible for the composition or procurement of the works played at these concerts and for rehearsing them, and he adjusted his choices to the taste of Count Wilhelm, who liked secular Italian vocal music and played keyboard instruments and perhaps the flute himself. In the period up to 1770 Bach wrote symphonies, trio sonatas, a number of Italian arias and cantatas (mainly to texts by Metastasio) and perhaps his most important work of this time, the large-scale cantata Cassandra. After Count Wilhelm’s marriage to Marie Barbara Eleonore zur Lippe-Biesterfeld on 12 November 1765, Protestant sacred music was performed at the Bückeburg court. Perhaps encouraged by his successful application to Altona, Bach applied on 24 June 1767 to succeed the late G.P. Telemann in Hamburg. He was, in fact, one of the short-listed candidates, but his half-brother Carl Philipp Emanuel gained the appointment. Between 1765 and 1773 Johann Christoph Friedrich set the best-known Protestant oratorio texts of his time, Der Tod Jesu, Die Hirten bei der Krippe Jesu and Die Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu, all by C.W. Ramler, and Die Pilgrime auf Golgatha by F.W. Zachariä. The tendency towards sacred vocal composition increased with the arrival in Bückeburg of J.G. Herder, who was court preacher and superintendent there from 1771 to 1776. His oratorio texts, highly regarded by Countess Marie Barbara, had a lasting effect on the music of the court. In these years Herder and Bach, who later regarded this as the happiest time of his life, collaborated on the cantata Michaels Sieg, oder Der Kampf des Guten und des Bösen in der Welt (1771, not 1775), the ‘biblical painting’ Die Kindheit Jesu (1772, for the birth of Countess Emilie Eleonore Wilhelmine in June 1771), Die Auferweckung Lazarus (1773, on the occasion of the death of Countess Marie Barbara’s twin brother Ferdinand Benjamin on 23 April 1772) and Der Fremdling auf Golgatha (1776), as well as the secular ‘scenes with song’, Brutus and Philoktetes, which have not survived.

The death of Countess Marie Barbara in 1776, Herder’s appointment to Weimar in the same year and the death of Count Wilhelm in 1777 marked a watershed in the intellectual life of the Bückeburg court. Count Philipp Ernst zu Schaumburg-Lippe-Allverdissen (1723–87) took over the government, holding court partly in Münster and partly in Bückeburg. In spring 1778 Bach asked for three months’ leave to visit his brother Johann Christian in London. He took his son Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst on this journey, which began some time between 16 March and 23 May 1778 and ended at the latest in November of the same year; the son was left with Johann Christian for further musical training. A series of string quartets and a set of six keyboard concertos, printed in London with dedications to members of the house of Schaumburg-Lippe, show how rapidly J.C.F. Bach adapted his music to English tastes. He also brought back an English piano from his travels, so his keyboard compositions after 1778 were not necessarily for the harpsichord. In 1780 Count Philipp Ernst took as his second wife Princess Juliane zu Hessen-Philippsthal (1761–99), who was particularly fond of the fine arts. At the Princess’s wish, attendance at court concerts was now open to the citizens of Bückeburg and to visitors. Forkel (Musikalischer Almanach, 1782) regarded the little Kapelle as one of the finest in Germany. Juliane took lessons in foreign languages and drawing, and studied the keyboard with J.C.F. Bach. Among the better known of his pupils (in addition to his son Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst and C.F. Geyer, later Kantor of Bückeburg) were the future Thomaskantor A.E. Müller and perhaps Adolf, Baron von Knigge. For teaching purposes Bach wrote a number of pedagogically valuable keyboard works, including the Sechs leichte Clavier-Sonaten (printed in 1784 with a dedication to Princess Juliane), variations (including a set on ‘Ah, vous dirai-je maman’), concertos and sonatas for four hands.

Bach also increased his efforts to get his compositions published. He could not muster enough subscribers for the edition of the large-scale sacred works he had been planning since about 1773, but he did publish the collection Musikalische Nebenstunden, containing mainly works by himself but also some songs by W.F.E. Bach and by noble dilettantes from Bückeburg and Minden. A comment in a letter to Breitkopf of 1 October 1788, in which Bach sought subscribers for a collection of three easy keyboard sonatas (‘These sonatas are easy, written in the latest style and composed in London, where they were much to the liking of Her Majesty the Queen’) may suggest that he paid a second visit to England, though further evidence of this is so far lacking.

The arrival in Bückeburg about 1793 of the brilliant Bohemian musician Franz Neubauer presented Bach with unaccustomed competition in the last years of his life. It inspired him to write new works (including a dozen large-scale symphonies and several double concertos) but it also intensified the latent depression from which he had been suffering since the death of his half-brother Carl Philipp Emanuel and which may have hastened the course of the chest ailment that brought about his death on 26 January 1795. In his obituary his friend Karl Gottlieb Horstig, superintendent at Bückeburg from 1793, described him as an industrious composer, always ready to be of service, and praised his upright character and ‘kindness of heart’.

Bach, §III: (11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

2. Works.

With his predisposition towards the use of existing models, his extensive revisions and his liking for experimentation, Bach showed in his compositions several apparently contradictory tendencies. His father had given him a thorough grounding in keyboard and organ playing and in the rudiments of composition, but when he moved to Bückeburg he found himself in an entirely different world. As a result he was obliged to adapt to new stylistic principles, studying them on his own with concrete models. His first works in almost all genres, therefore, are stylistic copies: the early piano sonatas are based on models by C.P.E. Bach, the aria ‘Luci amate, ah, non piangete’ (c1760) is an arrangement of a work by Matteo Capranica, and Der Tod Jesu (1769) is influenced by C.H. Graun’s setting of the same text (1755). However, Bach usually managed to move on rapidly, leaving his models behind, and to find new forms of expression. His secular cantatas from the period around 1773 are particularly noteworthy. They include Die Amerikanerin (after H.W. von Gerstenberg’s Lied eines Mohren) and Ino (text by Ramler), which during Bach’s lifetime brought him a reputation as one of the major cantata composers in Germany. The oratorios and cantatas written in collaboration with Herder may merit similar interest; they remained unpublished but were circulated and appreciated in aristocratic circles in Rheda, Detmold and Wernigerode. Although Bach preferred a lyrical tone, he had a special feeling for dramatic development, particularly evident in accompagnato scenas. The style of his vocal compositions is close to that of C.H. Graun, Telemann, and (particularly in choral movements) his brother Carl Philipp Emanuel, whom he even surpassed in his solidly constructed but fluent fugues. His keyboard compositions cover a wide range, from simple practice pieces in the style of J.S. Bach’s two-part Inventions (in the Musikalische Nebenstunden), through dance pieces and ‘easy keyboard sonatas’ to extremely demanding works written for his own use or for patrons outside Bückeburg. They felicitously unite the modern stylistic features of J.C. Bach with the sound musical construction of Carl Philipp Emanuel. The Drei leichte Sonaten fürs Klavier oder Piano Forte (Rinteln, 1789), as well as many of the works surviving only in manuscript, are among the best keyboard compositions of their time.

Bach’s compositions after the death of Count Wilhelm are notable for a willingness to experiment, encouraged by the attitude of Princess Juliane, who was always open to innovations, and by his continuing to work with an excellent Kapelle. He was turning to new genres even in the last years of his life, for example in the sonatas for two pianos of 1791, the wind septet of 1794 and two concertos for keyboard and another instrument dating from about 1791. In accordance with Bach’s conception of his duties, compositions written for the court and other patrons were exclusively for the use of those who had commissioned them, with the result that most of his music could not be widely disseminated. His reputation was therefore founded mainly on the compositions published during his lifetime. The music collection of the Bückeburg Hofkapelle, left by Prince Adolf in 1917 to the Fürstliches Institut für Musikforschung in Bückeburg which he had founded (in 1935 it became the Staatliches Institut für Musikforschung, Berlin), was destroyed in World War II, apart from a few fragments, making it difficult to evaluate Bach’s work as a whole. Almost without exception, the innovative compositions of his last years in particular were extant only in this collection.

Bach, §III: (11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

WORKS

Catalogues:H. Wohlfarth: ‘Neues Verzeichnis der Werke von Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach’, Mf, xiii (1960), 404–17; repr. in Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach (Berne, 1971) [W]Bach-Repertorium (forthcoming) [BR; Inc[ertum] = doubtful]Edition:Friedrich Bach; Ausgewählte Werke, ed. G. Schünemann (Bückeburg, 1920–23) [S]Sources:C.P.E. Bach, ed.: Musikalisches Vielerley (Hamburg, 1770) [MV]J.C.F. Bach, ed.: Musikalische Nebenstunden, i–iv (Rinteln, 1787–8) [MN]

keyboard

Edition:Le trésor des pianistes, ed. A. and L. Farrenc, xv (Paris, 1870/R) [F]

 

 

BR

W

 

 

 

A 1–2

XI/1–2

2 sonatas, F, C, MV; ed. in F

 

A 3–8

XI/3

6 leichte Sonaten, C, F, E, D, A, E (Leipzig, 1785); ed. H. Ruf and H. Bemmann (Mainz, 1966), nos.4–5 ed. in F

 

A 9–12

XI/4–7

3 sonatas, C, G, F, 1 sonatina, MN; sonatas 2–3 ed. in F, sonatina ed. in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser.F, ii (Stuttgart, 1989)

 

A 13–15

XI/8

3 leichte Sonaten, D, A, E, (Rinteln, 1789); no.2 ed. in S

 

A 16–21

XI/9 (= brA 18)

6 ‘easy’ sonatas, D, A, F, B, G, E, c1785, D-GOl

 

A 22–7

6 sonatas (nos.1–4 lost, no.5 E, no.6 F), c1785, GOl

 

A 28–34

7 sonatas (no.4 D, others lost), by 2 April 1789, HVl*

 

A 35–7

3 sonatas, after 1777, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799

 

A 38–9

2 sonatas, by 1789, lost, mentioned in letters from J.C.F. Bach to Breitkopf

 

A 40

XIII/1

Sonata, A, for 4 hands, 1786, Bsb*,

 

A 41

XIII/2

Sonata, C, for 4 hands, 1791, MS lost, formerly Bim; ed. in S

 

A 42–3

2 sonatas, 2 kbd, by 16 Feb 1791, lost, mentioned in letters from J.C.F. Bach to Breitkopf

 

A 44

XII/1

Romanza con XII variazioni, A, c1785–90, lost, formerly Bim

 

A 45

XII/2

Allegretto [‘Ah, vous dirai-je maman’] con VXIII variazioni, c1785–90, Bsb*

 

A 46–50

XII/3–7

5 dance movts, MV

 

A 51–120

XII/13

70 pieces, MN

 

A 121–5

XII/8–12

5 dances morts, c1745–9, Bsb

 

A Inc 1

Partia, C, by 1745, WD

 

A Inc 2–7

6 fugues, g, e, C, F, D, C, only no.4 (also attrib. G.P. Telemann) extant; pubd (Erfurt and Leipzig, c1858)

 

A Inc 8

Galanterie-Stücke, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799

 

chamber

B 1

X/3

Solo, A, vc, bc, MV

B 2

X/1

Solo, G, vc, b, c1780–85, D-Bsb*

B 3

VII/1

Trio, A, fl, vn, bc, (or Kbd, fl), MV

B 4

Trio, e, fl, va, bc, by 1760, Bsb

B 5–10

6 trios, 2 fl, bc, by 1770, lost

B 11–12

VII/2–3

2 trios, A, F, by 1768, US-BETm

B 13

Trio, 2 vn, bc, by 1788, lost, mentioned in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790)

B 14

VIII/2

Trio, E, kbd, fl/vn, MV

B 15–20

VIII/3

6 Sonaten, d, D, D, C, A, C, kbd, fl/vn (Riga, 1777)

B 21–2

IX/2–3

2 sonatas, G, D, kbd, vn, MN

B 23–4

2 trios, kbd, fl, by 1770, lost

B 25

VIII/1

Trio, F, kbd, fl/vn, by 1777, MS lost, formerly D-Bim; ed. W. Hinnenthal (Leipzig, 1937)

B 26–7

2 sonatas, F, D, by 1777, RH* (inc.)

B 28

IX/1

Sonata, G, kbd, vn, after 1777, lost, formerly Bim

B 29

VII/4

Sonata, D, kbd, fl/vn, vc, c1780, Bsb*; ed. in S

B 30–35

VII/5–7 (= brB 31–2, 34)

6 sonatas (no.2 G, no.3 A, no.5 C, others lost), kbd, fl/vn, va, 1770–80, Bsb*, PL-Kj*; nos.2, 5, ed. in S

B 36

X/4

Sonata, A, kbd, vc, 1789, MS lost, formerly D-Bim; arr. J. Smith (Brunswick, 1905)

B 37–42

VI

6 quartetti, D, G, C, A, F, B, fl, vn, va, bc (Hamburg, c1768)

B 43–8

6 quatuors, E, B, A, D, G, F, str (London, c1778)

B 49

IV

Septet, E, 2 ob, cl, 2 bn, hn, 1794, MS lost, formerly Bim; ed. in S

B 50–53

4 marches, after 1777, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799

B Inc 1

XX/3

Trio, B, 2 vn, bc, Bsb

B Inc 2

Trio, C, 2 fl, lost, formerly Berlin, Singakademie

B Inc 3

X/2

Solo, D, vc, bc, lost, formerly ?Bsb (?= brB 36)

B Inc 4

Sonata, kbd, ?vn, by 29 Sept 1789, lost

orchestral

symphonies; for 2 oboes, 2 horns and strings unless otherwise stated

C 1

Sym., D, MN (kbd red.)

 

C 2–3

2 syms., by 1770, lost

 

C 4

I/3

Sym., d, str, by 1768, US-WS

 

C 5–6

I/1–2

2 syms., F, B, by 1768, BETm

 

C 7

I/4

Sym., E, 2 hn, str, by 1768, WS

 

C 8–10

I/6 (= brC 10) 3 syms. (no.3 C, others lost), 1770, D-Bsb*

 

 

C 11–13

I/7–9

3 syms., D, G, D, ? by 1770, lost, formerly Bim

 

C 14

I/10

Sym., E, c1770–75, BÜC

 

C 15–17

3 syms., ? after 1777, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799

 

C 18–23

I/11–15

6 syms., D, F, D, C, G, nos.2–3 with 2 bn, c1792–3, lost, formerly Bim (= brC 19–23)

 

C 24–7

I/18–19, 16–17

4 syms., E, E, d, C, 1794, lost, formerly Bim

 

C 28

I/20

Sym., B, with fl, 2 cl, bn, 1794, Bsb*

 

concertos; for keyboard and orchestra (2 oboes/flutes, 2 horns and strings) unless otherwise stated

C 29

Conc., E, kbd, str (Riga, c1770)

 

C 30

Concerto II, A, kbd, str (Riga, c1772)

 

C 31–6

6 concs., G, F, D, E, B, C, kbd, vn, bc (London, n.d.)

 

C 37

II/1

Conc., E, kbd, str, by 1760, D-Bsb*

 

C 38

Conc., kbd, ?str, by 27 Oct 1766, lost

 

C 39

Conc., by 1788, lost, listed in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790)

 

C 40

II/4

Conc., F, 1782, Bsb*

 

C 41

II/2

Conc., D, c1780–85, Bsb*

 

C 42

II/3

Conc., A, ?c1785–90, lost, formerly Bim

 

C 43

II/5

Conc., E, 1792, Bsb*

 

C 44

Conc., E, va, kbd, orch, c1790, F-Pc*

 

C 45

III

Conc., E, ob, kbd, orch, 1791, lost, formerly D-Bim

 

oratorios

D 1

Die Pilgrime auf Golgotha (F.W. Zachariä), by 1769, D-F, Mbs

D 2

XIV/1

Der Tod Jesu (K.W. Ramler), 1769, rev. c1784, B-Bc*; ed. H. Salzwedel (Bückeburg, 1964)

D 3

XIV/10

Die Auferstehung und Himmelfahrt Jesu (Ramler), by 1772, rev. c1784, D-Bsb* (frag.)

D 4

XIV/9

Die Hirten bei der Krippe Jesu (Ramler), by 1773, lost, formerly Bim

D 5

XIV/2

Die Kindheit Jesu (J.G. Herder), 1773, rev. after 1777, Bsb*; ed. in DDT, lvi (1917/R)

D 6

XIV/3

Die Auferweckung Lazarus’ (Herder), 1773, rev. after 1777, Bsb*; ed. in DDT, lvi (1917/R)

D 7

XIV/7

Der Fremdling auf Golgotha (Herder), 1776, music lost, formerly Bim

D 8

XVII/3

Mosis Mutter und ihre Tochter (G.D. Stille), 1787, Bsb* (inc.)

other sacred vocal

in German unless otherwise stated

E 1

Miserere (Ps li) [Lat.], by 1770, rev. after 1777, F-Pc, private collection, USA (autograph); ed. in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser.F, i (Stuttgart, 1992)

F 1

XIV/4

Herr, wie lange willst du unser also veressen (J.G. Herder), cant. for Whitsun, c1773, music lost, formerly D-Bim

F 2

Sieh, Bückeburg, was Gott an Dir getan (J.H. Cramer), cant. for Ascension, 8 May 1763, music lost

F 3

XIV/8

Gross und mächtig, stark und prächtig, cant. for Ascension, 1776, perf. ?1777, Bsb*

F 4

XIV/5

Wie wird uns werden (Herder), cant. for feast of St Michael, 29 Sept 1771, Bsb

F 5

Nun, teures Land, der Herr hat dich erhört, cant. on birth of Countess Emilie Eleonore Wilhelmine, perf. July 1771, music lost

F 6

XIV/11

Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied, cant. on birth of Count Georg Wilhelm, perf. 6 Feb 1785, music lost, formerly Bim

F 7a–c

XIV/12

Gott wird deinen Fuss nicht gleiten lassen (G.D. Stille), cant. for birthday of Countess Juliane, perf. 8 June 1787, Bsb* [orig. as cant. for Count Philipp Ernst, unperf.]

F Inc 1

Funeral music for Count Philipp Ernst, perf. 31 May 1787, lost

F Inc 2

Heut ist der Tag des Dankens, ihr Völker, cant., ?1780s, music lost

secular vocal

G 1

XVIII/8

Luci amate ah non piangete, aria, S, insts, by 1760, rev. later, D-Bsb*

G 2–11

10 It. arias (P. Metastasio and others), by 1766, lost

G 12–17

6 It. cants. (Metastasio), by 1766, lost

G 18–44

27 cants. (Metastasio), incl. L’inciampo, S, bc (brG 27, wXVIII/2), Bsb*, others lost

G 45

scenes from Il pastor fido (G.B. Guarini), by 27 Sept 1766, lost

G 46

XVIII/1

Cassandra (A. Conti), A, insts, by 1770, B-Bc*

G 47

XVIII/3

Die Amerikanerin (H.W. von Gerstenberg), S, insts (Riga, 1776); ed. G.A. Walter (Berlin, 1919)

G 48

XVIII/4

Ino (K.W. Ramler), S, insts, D-Bsb*, vs (Leipzig, 1786)

G 49

XVIII/6

Prokris und Cephalus (J.E. Schlegel), S, S, insts, vs, MN

G 50

XVIII/5

Pygmalion (Ramler), A/B, insts, by 1772, Bsb

G 51

Ariadne auf Naxos (Gerstenberg), by 1773, music lost

G 52

XVII/1

Brutus (J.G. Herder), by 1774, music lost, formerly Bim

G 53

XVII/2

Philoktetes (Herder), by 1775, music lost, formerly Bim

G Inc 1

Stimmt an, greift rasch in eure Saiten, cant. on return of Count Wilhelm from Portugal, Nov 1764, music lost

G Inc 2

Va crescendo il mio tormento, aria, Mbs, by ?J.C. Bach

songs and motets

songs; for 1 voice and keyboard/continuo unless otherwise stated

H 1–5

XIX/1

5 songs, MV

H 6–10

XVI/1

5 sacred songs (B. Münter) in D. Balthasar Münters Erste Sammlung geistlicher Lieder (Leipzig, 1773)

H 11–60

XVI/2

50 sacred songs (Münter) in J. Balthasar Münters … Zweyte Sammlung geistlicher Lieder (Leipzig, 1774) [brH 47 also arr. 4vv (=wXV/3), D-Bsb*]

H 61–81

XIX/2

21 songs and arias, MN

H 82

Volkslied in Einige melodienreiche und leichte Klavier- und Singstücke von guten Komponisten unserer Zeit

H 83

Das schlafende Mädchen (H.W. von Gerstenberg) in J.C.F. Rellstab: Winterblumen am Clavier, ii (Berlin, 1794)

H 84

Feuerfarb (S. Mereau), c1794, in K.G. Horstig and C.U. Ulmenstein: Westfälisches Taschenbuch für das Jahr 1801 (Münster, c1800)

H 85–93

9 songs by ?1770, lost, listed in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790), [? some incl. in brH 1–5 and/or 61–81]

H 94

Klavier-Ode (C. Hölty), by 29 Sept 1789, lost

H 95

Berg-Lied, 1790, BÜC*

H 96

XVIII/7

O wir bringen gerne dir, aria, S, S, bc, c1790, Bsb*

motets; for 4 voices and continuo

H 97–99

XXI/1–3

3 motets after C.P.E. Bach (C.F. Gellert), Bsb*

H 100

XV/1

Ich lieg und schlaf, 1780, Bsb*; ed. in S, ed. in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser.F, i (Stuttgart, 1992)

H 101

XV/2

Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme (P. Nicolai), Bsb*; ed. in S, ed. in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser.F, i (Stuttgart, 1992)

H 102

Wie sie so sanft ruhn, alle die Seligen (J. Stockmann), c1792, lost, mentioned in obituary

H Inc 1

Wiegenliedschen, by 1772, BÜC

H Inc 2–4

3 songs for Georg Wilhelm von Schaumburg-Lippe, after 1784, inc.

H Inc 5

Der Unterschied der Künste, after ?1777, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799

Bach, §III: (11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

BIBLIOGRAPHY

EitnerQ

GerberL

GerberNL

MGG1 (R. Benecke)

NewmanSCE

J.G. Meusel: Teutsches Künstlerlexikon (Lemgo, 1778, 2/1808–14)

J.N. Forkel: Musikalischer Almanach für Deutschland (Leipzig, 1782–8)

K.G. Horstig: Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach’, Nekrolog der Deutschen auf das Jahr 1795, ed. F. Schlichtgeroll (Gotha, 1797), 269–84; ed. R. Schaal in Friedrich von Schlichtegroll: Musiker-Nekrologe (Kassel, 1954)

C.H. Bitter: Carl Philipp Emanuel und Wilhelm Friedemann Bach und deren Brüder (Berlin, 1868)

G. Schünemann: Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach’, BJb 1914, 45–165

G. Schünemann: Friedrich Bachs Briefwechsel mit Gerstenberg und Breitkopf’, BJb 1916, 20–35

G. Schünemann: Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach, DDT, lvi (1917) [ix]–xvii

G. Hey: Zur Biographie Johann Friedrich Bachs und seiner Familie’, BJb 1933, 77–85

J. Domp: Studien zur Geschichte der Musik an Westfälischen Adelshöfen im XVIII. Jahrhundert (Regensburg, 1934)

K. Geiringer: The Bach Family: Seven Generations of Creative Genius (London, 1954; Ger. trans., enlarged, 1958; enlarged 2/1977)

K. Geiringer: Unbeachtete Kompositionen des Bückeburger Bach’, Festschrift Wilhelm Fischer, ed. H. von Zingerle (Innsbruck, 1956), 99–107

U. Wulfhorst: Ein Orgelgutachten von Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach’, Mf, xiii (1960), 55–7

H.-J. Schulze, ‘Frühe Schriftzeugnisse des beiden jüngsten Bach-Söhne’, BJb 1963–4, 61–9

H. Wohlfarth: Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach: ein Komponist im Vorfeld des Klassik (Berne, 1971) [incl. list of works]

B. Poschmann: Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach, Schaumburg-Lippischer Capellmeister 1732–1795, Niedersächsisches Staatsarchiv, 1982 (Bückeburg, 1982) [exhibition catalogue]

L. Salter: Which Bach?’, The Consort, no.42 (1986), 50–60

G. Rötter: London gegen Bückeburg: fünf zu drei? Ein Bach-Porträt und zwei Komponisten’, Musica, xliv (1990), 83–6

B.J. Sing: Geistliche Vokalkompositionen zwischen Barock und Klassik: Studien zu den Kantatendichtungen Johann Gottfried Herders in den Vertonungen Johann Christoph Friedrich Bachs (Baden-Baden, 1992)

U. Leisinger: Die geistlichen Vokalwerke von Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach: Aspekte der Entstehungs- und Überlieferungsgeschichte’, BJb 1995, 115–43

U. Leisinger, ed.: Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach (1732–1795): ein Komponist zwischen Barock und Klassik, Niedersächsisches Staatsarchiv, 8 June – 11th Aug 1995 (Bückeburg, 1995) [exhibition catalogue, incl. list of works]

H. Tiggemann: Graf Wilhelm und Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach im Exil auf Gut Niensteden’, Shaumburg-Lippische Heimat-Blätter, xlvi (1995), 66–73

Bach, §III: Individual members

(12) Johann [John] Christian Bach

(50) (b Leipzig, 5 Sept 1735; d London, 1 Jan 1782). Composer, youngest son of (7) Johann Sebastian Bach. As a composer he was the most versatile of J.S. Bach’s sons and the only one to write Italian operas. He was an important influence on Mozart and, with C.F. Abel, did much to establish regular public concerts in London.

1. Germany and Italy.

2. London, 1762–72.

3. Mannheim and London, 1772–82.

4. Style and reputation.

5. Church music and oratorio.

6. Operas.

7. Symphonies and concertos.

8. Keyboard and chamber music.

WORKS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

1. Germany and Italy.

It is likely that J.C. Bach’s early musical education was supervised by his father, though some instruction may have been given by Johann Elias Bach (39), who lived in the Leipzig household between 1738 and 1743 and acted as secretary to the elder Bach. Johann Christian himself assumed some secretarial duties in 1749–50, preparing music manuscripts and receipts on his father’s behalf. Christian, evidently a favourite child of Sebastian, inherited three of his father’s harpsichords. J.S. Bach’s keyboard music played an important role in his son’s development: the second book of Das wohltemperirte Clavier was completed in the early 1740s and probably served as a teaching manual for Christian, as had the first book for his half-brother Wilhelm Friedemann in the 1720s; it is known that J.C. Bach owned a manuscript of the English Suites; a knowledge of the B keyboard Partita must be inferred from Christian’s use of a modified version of the opening in his accompanied sonata op.10 no.1; and the earliest datable music manuscript in J.C. Bach’s hand, a Stammbuch entry dated 23 October 1748, is a keyboard version in D minor of the Polonaise from J.S. Bach’s Second Orchestral Suite. None of J.C. Bach’s own compositions can be assigned to his Leipzig years except for a march in the second Clavierbüchlein of Anna Magdalena Bach (bwv Anh.131) and, possibly, a handful of keyboard dances.

After his father’s death in 1750 Christian moved to Berlin, where he studied composition and harpsichord with his half-brother Carl Philipp Emanuel. According to Gerber, the young Bach performed his own works on the harpsichord in Berlin ‘with great applause’ and composed his first large-scale compositions. Of the ‘5 harpsichord concertos, 1 cello concerto, 2 trios and 3 arias’ listed as Johann Christian’s in Emanuel’s Nachlass (1790), only the harpsichord concertos – large-scale works in the manner of C.P.E. Bach – are known to survive. The authenticity of the first publication attributed to J.C. Bach, the ode An Aeglen in a collection of 1755, has been disputed by Warburton (Thematic Catalogue, 1999). A similar song, Mezendore, printed in a similar collection the following year, is probably by Bach, though J.C.F. Bach’s authorship cannot be ruled out. A third song, Der Weise auf dem Lande, may be confidently attributed to J.C. Bach’s Berlin period; the autograph entry in a Stammbuch is dated 16 April 1755.

In late spring or summer 1755 Bach took his first steps towards abandoning the Protestant, Kapellmeister tradition which had nourished the Bach family for two centuries: he left for Italy, possibly in the company of an Italian lady singer, and took up residence in Milan. Little is known about his first months there: three arias attributed to him were evidently inserted in Cocchi’s Emira, performed in Milan in January 1756. Evidently he was installed in the house of his Milanese patron, Count Agostino Litta, by that time and began having lessons in counterpoint with Padre Martini in Bologna. The main biographical sources for Bach’s Italian years are his letters to Martini, beginning in January 1757 and continuing sporadically after Bach settled in London in 1762. These reveal Bach’s expanding reputation as a composer, first in Italy and later north of the Alps. His first music written in Italy was mostly liturgical, some of it in the antique contrapuntal style associated with Martini, and performed in churches in Milan and elsewhere. In June 1760 Bach was appointed second organist at Milan Cathedral, and it is probable that he embraced the Roman Catholic faith at this time. Increasingly, the opera house provided a stronger lure for him. After composing arias for pasticcios in Milan and elsewhere, he was commissioned to write an opera seria for the Teatro Regio, Turin; Artaserse was given its première there on 26 December 1760. In the following year Bach, neglecting his organist’s duties in Milan and thereby attracting Litta’s displeasure, travelled extensively in Italy, composing his next and most popular early opera, Catone in Utica, for the S Carlo, Naples, and Alessandro nell’Indie for the same theatre (performed on 20 January 1762; a cantata by Bach for the birthday of Charles III of Spain was performed on the same day). Catone was revived in Milan in 1762, performed in Pavia, Perugia and Parma in 1763 and again in Naples in 1764 and was heard as late as 1768 in Brunswick. Wider European recognition was achieved with the publication of the overture to Artaserse by Venier in Paris in 1761. Bach himself had signalled this recognition in an important letter to Martini dated 14 February 1761: ‘for some time past I have almost had to put my studies aside, being every day called upon to write something for concerts – a symphony, concerto, cantata and so forth for Germany or Paris’. The success of his operas attracted the attention of the management of the King’s Theatre, London, who commissioned two operas for the 1762–3 season; by accepting he gave up the opportunity of composing a third opera for Naples and one for Venice. Bach sought leave of absence for a year from the Milan Cathedral authorities, and although the post was kept open for him, he never returned. In late June or early July 1762 he made his way to London for the final and decisive stage of his career.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

2. London, 1762–72.

During Bach’s 20 years in London he lived comfortably at various addresses in Soho, Mayfair and later Richmond and Paddington. He found fame, success and, at least until the late 1770s, financial stability. He enjoyed the acquaintance of the royal family, the patronage of the aristocracy and the friendship of musicians and artists, including Abel, the painter Gainsborough and Charles Burney, and soon established a pre-eminent position in the concert and operatic life of the city. If, as Burney stated, Bach was initially disappointed by the mediocre operatic standards in the city, his future in London was assured by the triumph of his first complete stage work, Orione (February 1763; the première was attended by King George III and Queen Charlotte), followed by the less successful Zanaida (May 1763), and by his appointment as music master to the queen. It was now unnecessary for him to return to the claustrophobic and restrictive atmosphere of Milan. Bach’s court duties involved giving music lessons to the queen and her children, organizing chamber concerts, directing the queen’s band and accompanying the flute-playing of the king. Links with the royal family were strengthened with the publication of the keyboard concertos op.1, advertised in March 1763 and dedicated to Queen Charlotte. The finale of the sixth concerto, a set of variations on God Save the King, became one of Bach’s most popular and oft-published works.

Bach’s earliest years in London were those of his most vigorous activity in the opera house. His relationship with the King’s Theatre was not without setbacks. The violinist Felice Giardini took over the management for the 1763–4 season, and although he and Bach were later to collaborate professionally there were tensions in their relationship; no operatic work by Bach was staged during Giardini’s tenure. Bach was invited to return to Naples, but he evidently preferred to remain north of the Alps. He travelled to Paris in July 1763, establishing an important connection with the city, and was immediately granted a privilege for the publication of his works there; a similar privilege was granted in London on 15 December that year.

In the 1764–5 season Bach returned to the King’s Theatre, contributing to two pasticcios and composing Adriano in Siria, given on 26 January 1765. The opera received seven performances and met with Burney’s disapproval: ‘Every one seemed to come out of the theatre disappointed’. Apart from a few arias contributed to pasticcios, Bach had little further to do with the King’s Theatre until Carattaco, performed on 14 February 1767. Like Orione, it is on a grand scale with choruses, but although praised by Burney and others it was never revived. The singer Cecilia Grassi, later Bach’s wife, was to have sung in it, but she was indisposed. Bach also contributed arias for the English stage, including music for the pasticcios The Maid of the Mill (1765), The Summer’s Tale (1765) and Tom Jones (1769). In addition, he supplied songs, occasionally arranged from operatic arias, for performance at Vauxhall Gardens; four sets of Vauxhall songs were published between 1766 and 1779.

From his earliest days in London Bach took advantage of the flourishing music trade, publishing a whole series of works and establishing a relationship with the printer and publisher Peter Welcker, and later with his son John. Bach’s practice for the most part in the 1760s was to publish a work under his own auspices; Welcker would usually reissue it shortly afterwards under his own imprint. This relationship began about 1765 with the reissue of the concertos op.1 (first published in 1763) and continued with the accompanied sonatas op.2, the first set of symphonies op.3 and the first set of canzonets op.4, all dating from 1765. Most of Bach’s works were published a few months later in Paris by Huberty (and later Sieber) and by Hummel in Amsterdam. There is reason to believe that Bach had some arrangement with the continental firms, especially Sieber, who published the first edition of the piano sonatas op.17 (as op.12) in Paris in 1773 or 1774. Bach evidently took great care to protect his interests, and in 1773 he took Longman, Lukey & Co. to court for the unauthorized publication of several pieces.

From early 1764 Bach shared lodgings with Carl Friedrich Abel, the composer and viol da gamba player who had lived in London since 1759 and whose father had served at Cöthen with J.S. Bach. Carl Friedrich himself had studied with Sebastian in Leipzig and therefore may have known Johann Christian as a boy. Their collaboration in the series of concerts later dubbed the Bach-Abel concerts was to have a major impact on London concert life. The first one took place at the Great Room in Spring Gardens on 29 February 1764. In the following year they participated in the subscription series organized by Teresa Cornelys at Carlisle House, Soho Square, giving ten concerts in all that year and increasing to 15 from 1766. Bach and Abel took over the management of the concerts from 1768 when they moved to Almack’s Assembly Rooms in King Street, St James’s, where they remained until 1774. The concerts were directed alternately by Bach and Abel. Although few details are known, the programmes included the latest symphonies, concertos, chamber and vocal works of Bach, Abel and other fashionable composers. The performers were the best in London, and often of German origin; they included the oboist J.C. Fischer, the violinist Wilhelm Cramer (father of John, the pianist) and later the pianist J.S. Schroeter, one of Bach’s pupils.

In April 1764 Leopold Mozart arrived in London with his family. Although there is no evidence that Wolfgang Amadeus appeared at the Bach-Abel concerts, he did perform at court and became a great admirer of J.C. Bach. They are known to have performed duets on the harpsichord together. Mozart had a high regard for the man and his music: in the early 1770s he arranged three of Bach’s piano sonatas from op.5 as keyboard concertos, and the symphonies and sonatas from the time of his 15 months in London bear the stamp of both Bach’s and Abel’s music. The Mozarts evidently left London in 1765 with an autograph manuscript of a piano sonata by Bach (later published in modified form as op.17 no.3) which was kept in Leopold Mozart’s library in Salzburg.

Bach’s keyboard sonatas op.5, published in 1766, are a landmark in that they are the first published in London to bear the option of the piano on the title-page. Bach’s central role in the development of the piano in London is defined by Burney: ‘After the arrival of John Chr. Bach in this country, and the establishment of his concert[s] … all the harpsichord makers tried their mechanical powers at piano-fortes’. Bach is credited with performing the first solo in public on the piano in 1768 and had dealings with many of the major instrument makers of the day. He is known to have sent pianos to France, to the pianist Madame Brillon and also to the daughter of the Encyclopedist Diderot. A square piano, apparently by Zumpe, survives in a British private collection, bearing Bach’s signature on the soundboard.

At the end of the 1760s Bach was well established as the leading composer and musician in London, and as an international figure much in demand as a composer, performer and teacher. He evidently charged high fees as a teacher according to Charles Wesley writing in the late 1770s. Works such as the symphonies opp.3, 6 and 9 and piano concertos op.7 were performed in all (and published in many) of the major music centres of Europe. In the early 1770s this fame was consolidated in London and on the Continent. In 1770 he wrote his last major religious work, the two-act Gioas re di Giuda, performed at the King’s Theatre and revived the following year. R.J.S. Stevens reports that Bach, persuaded to perform an organ concerto between the acts, was hissed at by the audience and laughed at by the choristers for his style of playing – the first reference, perhaps, to Bach’s deteriorating keyboard abilities. In 1770, also for the King’s Theatre, Bach and Pietro Guglielmi adapted Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice, adding choruses and supplementary music to bring it to ‘a necessary length for an evening’s entertainment’. Although it blunted the reform elements in Gluck’s opera, this version was a success; it was revived with modifications in 1771 and 1773 and was also given at the Teatro S Carlo in Naples in 1774.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

3. Mannheim and London, 1772–82.

Apart from the two-act serenata Endimione (1772), no new work by Bach was performed at the King’s Theatre until 1778. In the meantime he fulfilled operatic commissions abroad. In about 1770 he had befriended Johann Baptist Wendling, first flautist in the electoral orchestra at Mannheim and husband of the singer Dorothea (both were later friends of Mozart). It was perhaps due to Wendling, who had lodged with him during his time in London, that Bach was commissioned to write Temistocle, to a libretto adapted from Metastasio by the Mannheim court poet Verazi, for the nameday festivities of the Elector Carl Theodor. The orchestra in the German city was unrivalled in quality, and Bach’s sumptuous score exploits the capabilities of the Mannheim orchestra and soloists to the full. Bach was able to experience this at first hand when he travelled to Mannheim in August or September 1772 and remained there for the première on 5 November. The opera was extremely successful and was revived the following year. This elicited a further operatic commission, and the result, Lucio Silla, was performed on 5 November 1775. It is not known for certain whether Bach himself attended the performance, but given that he attended all his other operatic premières it is possible that he made the trip. Lucio Silla was evidently less successful, although it was valued by Mozart who examined the score in Mannheim in 1777. Mozart himself had set the same text, by Giovanni de Gamerra, for Milan in 1772. Other works by Bach performed at Mannheim include the cantatas Amor vincitore (first performed in London in 1774) and La tempesta (published in Mannheim in 1778). Endimione was revised for a performance there in 1774.

The early 1770s saw a number of new publications: the keyboard concertos op.7 (1770), the flute quartets op.8 (1772) perhaps written with Wendling in mind, three symphonies op.9 (1773), the accompanied sonatas op.10 (1773) and the quintets op.11 (1774) dedicated to the Elector Carl Theodor. Many of these pieces would have been used in Bach’s English concerts, which were not restricted to London. In 1773 he visited Blandford and Salisbury, performing there with Cecilia Grassi. Terry and others have suggested that they married later in 1773 or early in 1774, on the evidence that Bach moved to 80 Newman Street, while Abel moved elsewhere. But concert advertisements continued to refer to Cecilia as Signora (or Mrs) Grassi until at least 1776, and so the date of the wedding remains in conjecture.

In 1774 the Bach-Abel concerts moved back to Carlisle House, Soho, now vacated by the bankrupt Mrs Cornelys. But Bach and Abel had more ambitious plans: with Giovanni Andrea Gallini they acquired a property in Hanover Square, on the corner of Hanover Street, and in the garden built a new concert hall, the Hanover Square Rooms, a lavishly appointed building with paintings by Gainsborough. This was the final home of the Bach-Abel concerts, but it also marked the beginning of their decline. Bach’s finances were depleted and receipts diminished, especially after 1778. The concerts remained Bach’s main forum for new works, including the cantatas Cefalo e Procri (1776) and Rinaldo ed Armida (1778). It is likely that the final set of keyboard concertos, op.13 (1777), received an airing there, along with his last major set of symphonies (including three for double orchestra) op.18 and the last major chamber works, including a sextet for keyboard, oboe, strings and two horns and quintets and quartets for various combinations of strings, keyboard and woodwind. Probably these chamber works were also performed by the queen’s band at Richmond Lodge. Bach had taken a house nearby as early as 1770, and Mrs Papendiek recalled performances there led by Bach and Abel.

In the mid-1770s Padre Martini requested Bach to send him his portrait. Although Gainsborough’s celebrated painting (fig.10) was apparently completed by May 1776, Bach waited for over two years before despatching it to Italy. It survives in the Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale, Bologna, and another version, formerly in the collection of the Earl of Hillingdon, is in the National Portrait Gallery, London.

Bach made a return to the King’s Theatre with the revival of Orione in 1777 (in a revised version) and in the following year produced his last and finest stage work for London, the opera La clemenza di Scipione (4 April 1778). Bach took the trouble to have the full score published (omitting most of the recitatives), a practice almost unknown in London in the 1770s. In 1778 Bach’s brother Johann Christoph Friedrich paid a visit to London with his son Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst, who stayed behind after his father had returned to Germany and remained in London until after Johann Christian’s death in 1782.

Bach’s last complete operatic venture, the tragédie lyrique Amadis de Gaule was performed in Paris in 1779. The composer had visited the French capital in August 1778 to audition singers, at the same time renewing his acquaintance with Mozart, who reported to his father his delight in meeting again his former mentor. Amadis, an unusual work, clearly written to accord with the current French taste, was a failure. It was withdrawn for revision after only three performances and returned to the stage in January 1780. A manuscript in the Bibliothèque de l’Opéra, Paris, presumably for the revised version, shows heavy cuts and alterations. In the printed score, which appeared shortly after Bach’s death, these cuts are restored. The first issue contains a poignant preface by Bach’s widow, in which she states that the published version is not as it was performed in Paris, but is the version preferred by the composer.

The last years of Bach’s life show declining fortunes and health. The Bach-Abel concerts continued to lose money; Bach was apparently defrauded of more than £1000 by a servant and his bank account became overdrawn. His pre-eminence in the opera house was usurped by Sacchini and others, and in the concert hall by his pupil Johann Samuel Schroeter; as Mrs Papendiek remarked: ‘Bach played occasionally, but Schroeder (sic) was the planet’. Ill-health supervened: Cecilia Grassi in the preface to Amadis reported on the ‘long illness which led him to the tomb’; the last known example of his handwriting, a list of subscribers for a proposed (but unrealized) series of new chamber works, dating from 1780 or 1781, reveals a shakiness of hand far removed from the confident script of Bach’s earlier years; and on 14 December 1781 the singer Angelo Morigi sent news to Martini that Bach was suffering from a chest illness. Bach died on 1 January 1782 and was buried in St Pancras churchyard on 6 January, leaving substantial debts which neither the last season of the Bach-Abel concerts, continued by Bach’s widow, nor a benefit concert on 27 May 1782 managed to efface completely. Cecilia Bach returned to Italy via Paris in summer 1782 after some of her debts had been repaid with assistance from Queen Charlotte.

Bach’s death elicited obituaries particularly in the German magazines. None is as eloquent as the few words of Mozart who, in a letter to his father, described Bach’s passing as ‘a loss to the musical world’.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

4. Style and reputation.

J.C. Bach’s music is more cosmopolitan and varied than that of any other of J.S. Bach’s sons. Abandoning the restrictive Lutheran sensibility of his brothers, he turned his face towards the south, embracing Catholicism and Italian opera, and his musical style was transformed accordingly. Bach’s German works (before mid-1755), notably the keyboard concertos written in Berlin, are strongly influenced by C.P.E. Bach, with their preponderance of minor keys, their severe character, and their solid, lumbering ideas with long melodic lines, wide leaps, sudden interruptions to the rhythmic and melodic flow and syncopations. After the move to Italy, this severe style all but vanished. It is still to be found from time to time, for example in the opening movement of the Dies irae, the keyboard Toccata in B minor and the A Sonata, though in a watered-down manner. The influence of Padre Martini is prominent in the first Italian works, notably in the strict counterpoint and antique pseudo-Palestrina style of the music for the Office of the Dead (1757) and also in the keyboard Sonata op.5 no.6 which, although not published until 1766, recalls Martini’s sonatas of the 1730s in its serious prelude, double fugue and gavotte.

The main influence on Bach during his years in Milan was Italian opera seria, which he wholeheartedly embraced. It transformed his style, tipping the balance from severity to a lighter, more bland manner: the stiff, terse and long-winded ideas of the Berlin works are softened into smooth, clear, symmetrical phrases composed of short motivic ideas underpinned by simple harmonies, with none of the sudden dramatic surprises of the Berlin concertos and with a marked slowing-down of the harmonic rhythm. The slow movements are often imbued with a sensuality and quiet passion unknown in the earlier works. Most compositions of the Italian years (1755–62) – the three operas, at least one symphonie concertante, church works, accompanied sonatas and operatic overtures – are representative of this new galant manner.

It was this ‘international’ style that Bach brought to London. During his period in England his musical language developed: the short motivic phrases of his Italian works gradually expanded into a more wholeheartedly melodic style, in some cases influenced by British popular songs and folksong. Bach widened his tonal range and structures became more expansive and varied, the binary sonata forms of his earlier works becoming larger and more diverse, often embracing a full recapitulation in the tonic key. Burney remarked that Bach seems to have been the first composer who observed the law of contrast as a principle. Before his time, contrast there frequently was in the work of others, but it seems to have been accidental. Bach in his symphonies and other incidental pieces as well as in his songs, seldom failed, after a rapid and noisy passage, to introduce one that was slow and soothing.Burney thus draws attention to Bach’s habitual use of contrasting themes in the sonata structures of his London works, and these ‘second subject’ ideas are a consistent feature of his later style.

Bach’s orchestration is often imaginative and felicitous, and occasionally calls for new or unusual instruments to achieve effects – for example clarinets in Orione, a pair of ‘octave flutes’ in the Vauxhall song ‘Hither turn thy wand’ring eyes’ and obbligato instruments such as the bassoon in the aria ‘Non m’alletta’ from Temistocle. Perhaps as a result of exposure to the orchestral manner of the Mannheimers, his orchestration became even more adept and imaginative, with greater freedom in the use of woodwind and pizzicato string effects and the use of two orchestras in three of the op.18 symphonies.

In London Bach broadened his range of musical subjects, embracing (in addition to operas and concertos) symphonies, chamber works, popular songs, canzonets, cantatas and various types of keyboard work, including duet sonatas. These are written in a Classical style with italianate thematic material, enlivened by contact with French and British melodies and ideas and allied to German strength and rigour. This synthesis of musical idiom resulted in an essentially popular style geared towards the large, music-loving aristocratic and middle-class audiences of London, which, as Haydn discovered in the 1790s, appreciated new and lavish effects and at the same time enjoyed familiar themes. Bach’s use of national songs in concerto finales and his exploitation of the piano and other new instruments, such as the ‘voce umana’, in the Bach-Abel concerts can be regarded as catering to the taste of the new audience.

Bach’s music had considerable influence on contemporary composers in London, namely Schroeter and Mazzinghi (his pupils), J.C. Fischer, W.F.E. Bach and, most notably, Mozart, whose symphonies and sonatas of the mid-1760s reveal the influence of both Bach and Abel. Although commentators have often noted several resemblances, such as that between ‘Martern aller Arten’ in Mozart’s Die Entführung aus dem Serail and ‘Infelice, in van m’affanno’ in Bach’s La clemenza di Scipione, Bach’s influence on Mozart is probably more general and fundamental, notably in the sensual slow movements and in particular in Bach’s highly developed sense of musical balance.

It is often stated that Bach’s reputation was immediately eclipsed after his death, that his music was no longer performed and his influence died with him. This is not strictly true. Though his reputation continued to decline in the 1780s, an analysis of London concert programmes reveals that Bach’s music continued to be performed in London at least until the mid-1790s, when his symphonies were still played alongside those of Haydn. His works, and arrangements of them, were posthumously printed in London and on the Continent, albeit sporadically, until the mid-1790s, and they continued to be available in manuscript until the end of the century and beyond, to judge by the vast number of late copies now in libraries in Italy and elsewhere. It was in the early 19th century that Bach’s music virtually ceased to be performed and published. An exception was the extraordinarily late revival (in a thoroughly revised form) of La clemenza di Scipione at the King’s Theatre in 1805, perhaps due to the advocacy of his pupil Mrs Billington; there were also isolated pockets where Bach’s works continued to be played in the 19th century, such as the monastery of Einsiedeln, where his church music was still heard and where ‘new’ religious works were created by supplying contrafact Latin texts to Italian arias from his operas. The 19th century nevertheless proved to be the nadir of J.C. Bach’s popularity. His self-deprecatory remark, ‘My brother [C.P.E. Bach] lives to compose, I compose to live’, provided the underlying text of much of the critical writing on the composer. It was only in the early years of the 20th century, with the writings of Terry, Schökel and Tutenberg among others, that a more balanced view of J.C. Bach has been achieved and the composer has taken his place among the most gifted and influential musicians of the early Classical period.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

5. Church music and oratorio.

Bach’s Latin church music comprises large-scale psalm and canticle settings, mass movements, music for the Office and Mass for the Dead (including three lessons, an invitatory, an introit, Kyrie and Dies irae), all scored for chorus, soloists and orchestra; and smaller works, such as motets for a single voice and orchestra, including settings of Attendite mortales and Salve regina. With only two exceptions, the oratorio Gioas, re di Giuda and Let the solemn organs blow, all the pieces are for Roman Catholic services; by contrast with his father and brothers, there are no Lutheran church works by J.C. Bach. Most of the religious works were composed during his Italian period (1755–62), and most date from 1757–9, that is, surprisingly, from the period before Bach took up his only church post as second organist at Milan Cathedral. The most important sacred composition of his later years is his only oratorio, Gioas (1770), to an Italian text by Metastasio.

The earliest church works, notably the introit and Kyrie from the Messa de’ morti, are in a pseudo-Palestrina contrapuntal style influenced by Padre Martini. For example, the responsory sections of the invitatory Regem cui omnia vivunt employ cantus firmus technique in the upper parts. All these apprentice works were shown to Martini for his comments, and though several have the manner of elaborate contrapuntal exercises they were nevertheless performed in churches in Milan. The impressive Dies irae, two early Magnificat settings and a Te Deum, all dating from 1757–8, are similarly somewhat backward-looking in their use of two choirs, often treated antiphonally. In the later church works, with Martini’s influence clearly waning, the style is more modern and the choral writing less contrapuntal, often with a simple chordal texture pitted against an active orchestral accompaniment, though the composition is frequently rounded off by a fugue, usually based on a brief, desultory subject treated in business-like fashion. Alongside the choruses, even those in archaic style, are arias and duets influenced by contemporary Italian opera, frequently of a virtuoso kind and sometimes with elaborate instrumental obbligatos (for organ, bassoon etc.). Perhaps the most ambitious of these is the aria ‘Intellectus bonus’ from Confitebor, which requires a chamber accompaniment of six solo instruments. As Bach matured, the number and importance of the arias increased, showing clearly where his true interests lay.

Arias dominate Bach’s only oratorio, Gioas, re di Giuda, an opera in all but name and a setting of a text by Metastasio. The choral writing is nevertheless composed with English taste in mind and displays the strong influence of Handel.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

6. Operas.

Bach was no innovator in the world of opera seria. All ten works written for Italy, London or Mannheim use the Metastasian format of recitative punctuated by long arias. In the Italian works and those written for Mannheim, the da capo aria is frequently used; in the London operas there is more variety in aria forms and the da capo is used less and less (La clemenza di Scipione has none at all). The chorus is more prominent in the London operas, in accordance with British taste, notably in Orione, Zanaida and Carattaco. These three works also are not based on texts by Metastasio and in terms of subject differ from the statuesque classical dramas of the other operas, with their greater emphasis on spectacle and lavish effects.

Bach would have encountered Italian and italianate opera in Berlin. Indeed C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlass documents ‘3 Arien’ composed by Christian before he went to Italy in 1755. His arrival in Milan allowed him to encounter opera seria at source and he immersed himself in the music and style. Three arias attributed to Bach, evidently inserted in Cocchi’s Emira in January 1756, survive in a contemporary manuscript of Italian provenance in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. Bach contributed arias to other operas elsewhere in the late 1750s, but his first complete score, Artaserse, was not composed until 1760 for Turin. In it he severely curtailed the Metastasian recitative and used a variety of aria forms. The da capo principle returned in force in his two works for Naples, Catone in Utica (1761) and Alessandro nell’Indie (1762). Two arias, ‘Confusa, smarrita’ from the former and ‘Non so d’onde viene’ from the latter, achieved great popularity in Bach’s lifetime, the second attracting the young Mozart’s approbation. Bach made use of them again in pasticcios in London.

Of the five operas for London, only Adriano in Siria (1765) is without chorus and is as dominated by arias as Bach’s works for Italy. Significantly, it was not a success. Perhaps the finest of the London operas is the last, La clemenza di Scipione (1778), in which, with da capo arias banished in favour of a variety of structures and with a more prominent use of the chorus, Bach achieved a greater sense of movement and dramatic flow. He also made an interesting attempt to integrate the overture into the opera: motifs from it appear in the final chorus in Act 3.

For the two operas for Mannheim, Temistocle (1772) and Lucio Silla (1775), Bach took advantage of the superb orchestral facilities of the electoral court orchestra and produced showpieces of vocal and instrumental virtuosity, with the woodwind in particular gaining especial prominence. Da capo arias predominate in Temistocle, but in Lucio Silla a greater variety of forms is used.

Bach’s most ambitious operatic venture was his only tragédie lyrique written for Paris, Amadis de Gaule (1779). The libretto, a botched condensation into three acts of Quinault’s five-act text written for Lully, is unlike anything Bach had previously set, with its vivid plot set in chivalric times – a tale of love, jealousy and attempted revenge with frequent interventions of the supernatural (ghosts, demons, etc.) and nature (thunder, lightning and enveloping clouds). The chorus, in various guises as prisoners or demons, is a protagonist, and ballets and divertissements are important elements. Bach rose to the challenge magnificently, taking advantage of the large Paris orchestra to create sumptuous and occasionally extraordinary effects. As in La clemenza, the overture is integrated into the opera: a dramatic crescendo and diminuendo on a diminished 7th chord scored for trombones, bassoon and woodwind is used again in Acts 2 and 3. The opera had the misfortune to receive its première at the time of the Gluck–Piccinni controversy and suffered accordingly; it was not revived until the 20th century.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

7. Symphonies and concertos.

It is probably to the symphony and the piano concerto that Bach made his most important contribution. For Bach the symphony was intimately connected with the three-movement (fast–slow–fast) Italian operatic overture and all his mature symphonies follow that plan; indeed Bach regarded the word ‘overture’ as synonymous with ‘symphony’. C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlass records that Johann Christian composed a symphony and an overture, both in six parts, before he left for Italy. These are almost certainly lost. His first opera overtures written for Turin and Naples appeared in print in Paris and in London in the early 1760s. The first symphonies for concert use, the set of six op.3, appeared in London in 1765. Their publication coincided with the early years of the Bach-Abel concerts and these works were almost certainly performed there. They are fine pieces, with sturdy, sonata-form first movements, contrasting second subjects and practically all-inclusive recapitulations in the tonic key. The opening of the Fifth Symphony is a particularly fine example, with its playful, quasi-Baroque running bass and attractive syncopated melodic material. The central slow movements mine that particular vein of sensual, nocturnal music that Bach made his own and the finales are in dance rhythms – minuets, gigues or bucolic dances as in the earthy horn-calls of the last movement of no.6.

Bach himself published no other set of symphonies in England until 1781. Three sets, opp.6, 8 (containing three works from op.6) and 9, were printed in the Netherlands between 1770 and 1775 and are again, with one exception, concert works. The most extraordinary piece in these collections is op.6 no.6 in G minor, Bach’s only gesture in the direction of the ‘Sturm und Drang’ symphony and a work worthy to be mentioned alongside the early G minor symphonies of Haydn and Mozart. All three movements are, extraordinarily, in the minor key (the slow movement is in C minor) – a noteworthy feature for a composer normally reticent in his use of the minor mode – and they all seem to breathe the air of an earlier sensibility: the presence of C.P.E. Bach and the north German school is not far away. Given that J.C. Bach often recycled earlier material, there is reason to conjecture that much of the material here might have belonged to one of the lost works mentioned in C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlass.

Bach’s crowning achievements in the concert symphony are the three for double orchestra published in the op.18 set (1781). They are large, richly orchestrated works, making much interplay of the two orchestras treated antiphonally and combining different textures, for example violins in four parts. The woodwind instruments, now liberated from merely doubling and reinforcing the strings, are given solos and contrasting passages.

Most of Bach’s concertos are for keyboard, although works survive for flute, oboe and bassoon and an early lost composition for cello is listed in his half-brother’s Nachlass. Also listed there are the five keyboard concertos which survive in Bach’s autograph in Berlin. A manuscript of a sixth in F minor also probably dates from those early years. The influence of C.P.E. Bach presides over these works, which adopt the ritornello/solo technique of the elder Bach’s Berlin compositions. None of Bach’s keyboard concertos can be firmly dated to his Italian period, though it is possible that several of the op.1 set (1763) may have been composed there. This set and opp.7 (1770) and 13 (1777), all first published in London, established Bach’s new, more Classical concerto style, with fewer and pared down ritornellos and a simpler, sparer keyboard style. This became the model for the keyboard concerto in London in the late 18th century.

Most of Bach’s mature keyboard concertos are in two movements, without a slow movement; two concertos from each of the three published collections are in three movements. In the later two sets Bach, in line with his maturing style, broadened the musical range, expanded the length of the movements and enriched the melodic content. In a recently discovered, partly autograph manuscript of the solo part of op.7 no.6, is revealed a much more extended version of the concerto, with longer ritornellos and a more technically difficult and extended keyboard part. Bach evidently reduced the scale of the work for publication.

Although no concertos can be ascribed with certainty to Bach’s Italian years, he did experiment with the genre of the symphonie concertante. The existence of an autograph manuscript in Regensburg of a work in D major, in his early hand and written on Italian paper, suggests that Bach’s earliest essays may date from the early 1760s. In all about 17 works in this or related genres are attributed to Bach. Solo instruments vary from two to nine players; most works are in three movements, though a number, including the earliest, are in two.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

8. Keyboard and chamber music.

As a keyboard performer and teacher Bach composed a large number of works for concert and didactic purposes, including two sets of solo sonatas, accompanied sonatas and chamber works with obbligato keyboard. The composition of keyboard works forms a constant thread throughout all three periods of his creative career. The only such works which can be dated from his German years are a march in the second Clavierbüchlein of Anna Magdalena a series of minuets and polonaises, which he may have composed even before he left Leipzig and also an early ‘Solo’ for keyboard in A minor, his first substantial German harpsichord work. These were followed by sonatas in B and A and an intriguing Toccata in B minor which have been dated to his years in Italy and survive in manuscript in Padre Martini’s library (and elsewhere). Bach’s lighter, italianate style can be seen in the eight accompanied sonatas in manuscript in Milan. This style was carried over into his first London works in this genre, the accompanied sonatas op.2. As in his other London works, Bach expanded and refined his musical language and forms, and in general the later sets of accompanied sonatas opp.10 (1773), 15 (1778), 16 (1779) and 18 (1780/81) are more accomplished. Opp.15 and 18 also include duet sonatas for keyboard.

The two most important keyboard publications of Bach’s London years are the sonatas opp.5 and 17. The earlier set was published in 1766 and was the first publication in London to mention the option of the piano on the title-page, preceding John Burton’s Lessons by a few months. The six works here are in a variety of styles and one at least – no.6 in C minor, with its imposing prelude, double fugue and gavotte all in the tonic key – may date from Bach’s Italian years. The grandiose D major sonata (no.2), with its orchestral sonorities and changes of dynamics, represents Bach’s first published attempt at idiomatic piano writing. The second set, commonly known by its London opus number, 17 (1779), was in fact published by Sieber in Paris (c1774) as op.12. Once again these works reveal a wide range of styles, from the vigorous gigue finales of the Second and Sixth Sonatas to the sensuous slow movement of the C minor, one of Bach’s greatest achievements.

Outstanding among the many chamber works, trios, quartets and quintets for strings and wind in various combinations are the four late pieces: a sextet, two quintets and a quartet with obbligato keyboard, published posthumously. The Sextet, for the unusual combination of keyboard, oboe, violin, cello and two horns has often been attributed to J.C.F. Bach, but a set of parts in J.C.F. Bach’s hand discovered in Kraców (PL-Kj) transmits the work, in a slightly different form from that of the published version (1783), with an attribution to ‘J.C. Bach’. The Quintet in D for keyboard, flute, oboe, violin and cello is justly one of Bach’s most popular compositions. Worthy of note is the highly attractive slow movement with its pathos-filled minore central section, as far away from the facile 19th-century view of a ‘porcelain’ composer as can be imagined.

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

WORKS

printed works published in London unless otherwise stated

Edition:The Collected Works of Johann Christian Bach 1735–1782, ed. E. Warburton, i–xlviii (New York, 1984–99) [CW]Catalogues:C.S. Terry: John Christian Bach (London, rev. 2/1967/R by H.C.R. Landon) [T] [t numbers show the page no./no. of the incipit on the page and are not Terry’s numbers; in a group the number of the first incipit only is given; roman numerals denote corrigenda pages]; E. Warburton: The Collected Works of Johann Christian Bach 1735–1782, xlviii/1: Thematic Catalogue (New York, 1999) [W]

liturgical

operas

oratorios, cantatas and serenatas

other vocal

symphonies and overtures

symphonies concertantes

concertos

wind music

chamber music

keyboard

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

liturgical

 

 

W

T

 

 

 

F2

199/4

Attendite mortales, motet, T, orch, ? after 1767, 1st aria arr. from Carattaco; CW xviii

 

E17

200/6

Beatus vir (F), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1758; CW xxiii

 

E16

202/1

Confitebor tibi Domine (E), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1759; CW xxiii

 

E5

202/3

Credo (C), SATB, orch; CW xx

 

E12

202/4

Dies irae; see [Messa de’ morti], below

 

E15

202/6

Dixit Dominus (D), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, by March 1758; CW xxiii

 

E13

203/3

Domine ad adiuvandum (D), S, SATB, orch, 1758; CW xlviii

 

E14

203/2

Domine ad adiuvandum (G), S, A, SATB, orch, 1760; CW xxii

 

E3

204/3

Gloria in excelsis (D), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1758/9; CW xix

 

E4

204/1

Gloria in excelsis (G), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch; CW xx

 

E2

204/8

Kyrie (D), S, T, SATB, orch; CW xix

 

F3

205/2

Larvae tremendae (D), motet, S, orch; CW xviii

 

E18

206/3

Laudate pueri (E), S, orch, Milan, 12 Aug 1758; CW xlviii

 

E19

206/1

Laudate pueri (G), S, T, orch, 1760; CW xxii

 

F5

199/1

Let the solemn organs blow (W. Dodd), anthem for Magdalen Chapel, London, c1764; CW xxv

 

E7–9

206/4

[3] Lezioni del officio per gli morti, 1757: Parce mihi, Domine (B), S, A, SATB, orch; Taedet animam meam (F), S, A, B, SATB, orch; Manus tuae (C), S, A, T, SATB, orch; CW xxi

 

E20

207/1

Magnificat (C), SATB, SATB, orch, 1758, inc.; CW xxii

 

E21

207/2

Magnificat (C), SATB, SATB; CW xxii

 

E22

207/3

Magnificat (C), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1760; CW xxii

 

E11–12

208/5, 202/4

[Messa de’ morti], 1757: Requiem aeternam (F), Kyrie (F), SSAATTBB, orch; Dies irae (c), S, A, T, B, SSAATTBB, orch; CW xxi

 

E10

207/5

Miserere (B), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1757; CW xxi

 

F1

Pater noster, lost, sent with letter to G.B. Martini, 6 Sept 1757

 

E6

208/4

Regem cui omnia vivunt (F), invitatory, S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1757; CW xxi

 

E23

209/3

Salve regina (E), S, orch; CW xviii

 

E24

209/3

Salve regina (F), S, orch; CW xviii

 

F4a and b

209/5

Si nocte tenebrosa (F), motet, S/T, orch (two versions); CW xviii

 

E25

210/2

Tantum ergo (F), T, orch, 1757; CW xlviii

 

E26

209/7

Tantum ergo (G), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1759; CW xxiv

 

E27

210/3

Te Deum (D), 2S, 2A, 2T, 2B, SATB, SATB, orch, 1758, inc.; CW xxiv

 

E28

210/5

Te Deum (D), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, 1762; CW xxiv

 

doubtful

YE4

202/7

Domine ad adiuvandum (C), S, SATB, str, GB-Lbl

YE7

Expugna impugnantes me (d), SSATB, CW xxiv

YE3

Gloria solenne (C), S, A, T, B, SATB, orch, inc.; CW xxiv

YE5

Laudate pueri (B), S, orch; CW xxiv

YE1

204/7

Messa in pastorale (Ky-Gl) (D), SATB, orch, Lbl (attrib. F. Durante)

YE2

204/6

Messa a più voci (Ky-Gl) (G), SATB, orch, Lbl (attrib. Durante)

YE6

208/6

Salve regina (D), S, S, A, T, B, SSATB, orch, Lbl

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

operas

drammi per musica in 3 acts unless otherwise stated; facsimiles of librettos in CW xliii–xlvii

LCG

London, Covent Garden

LKH

London, King’s Theatre in the Haymarket

 

G1

217; xl

Artaserse (P. Metastasio), Turin, Regio, 26 Dec 1760, CW i

G2

222; xlii, xliii

Catone in Utica (Metastasio), Naples, S Carlo, 4 Nov 1761, CW ii

G3

212; xxxii

Alessandro nell’Indie (Metastasio), Naples, S Carlo, 20 Jan 1762, CW iii; staged with his Cantata a tre voci

G4

237; xlvii

Orione, ossia Diana vendicata (drama, 3, G.G. Bottarelli), LKH, 19 Feb 1763, CW iv and xii; rev. LKH, 24 May 1777

G5

241; xlix

Zanaida (Bottarelli), LKH, 7 May 1763, CW iv and xii

G6

211; xxxi

Adriano in Siria (Metastasio), LKH, 26 Jan 1765, CW v

G42

The Fairy Favour (masque, 1, T. Hull), LCG, 29 Jan 1767, lib CW xlv, music lost [perf. by children as afterpiece]

G7

221; xli

Carattaco (Bottarelli), LKH, 14 Feb 1767, CW vi

G8

283/3; xlviii

Temistocle (Metastasio, rev. Verazi), Mannheim, Hof, 5 Nov 1772, CW vii

G9

232; xlv

Lucio Silla (G. De Gamerra, rev. Verazi), Mannheim, Hof, 5 Nov 1775, CW viii

G10

229; xliv

La clemenza di Scipione (serious op, 3), LKH, 4 April 1778, CW ix

G39

215; xxxiii

Amadis de Gaule (tragédie lyrique, 3, P. Quinault, rev. A.-D.-M. de Vismes du Valgay), Paris, Opéra, 14 Dec 1779, CW x

insertions in operas and pasticcios

G Inc 2

251/4

G. Cocchi: Emira, Milan, Jan 1756: 3 arias; CW xii

G21

252/2

A. Ferradini: Demofoonte, Milan, 26 Dec 1758: 1 aria; CW xii

G23

277/4

F. Gassmann: Gli uccellatori, Turin, Carignano, 1 Sept 1760: ov.; CW xii

G1/3

Zenobia, Lucca, aut. 1761: 1 aria

G22

275/3

G.B. Lampugnani and others: La Giulia, Milan, carn. 1761: ov.; CW xii

G24

273/2

Il tutore e la pupilla (pasticcio, Bottarelli), LKH, 13 Nov 1762: ov., from Cantata a tre voci with new 2nd movt; CW ix

G25

273/8; l

Astarto, re di Tiro (pasticcio, Bottarelli), LKH, 4 Dec 1762: ov., from Alessandro nell’Indie, qt, 2 duets (lost), 5 arias (2 lost); CW ix

G26

273/5

La cascina, (pasticcio, Bottarelli), LKH, 8 Jan 1763: ov.; CW ix

G27

272/5

B. Galuppi and others: La calamita de’ cuori, LKH, 3 Feb 1763: ov.; CW ix

G2/18

Catone in Utica (pasticcio), Turin, carn. 1763: qt, La

G1/9b, YG12

G.M. Rutini: Gli sposi in maschera, Florence, aut. 1763: 2 arias, I-Fc

G21, G1/3

J.A. Hasse, rev. Cafaro: L’Issipile, Naples, 26 Dec 1763: 2 arias, P-La

G Inc 7

244/1

Menalcas (pastoral, J. Harris), Salisbury, 22/24 Aug 1764: 3 arias 2 choruses; CW xxv

G3/19, 22b

225/1; xliii

Ezio (pasticcio, after Metastasio), LKH, 24 Nov 1764: 2 arias from Alessandro nell’Indie; CW ix

G2/16

219/3; xli

Berenice (pasticcio), LKH, 1 Jan 1765: 3 arias (1 from Catone in Utica, others lost); CW ix

G43

245/3

The Maid of the Mill (pasticcio, I. Bickerstaffe), LCG, 31 Jan 1765: 1 aria, 1 duet; CW xxv

Zophilette (pasticcio, J.-F. Marmontel), Paris, 17 May 1765: 2 ariettes (music lost)

G44

246/1

The Summer’s Tale (pasticcio, R. Cumberland), LCG, 6 Dec 1765: 2 arias, 1 duet; CW xxv

G6/20

Pharnaces, or The Revenge of Athridates (op, T. Hull), Dublin, Smock Alley, 12 Dec 1765: 1 aria; CW xxv

G2/3, 12; G3/18, 21

238/1; xlviii

Sifare (pasticcio), LKH, 5 March 1767: 4 arias; CW ix

G7/24, H24, H27

li

Tom Jones (pasticcio, J. Reed, after A. Poinsinet, after H. Fielding, LCG, 14 Jan 1769: 3 arias; CW xxv

G2/4

231/2

N. Piccinni: Le contadine bizzarre, LKH, 7 Nov 1769: 1 aria; CW ix

G28

231/3

L’olimpiade (pasticcio, after Metastasio), LKH, 11 Nov 1769: 1 aria; CW ix

G28

256/2

F. Tenducci and others: Amintas (op., R. Rolt), LCG, 15 Dec 1769: 1 aria; CW xxv

G29, LG1

234; xlvi

C.W. Gluck and P. Guglielmi: Orfeo ed Euridice, LKH, 7 April 1770: 6 arias (incl. 2 lost), 1 duet (lost), ballet music (lost), chorus (lost), CW ix; 3 arias, added 17 April 1770, ov. t346/8 added 30 April 1771, CW ix; rev. version, Naples, 4 Nov 1774, with new ov., 5 new arias, 5 choruses, ballets, CW xi; draft of discarded scena t251/5, D-Bsb*

LG2

245/2

The Flitch of Bacon (pasticcio, H. Bate), London, New Theatre, Haymarket, 17 Aug 1778: 1 aria; CW xxv

G45

The Genius of Nonesense (extravaganza, G. Colman), London, New Theatre, Haymarket, 2 Sept 1780: 1 aria, lost

Doubtful arias etc., incl. t250/5, 251/2–3, 252/1, 252/6–7, 253/2–5, 24 others, A-Wgm, Wn; B-Bc; CH-A, E; D-Bsb, Dl, Hs, LEb, LÜh, Mbs, MÜu; DK-Kc; GB-Er; I-Gl, MC, Nc, MAav, Tf, Rc; S-Skma; US-AAu, BEm

 

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

oratorios, cantatas and serenatas

G Inc 6

244/6

Ode on the Auspicious Arrival and Nuptials of … Queen Charlotte (Thanks to the God who rules the deep) (J.Lockman), S, SAB, vn, bc; CW xxv

G11

Cant. a 3 voci … per festeggiare il felicissimo giorno natalizio di sua Maestà cattolica, S, S, T, SATB, orch, Naples, S Carlo, 20 Jan 1762; CW xiii

G12

La Galatea (serenata, after Metastasio), 3vv, orch, London, Spring Gardens, 29 Feb 1764, music lost, lib in CW xlv

D1

226: xliv

Gioas, re di Giuda (orat., after Metastasio), London, King’s, 22 March 1770; CW xvii

G41

243/1

Happy morn, auspicious rise! (? birthday ode for George III), S, S, A, T, SATB, SATB, orch [incl. arrs. from Gioas, re di Giuda]; CW xxv

G15

248/3

Endimione (serenata, after Metastasio), S, S, S, T, SATB, orch, London, King’s, 6 April 1772; rev. Mannheim, Hof, 24 July 1773, with scene by N. Jommelli; CW xiv

G16

La tempesta (cant., Metastasio), S, orch, ? London, Hickford’s Rooms, 17 May 1773, perf. Mannheim, c1776; CW xiii

G18

247/2

Amor vincitore (serenata), S, S, SATB, orch, London, King’s, 15 April 1774; CW xv

G19

li

Cefalo e Procri (cant., ? G.G. Bottarelli), S, S, S, orch, London, Hanover Square Rooms, 26 April 1776; recit and aria pubd as Aurora: a Favourite Cantata. t248/1–2; CW xiii

G20

250/2

Rinaldo ed Armida (cant.), 3vv, orch, London, Hanover Square Rooms, 20 May 1778, lost except 1 recit and aria (c1785), A-Wn, B-Bc, D-Bsb, Mbs, F-Pn, GB-Lbl, I-PEsf, Vc

G38

Berenice che fai! (scena), S, orch, music lost, lib in CW xlv

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

other vocal

chamber duets

H4–11

[8] duetti (P. Metastasio), S, S, bc, ? before mid-1762: 1 Io lo so; 2 Trova un sol; 3 Che ciascun per te sospiri; 4 Chi mai di questo core; 5 Ascoltami, o Clori; 6 Lascia ch’io posso; 7 Parlami pur; 8 Eccomi alfin [nos. 3, 5, rev. as op.4 nos.5, 6; others different from opp. 4, 6]; CW xvi

H12–17

259/1

Sei canzonette (Metastasio), S, S, bc, op.4 (1765/R): 1 Già la notte; 2 Ah rammenta oh bella Irene; 3 Pur nel sonno almen talora; 4 T’intendo sí, mio core; 5 Che ciascun per te sospiri; 6 Ascoltami, o Clori; CW xvi

H18–23

260/2

Sei canzonette (Metastasio), S, S, bc, op.6 (1767); 1 Torna in quell’onda; 2 Io lo so; 3 E pur fra le tempeste; 4 Trova un sol; 5 Chi mai di questo core; 6 Se infida tu mi chiami; CW xvi

miscellaneous songs and arias

G36a

Perchè sì ingrata, S, orch [another version of aria Cara ti lascio; cf G36b]; CW xlviii/3

 

G36b

Ah che gl’istessi numi … Cara ti lascio, S, orch [cf G36a]; CW xxi

 

H2

Der Weise auf dem Lande (O Wald! o Schatten grüner Gänge!), 16 April 1755, in Stammbuch of Friedrich Nicolai; CW xlviii/3

 

LG5

247/1

Infelice … Là nei regni, S, kbd 4 hands, pubd as A Favourite Scene and Rondo on the Duke of Nivernois Air (c1783); CW xvi, xlviii/3

 

H1

Mezendore (Herr Nicolaus Klimm erfand) (F. von Hagedorn), in F.W. Marpurg: Neue Lieder zum singen beym Clavier (Berlin, 1756); CW xlviii/3

 

G7/24

258/1

The London Lass (While Cecilia we admire), S, bc (c1772), based on Non è ver from Carattaco; CW xxv

 

G17

252/3

O Venere vezzosa (Horace, trans. G.G. Bottarelli), S, orch; CW xvi

 

LG4

251/1

Sentimi, non partir … Al mio bene (récit and rondo, after G. Roccaforte), S, pf, 2 vc, orch, as Rondeau … sung by Mr Tenducci at Messrs Bach and Abels Concert (1779); CW xvi

 

G35

Sventurata in van mi lagno, S, orch, after 1772; CW xvi

 

Doubtful: An Aeglen (Und fehlten dir der Schönheit holde Gaben (?Gemmingen) wYH1, in Oden mit Melodien, ii (Berlin, 1755); Farewell ye green fields, S/T, bc (Edinburgh, n.d.) [version of canzonette Ich schlief, da träumte mir], CW xxv; Ist das Leben nicht ein Traum?, D-LÜh; La sorte spietata t251/6, in B. Mengozzi: Méthode du chant du Conservatoire (Paris, 1803); Luci amate a voi non chiedo wYG15 (1777), CW xxv; Neptune (When an angry woman’s breast) t256/3, S/T, bc (c1762), CW xxv; [9] Solfeggi … del Sig. Giovanni Bach in Genova wYH7–15, S, bc, I-Gl; So oft ich meine Tobacks-Pfeife, D-Bsb; The World (When launched into life) (J.M. Perrin), S/T, orch (n.d.), CW xxv

music for Vauxhall Gardens

H24–7

254/1

A Collection of Favourite Songs sung at Vaux Hall by Mrs Weichsell (1766/R), S, orch: 1 By my sighs; 2 Cruel Strephon; 3 Come Colin; 4 Ah why shou’d love; CW xxv

H28–31

254/5

A Second Collection of Favourite Songs sung at Vaux Hall by Mrs Pinto and Mrs Weichsell (1767/R), S, orch: 1 In this shady blest retreat; 2 Smiling Venus; 3 Tender virgins [arr. from Non è ver from Carattico, rev. as Blest with thee in Tom Jones (pasticcio, 1769)]; Lovely yet ungratefull swain; CW xxv

H32

When chilling winter hies away, S, orch, music lost, text pubd (1768)

H33–6

255/2

A Third Collection of Favorite Songs sung at Vaux Hall by Miss Cowper (1771/R), S, orch: 1 Midst silent shades; 2 Ah seek to know; 3 Would you a female heart inspire; 4 Cease a while; CW xxv

H38–9

A Fourth Collection of Favorite Songs sung at Vauxhall Gardens (1779/R): 1 Oh how blest; 2 Hither turn thy wand’ring eyes; CW xxv

H40

Ode to Pleasure, S, S, S, T, chorus, orch, music lost, text in A Genuine Collection (London, 1766)

H41

Ode to Summer, 4 solo vv, chorus, orch, music lost, text in A Genuine Collection (London, 1766)

H42

The Pastoral Invitation (Ye nymphs and swains), S, S, T, orch, music lost, text in Westminster Journal, 2 July 1768; CW xxv (text only)

H37

257/2

See the kind indulgent gales: a Favourite Song sung by Mrs Weichsell at Vaux Hall Gardens (1777/R), S, orch [Eng. rev. of Se spiegò from Zanaida]; CW xxv

folksong settings

LH1

Braes of Ballanden (Beneath a green shade) (T. Blacklock), A, ob, vn, va, vc, kbd (1779); CW xxv

LH2

257/3

The Broom of Cowdenknows (How blyth was I each morn), A, 2 fl, 2 vn, bc (c1784); CW xxv

LH3

I’ll never leave thee (One day I heard Mary say) (R. Crawford), A, 2 fl, 2 vn, bc (c1784); CW xxv

LH4

256

Lochaber (Farewell to Lochaber) (A. Ramsay), A, 2 fl, 2 vn, bc (c1785); CW xxv

LH5

The Yellow-Hair’d Laddie, lost, attrib. Bach in S. Storace: Gli equivoci, 1786, A-Wn; arr. in last movt of pf conc. op.13 no.4

transcriptions

LG2

250/2

Ebben si vada … Io ti lascio (after P. Metastasio), acc. recit and rondo, S, pf, orch, pubd as The Favourite Rondeau sung by Mr Tenducci (c1778); ? from cant. Rinaldo ed Armida; expanded version of Ombra felice … Io ti lascio from M. Mortellari: Arsace, 1775; another version, No ’twas neither shape nor feature, in A Flitch of Bacon (1778, London); CW xvi

LG3

251/7

Mi scordo i torti miei … Dolce aurette, S, orch, c1778, recit and aria from G. Gazzaniga: Perseo ed Andromeda with new coda by Bach, D-Bsb, WRgs; CW xvi

253/6

Wenn nach der Stürme, aria, S, bc, in J.A. Hiller: Deutsche Arien und Duette (Leipzig, 1785), based on Allor che il vincitore from La clemenza di Scipione

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

symphonies and overtures

for 2 oboes, 2 horns and strings unless otherwise stated

G4, 27, 1, 24, 26, 25

272/2

Six Favourite Overtures (1763): ovs. to the operas: 1 Orione (D), 2 ob, 2 hn, 2 bn, str; 2 La calamita de’ cuori (D); 3 Artaserse (D); 4 Il tutore e la pupilla (C); 5 La cascina (G); 6 Astarto (= Alessandro nell’Indie) (G); no.2 in VI sinfonie a più stromenti composte da vari autori op.13 (Paris, 1762); no.3 in VI sinfonie a più stromenti composte da vari autori op.12 (Paris, 1761); arr. kbd (1763)

 

G23B

277/4

The Periodical Overture no.1 (D) (1763): ov. to Gli uccellatori

 

C1–6

262/1

Six simphonies (D, C, E, B, F, G), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, op.3 (1765), =w C1a–6a, CW xxvi; arr. Bach as Six Overtures Composed and Adapted for the Harpsichord (c1769), =wC1b–6b, t347/2, CW xlii

 

G22B

275/3

An Overture in 8 parts (D) (1766); corrected version of Periodical Overture no.xv (1766): ov. to La Giulia

 

C16a

276/3

Symphony (C), as no.46 in Sinfonie a più stromenti composte da vari autori (Paris, 1770/71), CW xxvii; with different 2nd and 3rd movts wC16b, CW xxix

 

C7–12

264/1

Six simphonies (G, D, E, B, E, g), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, op.6 (Amsterdam, 1770); nos.3–5 in Six simphonies périodiques op.8 nos.1, 5, 6; CW xxvi–xxvii

 

C9, 13–15, 10–11

266/5

Six simphonies périodiques (E, G, D, F, B, E), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, op.8 (Amsterdam, c1775); nos.1, 5, 6 = op.6 nos.3–5; CW xxvi–xxvii

 

C17–19

268/3

Trois simphonies (B, E, B), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, op.9 (The Hague, 1773) [also as op.21]; no.1, 2 cl, 2 bn, 2 hn, str, in Six sinfoni … par J.C. Bach, Toesky et Stamitz (Paris, 1773); no.2 with addl movt (Paris, ?1776); 2 movts from no.2 arr. kbd in J.A. Hiller: Sammlung kleiner Clavier- und Singstücke (Leipzig, 1774), ed. S. Staral (Graz, 1981); no.1 ed. in EDM, 1st ser., xxx (1956); CW xxvii (nos.1 and 2), iv (no.3)

 

C26, G9, G15, C27, C28, XC1

269/4

Six Grand Overtures (E, B, D, D, E, D), 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 cl, 2 bn, 2 hn, 2 tpt, timp, str, op.18 (c1782); nos.1, 3, 5 for double orch (2 ob, bn, 2 hn, str; 2 fl, str); no.1, I-Gl [dated 1779]; no.2 = ov. to Lucio Silla; no.3 = ov. to Endimione; no.4 = no.2 of t271/6, Deux sinfonies op.18; 2nd movt of no.4 = arr. of 2nd movt of ov. to Temistocle; no.6 arr. from Amadis de Gaule; CW xxviii

 

XC2, C27

271/6

Deux sinfonies à grand orchestre (D, D), 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 bn, 2 hn, str, op.18 (Amsterdam, c1785); 1st movt of no.1 = ov. to La clemenza di Scipione, 2nd movt = Andante from ov. to Amadis de Gaule; no.2 = no.4 of t269/4, Six Grand Overtures op.18; CW xxviii

 

G27a

Sym. (D) (inc., = ov. to La calamita de’ cuori with different finale), CW xxix; Sym. (D), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, CW xxix

 

G27b

Sym. (D), 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, CW xxix

 

279/4

Sym. (F), CW xxix

 

C Inc 4

279/7

Sym. (F), 2 ob, 2 hn/tpt, str, CH-A, Bu, E, I-MAav; CW xxix

 

C Inc 3

282/5

Sym. (E), as Divertimento notturno (Paris, before 1775); CW xxvii

 

C84

361/7

Menuett (F), for Her Majesty’s birthday, 1767; CW xxv

 

C85

361/8

Menuett (C), for Her Majesty’s birthday, 1769; CW xxv

 

Lost, listed in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790): Sym. in 6 pts, before 1755; ov. in 6 pts, before 1755

for doubtful and misattributed works see wYC1–83

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

symphonies concertantes

instruments listed as concertante; ripieno

C32

284/1

Sinfonia concertante (G), 2 vn, vc; 2 fl, 2 hn, str, ?c1760 (Paris, by 1772); CW xxx

C33

284/6

Concert ou symphonie (E). 2 vn, ob; 2 fl, cl, bn, 2 hn, str (Paris, 1773); CW xxx [also as pf conc., wC75, t300/8]

C34

284/4

Simphonie concertante (A), vn, vc; 2 ob, 2 hn, str (Paris, by 1775); CW xxx

C36a

286/1

Sym. conc. (C), 2 vn, vc; 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 hn, str, CW xlviii/3; rev. version w C36b, CW xxx

C45

286/4

Sym. conc. (G), ob, vn, va, vc; 2 fl, 2 hn, str

C Inc 5

Sym. conc. (G), fl, 2 vn, vc; fl, 2 hn, str, doubtful; CW xxx

C44

286/8

Sym. conc. (E), fl, 2 vn, vc; 2 ob, 2 hn, str, by 1775; CW xxx

C38

287/2

Sym. conc. (F), ob, bn/vc; ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxi

C46

287/7

Sym. conc. (B), vc; 2 cl, bn, 2 hn, str; CW xlviii/3 formerly D-Bsb (see White, 1958)

C42

288/4

Sym. conc. (E), 2 vn, vc; 2 ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxx [also as bn conc., wC82, t288/4]

C40

288/7

Notturno (E), 2 ob, 2 hn/tpt, 2 vn, 2 va, vc; str; CW xxxi

C43

289/4

Sym. conc. (C), fl, ob, vn, vc; 2 fl, 2 cl, 2 bn, 2 hn, str; CW xxxi

C48

289/7

Sym. conc. (B), ob, vn, vc, pf; 2 fl, 2 hn, str; CW xxxi

C39

290/2

Sym. conc. (D), 2 fl, 2 vn, vc; 2 hn, str, c1760; CW xxxi

C37

290/4

Sym. conc. (E), fl, ob, bn; ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxi

C41

290/9

Sym. conc. (E), fl, 2 cl, bn, 2 hn; 1/2 fl, str; CW xxxi

C35

Concerto a più istrumenti (D), 2 vn; 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str, ?doubtful; CW xxx

YC95

Sym. (B), vn, vc (ad lib); 2 ob (ad lib), 2 hn, str, I-MAav, attrib. J.C. Bach in Breitkopf suppl. 1767, doubtful; probably by F.P. Ricci, op.9 no.2 (The Hague, London and Paris, c1775)

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

concertos

C74

Conc., hpd, before 1755, lost, listed in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790)

C68–72

298/1

5 concs. (B, f, d, E, G), kbd, str; CW xxxii

C73

301/4

Conc. (f), hpd, str, CW xxxii

C77

Conc, vc, before 1755, lost, listed in Verzeichniss des musikalischen Nachlasses … Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Hamburg, 1790)

C49–54

292/1

Six Concertos (B, A, F, G, C, D), hpd, str, op.1 (1763); CW xxxiii

C79

286/7

Conc. (D), fl, 2 hn, str; CW xxxvi

C55–60

293/4

Sei concerti (C, F, D, B, E, G), hpd/pf, str, op.7 (1770); CW xxxiii–xxxiv [cadenzas for no.5 and expanded solo pt of no.6, private collection, USA]

C62–7

295/1

A Third Sett of Six Concertos (C, D, F, B, G, E), hpd/pf, str (2 ob, 2 hn ad lib), op.13 (1777); CW xxxv

C75

300/8

Conc. (E), kbd, 2 fl, 2 cl, bn, 2 hn, str; CW xxxiv [also as sym. conc., wC42 t284/6]

C61

301/1

Conc. (E), hpd/pf, str (2 hn ad lib), as op.14 no.1 (Paris, c1776); CW xxxiv

C80

287/4

Conc. (F), ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxvi [also as fl conc. (G)wC78, private collection, USA]

C81

290/7

Conc. (F), ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxvi

C83

288/1

Conc., (B), bn, 2 ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxvi

C82

288/4

Conc., (E), bn, 2 ob, 2 hn, str; CW xxxvi [also as sym. conc., wC42 t288/4]

C76

Conc. (C), vn, 2 ob/fl, 2 hn, str; CW xlviii/3

doubtful

YC90–91

297/1

[2] Concerto (E, A), hpd, str (Riga, c1776), attrib. ‘I.C. Bach’, Breitkopf suppl. 1776–7, also attrib. C.P.E. Bach and J.C.F. Bach; no.1 ed. E. Praetorius (1937), no.2 ed. in Antiqua (1935)

YC92

300/1

Conc. (A), hpd, str, Bsb [? by C.P.E. Bach; also attrib. Schaffrath and C.H. or J.G. Graun]; ed. A. Hoffmann (Wolfenbüttel, 1963)

C Inc 6

300/4

Conc. (E), hpd, str, Dl

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

wind music

see Sadie for information on borrowed material and transcriptions

B Inc 7–12

285/3

Sei sinfonie (E, B, E, B, E, B), 2 cl, 2 hn, [2] bn (1782); CW xxxvii

B79–82

Military Pieces [Quintette] (E, E, B, B), 2 cl, 2 hn, bn (Dublin, c1794); CW xxxvii

B83–5

359/3

3 military marches: Marche du régiment de Prince Ernst; Marche du régiment de Braun[schweig]; Marche du régiment de Wür[tte]mb[erg], all in E, 2 ob, 2 hn, bn; CW xxxvii [nos.2–3 arr. kbd, GB-Lbl (part autograph)]

B88–9

360/1

2 Märsche … vom ersten … zweiten Batallion Garde-Regiment in Hannover (E, E) 2 ob, 2 cl, 2 hn, 2 bn, no.2 spurious, by Abel, Lbl (part autograph); CW xxxvii

B86–7

360/5

Due marce … di cavalleria e d’infanteria (E, E), 2 ob, 2 cl, 2 hn, bn; CW xxxvii [also arr. kbd, Lbl (part autograph)]

B90–93

361/2

4 marches (E, E, E, B); CW xxxvii [also arr. kbd, Lbl (part autograph)

YB85–6

360/3

Due marce … Prince Walles (E, E), 2 cl, 2 hn, bn; spurious, by C.F. Abel

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

chamber music

B78

302/1

Sestetto (C), ob, 2 hn, vn, vc, kbd; CW xli [arr. kbd, vn in Three Favorite Quartetts and One Quintett (1785), = t311/3]

 

B Inc 5

305/1

Quintet (B), 2 vn/ob, va, vc/bn, bc; CW xli

 

B70–75

303/1

Six Quintettos (C, G, F, E, A, D), fl, ob, vn, va, bc, op.11 (1774); CW xli

 

B76–7

304/6

Deux quintetts (D, F), op.22 (1785), fl, ob, vn, vc, kbd; CW xli [arr. kbd, vn in Three Favorite Quartetts and One Quintett (1785) = t311/2, 4]

 

B51–6

306/1

Six Quartettos (C, D, E, F, G, B), fl, vn, va, vc, op.8 (1772); CW xl

 

B57–9

309/1

3 qts (D, C, A), fl/vn, vn, va, bc, nos.1, 3, 5 in Six Quartettos … by Messrs Bach, Abel and Giardini (1776); CW xl

 

B60

Qt (B), 2 vn, va, vc, no.1 in Six Quatuors … par J.C. Bach et C.F. Abel, op.14 (Paris, 1776); CW xl [also arr. eng hn, vn, va, vc, I-Gl; erroneously attrib. Haydn, hII:B4]

 

B66

310/9

Quartetto (G), vn, 2 vc, hpd, op.2 (Offenbach, 1783); CW xl [arr. hpd, vn in Three Favorite Quartetts and One Quintett (1785) = t311/5]

 

B61–4

307/4

Four Quartettos (C, D, G, C), op.19 (1784): nos. 1, 3, for 2 fl, va, vc; no.2 for fl, ob/fl, va, vc; no.4 for 2 fl, vn; CW xl [arr. hpd/pf, vn, fl, vc (c1787)]

 

B30–35

314/5

Six Trios (B, A, E, G, D, C), 2 vn, va/bc, op.2 (1763), also as op.4 (Amsterdam, 1767), in Breitkopf suppl. 1766 as first 6 of set of 12 (see also t317/5); CW xxxix

 

B36–41

317/5

6 trios (G, D, E, F, B, E), 2 vn, bc, in Breitkopf suppl. 1766 as second 6 of set of 12 (see also t314/5); CW xxxix

 

B43–8

313/1

Six sonates (F, G, D, C, D, E), hpd, vn/fl, vc, op.2 (1764); CW xxxix

 

B42

311/6

Sonata (B), 2 vn, vc, no.1 in Six Sonatas … by Messrs Bach, Abel and Kammel (1777); CW xxxix

 

B49–50

323/5

2 sonatas (C, A), hpd/pf, vn, vc, nos.1–2 in Four Sonatas and Two Duetts op.15 (1778); CW xxxix

 

B Inc 3

330/5

Sonata (B), harp, (vn, vc)/hpd, no.6 in Musical Remains, ed. E. Jones (c1796) [1st movt based on 1st movt of wB78; CW xxxix

 

B Inc 2

317/7

Trio sonata (G), 2 fl/vn, bc; CW xxxix

 

B20–26

332/4

[7] sonatas (F, D, G, A, G, D, F), hpd, vn; CW xxxviii

 

B27

Sonata (A), hpd, vn; CW xxxviii

 

B2–7

322/1

Six Sonatas (B, C, G, A, F, D), hpd/pf, vn, op.10 (1773), also for 2 vn, va, bc, op.17 (Paris, c1779); CW xxxviii [nos.1, 3, 5 arr. kbd, va da gamba, private collection, USA]

 

B8–9

324/2

2 sonatas (D, B), hpd/pf, vn, nos.3–4 in Four Sonatas and Two Duetts op.15 (1778); CW xxxviii

 

B10–15

325/1

Six Sonatas (D, G, C, A, D, F), hpd/pf, vn/fl, op.16 (1779/R); CW xxxviii [other versions of no.6, private collection, USA, and CW xlviii/3]

 

B16–19

326/3

4 sonatas (C, D, E, G), hpd/pf, vn/fl, nos.1–4 in Four Sonatas and Two Duetts op.18 (c1781); CW xxxviii

 

Sonata (F), hpd, va da gamba, private collection, USA [1st movt from op.10 no.5, 2nd movt from ob conc. wB80, t287/6

 

Doubtful: 4 canzonette (F, E, G, B), 2 vn, t336/6, arr. of Sei canzonette op.6 nos.1, 4, 3, 2; 2 qts (F, C), fl/vn, va, vc, in L’anné musicale (Liège, 1776); Qt (F), fl/vn, vn, va, vc I-Rdp; 2 qt (F, D), fl/vn, vn, va, vc, Gl; Sonata (C), gui, vn (c1770), CW xxxviii; Six Sonatas (C, G, D, A, E, B), hpd/pf, vn/fl, op.19 (1783), t327/5; Three [= 6] Sonatas [i, ii] (C, D, F, G, A, B), hpd/pf, vn, op.20 (c1785), t329/1; Trois sonates (E, B, D), hpd/pf, vn, op.21 (Paris, c1784), t344/2; Sonata (F), hpd, fl, D-Bsb (2 copies: 1 attrib J.C. Bach, 1 attrib. C.P.E. Bach), US-Wc (attrib. ‘Sigr. Bach’), also attrib. W.F. Bach, ed. K. Marguerre (Celle, 1960), t332/1; Sonata (D), vn, bc, D-Bsb, ?lost, t3323/5; 3 sonatas (D, G, C), fl, vn, A-Wn, t337/1; Sonata (C), hpd/of, vn, in The Feast of Apollo (1788), t352/2; Trio sonata (F), 2 vn, bc, lost, formerly D-Bsb, t318/8; for others see wYB1–86

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach: Works

keyboard

for harpsichord unless otherwise stated

A22

Untitled piece [March]bwv Anh.131, in Clavierbüchlein for Anna Magdalena Bach; CW xlviii/3

 

A23–31

6 minuets (c, C, d, g, C, C), 2 polonaises (B, E), aria (a), c1750; CW xlii

 

A13

358/4

Solo (a), ? before 1755; CW xlii

 

A14

Sonata (A), I-Bc, Mc, MC; CW xlii

 

A16

Sonata (B), Bc; CW xlii

 

A15

Toccata (b), Bc, Mc, MC (as Sonata); CW xlii, xlviii/3 (2 versions)

 

A1–6

338/1

Six Sonatas (B, D, G, E, E, c), hpd/pf, op.5 (1766/R); CW xlii

 

C1b–6b

347/2

Six simphonies (D, C, E, B, F, G), op.3 (1769); CW xlii [see ‘Symphonies and overtures’]

 

A10b

A New Lesson (G), hpd/pf (1772) [early versions of movts from op.17 nos.4 and 1]

 

A21, 18

340/5

2 duets (G, C): 1 for 2 hpd/pf, 1 for hpd/pf 4 hands, in Four Sonatas and Two Duetts op.15 (1778); CW xlii

 

A7–12

341/1

Six Sonatas (G, c, E, G, A, B), hpd/pf, op.17 (1779/R), previously pubd as op.12 (Paris, 1773/4), CW xlii; other versions of nos.2–3, CW xlviii/3; see also A New Lesson, above

 

A19–20

343/3

2 duets (A, F), hpd/pf 4 hands, in Four Sonatas and Two Duetts op.18 (1781); CW xlii

 

2 marches (A, C), GB-Lbl (part autograph)

 

For doubtful works see wYA1–54

Bach, §III: (12) Johann Christian Bach

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BrookB

BurneyH

DNB (S.W. Roe)

EitnerQ

FiskeETM

FétisB

GerberNL

LS

MGG1 (H. Wirth)

WalterG

The Lyric Muse Revived in Europe (London, 1768)

G.J. Vogler: Betrachtungen der Mannheimer Tonschule (Mannheim, 1778–81/R)

ABC Dario Musico (Bath, 1780)

C.F. Cramer, ed.: Magazin der Musik (Hamburg, 1783–6/R)

H. Angelo: Reminiscences of Henry Angelo (London, 1828–30)

Earl of Mount Edgcumbe: Musical Reminiscences of an Old Amateur (London, 1824, 4/1834/R)

[T. MacKinley]: Mrs Cornely’s Entertainments at Carlisle House, Soho Square (Bradford, c1840)

Mrs V.D. Broughton, ed.: Court and Private Life in the Time of Queen Charlotte: being the Journals of Mrs. Papendiek (London, 1887)

M. Schwarz: Johann Christian Bach (1735–82): sein Leben und seine Werke (Leipzig, 1901)

M. Schwarz: Johann Christian Bach’, SIMG, ii (1900–01), 401–54

M. Brenet: Un fils du grand Bach à Paris en 1779–1779’, Guide musical, xlviii (1902), 551–3, 571–3

H. Abert: Joh. Christian Bachs italienische Opern und ihr Einfluss auf Mozart’, ZMw, i (1919), 313–28

G. de Saint-Foix: A propos de Jean-Chrétien Bach’, RdM, vii (1926), 83–91

H.P. Schökel: Johann Christian Bach und die Instrumentalmusik seiner Zeit (Wolfenbüttel, 1926)

F. Tutenberg: Die Sinfonik Johann Christian Bachs (Wolfenbüttel, 1928)

C.S. Terry: John Christian Bach (London, 1929 [review by H. Miesner in ZMw, xvi (1934), 182]; rev. 2/1967/R by H.C.R. Landon [review by S. Sadie in MT, cviii (1967), 330–31)

A. Wenk: Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Opernschaffens von J. Christian Bach (diss., U. of Frankfurt, 1932)

C. Sartori: A Milano J.C. Bach in disaccordo con il tesoriere’, La Scala, no.2 (1950), 29–31

S. Sadie: The Wind Music of J.C. Bach’, ML, xxxvii (1956), 107–17

R. Seebandt: Arientypen Johann Christian Bachs (diss., Humboldt U., Berlin, 1956)

E.O.D. Downes: The Operas of Johann Christian Bach as a Reflection of the Dominant Trends in Opera Seria 1750–1780 (diss., Harvard U., 1958)

J.A. White: The Concerted Symphonies of John Christian Bach (diss., U. of Michigan, 1958) [incl. edns of 3 concerted syms.]

E.J. Simon: A Royal Manuscript: Ensemble Concertos by J.C. Bach’, JAMS, xii (1959), 161–77

C.B. Oldman: Mozart’s Scena for Tenducci’, ML, xlii (1961), 44–52

H.-J. Schulze: Frühe Schriftzeugnisse der beiden jüngsten Bach-Söhne’, BJb 1963–4, 61–9

S. Kunze: Die Vertonungen der Arie “Non sò d’onde viene” von J. Chr. Bach und von W.A. Mozart’, AnMc, no.2 (1965), 85–111

E. Warburton: J.C. Bach’s Operas’, PRMA, xcii (1965–6), 95–106

A. Weinmann: Eine “Arie von Bach” für die Storace’, ÖMz, xxi (1966), 53–61

B. Matthews: J.C. Bach in the West Country’, MT, cviii (1967), 702–4

B.A. Mekota: The Solo and Ensemble Keyboard Works of Johann Christian Bach (diss., U. of Michigan, 1969)

M.A.H. Vos: The Liturgical Choral Works of Johann Christian Bach (diss., Washington U., 1969)

E. Warburton: A Study of Johann Christian Bach’s Operas (diss., U. of Oxford, 1969)

P.M. Young: The Bachs 1500–1850 (London, 1970)

N. Krabbe: J.C. Bach’s Symphonies and the Breitkopf Thematic Catalogue’, Festskrift Jens Peter Larsen, ed. N. Schiørring, H. Glahn and C.E. Hatting (Copenhagen, 1972), 233–54

I.S. Baierle: Die Klavierwerke von Johann Christian Bach (Graz, 1974)

J. Bolen: The Five Berlin Cembalo Concertos P390 of Johann Christian Bach: a Critical Edition (diss., Florida State U., 1974)

B. Matthews: The Davies Sisters, J.C. Bach and the Glass Harmonica’, ML, lvi (1975), 150–69

H.-J. Schulze: Die Bach-Überlieferung: Pläydoyer für ein notwendiges Buch’, BMw, xvii (1975), 45–57, esp. 48

H. Brofsky: J.C. Bach, G.B. Sammartini, and Padre Martini: a Concorso in Milan in 1762’, A Musical Offering: Essays in Honor of Martin Bernstein, ed. E.H. Clinkscale and C. Brook (New York, 1977), 63–8

D.J. Keahey: The Genoa Manuscripts: Recently Rediscovered Trios of J.C. Bach (diss., U. of Texas at Austin, 1977)

F.C. Petty: Italian Opera in London 1760–1800 (Ann Arbor, 1980)

D. McCulloch: Mrs Papendiek and the London Bach’, MT, cxxiii (1982), 26–9

R. Maunder: J.C. Bach’s “Endimione”’, ibid., 474–5

S.W. Roe: J.C. Bach (1735–1782): Towards a New Biography’, ibid., 23–6

E. Warburton: J.C. Bach’s Latin Church Music’, ibid., 781–4

S.W. Roe: J.C. Bach’s Vauxhall Songs: a New Discovery’, MT, cxxiv (1983), 675–6

H.-J. Schulze: Wann begann die “italienische Reise” des jüngsten Bach-Sohnes?’, BJb 1983, 119–22

R. Maunder: J.C. Bach and the Basset Horn’, GSJ, xxxvii (1984), 42–7

J. Small: J.C. Bach Goes to Law’, MT, cxxvi (1985), 526–9

S.W. Roe: J.C. Bach and “new Music, at a more Reasonable Expence”’, ibid., 529–31

E. Warburton: “Lucio Silla”: by Mozart and J.C. Bach’, ibid., 726–30

S. Staral: ‘Aufführungspraktische Aspekte im Klavierwerk von Johann Christian Bach, dargestellt an den Sonaten Op.V’, Mf, ix (1986), 245–53

H.-J. Schulze: Noch einmal: Wann begann “die italienische Reise” des jüngsten Bach-Sohnes?’, BJb 1988, 235–6

J.R. Stevens: Concerto no.6 in F minor: by Johann Christian Bach?’, RMARC, no.21 (1988), 53–6

S.W. Roe: The Keyboard Music of J.C. Bach (New York, 1989)

H. Gärtner: Johann Christian Bach, Mozarts Freund und Lehrmeister (Munich, 1989; Eng. trans., 1994)

C. Esch: ‘Lucio Silla’: vier Opera-seria-Vertonungen aus der Zeit zwischen 1770 und 1780 (diss., U. of Göttingen, 1991)

L. Finscher, ed.: Die Mannheimer Hofkapelle im Zeitalter Carl Theodors (Mannheim, 1991)

R. Maunder: J.C. Bach and the Early Piano in London’, JRMA, cxvi (1991), 201–10

S. Staral: Wolfgang Amadé Mozart, Johann Christian Bach und Mannheim’, 176 Tage W.A. Mozarts in Mannheim, ed. K. von Welck and L. Homering (Mannheim, 1991), 164–73 [exhibition catalogue]

C. Esch: Michele Mortellari, Johann Christian Bach’, MISM, xxxviii (1991), 133–58

M. Sickbert: The Mozarts in Milan, February 9–10, 1770: a Funeral Performance of Johann Christian Bach’s Dies Irae and Vespers Music?’, MJb 1991, 461–7

M. Feldman: Mozart and his Elders: Opera-Seria Arias, 1766–1775’, ibid., 564–75

K.-J. Sachs: Impuls und Ingenium: der Kopfsatz aus Mozarts Haffner-Sinfoni KV 385 vor dem Hintergrund von Johann Christian Bachs “Grand Ouverture” Es-Dur op.19/1’, ibid., 844–51

R. Allorto: Gli anni milanesi di Giovanni Cristiano Bach e le sue composizioni sacre (Milan, 1992)

E. Warburton: Johann Christian Bach und die Freimaurer-Loge zu den Neun Musen in London’, BJb 1992, 113–17

C. Price, J. Milhous and R. Hume: The Impresario’s Ten Commandments (London, 1992)

M. Argent, ed.: Recollections of R.J.S. Stevens, an Organist in Georgian London (London, 1992)

U. Leisinger: Die Bach-Quellen der Forschungs- und Landesbibliothek Gotha (Gotha, 1993)

S.W. Roe: Johann Christian Bach’, The Viking Opera Guide, ed. A. Holden (London, 1993), 43–6

D.E. Freeman: Johann Christian Bach and the Early Classical Italian Masters’, Eighteenth-Century Keyboard Music, ed. R.L. Marshall (New York, 1994), 230–69

C. Price, J. Milhous and E. Hume: Italian Opera in Late Eighteenth-Century London, i: The King’s Theatre, Haymarket, 1778–1791 (Oxford, 1995)

Y. Kobayashi: Breitkopf Attributions and Research on the Bach Family’, J.S. Bach, the Breitkopfs and the Eighteenth-Century Music Trade, Bach Perspectives, ii, ed. G.B. Stauffer (Lincoln, NE, and London, 1996), 53–64

Y. Kobayashi: On the Identification of Breitkopf’s Manuscripts’, ibid., 107–22

R. Charteris: The Music Collections of the Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek, Hamburg: a Survey of its British Holdings Prior to the Second World War’, RMARC, no.30 (1997), 1–138

C. Eisen: The Mozarts’ Salzburg Library’, Mozart Studies 2 (Oxford, 1997), 85–138

U. Leisinger: “Berlinischer Oden und Lieder” von Bückeburger, Londoner und Hallischen Bach’, JbSIM 1997, 117–21

U. Leisinger and P. Wollny: Die Bach-Quellen der Bibliotheken in Brüssel (Hildesheim, 1997)

B. Robins, ed.: The John Marsh Journals: the Life and Times of a Gentleman Composer (1752–1828) (Stuyvesant, NY, 1998)

S.W. Roe: The Sextet in C Major, by J.C. or J.C.F. Bach?’, Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven: Studies in the Music of the Classical Period: Essays in Honour of Alan Tyson, ed. S. Brandenburg (Oxford, 1998), 13–19

S.W. Roe: Neuerkenntnisse zu einigen autographen Notenhandschriften von Johann Christian Bach’, BJb 1999, 179–90

S.W. Roe: The Paris BachBunte Blätter: Klaus Mecklenburg zum 23. Februar 2000, ed. R. Elvers and A. Moirandat, (Basle, 2000), 247–54

Bach, §III: Individual members

(13) Johann Michael Bach

(b Struth, nr Schmalkalden, 9 Nov 1745; d Elberfeld, 1820). Composer. He was descended from a Hessian line of Bachs that can be traced back to a Caspar Bach (d Struth, c1640) and already had many branches in the 17th century. It is probable, but cannot be proved, that this line was originally connected with the main Wechmar line of the Bach family. Johann Michael evidently went on his travels at an early date, and in about 1767 visited Holland, where he was in touch with the Amsterdam music publisher Hummel; he then went to England and America. On his return he studied law in 1779–80 at the University of Göttingen, where he met J.N. Forkel, and from 1781 at Leipzig University. He was practising as a lawyer in Güstrow, Mecklenburg, in 1790 but composed music at the same time, and in 1793 (or earlier) he was appointed Kantor and organist in Tann. He was then active as a music theorist and composer in Elberfeld, and when he died there he was employed as a music teacher at the Gymnasium.

As well as an early set of piano concertos (the finale of no.6 is a fugue on B–A–C–H), Johann Michael Bach published a treatise in 1780 which had a surprisingly wide distribution in its time. His musical style is reminiscent of that of Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach (49) and rather derivative. Two of his sons were also musicians, Johann Georg and Georg Friedrich (see §I above).

WORKS

6 Klavierkonzerte, C, G, D, F, D, B, op.1 (Amsterdam, 1767)

Cants.: Gott fähret auf mit Jauchzen, D-Bsb; Jehova, Vater der Weisen, Bsb; others GOl

Jauchzet dem Herren, motet, GOl

Kurze und systematische Anleitung zum General-Bass und der Tonkunst überhaupt (Kassel, 1780)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

H. Lämmerhirt: Ein hessischer Bach-Stamm’, BJb 1936, 53–89

H.-J. Schulze and C. Wolff: Bach Repertorium (forthcoming)

Bach, §III: Individual members

(14) Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach

(84) (b Bückeburg, 24 May 1759; d Berlin, 25 Dec 1845). Keyboard player and composer, son of (11) Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach. He was baptized on 27 May, with Count Wilhelm von Schaumburg-Lippe standing godfather. W.F.E. Bach was musically educated by his father and Christian Friedrich Geyer, Kantor of the Stadtkirche, Bückeburg. In 1778 he went with his father to London and remained there in the care of his uncle (12) J.C. Bach, making a name for himself as a pianist and keyboard teacher. He appeared at one of the Bach-Abel concerts in Hanover Square as early as 6 December 1778, playing a sonata of his own, and his first keyboard and chamber works were published by leading English firms. Some time after the death of his uncle on 1 January 1782, W.F.E. Bach returned to Germany. His route took him through Paris and the Netherlands, where he met the publisher J.J. Hummel in Amsterdam, and then to north Germany, where he gave concerts in Oldenburg and elsewhere. According to his own account, he stayed for some time with his uncle (9) C.P.E. Bach in Hamburg before settling in 1784 in Minden, near Bückeburg. He seems to have given himself the title of Musikdirektor, since there is no evidence that such a post actually existed. His position, however, allowed him to perform dramatic works and cantatas (probably including compositions by his father). He received particular encouragement from the Kammerpräsident Franz Wilhelm Traugott von Breitenbauch (1739–96), whose daughter Antoinette (b 1766) was probably his pupil. Cantatas in celebration of the royal house of Prussia, performed in 1786 and 1788, secured for Bach a post in Berlin, where he arrived at the end of March or beginning of April 1789. There he succeeded Christian Kalkbrenner (1755–1806) as Kapellmeister to the widowed Queen Elisabeth Christine and he also taught keyboard to Queen Friederike. From 1798 at the latest he was employed as teacher ‘to the reigning Queen [Luise] and all the brothers and sisters of the King [Friedrich Wilhelm III]’, as he put it in a letter to W.C. Müller on 14 May 1830.

Bach’s salary in Berlin was a modest one, and in a letter of 15 October 1809 to the privy councillor and Oberpräsident von Altenstein, now lost, he dwelt on his poverty-stricken situation. It was improved only by a pension of 300 thaler thought to have been granted by Prince Heinrich in 1811 after the death of Queen Luise. Thereupon Bach, who had previously played an active part in Berlin concerts as a keyboard virtuoso and violinist, retired from public life. In 1843 he was present at the ceremonial unveiling of the J.S. Bach monument in Leipzig. He was twice married and had four children. He was survived by his second wife and an unmarried daughter from each marriage, one of them a good soprano and the other an alto.

W.F.E. Bach was a stylish if not outstandingly talented composer. His extant works are varied and substantial, but too many have been lost for a true assessment to be made. Apart from the few that were printed, they remained confined to the courts of Berlin and Bückeburg, which he regularly supplied with compositions until the death of Princess Juliane in 1799. Contrary to previous assumptions, most of the surviving works date from his Berlin period. Those written in London show him as a typical representative of the early London pianoforte school in the tradition of J.C. Bach and Clementi, while of the occasional cantatas written in Minden, only one survives (in vocal score). In Berlin he composed, as well as orchestral works for Queen Christine Elisabeth’s Kapelle, a great many pedagogical keyboard pieces for two, four or occasionally even six hands. The keyboard works are typical of early Romantic music, while the vocal compositions in particular are notable for a sense of humour and irony; they include, for instance, a Concerto buffo, probably composed for his royal pupils, which employs toy instruments and features a singing Kapellmeister, probably Bach himself. Some of the songs and keyboard pieces which circulated at the turn of the century, either singly or in collections, were very popular. From his Minden period onwards Bach was associated with freemasonry, and wrote several masonic songs. He apparently closed his career as a composer in 1822 with the publication of 12 grandes variations on the folksong ‘Gestern Abend war Vetter Michel da’, bearing in the autograph manuscript the title Reminiscences, ou XII Grandes variations sur un air allemand populaire, with a dedication to two of his former royal pupils. However, he is said to have written an overture of rejoicing for Prince Heinrich the year before his death.

The extant compositions do not support claims by Ledebur and others that Bach was an adherent of the strict style and despised modern music; there has probably been some confusion here with Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, who was almost certainly also the composer of the strongly contrapuntal Trio in G major for two flutes and viola, published as W.F.E. Bach’s by Rudolf Ermeler. Bach’s modest and unassuming nature was an obstacle to a wide distribution of his compositions, and he was soon forgotten after his retirement in 1811.

WORKS

keyboard

4 Progressive Lessons and 2 Duets (London, 1782) [also attrib. J.C. Bach]

5 Sonatas and 1 Duett (London, c1785) [also attrib. J.C. Bach]

6 sonates (Berlin, ?1796)

16 pieces, in F.F. Franz, ed.: Musikalisches Journal (Berlin, 1799–1800)

Tempo di minuetto, with 7 variations, S-Smf* (Berlin, ?c1800), print lost

2 pieces, in Apollo, v (Stockholm, 1805–6)

12 pieces, in Monatsfrüchte für Klavier (Berlin, n.d.)

XII grandes variations sur un air allemand populaire (Berlin, 1822)

Amusement [Sonata, Andante with variation, Sonatina, Walzer, Sonatina], D-Bsb*; Das Dreyblatt, pf 6 hands, GB-Lbl*; Divertimento, Lbl*; Doppelsonate, by 1805, lost; Variations on God save Frederick our King, doubtful, Lbl; Grand Sonata, E, 1778, Lbl*; Grand Walzer, D, D-Bsb*; Le melancholique, GB-Lbl*; Minuet, D, CH-SObo; Variations, C, GB-Lbl*; 6 Waltzer, D-Bsb*, 3 ed. K. Geiringer (Vienna, 1936)

chamber

6 sonates, C, D, B, E, F, G, pf, vn (Berlin, c1781)

3 sonates, C, B, E, pf, vn (Berlin and Amsterdam, c1789)

6 Sonatas, C, D, F, B, E, A, pf, vn, vc (London, n.d.); nos.1, 2 ed. F. Goebels (Wolfenbüttel, 1986)

Divertimento, E, cl, 2 hn, vn, va, vc, GB-Lbl*; Fantasia, E, fl, cl, 2 hn, 2 vn, va, vc, D-Bsb; Parthie, E, 2 fl, 2 ob, 2 cl, 2 bn, 2 hn, GB-Lbl*; Sestetto, E, cl, 2 hn, vn, va, vc, D-Bsb, GB-Lbl*, ed. K. Janetzky (Halle, 1951); Sinfonia, C, D-Bsb*; Sinfonia, C, GB-Lbl*

Lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799: Divertimento, E; Qt, ? pf, str

orchestral

Ballet-pantomime (ov., 43 dance movts), GB-Lbl*; Conc., E, 2 kbd, orch, D-Bsb; Overture, D, 1793, private collection, USA; Sinfonia, C, private collection, USA; 2 syms., C, G, GB-Lbl*

Lost: 3 concs., G, E, E, kbd, orch, formerly D-Bsb; Jubel-Ouverture, 1844, mentioned in obituary; Sinfonia, C, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799; 2 intermezzos, C, D, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1799; Largo, A, kbd, orch, doubtful, formerly D-Bsb; 2 ovs., B, E, doubtful, listed in EitnerQ

vocal

Stabat mater, ? by 1784, lost, mentioned in Meusel

Colma (Ossian), perf. Minden, 1 May 1785, music lost

Der edelsten Freude geweihet (S.F. Martini), cant. for birthday of Friedrich II of Prussia, perf. Minden, 24 Jan 1786, music lost

Liesst von unsrer Wang herab (Martini), cant. for birthday of Friedrich II of Prussia, perf. Minden, 10 Sept 1786, music lost

Kommt vor sein Angesicht mit Jauchzen (Martini), cant. for installation of Friedrich Wilhelm II of Prussia, perf. Minden, 28 Oct 1786, music lost

Triumph, Triumph, Westphalia (Martini), cant. for visit of Friedrich Wilhelm II, perf. Minden, 5 June 1788, A-Wn*, vs (Rinteln, 1791)

Wer spricht es aus, was wir verloren haben (Martini), funeral cant. for Pastor Wesselmann, perf. Minden, 6 Feb 1789, music lost

Vater unser (S.A. Mahlmann), T, B. choir, orch, by 1799, GB-Lbl*; ed. in Stuttgarter Bach-Ausgaben, ser.A, v, suppl. (Stuttgart, c1977)

Der Theaterprinzipal, by 1809, lost, mentioned in AMZ, xii (1809–10)

Auf muntere Zecher, T, B, pf, D-Bsb

Columbus, oder Die Entdeckung von Amerika (after F. Schiller), T, B, chorus, orch, GB-Lbl*

Concerto buffo, B, pf, toy insts, *Lbl

Der Schmerz, der Trost (Erinnerung an Schillers Sterbetag), 4vv, pf, Lbl*

Der Wechselschlag, lost, listed in estate catalogue of W.H. Cummings (London, 1917)

Durchs Leben führt so mancher Pfad (Der Pfad des Lebens), T, T, B, pf, D-Bsb, GB-Lbl*

L’amour est un bien suprême; Ninfe se liete: S, orch, Lbl*

Schön o schön ist diese Welt (Die Ruhe des Lebens) – Sie lebt (Der Dichter und der Komponist), T, B, pf, *Lbl

Wie sehr lieb ich mein Mädchen nicht (Der Vorsatz), 4vv, pf, Lbl*

Lieder: Auswahl [7] deutscher und [2] französischer Lieder und Arietten (Berlin, c1798); Etwas lieben und entbehren (An Lauren), in Blumenkranz dem neuen Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1800); Berlinade, oder Lindenlied (F. Monti) (Berlin, n.d.); Freude, schöner Götterfunken, ode (F. Schiller) (Berlin, n.d.), lost; Rheinweinlied (C. Müchler) (Berlin, n.d.); Ruf zur Freude, Lbl*; Seid gegrüsst, ihr grün bemooste Hügel (C.F.D. Schubart), in J.C.F. Bach, ed.: Musikalische Nebenstunden (Rinteln, 1787); 1 other in J.M. Böheim: Auswahl von Maurer-Gesängen, iii (Berlin, 1814)

Cavatines, ?S, orch, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventories, 1799, 1865

6 It. arias (Metastasio and others), S, orch, by ?1799, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1865, some listed in estate catalogue of J.F. Reichart (Berlin, 1815)

Oue des maux loin de toi, S, orch, by ?1799, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventory, 1865

3 romances, lost, listed in Bückeburg inventories, 1799, 1865

Doubtful: Als einst die Gottheit Völker zu beglücken (Martini), cant. for birthday of Queen Luise of Prussia, ? perf. Berlin/Minden, 10 March 1793/4, music lost; Er segnet Au, er segnet Felder, cant., D-BO; 3 Gedichte (Kahlert), T, pf (Leipzig, n.d.), ? by A.W. Bach; Lobsingt dem Gott der Ernte, cant., BO; song, in F.F. Hůrka, ed.: Auswahl maurerischer Gesänge (n.p., c1803)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

GerberL

GerberNL

C. von Lederbur: Tonkünstler-Lexicon (Berlin, 1861/R)

J.G. Meusel: Teutsches Künstlerlexikon (Lemgo, 1778, 2/1808–14)

Neuer Nekrolog der Deutschen, xxiii (Weimar, 1847)

H. Miesner: Urkundliche Nachrichten über die Familie Bach in Berlin’, BJb 1932, 157–63

G. Hey: Zur Biographie Johann Friedrich Bachs und seiner Familie’, BJb 1933, 77–85

K. Geiringer: The Bach Family: Seven Generations of Creative Genius (London, 1954; Ger. trans., enlarged, 1958; enlarged 2/1977)

H. Wohlfahrt: Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach: Werkverzeichnis’, Schaumburg-Lippische Mitteilungen, xvi (1964), 27–32

J.K. von Schroeder: Verschollene Werke von Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach, Musikdirektor in Minden’, Mindener Mitteilungen 1965, 171–2

M. Jahrmärker: Ossian, eine Figur und eine Idee des europäischen Musiktheaters um 1800 (Cologne, 1993)

U. Leisinger: Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach, der letzte musikalische Enkel Johann Sebastian Bachs’, Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach (1732–1795): ein Komponist zwischen Barock und Klassik, Niedersächsisches Staatsarchiv, 8 June – 11 Aug 1995 (Bückeburg, 1995) [exhibition catalogue], 71–82, 127–34 [incl. list of works]

A. Rockstroh: Der Hofkapellmeister, Cembalist und Musiklehrer der Königlichen Familie: zum 150. Todestag von Wilhelm Friedrich Ernst Bach, dem letzten musikalischen Enkel Johann Sebastian Bachs’, Neue berlinische Musikzeitung, x/2 (1995), 97–102